Low-potassium UW solution for lung preservation. Comparison with regular UW, LPD, and Euro-Collins solutions

University of Wisconsin solution has been used successfully in clinical kidney and liver preservation. The object of this study was to determine if low-potassium UW (LPUW) solution could be applied to pulmonary preservation. Rabbit lungs were stored after hypothermic pulmonary artery (PA) flush with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation 1991-12, Vol.52 (6), p.984-988
Hauptverfasser: Oka, T, Puskas, J D, Mayer, E, Cardoso, P F, Shi, S Q, Wisser, W, Slutsky, A S, Patterson, G A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:University of Wisconsin solution has been used successfully in clinical kidney and liver preservation. The object of this study was to determine if low-potassium UW (LPUW) solution could be applied to pulmonary preservation. Rabbit lungs were stored after hypothermic pulmonary artery (PA) flush with four different solutions (group 1: low-potassium dextran (LPD) solution, group 2: high-potassium UW (HPUW) solution, group 3: LPUW solution, group 4: modified Euro-Collins (E-C) solution). The lungs were preserved at 10 degrees C for 30 hr and evaluated in an ex vivo ventilation/perfusion apparatus using fresh pooled venous rabbit blood. Mean PA flush pressures (MFP) during harvesting were significantly lower in groups 1 and 3 (8.1 +/- 1.0 mmHg and 7.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg, respectively; mean +/- SEM) than in groups 2 and 4 (15.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg and 12.3 +/- 0.9 mmHg, respectively). Lungs in groups 1 and 3 showed significantly higher PaO2 (103.5 +/- 8.0 mmHg and 89.3 +/- 7.2 mmHg) than groups 2 and 4 (48.3 +/- 7.7 mmHg, 66.7 +/- 4.7 mmHg). Groups 1 and 3 showed significantly lower wet/dry weight (W/D) ratios after reperfusion (6.21 +/- 0.15 and 6.39 +/- 0.23) than groups 2 and 4 (7.70 +/- 0.57 and 7.13 +/- 0.21, respectively). There were no significant differences in MFP, PaO2, PaCO2, mean pulmonary artery pressure, or W/D ratio between groups 1 and 3. These results suggest that LPUW solution may be as beneficial as LPD solution for pulmonary arterial flush and lung preservation.
ISSN:0041-1337
DOI:10.1097/00007890-199112000-00009