A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC EXTENSION SPLINTING AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION OF COMPLETE DIVISIONS OF EXTENSOR TENDONS IN ZONES 5 AND 6
We present a prospective randomized trial of two groups of 50 patients each having complete zone 5 and 6 extensor tendon injuries. These were rehabilitated by the use of either a dynamic outrigger splint or a palmar blocking splint. The results were analysed using the Miller and TAM assessments. Goo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hand surgery, British volume British volume, 2000-04, Vol.25 (2), p.140-146 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 146 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 140 |
| container_title | Journal of hand surgery, British volume |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | KHANDWALA, A.R WEBB, J HARRIS, S.B FOSTER, A.J ELLIOT, D |
| description | We present a prospective randomized trial of two groups of 50 patients each having complete zone 5 and 6 extensor tendon injuries. These were rehabilitated by the use of either a dynamic outrigger splint or a palmar blocking splint. The results were analysed using the Miller and TAM assessments. Good and excellent results were achieved in 95 and 98% of cases following dynamic outrigger mobilization and 93 and 95% of cases using palmar blocking splint mobilization, using the Miller and TAM assessments respectively. There was no statistical difference in the results obtained between the two groups. Therefore, we prefer the latter technique which is simple, cheap, more convenient and requires less therapy time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0356 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72552221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1054_jhsb.1999.0356</sage_id><els_id>S026676819990356X</els_id><sourcerecordid>72552221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-df413bad33355d600bc6e849bdc3a07ec33547922fabf5fb25e4a778785dc9ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE-PlDAYhxujccfVq0fTkxfD2D-0hSMCuzZhymbAje6lgVKUycyw0hkTP4Lf2iKTeNpTk1-e90n6APAWozVGLPy4--HaNY7jeI0o48_ACjNKAkIwfg5WiHAeCB7hK_DKuR1CCDMRvgRXGCNOGI9X4E8C03Jzl2xlVSpY3sDsm0o2MoX51zpXlfRjdVdIVUt1CxOVeVrV27Io8gwmaS3vc7gpP8lCPiS1XAyzr8jrHGbyXs6Gal4XX7mF_snmTSr4UKq8guyfl78GL_pm7-yby3sNvtzkdfo5KMpbmSZFYKjgp6DrQ0zbpqOUMtZxhFrDbRTGbWdog4Q1fg9FTEjftD3rW8Js2AgRiYh1JrY9vQbvF-_jNP48W3fSh8EZu983RzuenRaEMeIDenC9gGYanZtsrx-n4dBMvzVGeo6v5_h6jq_n-P7g3cV8bg-2-49fanvgwwK45rvVu_E8Hf1Pn9ZFC219jV-DnbQzgz0a2w2TNSfdjcNTp38Bly2WZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72552221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC EXTENSION SPLINTING AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION OF COMPLETE DIVISIONS OF EXTENSOR TENDONS IN ZONES 5 AND 6</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KHANDWALA, A.R ; WEBB, J ; HARRIS, S.B ; FOSTER, A.J ; ELLIOT, D</creator><creatorcontrib>KHANDWALA, A.R ; WEBB, J ; HARRIS, S.B ; FOSTER, A.J ; ELLIOT, D</creatorcontrib><description>We present a prospective randomized trial of two groups of 50 patients each having complete zone 5 and 6 extensor tendon injuries. These were rehabilitated by the use of either a dynamic outrigger splint or a palmar blocking splint. The results were analysed using the Miller and TAM assessments. Good and excellent results were achieved in 95 and 98% of cases following dynamic outrigger mobilization and 93 and 95% of cases using palmar blocking splint mobilization, using the Miller and TAM assessments respectively. There was no statistical difference in the results obtained between the two groups. Therefore, we prefer the latter technique which is simple, cheap, more convenient and requires less therapy time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-7681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11062569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Finger Joint - physiopathology ; Hand Injuries - physiopathology ; Hand Injuries - therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Splints ; Tendon Injuries - physiopathology ; Tendon Injuries - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand surgery, British volume, 2000-04, Vol.25 (2), p.140-146</ispartof><rights>2000 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-df413bad33355d600bc6e849bdc3a07ec33547922fabf5fb25e4a778785dc9ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-df413bad33355d600bc6e849bdc3a07ec33547922fabf5fb25e4a778785dc9ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1054/jhsb.1999.0356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1054/jhsb.1999.0356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11062569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KHANDWALA, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBB, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, S.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIOT, D</creatorcontrib><title>A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC EXTENSION SPLINTING AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION OF COMPLETE DIVISIONS OF EXTENSOR TENDONS IN ZONES 5 AND 6</title><title>Journal of hand surgery, British volume</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Br</addtitle><description>We present a prospective randomized trial of two groups of 50 patients each having complete zone 5 and 6 extensor tendon injuries. These were rehabilitated by the use of either a dynamic outrigger splint or a palmar blocking splint. The results were analysed using the Miller and TAM assessments. Good and excellent results were achieved in 95 and 98% of cases following dynamic outrigger mobilization and 93 and 95% of cases using palmar blocking splint mobilization, using the Miller and TAM assessments respectively. There was no statistical difference in the results obtained between the two groups. Therefore, we prefer the latter technique which is simple, cheap, more convenient and requires less therapy time.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hand Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hand Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Splints</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0266-7681</issn><issn>1532-2211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE-PlDAYhxujccfVq0fTkxfD2D-0hSMCuzZhymbAje6lgVKUycyw0hkTP4Lf2iKTeNpTk1-e90n6APAWozVGLPy4--HaNY7jeI0o48_ACjNKAkIwfg5WiHAeCB7hK_DKuR1CCDMRvgRXGCNOGI9X4E8C03Jzl2xlVSpY3sDsm0o2MoX51zpXlfRjdVdIVUt1CxOVeVrV27Io8gwmaS3vc7gpP8lCPiS1XAyzr8jrHGbyXs6Gal4XX7mF_snmTSr4UKq8guyfl78GL_pm7-yby3sNvtzkdfo5KMpbmSZFYKjgp6DrQ0zbpqOUMtZxhFrDbRTGbWdog4Q1fg9FTEjftD3rW8Js2AgRiYh1JrY9vQbvF-_jNP48W3fSh8EZu983RzuenRaEMeIDenC9gGYanZtsrx-n4dBMvzVGeo6v5_h6jq_n-P7g3cV8bg-2-49fanvgwwK45rvVu_E8Hf1Pn9ZFC219jV-DnbQzgz0a2w2TNSfdjcNTp38Bly2WZw</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>KHANDWALA, A.R</creator><creator>WEBB, J</creator><creator>HARRIS, S.B</creator><creator>FOSTER, A.J</creator><creator>ELLIOT, D</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC EXTENSION SPLINTING AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION OF COMPLETE DIVISIONS OF EXTENSOR TENDONS IN ZONES 5 AND 6</title><author>KHANDWALA, A.R ; WEBB, J ; HARRIS, S.B ; FOSTER, A.J ; ELLIOT, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-df413bad33355d600bc6e849bdc3a07ec33547922fabf5fb25e4a778785dc9ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hand Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hand Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Splints</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KHANDWALA, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBB, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, S.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIOT, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand surgery, British volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KHANDWALA, A.R</au><au>WEBB, J</au><au>HARRIS, S.B</au><au>FOSTER, A.J</au><au>ELLIOT, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC EXTENSION SPLINTING AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION OF COMPLETE DIVISIONS OF EXTENSOR TENDONS IN ZONES 5 AND 6</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand surgery, British volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Br</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>140-146</pages><issn>0266-7681</issn><eissn>1532-2211</eissn><abstract>We present a prospective randomized trial of two groups of 50 patients each having complete zone 5 and 6 extensor tendon injuries. These were rehabilitated by the use of either a dynamic outrigger splint or a palmar blocking splint. The results were analysed using the Miller and TAM assessments. Good and excellent results were achieved in 95 and 98% of cases following dynamic outrigger mobilization and 93 and 95% of cases using palmar blocking splint mobilization, using the Miller and TAM assessments respectively. There was no statistical difference in the results obtained between the two groups. Therefore, we prefer the latter technique which is simple, cheap, more convenient and requires less therapy time.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11062569</pmid><doi>10.1054/jhsb.1999.0356</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0266-7681 |
| ispartof | Journal of hand surgery, British volume, 2000-04, Vol.25 (2), p.140-146 |
| issn | 0266-7681 1532-2211 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72552221 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Female Finger Joint - physiopathology Hand Injuries - physiopathology Hand Injuries - therapy Humans Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Splints Tendon Injuries - physiopathology Tendon Injuries - therapy Treatment Outcome |
| title | A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC EXTENSION SPLINTING AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION OF COMPLETE DIVISIONS OF EXTENSOR TENDONS IN ZONES 5 AND 6 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20COMPARISON%20OF%20DYNAMIC%20EXTENSION%20SPLINTING%20AND%20CONTROLLED%20ACTIVE%20MOBILIZATION%20OF%20COMPLETE%20DIVISIONS%20OF%20EXTENSOR%20TENDONS%20IN%20ZONES%205%20AND%206&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery,%20British%20volume&rft.au=KHANDWALA,%20A.R&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=140-146&rft.issn=0266-7681&rft.eissn=1532-2211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/jhsb.1999.0356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72552221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72552221&rft_id=info:pmid/11062569&rft_sage_id=10.1054_jhsb.1999.0356&rft_els_id=S026676819990356X&rfr_iscdi=true |