Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
To compare two different image registration methods for accurately displaying the position of a flexible bronchoscope on a previously acquired three-dimensional CT scan during bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopy suite of a university hospital. Fifteen adult patients scheduled for nonemergent bronchoscopy. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chest 2000-12, Vol.118 (6), p.1783-1787 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To compare two different image registration methods for accurately displaying the position of a flexible bronchoscope on a previously acquired three-dimensional CT scan during bronchoscopy.
Bronchoscopy suite of a university hospital.
Fifteen adult patients scheduled for nonemergent bronchoscopy.
A miniature electromagnetic position sensor was placed at the tip of a flexible bronchoscope. Previously acquired three-dimensional CT scans were registered with the patient in the bronchoscopy suite. Registration method 1 used multiple skin fiducial markers. Registration method 2 used the inner surface of the trachea itself for registration. Method 1 was objectively assessed by measuring the error distance between the real skin marker position and the computer display position. Methods 1 and 2 were subjectively assessed by the bronchoscopist correlating visual bronchoscopic anatomic location with the computer display position on the CT image.
The error distance (+/- SD) from known points for registration method 1 was 5.6 +/- 2.7 mm. Objective error distances were not measured for method 2 because no accurate placement of the bronchoscope sensor could be correlated with CT position. Subjectively, method 2 was judged more accurate than method 1 when compared with the fiberoptic view of the airways through the bronchoscope. Additionally, method 2 had the advantage of not requiring placement of fiducial markers before the CT scan. Respiratory motion contributed an error of 3.6 +/- 2.6 mm, which was partially compensated for by a second tracking sensor placed on the patient's chest.
Image registration method 2 of surface fitting the trachea rather than method 1 of fiducial markers was subjectively judged to be superior for registering the position of a flexible bronchoscope during bronchoscopy. Method 2 was also more practical inasmuch as no special CT scanning technique was required before bronchoscopy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-3692 1931-3543 |
DOI: | 10.1378/chest.118.6.1783 |