BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison

The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2000-12, Vol.44 ( Pt 6) (6), p.685-696
Hauptverfasser: Holt, G, Costello, H, Bouras, N, Diareme, S, Hillery, J, Moss, S, Rodriguez-Blazquez, C, Salvador, L, Tsiantis, J, Weber, G, Dimitrakaki, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 696
container_issue 6
container_start_page 685
container_title Journal of intellectual disability research
container_volume 44 ( Pt 6)
creator Holt, G
Costello, H
Bouras, N
Diareme, S
Hillery, J
Moss, S
Rodriguez-Blazquez, C
Salvador, L
Tsiantis, J
Weber, G
Dimitrakaki, C
description The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72476806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72476806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkclOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvKJW4K32GlvUMIiURUhOFveAq7SpNhJKW9PQis4MpeRZr5Z9P8AQIxSjBi_XKSY8iwhIs9TghBKEaKYpJs9MPpt7IMRGnOWEE7pETiOcdGDHDN-CI5wHxkidATerh_ms-ImmRXP86cCrkKzcKadwOjC2hs3FNY--qaGZROgsl3VRvjp23fo69ZVVQ93qoLWR6V95duvCVSw6EKzcqqGplmuVPCxqU_BQamq6M52-QS83hYv0_vkcX73ML16TAxlpE0wM5rkymiKnTbGKmsdU1oIrKjRLjOlLcc5L4XOrOUcEUwcocgowfiYa0ZPwMV2b__4R-diK5c-mv5RVbumi1IQJniO-L9gJjJBuch7MN-CJjQxBlfKVfBLFb4kRnJwQy7kILocRJeDG_LHDbnpR893Nzq9dPZvcCc__QalaIgT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57573678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Holt, G ; Costello, H ; Bouras, N ; Diareme, S ; Hillery, J ; Moss, S ; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C ; Salvador, L ; Tsiantis, J ; Weber, G ; Dimitrakaki, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Holt, G ; Costello, H ; Bouras, N ; Diareme, S ; Hillery, J ; Moss, S ; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C ; Salvador, L ; Tsiantis, J ; Weber, G ; Dimitrakaki, C</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11115023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Austria ; Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence ; Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration ; Community Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data ; Crossnational studies ; Deinstitutionalization - legislation & jurisprudence ; Deinstitutionalization - trends ; Europe ; Greece ; Health Planning - legislation & jurisprudence ; Health Planning - trends ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Ireland ; Learning disabled people ; Legislation, Medical ; Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence ; Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data ; Service provision ; Social Support ; Spain ; United Kingdom]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2000-12, Vol.44 ( Pt 6) (6), p.685-696</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,31005</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11115023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diareme, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillery, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiantis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitrakaki, C</creatorcontrib><title>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Crossnational studies</subject><subject>Deinstitutionalization - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Deinstitutionalization - trends</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Greece</subject><subject>Health Planning - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health Planning - trends</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Legislation, Medical</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Service provision</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkclOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvKJW4K32GlvUMIiURUhOFveAq7SpNhJKW9PQis4MpeRZr5Z9P8AQIxSjBi_XKSY8iwhIs9TghBKEaKYpJs9MPpt7IMRGnOWEE7pETiOcdGDHDN-CI5wHxkidATerh_ms-ImmRXP86cCrkKzcKadwOjC2hs3FNY--qaGZROgsl3VRvjp23fo69ZVVQ93qoLWR6V95duvCVSw6EKzcqqGplmuVPCxqU_BQamq6M52-QS83hYv0_vkcX73ML16TAxlpE0wM5rkymiKnTbGKmsdU1oIrKjRLjOlLcc5L4XOrOUcEUwcocgowfiYa0ZPwMV2b__4R-diK5c-mv5RVbumi1IQJniO-L9gJjJBuch7MN-CJjQxBlfKVfBLFb4kRnJwQy7kILocRJeDG_LHDbnpR893Nzq9dPZvcCc__QalaIgT</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Holt, G</creator><creator>Costello, H</creator><creator>Bouras, N</creator><creator>Diareme, S</creator><creator>Hillery, J</creator><creator>Moss, S</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</creator><creator>Salvador, L</creator><creator>Tsiantis, J</creator><creator>Weber, G</creator><creator>Dimitrakaki, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</title><author>Holt, G ; Costello, H ; Bouras, N ; Diareme, S ; Hillery, J ; Moss, S ; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C ; Salvador, L ; Tsiantis, J ; Weber, G ; Dimitrakaki, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Crossnational studies</topic><topic>Deinstitutionalization - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Deinstitutionalization - trends</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Greece</topic><topic>Health Planning - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health Planning - trends</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Legislation, Medical</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Service provision</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diareme, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillery, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiantis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitrakaki, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holt, G</au><au>Costello, H</au><au>Bouras, N</au><au>Diareme, S</au><au>Hillery, J</au><au>Moss, S</au><au>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</au><au>Salvador, L</au><au>Tsiantis, J</au><au>Weber, G</au><au>Dimitrakaki, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>44 ( Pt 6)</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>685-696</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>11115023</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-2633
ispartof Journal of intellectual disability research, 2000-12, Vol.44 ( Pt 6) (6), p.685-696
issn 0964-2633
1365-2788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72476806
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects Adult
Austria
Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence
Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration
Community Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data
Crossnational studies
Deinstitutionalization - legislation & jurisprudence
Deinstitutionalization - trends
Europe
Greece
Health Planning - legislation & jurisprudence
Health Planning - trends
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
International Cooperation
Ireland
Learning disabled people
Legislation, Medical
Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence
Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data
Service provision
Social Support
Spain
United Kingdom
title BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T20%3A32%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BIOMED-MEROPE%20project:%20service%20provision%20for%20adults%20with%20intellectual%20disability:%20a%20European%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Holt,%20G&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=44%20(%20Pt%206)&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=685-696&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72476806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57573678&rft_id=info:pmid/11115023&rfr_iscdi=true