BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison
The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 2000-12, Vol.44 ( Pt 6) (6), p.685-696 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 696 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 685 |
container_title | Journal of intellectual disability research |
container_volume | 44 ( Pt 6) |
creator | Holt, G Costello, H Bouras, N Diareme, S Hillery, J Moss, S Rodriguez-Blazquez, C Salvador, L Tsiantis, J Weber, G Dimitrakaki, C |
description | The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72476806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72476806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkclOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvKJW4K32GlvUMIiURUhOFveAq7SpNhJKW9PQis4MpeRZr5Z9P8AQIxSjBi_XKSY8iwhIs9TghBKEaKYpJs9MPpt7IMRGnOWEE7pETiOcdGDHDN-CI5wHxkidATerh_ms-ImmRXP86cCrkKzcKadwOjC2hs3FNY--qaGZROgsl3VRvjp23fo69ZVVQ93qoLWR6V95duvCVSw6EKzcqqGplmuVPCxqU_BQamq6M52-QS83hYv0_vkcX73ML16TAxlpE0wM5rkymiKnTbGKmsdU1oIrKjRLjOlLcc5L4XOrOUcEUwcocgowfiYa0ZPwMV2b__4R-diK5c-mv5RVbumi1IQJniO-L9gJjJBuch7MN-CJjQxBlfKVfBLFb4kRnJwQy7kILocRJeDG_LHDbnpR893Nzq9dPZvcCc__QalaIgT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57573678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Holt, G ; Costello, H ; Bouras, N ; Diareme, S ; Hillery, J ; Moss, S ; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C ; Salvador, L ; Tsiantis, J ; Weber, G ; Dimitrakaki, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Holt, G ; Costello, H ; Bouras, N ; Diareme, S ; Hillery, J ; Moss, S ; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C ; Salvador, L ; Tsiantis, J ; Weber, G ; Dimitrakaki, C</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11115023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Austria ; Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence ; Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration ; Community Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data ; Crossnational studies ; Deinstitutionalization - legislation & jurisprudence ; Deinstitutionalization - trends ; Europe ; Greece ; Health Planning - legislation & jurisprudence ; Health Planning - trends ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Ireland ; Learning disabled people ; Legislation, Medical ; Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence ; Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data ; Service provision ; Social Support ; Spain ; United Kingdom]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2000-12, Vol.44 ( Pt 6) (6), p.685-696</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,31005</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11115023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diareme, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillery, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiantis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitrakaki, C</creatorcontrib><title>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Crossnational studies</subject><subject>Deinstitutionalization - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Deinstitutionalization - trends</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Greece</subject><subject>Health Planning - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health Planning - trends</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Legislation, Medical</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Service provision</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkclOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvKJW4K32GlvUMIiURUhOFveAq7SpNhJKW9PQis4MpeRZr5Z9P8AQIxSjBi_XKSY8iwhIs9TghBKEaKYpJs9MPpt7IMRGnOWEE7pETiOcdGDHDN-CI5wHxkidATerh_ms-ImmRXP86cCrkKzcKadwOjC2hs3FNY--qaGZROgsl3VRvjp23fo69ZVVQ93qoLWR6V95duvCVSw6EKzcqqGplmuVPCxqU_BQamq6M52-QS83hYv0_vkcX73ML16TAxlpE0wM5rkymiKnTbGKmsdU1oIrKjRLjOlLcc5L4XOrOUcEUwcocgowfiYa0ZPwMV2b__4R-diK5c-mv5RVbumi1IQJniO-L9gJjJBuch7MN-CJjQxBlfKVfBLFb4kRnJwQy7kILocRJeDG_LHDbnpR893Nzq9dPZvcCc__QalaIgT</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Holt, G</creator><creator>Costello, H</creator><creator>Bouras, N</creator><creator>Diareme, S</creator><creator>Hillery, J</creator><creator>Moss, S</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</creator><creator>Salvador, L</creator><creator>Tsiantis, J</creator><creator>Weber, G</creator><creator>Dimitrakaki, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</title><author>Holt, G ; Costello, H ; Bouras, N ; Diareme, S ; Hillery, J ; Moss, S ; Rodriguez-Blazquez, C ; Salvador, L ; Tsiantis, J ; Weber, G ; Dimitrakaki, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-14cb28acb31ebccdadde4ab771a3cbe5cfdf986f7b5dd660212e230ca74696b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Crossnational studies</topic><topic>Deinstitutionalization - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Deinstitutionalization - trends</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Greece</topic><topic>Health Planning - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health Planning - trends</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Legislation, Medical</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Service provision</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouras, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diareme, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillery, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiantis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitrakaki, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holt, G</au><au>Costello, H</au><au>Bouras, N</au><au>Diareme, S</au><au>Hillery, J</au><au>Moss, S</au><au>Rodriguez-Blazquez, C</au><au>Salvador, L</au><au>Tsiantis, J</au><au>Weber, G</au><au>Dimitrakaki, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>44 ( Pt 6)</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>685-696</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>The aim of the present paper is to describe and compare services for adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental health needs in five European countries: Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and Spain. A framework and structure for collecting information about service provision was designed. This information was collected through a mixture of interviews with service providers, questionnaires and a review of the research literature within each country. Information was collected on historical context, policy, legislation, assessment, treatment and the structure of services for people with ID and mental health problems. Overall, the needs of those with additional mental health needs have not been specifically addressed at a national level with perhaps the exception of England and Ireland, although there are still gaps in services in these nations. Normalization has been adopted in each of the five countries, and there are moves toward deinstitutionalization, integration and inclusion. Families and self-advocacy groups have grown. The pace of this change varies between and even within countries. The main findings of the study include: unclear policy, trends for legislative changes, increased prevalence of mental health problems, inadequate generic service provision, a need for specialist mental health services, a need for improved interconnections of services, and a need for training developments. Policy and legislation in the five European countries under consideration tend to separate the disability aspects of people with ID from their mental health needs. Consequently, the service needs of this group remain largely invisible. This might be a direct reflection of policy clarity and legislation, or could be the result of a failure to implement existing guidelines. This has a detrimental effect on the lives of people with ID, and their families and carers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>11115023</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-2633 |
ispartof | Journal of intellectual disability research, 2000-12, Vol.44 ( Pt 6) (6), p.685-696 |
issn | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72476806 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
subjects | Adult Austria Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration Community Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data Crossnational studies Deinstitutionalization - legislation & jurisprudence Deinstitutionalization - trends Europe Greece Health Planning - legislation & jurisprudence Health Planning - trends Health Services Needs and Demand Humans International Cooperation Ireland Learning disabled people Legislation, Medical Mentally Disabled Persons - legislation & jurisprudence Mentally Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data Service provision Social Support Spain United Kingdom |
title | BIOMED-MEROPE project: service provision for adults with intellectual disability: a European comparison |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T20%3A32%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BIOMED-MEROPE%20project:%20service%20provision%20for%20adults%20with%20intellectual%20disability:%20a%20European%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Holt,%20G&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=44%20(%20Pt%206)&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=685-696&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00312.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72476806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57573678&rft_id=info:pmid/11115023&rfr_iscdi=true |