An ELISA procedure for the diagnosis of dengue infections

Although the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test has been the standard test used by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the classification of serologic response in dengue infections, it is slow, requiring paired specimens. Furthermore, not all investigators have accepted the classification. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of virological methods 1991-06, Vol.33 (1), p.101-113
Hauptverfasser: Kuno, G., Gómez, I., Gubler, D.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Journal of virological methods
container_volume 33
creator Kuno, G.
Gómez, I.
Gubler, D.J.
description Although the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test has been the standard test used by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the classification of serologic response in dengue infections, it is slow, requiring paired specimens. Furthermore, not all investigators have accepted the classification. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a rapid test which employs a single specimen. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for rapid classification of serologic responses in dengue infections based on the ratio of IgM and IgG in a single specimen. Using the criteria established by the WHO (1986) for comparison, concordant results were obtained in 81% and 95% of primary and secondary infections, respectively, when serum specimens were tested as pairs. When tested as single specimens, the diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 41% and 52% of acute specimens of primary and secondary infections, respectively. The lower rate of concordance in acute-phase samples was due to the absence of detectable IgM in acute specimens collected at outpatient clinics. On the other hand, diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 79% and 95% of primary and secondary infections when single convalescent specimens were used. Analysis of the discordant results between the two tests revealed that the interpretation by the IgMIgG ratio agreed better with HI classifications practised by some investigators than it did with the WHO.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0166-0934(91)90011-N
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72449885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016609349190011N</els_id><sourcerecordid>16177431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-9ba5ec020979e6c61a3fb19f4efdbb031c2ae86ce7e47bcf808932ebbe3a2dae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMotVbfQGEPInpYTTbZ3eQilFK1UOpBPYdsdlIjbVaTXcG3N3VLvelhGJj5Zvj5EDol-JpgUtzEKlIsKLsU5EpgTEi62ENDwksRx5zto-EOOURHIbxhjPOS0gEaEEFFjrMhEmOXTOezp3Hy7hsNdechMY1P2ldIaquWrgk2JI1JanDLDhLrDOjWNi4cowOjVgFOtn2EXu6mz5OHdP54P5uM56lmnLapqFQOGmdYlAIKXRBFTUWEYWDqqsKU6EwBLzSUwMpKG465oBlUFVCV1QroCF30f2PAjw5CK9c2aFitlIOmC7LMGBOc5_-CpCBlySiJIOtB7ZsQPBj57u1a-S9JsNyolRtvcuNNCiJ_1MpFPDvb_u-qNdS_R73LuD_f7lXQamW8ctqGHZZnWY55EbHbHoMo7dOCl0FbcNG99VGtrBv7d45vF3OUOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16177431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An ELISA procedure for the diagnosis of dengue infections</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kuno, G. ; Gómez, I. ; Gubler, D.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuno, G. ; Gómez, I. ; Gubler, D.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Although the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test has been the standard test used by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the classification of serologic response in dengue infections, it is slow, requiring paired specimens. Furthermore, not all investigators have accepted the classification. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a rapid test which employs a single specimen. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for rapid classification of serologic responses in dengue infections based on the ratio of IgM and IgG in a single specimen. Using the criteria established by the WHO (1986) for comparison, concordant results were obtained in 81% and 95% of primary and secondary infections, respectively, when serum specimens were tested as pairs. When tested as single specimens, the diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 41% and 52% of acute specimens of primary and secondary infections, respectively. The lower rate of concordance in acute-phase samples was due to the absence of detectable IgM in acute specimens collected at outpatient clinics. On the other hand, diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 79% and 95% of primary and secondary infections when single convalescent specimens were used. Analysis of the discordant results between the two tests revealed that the interpretation by the IgMIgG ratio agreed better with HI classifications practised by some investigators than it did with the WHO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0166-0934(91)90011-N</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1939502</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JVMEDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antigens, Viral ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dengue ; Dengue - classification ; Dengue - diagnosis ; Dengue - immunology ; Dengue Virus - immunology ; ELISA ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - analysis ; Immunoglobulin M - analysis ; Laboratory diagnosis ; Microbiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Techniques used in virology ; Virology ; Virology - methods ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of virological methods, 1991-06, Vol.33 (1), p.101-113</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-9ba5ec020979e6c61a3fb19f4efdbb031c2ae86ce7e47bcf808932ebbe3a2dae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-9ba5ec020979e6c61a3fb19f4efdbb031c2ae86ce7e47bcf808932ebbe3a2dae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0934(91)90011-N$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5225086$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1939502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuno, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubler, D.J.</creatorcontrib><title>An ELISA procedure for the diagnosis of dengue infections</title><title>Journal of virological methods</title><addtitle>J Virol Methods</addtitle><description>Although the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test has been the standard test used by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the classification of serologic response in dengue infections, it is slow, requiring paired specimens. Furthermore, not all investigators have accepted the classification. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a rapid test which employs a single specimen. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for rapid classification of serologic responses in dengue infections based on the ratio of IgM and IgG in a single specimen. Using the criteria established by the WHO (1986) for comparison, concordant results were obtained in 81% and 95% of primary and secondary infections, respectively, when serum specimens were tested as pairs. When tested as single specimens, the diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 41% and 52% of acute specimens of primary and secondary infections, respectively. The lower rate of concordance in acute-phase samples was due to the absence of detectable IgM in acute specimens collected at outpatient clinics. On the other hand, diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 79% and 95% of primary and secondary infections when single convalescent specimens were used. Analysis of the discordant results between the two tests revealed that the interpretation by the IgMIgG ratio agreed better with HI classifications practised by some investigators than it did with the WHO.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dengue</subject><subject>Dengue - classification</subject><subject>Dengue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dengue - immunology</subject><subject>Dengue Virus - immunology</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - analysis</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - analysis</subject><subject>Laboratory diagnosis</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Techniques used in virology</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Virology - methods</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>0166-0934</issn><issn>1879-0984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMotVbfQGEPInpYTTbZ3eQilFK1UOpBPYdsdlIjbVaTXcG3N3VLvelhGJj5Zvj5EDol-JpgUtzEKlIsKLsU5EpgTEi62ENDwksRx5zto-EOOURHIbxhjPOS0gEaEEFFjrMhEmOXTOezp3Hy7hsNdechMY1P2ldIaquWrgk2JI1JanDLDhLrDOjWNi4cowOjVgFOtn2EXu6mz5OHdP54P5uM56lmnLapqFQOGmdYlAIKXRBFTUWEYWDqqsKU6EwBLzSUwMpKG465oBlUFVCV1QroCF30f2PAjw5CK9c2aFitlIOmC7LMGBOc5_-CpCBlySiJIOtB7ZsQPBj57u1a-S9JsNyolRtvcuNNCiJ_1MpFPDvb_u-qNdS_R73LuD_f7lXQamW8ctqGHZZnWY55EbHbHoMo7dOCl0FbcNG99VGtrBv7d45vF3OUOw</recordid><startdate>19910601</startdate><enddate>19910601</enddate><creator>Kuno, G.</creator><creator>Gómez, I.</creator><creator>Gubler, D.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910601</creationdate><title>An ELISA procedure for the diagnosis of dengue infections</title><author>Kuno, G. ; Gómez, I. ; Gubler, D.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-9ba5ec020979e6c61a3fb19f4efdbb031c2ae86ce7e47bcf808932ebbe3a2dae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dengue</topic><topic>Dengue - classification</topic><topic>Dengue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dengue - immunology</topic><topic>Dengue Virus - immunology</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - analysis</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - analysis</topic><topic>Laboratory diagnosis</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Techniques used in virology</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Virology - methods</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuno, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubler, D.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of virological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuno, G.</au><au>Gómez, I.</au><au>Gubler, D.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An ELISA procedure for the diagnosis of dengue infections</atitle><jtitle>Journal of virological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Virol Methods</addtitle><date>1991-06-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>101-113</pages><issn>0166-0934</issn><eissn>1879-0984</eissn><coden>JVMEDH</coden><abstract>Although the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test has been the standard test used by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the classification of serologic response in dengue infections, it is slow, requiring paired specimens. Furthermore, not all investigators have accepted the classification. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a rapid test which employs a single specimen. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for rapid classification of serologic responses in dengue infections based on the ratio of IgM and IgG in a single specimen. Using the criteria established by the WHO (1986) for comparison, concordant results were obtained in 81% and 95% of primary and secondary infections, respectively, when serum specimens were tested as pairs. When tested as single specimens, the diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 41% and 52% of acute specimens of primary and secondary infections, respectively. The lower rate of concordance in acute-phase samples was due to the absence of detectable IgM in acute specimens collected at outpatient clinics. On the other hand, diagnoses by ELISA and HI agreed in 79% and 95% of primary and secondary infections when single convalescent specimens were used. Analysis of the discordant results between the two tests revealed that the interpretation by the IgMIgG ratio agreed better with HI classifications practised by some investigators than it did with the WHO.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>1939502</pmid><doi>10.1016/0166-0934(91)90011-N</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-0934
ispartof Journal of virological methods, 1991-06, Vol.33 (1), p.101-113
issn 0166-0934
1879-0984
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72449885
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Antibodies, Viral - blood
Antigens, Viral
Biological and medical sciences
Dengue
Dengue - classification
Dengue - diagnosis
Dengue - immunology
Dengue Virus - immunology
ELISA
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests
Humans
Immunoglobulin G - analysis
Immunoglobulin M - analysis
Laboratory diagnosis
Microbiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Techniques used in virology
Virology
Virology - methods
World Health Organization
title An ELISA procedure for the diagnosis of dengue infections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A10%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20ELISA%20procedure%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20dengue%20infections&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20virological%20methods&rft.au=Kuno,%20G.&rft.date=1991-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=101-113&rft.issn=0166-0934&rft.eissn=1879-0984&rft.coden=JVMEDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0166-0934(91)90011-N&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16177431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16177431&rft_id=info:pmid/1939502&rft_els_id=016609349190011N&rfr_iscdi=true