The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community

OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple method for identifying community‐dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self‐reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function‐based survey. DESIGN:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2001-12, Vol.49 (12), p.1691-1699
Hauptverfasser: Saliba, Debra, Elliott, Marc, Rubenstein, Laurence Z., Solomon, David H., Young, Roy T., Kamberg, Caren J., Carol Roth, RN, MacLean, Catherine H., Shekelle, Paul G., Sloss, Elizabeth M., Wenger, Neil S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple method for identifying community‐dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self‐reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function‐based survey. DESIGN: Analysis of longitudinal survey data. SETTING: A nationally representative community‐based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand two hundred five Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey; development and comparison of scoring systems that use age, function, and self‐reported diagnoses to predict future death and functional decline. RESULTS: A multivariate model using function, self‐rated health, and age to predict death or functional decline was only slightly improved when self‐reported diagnoses and conditions were included as predictors and was significantly better than a model using age plus self‐reported diagnoses alone. These analyses provide the basis for a 13‐item function‐based scoring system that considers age, self‐rated health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. A score of ≥3 targeted 32% of this nationally representative sample as vulnerable. This targeted group had 4.2 times the risk of death or functional decline over a 2‐year period compared with those with scores
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x