Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile?
It has been suggested that there is considerable unmet need in respect of hearing loss amongst the elderly population, but no routine screening test is currently used in general practice to identify these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine questionnaire screening of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of laryngology and otology 2000-09, Vol.114 (9), p.661-666 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 666 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 661 |
container_title | Journal of laryngology and otology |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Hands, S. |
description | It has been suggested that there is considerable unmet need in respect of hearing loss amongst the elderly population, but no routine screening test is currently used in general practice to identify these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine questionnaire screening of the over-65s is a feasible way to identify elderly patients with hearing loss in primary care and whether patients so identified would benefit from hearing aid fitting. A cohort of patients consisting of a sample of 234 individuals aged between 65 and 74, attending a doctor’s surgery over a specified period, received a scored questionnaire to complete based on the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening test. Hearing aid owners and those with a hearing handicap were identified, and non-aid wearers with handicap offered examination and referral. Those patients who were fitted with aids were assessed after six months for aid usage and persisting handicap. Twenty-five per cent of the patient sample reported a previously undiagnosed hearing handicap. Six months after aid fitting, a reduction in hearing handicap was reported in 79 per cent of these cases and overall aid usage in the population sample had increased from nine per cent to 20 per cent. Routine questionnaire screening in general practice may be worthwhile since it is easy to carry out and the resulting intervention significantly reduces reported hearing handicap. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1258/0022215001906633 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72430877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1258_0022215001906633</cupid><sourcerecordid>72430877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4a5d43a356c6b96b92a453409251f75680cff57eb48b851cb5ae5e987c10cdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LHDEcxYNUdGt776kMRXob-83vmV6kWOvaKqWwB28hk_2Oxs5mbDKj9b9v1h1cEAqBHN7nPd73EfKOwhFlsvoEwBijEoDWoBTnO2RGtahKKRS8IrO1XGad7pPXKd1C5jSwPbJPKdS0YmpG5nO00YfroutTKnwo-nuMpZLpc-FTEftx8AGLPyOmwfchWB-xSC4ihrXpoY_DzcON7_D4DdltbZfw7fQfkMW308XJvLz4eXZ-8uWidIKzoRRWLgW3XCqnmjo_ZoXkAmomaaulqsC1rdTYiKqpJHWNtCixrrSj4JYNPyAfN7F3sX9qZVY-Oew6G7Afk9FMcKi0zuCHF-BtP8aQqxmmRS20UCJDsIFczOdHbM1d9CsbHw0Fs17YvFw4W95PuWOzwuXWME2agcMJsMnZro02OJ-2XM4CVmes3GA-Dfj3Wbbxt1Gaa2nU2S-zuLwScPnjq_meeTZVtasm-uU1bg_6b9l_ovKe2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274947464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hands, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hands, S.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that there is considerable unmet need in respect of hearing loss amongst the elderly population, but no routine screening test is currently used in general practice to identify these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine questionnaire screening of the over-65s is a feasible way to identify elderly patients with hearing loss in primary care and whether patients so identified would benefit from hearing aid fitting. A cohort of patients consisting of a sample of 234 individuals aged between 65 and 74, attending a doctor’s surgery over a specified period, received a scored questionnaire to complete based on the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening test. Hearing aid owners and those with a hearing handicap were identified, and non-aid wearers with handicap offered examination and referral. Those patients who were fitted with aids were assessed after six months for aid usage and persisting handicap. Twenty-five per cent of the patient sample reported a previously undiagnosed hearing handicap. Six months after aid fitting, a reduction in hearing handicap was reported in 79 per cent of these cases and overall aid usage in the population sample had increased from nine per cent to 20 per cent. Routine questionnaire screening in general practice may be worthwhile since it is easy to carry out and the resulting intervention significantly reduces reported hearing handicap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/0022215001906633</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11091826</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLOTAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>(RF) Otorhinolaryngology ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Audiometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology ; Family Practice ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Impaired Persons ; Hearing loss ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Non tumoral diseases ; Older people ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Presbycusis - diagnosis ; Primary care ; Questionnaires ; Referral and Consultation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of laryngology and otology, 2000-09, Vol.114 (9), p.661-666</ispartof><rights>Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited 2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd. Sep 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4a5d43a356c6b96b92a453409251f75680cff57eb48b851cb5ae5e987c10cdb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022215100002073/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1500029$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11091826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hands, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile?</title><title>Journal of laryngology and otology</title><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that there is considerable unmet need in respect of hearing loss amongst the elderly population, but no routine screening test is currently used in general practice to identify these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine questionnaire screening of the over-65s is a feasible way to identify elderly patients with hearing loss in primary care and whether patients so identified would benefit from hearing aid fitting. A cohort of patients consisting of a sample of 234 individuals aged between 65 and 74, attending a doctor’s surgery over a specified period, received a scored questionnaire to complete based on the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening test. Hearing aid owners and those with a hearing handicap were identified, and non-aid wearers with handicap offered examination and referral. Those patients who were fitted with aids were assessed after six months for aid usage and persisting handicap. Twenty-five per cent of the patient sample reported a previously undiagnosed hearing handicap. Six months after aid fitting, a reduction in hearing handicap was reported in 79 per cent of these cases and overall aid usage in the population sample had increased from nine per cent to 20 per cent. Routine questionnaire screening in general practice may be worthwhile since it is easy to carry out and the resulting intervention significantly reduces reported hearing handicap.</description><subject>(RF) Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Aids</subject><subject>Hearing Impaired Persons</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Presbycusis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0022-2151</issn><issn>1748-5460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LHDEcxYNUdGt776kMRXob-83vmV6kWOvaKqWwB28hk_2Oxs5mbDKj9b9v1h1cEAqBHN7nPd73EfKOwhFlsvoEwBijEoDWoBTnO2RGtahKKRS8IrO1XGad7pPXKd1C5jSwPbJPKdS0YmpG5nO00YfroutTKnwo-nuMpZLpc-FTEftx8AGLPyOmwfchWB-xSC4ihrXpoY_DzcON7_D4DdltbZfw7fQfkMW308XJvLz4eXZ-8uWidIKzoRRWLgW3XCqnmjo_ZoXkAmomaaulqsC1rdTYiKqpJHWNtCixrrSj4JYNPyAfN7F3sX9qZVY-Oew6G7Afk9FMcKi0zuCHF-BtP8aQqxmmRS20UCJDsIFczOdHbM1d9CsbHw0Fs17YvFw4W95PuWOzwuXWME2agcMJsMnZro02OJ-2XM4CVmes3GA-Dfj3Wbbxt1Gaa2nU2S-zuLwScPnjq_meeTZVtasm-uU1bg_6b9l_ovKe2A</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Hands, S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile?</title><author>Hands, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4a5d43a356c6b96b92a453409251f75680cff57eb48b851cb5ae5e987c10cdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>(RF) Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Aids</topic><topic>Hearing Impaired Persons</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Presbycusis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hands, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hands, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>661-666</pages><issn>0022-2151</issn><eissn>1748-5460</eissn><coden>JLOTAX</coden><abstract>It has been suggested that there is considerable unmet need in respect of hearing loss amongst the elderly population, but no routine screening test is currently used in general practice to identify these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine questionnaire screening of the over-65s is a feasible way to identify elderly patients with hearing loss in primary care and whether patients so identified would benefit from hearing aid fitting. A cohort of patients consisting of a sample of 234 individuals aged between 65 and 74, attending a doctor’s surgery over a specified period, received a scored questionnaire to complete based on the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening test. Hearing aid owners and those with a hearing handicap were identified, and non-aid wearers with handicap offered examination and referral. Those patients who were fitted with aids were assessed after six months for aid usage and persisting handicap. Twenty-five per cent of the patient sample reported a previously undiagnosed hearing handicap. Six months after aid fitting, a reduction in hearing handicap was reported in 79 per cent of these cases and overall aid usage in the population sample had increased from nine per cent to 20 per cent. Routine questionnaire screening in general practice may be worthwhile since it is easy to carry out and the resulting intervention significantly reduces reported hearing handicap.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>11091826</pmid><doi>10.1258/0022215001906633</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2151 |
ispartof | Journal of laryngology and otology, 2000-09, Vol.114 (9), p.661-666 |
issn | 0022-2151 1748-5460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72430877 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | (RF) Otorhinolaryngology Aged Algorithms Audiometry Biological and medical sciences Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology Family Practice Feasibility Studies Female Hearing Aids Hearing Impaired Persons Hearing loss Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Medical sciences Non tumoral diseases Older people Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Patients Predictive Value of Tests Presbycusis - diagnosis Primary care Questionnaires Referral and Consultation Sensitivity and Specificity Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T04%3A30%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hearing%20loss%20in%20over-65s:%20is%20routine%20questionnaire%20screening%20worthwhile?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laryngology%20and%20otology&rft.au=Hands,%20S.&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=661-666&rft.issn=0022-2151&rft.eissn=1748-5460&rft.coden=JLOTAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/0022215001906633&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72430877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274947464&rft_id=info:pmid/11091826&rft_cupid=10_1258_0022215001906633&rfr_iscdi=true |