A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives

Adopting a new paradigm for natural resource and environmental policy that emphasises continuous change, adaptation and learning demands a new approach to evaluation to enable improvements in the way these initiatives contribute to sustainable resource use. Evaluation is fundamental to identifying c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2001-12, Vol.63 (4), p.407-423
Hauptverfasser: Bellamy, Jennifer A, Walker, Daniel H, McDonald, Geoffrey T, Syme, Geoffrey J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 423
container_issue 4
container_start_page 407
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 63
creator Bellamy, Jennifer A
Walker, Daniel H
McDonald, Geoffrey T
Syme, Geoffrey J
description Adopting a new paradigm for natural resource and environmental policy that emphasises continuous change, adaptation and learning demands a new approach to evaluation to enable improvements in the way these initiatives contribute to sustainable resource use. Evaluation is fundamental to identifying change, supporting an adaptive approach that is flexible enough to meet the challenge of change, and enabling learning at individual, community, institutional and policy levels. Based on a consideration of changing approaches to natural resource management (NRM) policy and observations and experiences in the practical assessment of on-the-ground initiatives, the authors develop a set of principles for evaluation in NRM that: (a) addresses evaluation from a systems perspective, (b) links objective to consequence, (c) considers the fundamental assumptions and hypotheses that underpin core policy or program objectives, (d) is grounded in the natural resource, policy/institutional, economic, socio-cultural and technological contexts of implementation in practice, (e) establishes practical and valid evaluation criteria by which change can be monitored and assessed, (f) involves methodological pluralism including both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure rigour and comprehensiveness in assessment, and (g) integrates different disciplinary perspectives (i.e. social, economic, environmental, policy and technological). The paper develops a systems-based evaluation framework that incorporates these principles and also recognises the multiple levels and nested nature of NRM policy, namely: problem characterisation, policy formulation and intent, program logic, and on-ground implementation. Finally, we demonstrate its utility through application to three contrasting Australian case studies: a community-based Integrated Catchment Management policy implementation; a resource information delivery system; and the development of a Decision Support System.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jema.2001.0493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72428483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479701904931</els_id><sourcerecordid>19894856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-cf80f04eac255706e0358dac169c6bbbab149fb46433acdbaeb74603ad282d263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctr3DAQB2BRWppN2muPRRSa225HD8vSMYS-IJBLexZjedxo8WMr2Qv57yOzC4FCyUmXT_P6MfZBwE4AmC97GnAnAcQOtFOv2EaAq7bWKHjNNqBAbHXt6gt2mfMeAJQU9Vt2IYSVppZqw-5veH7MMw2Z4-GQJgwPfJ74_ECcjtgvOMdp5FPHR5yXhD1PlKclBeIDjviHBhpnHsc4xyKPlN-xNx32md6f3yv2-9vXX7c_tnf333_e3txtg67cvA2dhQ40YZBVVYMhUJVtMQjjgmmaBhuhXddoo5XC0DZITa0NKGylla006opdn-qWmf8ulGc_xByo73Gkacm-llpabdWLUDkwtnLwIhTOOm2rtfWnf-C-XGQs2xZTGVEpWRe0O6GQppwTdf6Q4oDp0Qvwa3J-Tc6vyfk1ufLh47nq0gzUPvNzVAV8PgPMAfsu4RhifnZKQy2kLs6eHJXzHyMln0OkMVAbE4XZt1P83wxPSA60Kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195615327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bellamy, Jennifer A ; Walker, Daniel H ; McDonald, Geoffrey T ; Syme, Geoffrey J</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Jennifer A ; Walker, Daniel H ; McDonald, Geoffrey T ; Syme, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><description>Adopting a new paradigm for natural resource and environmental policy that emphasises continuous change, adaptation and learning demands a new approach to evaluation to enable improvements in the way these initiatives contribute to sustainable resource use. Evaluation is fundamental to identifying change, supporting an adaptive approach that is flexible enough to meet the challenge of change, and enabling learning at individual, community, institutional and policy levels. Based on a consideration of changing approaches to natural resource management (NRM) policy and observations and experiences in the practical assessment of on-the-ground initiatives, the authors develop a set of principles for evaluation in NRM that: (a) addresses evaluation from a systems perspective, (b) links objective to consequence, (c) considers the fundamental assumptions and hypotheses that underpin core policy or program objectives, (d) is grounded in the natural resource, policy/institutional, economic, socio-cultural and technological contexts of implementation in practice, (e) establishes practical and valid evaluation criteria by which change can be monitored and assessed, (f) involves methodological pluralism including both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure rigour and comprehensiveness in assessment, and (g) integrates different disciplinary perspectives (i.e. social, economic, environmental, policy and technological). The paper develops a systems-based evaluation framework that incorporates these principles and also recognises the multiple levels and nested nature of NRM policy, namely: problem characterisation, policy formulation and intent, program logic, and on-ground implementation. Finally, we demonstrate its utility through application to three contrasting Australian case studies: a community-based Integrated Catchment Management policy implementation; a resource information delivery system; and the development of a Decision Support System.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11826723</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Cultural Characteristics ; Decision Support Techniques ; Environment ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; Evaluation ; evaluation, natural resource management paradigm, policy, systems approach, integration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Natural resources ; Organizational Case Studies ; Policy Making ; Problem Solving ; Resource management ; Social Conditions ; Systems theory</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2001-12, Vol.63 (4), p.407-423</ispartof><rights>2001 Academic Press</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-cf80f04eac255706e0358dac169c6bbbab149fb46433acdbaeb74603ad282d263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-cf80f04eac255706e0358dac169c6bbbab149fb46433acdbaeb74603ad282d263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13407124$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11826723$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Geoffrey T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syme, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><title>A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Adopting a new paradigm for natural resource and environmental policy that emphasises continuous change, adaptation and learning demands a new approach to evaluation to enable improvements in the way these initiatives contribute to sustainable resource use. Evaluation is fundamental to identifying change, supporting an adaptive approach that is flexible enough to meet the challenge of change, and enabling learning at individual, community, institutional and policy levels. Based on a consideration of changing approaches to natural resource management (NRM) policy and observations and experiences in the practical assessment of on-the-ground initiatives, the authors develop a set of principles for evaluation in NRM that: (a) addresses evaluation from a systems perspective, (b) links objective to consequence, (c) considers the fundamental assumptions and hypotheses that underpin core policy or program objectives, (d) is grounded in the natural resource, policy/institutional, economic, socio-cultural and technological contexts of implementation in practice, (e) establishes practical and valid evaluation criteria by which change can be monitored and assessed, (f) involves methodological pluralism including both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure rigour and comprehensiveness in assessment, and (g) integrates different disciplinary perspectives (i.e. social, economic, environmental, policy and technological). The paper develops a systems-based evaluation framework that incorporates these principles and also recognises the multiple levels and nested nature of NRM policy, namely: problem characterisation, policy formulation and intent, program logic, and on-ground implementation. Finally, we demonstrate its utility through application to three contrasting Australian case studies: a community-based Integrated Catchment Management policy implementation; a resource information delivery system; and the development of a Decision Support System.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>evaluation, natural resource management paradigm, policy, systems approach, integration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Social Conditions</subject><subject>Systems theory</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctr3DAQB2BRWppN2muPRRSa225HD8vSMYS-IJBLexZjedxo8WMr2Qv57yOzC4FCyUmXT_P6MfZBwE4AmC97GnAnAcQOtFOv2EaAq7bWKHjNNqBAbHXt6gt2mfMeAJQU9Vt2IYSVppZqw-5veH7MMw2Z4-GQJgwPfJ74_ECcjtgvOMdp5FPHR5yXhD1PlKclBeIDjviHBhpnHsc4xyKPlN-xNx32md6f3yv2-9vXX7c_tnf333_e3txtg67cvA2dhQ40YZBVVYMhUJVtMQjjgmmaBhuhXddoo5XC0DZITa0NKGylla006opdn-qWmf8ulGc_xByo73Gkacm-llpabdWLUDkwtnLwIhTOOm2rtfWnf-C-XGQs2xZTGVEpWRe0O6GQppwTdf6Q4oDp0Qvwa3J-Tc6vyfk1ufLh47nq0gzUPvNzVAV8PgPMAfsu4RhifnZKQy2kLs6eHJXzHyMln0OkMVAbE4XZt1P83wxPSA60Kw</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Bellamy, Jennifer A</creator><creator>Walker, Daniel H</creator><creator>McDonald, Geoffrey T</creator><creator>Syme, Geoffrey J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T4</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives</title><author>Bellamy, Jennifer A ; Walker, Daniel H ; McDonald, Geoffrey T ; Syme, Geoffrey J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-cf80f04eac255706e0358dac169c6bbbab149fb46433acdbaeb74603ad282d263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>evaluation, natural resource management paradigm, policy, systems approach, integration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Social Conditions</topic><topic>Systems theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Geoffrey T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syme, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Human Population &amp; Natural Resource Management</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellamy, Jennifer A</au><au>Walker, Daniel H</au><au>McDonald, Geoffrey T</au><au>Syme, Geoffrey J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>407-423</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>Adopting a new paradigm for natural resource and environmental policy that emphasises continuous change, adaptation and learning demands a new approach to evaluation to enable improvements in the way these initiatives contribute to sustainable resource use. Evaluation is fundamental to identifying change, supporting an adaptive approach that is flexible enough to meet the challenge of change, and enabling learning at individual, community, institutional and policy levels. Based on a consideration of changing approaches to natural resource management (NRM) policy and observations and experiences in the practical assessment of on-the-ground initiatives, the authors develop a set of principles for evaluation in NRM that: (a) addresses evaluation from a systems perspective, (b) links objective to consequence, (c) considers the fundamental assumptions and hypotheses that underpin core policy or program objectives, (d) is grounded in the natural resource, policy/institutional, economic, socio-cultural and technological contexts of implementation in practice, (e) establishes practical and valid evaluation criteria by which change can be monitored and assessed, (f) involves methodological pluralism including both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure rigour and comprehensiveness in assessment, and (g) integrates different disciplinary perspectives (i.e. social, economic, environmental, policy and technological). The paper develops a systems-based evaluation framework that incorporates these principles and also recognises the multiple levels and nested nature of NRM policy, namely: problem characterisation, policy formulation and intent, program logic, and on-ground implementation. Finally, we demonstrate its utility through application to three contrasting Australian case studies: a community-based Integrated Catchment Management policy implementation; a resource information delivery system; and the development of a Decision Support System.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11826723</pmid><doi>10.1006/jema.2001.0493</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2001-12, Vol.63 (4), p.407-423
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72428483
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Australia
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation of Natural Resources
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Cultural Characteristics
Decision Support Techniques
Environment
Environmental management
Environmental policy
Evaluation
evaluation, natural resource management paradigm, policy, systems approach, integration
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Humans
Natural resources
Organizational Case Studies
Policy Making
Problem Solving
Resource management
Social Conditions
Systems theory
title A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systems%20approach%20to%20the%20evaluation%20of%20natural%20resource%20management%20initiatives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Bellamy,%20Jennifer%20A&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=407-423&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jema.2001.0493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19894856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195615327&rft_id=info:pmid/11826723&rft_els_id=S0301479701904931&rfr_iscdi=true