Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction. Results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies In Hospital (VANQWISH) trial

Aims To compare the role of early invasive vs conservative management strategies in treating patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction with or without a prior myocardial infarction. Background In patients recovering from non-Q wave myocardial infarction, the prognosis among patients with a firs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2000-12, Vol.21 (24), p.2014-2025
Hauptverfasser: Heggunje, P.S, Wade, M.J, O'Rourke, R.A, Kleiger, R.E, Deedwania, P.C, Lavori, P.W, Boden, W.E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2025
container_issue 24
container_start_page 2014
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 21
creator Heggunje, P.S
Wade, M.J
O'Rourke, R.A
Kleiger, R.E
Deedwania, P.C
Lavori, P.W
Boden, W.E
description Aims To compare the role of early invasive vs conservative management strategies in treating patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction with or without a prior myocardial infarction. Background In patients recovering from non-Q wave myocardial infarction, the prognosis among patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction is significantly better than in patients with a prior myocardial infarction, yet physicians often adopt an early invasive strategy to treat patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Methods Non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the VANQWISH trial with a history of prior myocardial infarction were compared to those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction, for the trial primary end-point of death or myocardial infarction at 1 and 12 months, as well as for the initial randomized treatment strategy. Results Of the 920 non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients, 396 had a history of prior myocardial infarction and 524 did not. Patients with a history of prior myocardial infarction were older and had a higher incidence of multiple high-risk baseline characteristics than those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Compared to the group with a first myocardial infarction, the prior myocardial infarction group suffered more events at both 1 month (11% vs 6%, P=0·007) and at 12 months (29% vs 16%, P
doi_str_mv 10.1053/euhj.2000.2423
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72427499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72427499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d187b2188e7874d932dd774fb4d4e7ca9275d9b2d6cae2d7933870102963993f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9v0zAUxyMEYqVw5YgsIU1wSIntJE6O1bTRStNQ2VgnLtZr_NJ6JE6xnY7-5xxxf2i9cLKl93nf79P3G0XvaTKiSca_YL96HLEkSUYsZfxFNKAZY3GZp9nLaJDQMovzvHg4i9449xioIqf56-iMUpowlrFB9PcSbLMl2mzA6Q2SDVrXO6JdtQJsNcTLXitUxHkLHpcaw8wQv0LSgoEltmg86WpiOhPPyBMEiXbbVWCVhiagNdjK686QNXgdWEeetF8RMGr_6XpP1lZ39v9bI_IdXd-ErWBxjx4tGEfGdQ3aOnKz95zvPKcno9vTpVNDJp1bax9EP92Pb2bz6e3kM_E2uLyNXtXQOHx3fIfRj6vLu4tJfP3t6_RifB1XvBQ-VrQQC0aLAkUhUlVyppQQab1IVYqigpKJTJULpvIKkClRcl6IJKRb5rwsec2H0flBd2273z06L9sQLjYNGOx6J0XoTaQBHUajA1jZzjmLtQzBtGC3kiZy17XcdS13Xctd12Hhw1G5X7SoTvix3AB8PALgKmjqEF6l3TNXsEzsqfhAaefxz_MU7C-ZCy4yOXn4Kefsis1mZS7v-D94-8aF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72427499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction. Results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies In Hospital (VANQWISH) trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Heggunje, P.S ; Wade, M.J ; O'Rourke, R.A ; Kleiger, R.E ; Deedwania, P.C ; Lavori, P.W ; Boden, W.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Heggunje, P.S ; Wade, M.J ; O'Rourke, R.A ; Kleiger, R.E ; Deedwania, P.C ; Lavori, P.W ; Boden, W.E ; VANQWISH trial investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To compare the role of early invasive vs conservative management strategies in treating patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction with or without a prior myocardial infarction. Background In patients recovering from non-Q wave myocardial infarction, the prognosis among patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction is significantly better than in patients with a prior myocardial infarction, yet physicians often adopt an early invasive strategy to treat patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Methods Non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the VANQWISH trial with a history of prior myocardial infarction were compared to those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction, for the trial primary end-point of death or myocardial infarction at 1 and 12 months, as well as for the initial randomized treatment strategy. Results Of the 920 non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients, 396 had a history of prior myocardial infarction and 524 did not. Patients with a history of prior myocardial infarction were older and had a higher incidence of multiple high-risk baseline characteristics than those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Compared to the group with a first myocardial infarction, the prior myocardial infarction group suffered more events at both 1 month (11% vs 6%, P=0·007) and at 12 months (29% vs 16%, P&lt;0·001). This difference in outcome remained significant even after adjusting for confounding variables (P&lt;0·0001 at 12 months). Among the non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with a prior myocardial infarction, the frequency of death or recurrent myocardial infarction was similar in both invasive and conservative groups during the first year of follow-up. Among the first non-Q wave myocardial infarction group, those assigned to the conservative strategy had significantly fewer events (3% vs 9%,P =0·009 at 1 month; 12% vs 20%, P=0·016 at 12 months) and mortality (1% vs 5%, P=0·012 at one month; 5% vs 11%, P=0·009 at 12 months) than those assigned to early invasive strategy. Conclusion A history of prior myocardial infarction identifies a moderately high-risk subset of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients who display similar long-term outcomes regardless of the strategy assignment; however, patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction may fare better with a conservative or ischaemia-guided approach during the first post infarction year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2423</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11102252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Coronary heart disease ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; invasive ; ischaemia-guided ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Myocardial Revascularization - methods ; Non-Q wave myocardial infarction ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Recurrence ; Risk ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>European heart journal, 2000-12, Vol.21 (24), p.2014-2025</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d187b2188e7874d932dd774fb4d4e7ca9275d9b2d6cae2d7933870102963993f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=825752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11102252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heggunje, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wade, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, R.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiger, R.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deedwania, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavori, P.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boden, W.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANQWISH trial investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction. Results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies In Hospital (VANQWISH) trial</title><title>European heart journal</title><addtitle>Eur Heart J</addtitle><description>Aims To compare the role of early invasive vs conservative management strategies in treating patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction with or without a prior myocardial infarction. Background In patients recovering from non-Q wave myocardial infarction, the prognosis among patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction is significantly better than in patients with a prior myocardial infarction, yet physicians often adopt an early invasive strategy to treat patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Methods Non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the VANQWISH trial with a history of prior myocardial infarction were compared to those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction, for the trial primary end-point of death or myocardial infarction at 1 and 12 months, as well as for the initial randomized treatment strategy. Results Of the 920 non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients, 396 had a history of prior myocardial infarction and 524 did not. Patients with a history of prior myocardial infarction were older and had a higher incidence of multiple high-risk baseline characteristics than those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Compared to the group with a first myocardial infarction, the prior myocardial infarction group suffered more events at both 1 month (11% vs 6%, P=0·007) and at 12 months (29% vs 16%, P&lt;0·001). This difference in outcome remained significant even after adjusting for confounding variables (P&lt;0·0001 at 12 months). Among the non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with a prior myocardial infarction, the frequency of death or recurrent myocardial infarction was similar in both invasive and conservative groups during the first year of follow-up. Among the first non-Q wave myocardial infarction group, those assigned to the conservative strategy had significantly fewer events (3% vs 9%,P =0·009 at 1 month; 12% vs 20%, P=0·016 at 12 months) and mortality (1% vs 5%, P=0·012 at one month; 5% vs 11%, P=0·009 at 12 months) than those assigned to early invasive strategy. Conclusion A history of prior myocardial infarction identifies a moderately high-risk subset of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients who display similar long-term outcomes regardless of the strategy assignment; however, patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction may fare better with a conservative or ischaemia-guided approach during the first post infarction year.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>invasive</subject><subject>ischaemia-guided</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Myocardial Revascularization - methods</subject><subject>Non-Q wave myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9v0zAUxyMEYqVw5YgsIU1wSIntJE6O1bTRStNQ2VgnLtZr_NJ6JE6xnY7-5xxxf2i9cLKl93nf79P3G0XvaTKiSca_YL96HLEkSUYsZfxFNKAZY3GZp9nLaJDQMovzvHg4i9449xioIqf56-iMUpowlrFB9PcSbLMl2mzA6Q2SDVrXO6JdtQJsNcTLXitUxHkLHpcaw8wQv0LSgoEltmg86WpiOhPPyBMEiXbbVWCVhiagNdjK686QNXgdWEeetF8RMGr_6XpP1lZ39v9bI_IdXd-ErWBxjx4tGEfGdQ3aOnKz95zvPKcno9vTpVNDJp1bax9EP92Pb2bz6e3kM_E2uLyNXtXQOHx3fIfRj6vLu4tJfP3t6_RifB1XvBQ-VrQQC0aLAkUhUlVyppQQab1IVYqigpKJTJULpvIKkClRcl6IJKRb5rwsec2H0flBd2273z06L9sQLjYNGOx6J0XoTaQBHUajA1jZzjmLtQzBtGC3kiZy17XcdS13Xctd12Hhw1G5X7SoTvix3AB8PALgKmjqEF6l3TNXsEzsqfhAaefxz_MU7C-ZCy4yOXn4Kefsis1mZS7v-D94-8aF</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Heggunje, P.S</creator><creator>Wade, M.J</creator><creator>O'Rourke, R.A</creator><creator>Kleiger, R.E</creator><creator>Deedwania, P.C</creator><creator>Lavori, P.W</creator><creator>Boden, W.E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction. Results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies In Hospital (VANQWISH) trial</title><author>Heggunje, P.S ; Wade, M.J ; O'Rourke, R.A ; Kleiger, R.E ; Deedwania, P.C ; Lavori, P.W ; Boden, W.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d187b2188e7874d932dd774fb4d4e7ca9275d9b2d6cae2d7933870102963993f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>invasive</topic><topic>ischaemia-guided</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Myocardial Revascularization - methods</topic><topic>Non-Q wave myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heggunje, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wade, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, R.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiger, R.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deedwania, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavori, P.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boden, W.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANQWISH trial investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heggunje, P.S</au><au>Wade, M.J</au><au>O'Rourke, R.A</au><au>Kleiger, R.E</au><au>Deedwania, P.C</au><au>Lavori, P.W</au><au>Boden, W.E</au><aucorp>VANQWISH trial investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction. Results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies In Hospital (VANQWISH) trial</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Heart J</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2014</spage><epage>2025</epage><pages>2014-2025</pages><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>Aims To compare the role of early invasive vs conservative management strategies in treating patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction with or without a prior myocardial infarction. Background In patients recovering from non-Q wave myocardial infarction, the prognosis among patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction is significantly better than in patients with a prior myocardial infarction, yet physicians often adopt an early invasive strategy to treat patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Methods Non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the VANQWISH trial with a history of prior myocardial infarction were compared to those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction, for the trial primary end-point of death or myocardial infarction at 1 and 12 months, as well as for the initial randomized treatment strategy. Results Of the 920 non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients, 396 had a history of prior myocardial infarction and 524 did not. Patients with a history of prior myocardial infarction were older and had a higher incidence of multiple high-risk baseline characteristics than those with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Compared to the group with a first myocardial infarction, the prior myocardial infarction group suffered more events at both 1 month (11% vs 6%, P=0·007) and at 12 months (29% vs 16%, P&lt;0·001). This difference in outcome remained significant even after adjusting for confounding variables (P&lt;0·0001 at 12 months). Among the non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with a prior myocardial infarction, the frequency of death or recurrent myocardial infarction was similar in both invasive and conservative groups during the first year of follow-up. Among the first non-Q wave myocardial infarction group, those assigned to the conservative strategy had significantly fewer events (3% vs 9%,P =0·009 at 1 month; 12% vs 20%, P=0·016 at 12 months) and mortality (1% vs 5%, P=0·012 at one month; 5% vs 11%, P=0·009 at 12 months) than those assigned to early invasive strategy. Conclusion A history of prior myocardial infarction identifies a moderately high-risk subset of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients who display similar long-term outcomes regardless of the strategy assignment; however, patients with a first non-Q wave myocardial infarction may fare better with a conservative or ischaemia-guided approach during the first post infarction year.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11102252</pmid><doi>10.1053/euhj.2000.2423</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2000-12, Vol.21 (24), p.2014-2025
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72427499
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology. Vascular system
Coronary heart disease
Female
Heart
Humans
invasive
ischaemia-guided
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Myocardial Infarction - therapy
Myocardial Revascularization - methods
Non-Q wave myocardial infarction
Proportional Hazards Models
Recurrence
Risk
Survival Analysis
title Early invasive versus ischaemia-guided strategies in the management of non-Q wave myocardial infarction patients with and without prior myocardial infarction. Results of Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies In Hospital (VANQWISH) trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20invasive%20versus%20ischaemia-guided%20strategies%20in%20the%20management%20of%20non-Q%20wave%20myocardial%20infarction%20patients%20with%20and%20without%20prior%20myocardial%20infarction.%20Results%20of%20Veterans%20Affairs%20Non-Q%20Wave%20Infarction%20Strategies%20In%20Hospital%20(VANQWISH)%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Heggunje,%20P.S&rft.aucorp=VANQWISH%20trial%20investigators&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2014&rft.epage=2025&rft.pages=2014-2025&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/euhj.2000.2423&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72427499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72427499&rft_id=info:pmid/11102252&rfr_iscdi=true