Is Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery Related to Internal Mammary Harvesting?

Background: Although many surgeons feel that internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting is a risk factor for phrenic nerve dysfunction (PND) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), objective data confirming this are lacking. We sought to compare two groups of cardiac surgical patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac surgery 2001-05, Vol.16 (3), p.228-231
Hauptverfasser: Tripp, Henry F., Sees, David W., Lisagor, Philip G., Cohen, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 3
container_start_page 228
container_title Journal of cardiac surgery
container_volume 16
creator Tripp, Henry F.
Sees, David W.
Lisagor, Philip G.
Cohen, David J.
description Background: Although many surgeons feel that internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting is a risk factor for phrenic nerve dysfunction (PND) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), objective data confirming this are lacking. We sought to compare two groups of cardiac surgical patients to determine if an association exists between IMA harvesting and PND following CABG. Methods: Using inpatient medical records and chest radiographs, we performed a retrospective analysis of 25 consecutive CABG patients and 25 consecutive valve procedure patients in order to compare the incidence of PND following cardiac surgery with and without IMA harvesting. Results: Two patients were excluded. Thirty‐one patients underwent IMA harvesting as part of their procedure, of whom 42% had PND evidenced on postextubation chest X‐ray. Seventeen patients did not have IMA harvesting, and the incidence of PND in this group was 12% (p = 0.05). Both groups were similar in preoperative variables and operative techniques. Conclusion: This study suggests IMA harvesting is indeed a risk factor for PND following CABG.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb00512.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72419848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72419848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5568-2853e4a4db093fb5b42cb5c53957cbd7453d24f5888cc3e4271637f4cc3e1b1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EgvL4BWSxYJfgZ-KyQShAKQKK2gISG8txHEhJE7ATaP8eR61gzWys0Zy5Yx0AjjAKsa-TWYg5Q4HAfRwShHDYpAhxTMLFBuj9jjZBDwkRBYgxtAN2nZshRAijaBvsYCwIiyLRAy9DBx_erKkKDe-N_TLwYunyttJNUVfwPG-MhYmyWaE0nLT21dglHJtSNSaDTQ2HlQcqVcI7NZ8rP7tWPsM1RfV6tg-2clU6c7B-98Dj1eU0uQ5uR4Nhcn4baM4jERDBqWGKZSnq0zzlKSM65ZrTPo91msWM04ywnAshtPYkiXFE45x1DU6xoXvgeJX7YevP1h-X88JpU5aqMnXrZEwY7gsmPHi6ArWtnbMmlx-26H4tMZKdWTmTnT7Z6ZOdWbk2Kxd--XB9pU3nJvtbXav0wNkK-C5Ks_xHtLwZJRNCuoRglVC4xix-E5R9l1FMYy6f7wfyYvyU8MGUSUJ_AIarl98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72419848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery Related to Internal Mammary Harvesting?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Tripp, Henry F. ; Sees, David W. ; Lisagor, Philip G. ; Cohen, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tripp, Henry F. ; Sees, David W. ; Lisagor, Philip G. ; Cohen, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Although many surgeons feel that internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting is a risk factor for phrenic nerve dysfunction (PND) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), objective data confirming this are lacking. We sought to compare two groups of cardiac surgical patients to determine if an association exists between IMA harvesting and PND following CABG. Methods: Using inpatient medical records and chest radiographs, we performed a retrospective analysis of 25 consecutive CABG patients and 25 consecutive valve procedure patients in order to compare the incidence of PND following cardiac surgery with and without IMA harvesting. Results: Two patients were excluded. Thirty‐one patients underwent IMA harvesting as part of their procedure, of whom 42% had PND evidenced on postextubation chest X‐ray. Seventeen patients did not have IMA harvesting, and the incidence of PND in this group was 12% (p = 0.05). Both groups were similar in preoperative variables and operative techniques. Conclusion: This study suggests IMA harvesting is indeed a risk factor for PND following CABG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-0440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb00512.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11824668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mammary Arteries - transplantation ; Middle Aged ; Phrenic Nerve - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiac surgery, 2001-05, Vol.16 (3), p.228-231</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5568-2853e4a4db093fb5b42cb5c53957cbd7453d24f5888cc3e4271637f4cc3e1b1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5568-2853e4a4db093fb5b42cb5c53957cbd7453d24f5888cc3e4271637f4cc3e1b1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8191.2001.tb00512.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8191.2001.tb00512.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11824668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tripp, Henry F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sees, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisagor, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery Related to Internal Mammary Harvesting?</title><title>Journal of cardiac surgery</title><addtitle>J Card Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Although many surgeons feel that internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting is a risk factor for phrenic nerve dysfunction (PND) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), objective data confirming this are lacking. We sought to compare two groups of cardiac surgical patients to determine if an association exists between IMA harvesting and PND following CABG. Methods: Using inpatient medical records and chest radiographs, we performed a retrospective analysis of 25 consecutive CABG patients and 25 consecutive valve procedure patients in order to compare the incidence of PND following cardiac surgery with and without IMA harvesting. Results: Two patients were excluded. Thirty‐one patients underwent IMA harvesting as part of their procedure, of whom 42% had PND evidenced on postextubation chest X‐ray. Seventeen patients did not have IMA harvesting, and the incidence of PND in this group was 12% (p = 0.05). Both groups were similar in preoperative variables and operative techniques. Conclusion: This study suggests IMA harvesting is indeed a risk factor for PND following CABG.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mammary Arteries - transplantation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phrenic Nerve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0886-0440</issn><issn>1540-8191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EgvL4BWSxYJfgZ-KyQShAKQKK2gISG8txHEhJE7ATaP8eR61gzWys0Zy5Yx0AjjAKsa-TWYg5Q4HAfRwShHDYpAhxTMLFBuj9jjZBDwkRBYgxtAN2nZshRAijaBvsYCwIiyLRAy9DBx_erKkKDe-N_TLwYunyttJNUVfwPG-MhYmyWaE0nLT21dglHJtSNSaDTQ2HlQcqVcI7NZ8rP7tWPsM1RfV6tg-2clU6c7B-98Dj1eU0uQ5uR4Nhcn4baM4jERDBqWGKZSnq0zzlKSM65ZrTPo91msWM04ywnAshtPYkiXFE45x1DU6xoXvgeJX7YevP1h-X88JpU5aqMnXrZEwY7gsmPHi6ArWtnbMmlx-26H4tMZKdWTmTnT7Z6ZOdWbk2Kxd--XB9pU3nJvtbXav0wNkK-C5Ks_xHtLwZJRNCuoRglVC4xix-E5R9l1FMYy6f7wfyYvyU8MGUSUJ_AIarl98</recordid><startdate>200105</startdate><enddate>200105</enddate><creator>Tripp, Henry F.</creator><creator>Sees, David W.</creator><creator>Lisagor, Philip G.</creator><creator>Cohen, David J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200105</creationdate><title>Is Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery Related to Internal Mammary Harvesting?</title><author>Tripp, Henry F. ; Sees, David W. ; Lisagor, Philip G. ; Cohen, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5568-2853e4a4db093fb5b42cb5c53957cbd7453d24f5888cc3e4271637f4cc3e1b1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mammary Arteries - transplantation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phrenic Nerve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tripp, Henry F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sees, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisagor, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiac surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tripp, Henry F.</au><au>Sees, David W.</au><au>Lisagor, Philip G.</au><au>Cohen, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery Related to Internal Mammary Harvesting?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiac surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Card Surg</addtitle><date>2001-05</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>228-231</pages><issn>0886-0440</issn><eissn>1540-8191</eissn><abstract>Background: Although many surgeons feel that internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting is a risk factor for phrenic nerve dysfunction (PND) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), objective data confirming this are lacking. We sought to compare two groups of cardiac surgical patients to determine if an association exists between IMA harvesting and PND following CABG. Methods: Using inpatient medical records and chest radiographs, we performed a retrospective analysis of 25 consecutive CABG patients and 25 consecutive valve procedure patients in order to compare the incidence of PND following cardiac surgery with and without IMA harvesting. Results: Two patients were excluded. Thirty‐one patients underwent IMA harvesting as part of their procedure, of whom 42% had PND evidenced on postextubation chest X‐ray. Seventeen patients did not have IMA harvesting, and the incidence of PND in this group was 12% (p = 0.05). Both groups were similar in preoperative variables and operative techniques. Conclusion: This study suggests IMA harvesting is indeed a risk factor for PND following CABG.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11824668</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb00512.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-0440
ispartof Journal of cardiac surgery, 2001-05, Vol.16 (3), p.228-231
issn 0886-0440
1540-8191
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72419848
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Case-Control Studies
Coronary Artery Bypass
Female
Humans
Male
Mammary Arteries - transplantation
Middle Aged
Phrenic Nerve - physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
title Is Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery Related to Internal Mammary Harvesting?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Phrenic%20Nerve%20Dysfunction%20After%20Cardiac%20Surgery%20Related%20to%20Internal%20Mammary%20Harvesting?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiac%20surgery&rft.au=Tripp,%20Henry%20F.&rft.date=2001-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=228-231&rft.issn=0886-0440&rft.eissn=1540-8191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb00512.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72419848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72419848&rft_id=info:pmid/11824668&rfr_iscdi=true