Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: Different approaches and long-term outcome

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2000-10, Vol.70 (4), p.1371-1377
Hauptverfasser: STAMOU, Sotiris C, BAFI, Ammar S, BOYCE, Steven W, PFISTER, Albert J, DULLUM, Mercedes K. C, HILL, Peter C, ZAKI, Salah, GARCIA, Jorge M, CORSO, Paul J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1377
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1371
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 70
creator STAMOU, Sotiris C
BAFI, Ammar S
BOYCE, Steven W
PFISTER, Albert J
DULLUM, Mercedes K. C
HILL, Peter C
ZAKI, Salah
GARCIA, Jorge M
CORSO, Paul J
description Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However, it is unknown whether lateral MIDCAB may yield an improved long-term outcome over the conventional on-pump median sternotomy approach. We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing lateral MIDCAB (n = 34) versus conventional on-pump CABG of the circumflex system (n = 16) from June 1996 to July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification. Patients who required only one or two grafts for complete revascularization were included. Lateral MIDCAB patients had a lower need than on-pump CABG patients for intraoperative (12% MIDCAB vs 43% on-pump CABG, p = 0.03) and postoperative transfusions (29% vs 69%, p = 0.01), had fewer neuropsychologic changes (0% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and had a lower rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (12% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Lateral MIDCAB was also associated with a significantly lower postoperative length of stay (5 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 3 days, p = 0.02). Actuarial survival at a mean period of follow-up of 19 +/- 11 months was 97% for the lateral MIDCAB versus 88% for the on-pump CABG group (p = 0.6). Event-free survival was 88% for lateral MIDCAB versus 81% for on-pump CABG (p = 0.1). Lateral MIDCAB may safely be performed in patients with isolated coronary artery disease of the circumflex system with improved early morbidity and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional median sternotomy on-pump CABG.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01680-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72416625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72416625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j331t-c1e5c6bedb2ca64da9af2f5f60f3ee3f6c6981efbb5fd97a3fd55f91b67a0dd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0A5IASHQtI02cINjU9pEhc4V27qsE5tM5IUMX49kRhwsuz3kWU_hBxzdskZV1eBMSayQk_lOWMXaTJjmdwhYy5lnqlc6l0y_kNG5CCEVWrzFO-TEedsxjXjY1LOnXc9-A31-AHBDC345gti43rqLI1LpKbxZuhsi580bELE7preNtaixz5SWK-9A7PEQKGvaev6tyyi76gbonEdHpI9C23Ao22dkNf7u5f5Y7Z4fnia3yyylRA8ZoajNKrCusoNqKIGDTa30ipmBaKwyig942irStpaT0HYWkqreaWmwOpaiwk5-9mbznkfMMSya4LBtoUe3RDKaV5wlbQk8GQLDlWHdbn2TZfeL3-VJOB0CyQd0FoPvWnCPycFKzQX35pAdBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72416625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: Different approaches and long-term outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>STAMOU, Sotiris C ; BAFI, Ammar S ; BOYCE, Steven W ; PFISTER, Albert J ; DULLUM, Mercedes K. C ; HILL, Peter C ; ZAKI, Salah ; GARCIA, Jorge M ; CORSO, Paul J</creator><creatorcontrib>STAMOU, Sotiris C ; BAFI, Ammar S ; BOYCE, Steven W ; PFISTER, Albert J ; DULLUM, Mercedes K. C ; HILL, Peter C ; ZAKI, Salah ; GARCIA, Jorge M ; CORSO, Paul J</creatorcontrib><description>Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However, it is unknown whether lateral MIDCAB may yield an improved long-term outcome over the conventional on-pump median sternotomy approach. We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing lateral MIDCAB (n = 34) versus conventional on-pump CABG of the circumflex system (n = 16) from June 1996 to July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification. Patients who required only one or two grafts for complete revascularization were included. Lateral MIDCAB patients had a lower need than on-pump CABG patients for intraoperative (12% MIDCAB vs 43% on-pump CABG, p = 0.03) and postoperative transfusions (29% vs 69%, p = 0.01), had fewer neuropsychologic changes (0% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and had a lower rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (12% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Lateral MIDCAB was also associated with a significantly lower postoperative length of stay (5 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 3 days, p = 0.02). Actuarial survival at a mean period of follow-up of 19 +/- 11 months was 97% for the lateral MIDCAB versus 88% for the on-pump CABG group (p = 0.6). Event-free survival was 88% for lateral MIDCAB versus 81% for on-pump CABG (p = 0.1). Lateral MIDCAB may safely be performed in patients with isolated coronary artery disease of the circumflex system with improved early morbidity and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional median sternotomy on-pump CABG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01680-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11081901</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ATHSAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Coronary Disease - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the heart ; Thoracotomy</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2000-10, Vol.70 (4), p.1371-1377</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1530491$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11081901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STAMOU, Sotiris C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAFI, Ammar S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYCE, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PFISTER, Albert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DULLUM, Mercedes K. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILL, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAKI, Salah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARCIA, Jorge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORSO, Paul J</creatorcontrib><title>Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: Different approaches and long-term outcome</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However, it is unknown whether lateral MIDCAB may yield an improved long-term outcome over the conventional on-pump median sternotomy approach. We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing lateral MIDCAB (n = 34) versus conventional on-pump CABG of the circumflex system (n = 16) from June 1996 to July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification. Patients who required only one or two grafts for complete revascularization were included. Lateral MIDCAB patients had a lower need than on-pump CABG patients for intraoperative (12% MIDCAB vs 43% on-pump CABG, p = 0.03) and postoperative transfusions (29% vs 69%, p = 0.01), had fewer neuropsychologic changes (0% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and had a lower rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (12% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Lateral MIDCAB was also associated with a significantly lower postoperative length of stay (5 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 3 days, p = 0.02). Actuarial survival at a mean period of follow-up of 19 +/- 11 months was 97% for the lateral MIDCAB versus 88% for the on-pump CABG group (p = 0.6). Event-free survival was 88% for lateral MIDCAB versus 81% for on-pump CABG (p = 0.1). Lateral MIDCAB may safely be performed in patients with isolated coronary artery disease of the circumflex system with improved early morbidity and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional median sternotomy on-pump CABG.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the heart</subject><subject>Thoracotomy</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0A5IASHQtI02cINjU9pEhc4V27qsE5tM5IUMX49kRhwsuz3kWU_hBxzdskZV1eBMSayQk_lOWMXaTJjmdwhYy5lnqlc6l0y_kNG5CCEVWrzFO-TEedsxjXjY1LOnXc9-A31-AHBDC345gti43rqLI1LpKbxZuhsi580bELE7preNtaixz5SWK-9A7PEQKGvaev6tyyi76gbonEdHpI9C23Ao22dkNf7u5f5Y7Z4fnia3yyylRA8ZoajNKrCusoNqKIGDTa30ipmBaKwyig942irStpaT0HYWkqreaWmwOpaiwk5-9mbznkfMMSya4LBtoUe3RDKaV5wlbQk8GQLDlWHdbn2TZfeL3-VJOB0CyQd0FoPvWnCPycFKzQX35pAdBA</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>STAMOU, Sotiris C</creator><creator>BAFI, Ammar S</creator><creator>BOYCE, Steven W</creator><creator>PFISTER, Albert J</creator><creator>DULLUM, Mercedes K. C</creator><creator>HILL, Peter C</creator><creator>ZAKI, Salah</creator><creator>GARCIA, Jorge M</creator><creator>CORSO, Paul J</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: Different approaches and long-term outcome</title><author>STAMOU, Sotiris C ; BAFI, Ammar S ; BOYCE, Steven W ; PFISTER, Albert J ; DULLUM, Mercedes K. C ; HILL, Peter C ; ZAKI, Salah ; GARCIA, Jorge M ; CORSO, Paul J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j331t-c1e5c6bedb2ca64da9af2f5f60f3ee3f6c6981efbb5fd97a3fd55f91b67a0dd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the heart</topic><topic>Thoracotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STAMOU, Sotiris C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAFI, Ammar S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYCE, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PFISTER, Albert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DULLUM, Mercedes K. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILL, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAKI, Salah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARCIA, Jorge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORSO, Paul J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STAMOU, Sotiris C</au><au>BAFI, Ammar S</au><au>BOYCE, Steven W</au><au>PFISTER, Albert J</au><au>DULLUM, Mercedes K. C</au><au>HILL, Peter C</au><au>ZAKI, Salah</au><au>GARCIA, Jorge M</au><au>CORSO, Paul J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: Different approaches and long-term outcome</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1371</spage><epage>1377</epage><pages>1371-1377</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><coden>ATHSAK</coden><abstract>Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However, it is unknown whether lateral MIDCAB may yield an improved long-term outcome over the conventional on-pump median sternotomy approach. We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing lateral MIDCAB (n = 34) versus conventional on-pump CABG of the circumflex system (n = 16) from June 1996 to July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification. Patients who required only one or two grafts for complete revascularization were included. Lateral MIDCAB patients had a lower need than on-pump CABG patients for intraoperative (12% MIDCAB vs 43% on-pump CABG, p = 0.03) and postoperative transfusions (29% vs 69%, p = 0.01), had fewer neuropsychologic changes (0% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and had a lower rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (12% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Lateral MIDCAB was also associated with a significantly lower postoperative length of stay (5 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 3 days, p = 0.02). Actuarial survival at a mean period of follow-up of 19 +/- 11 months was 97% for the lateral MIDCAB versus 88% for the on-pump CABG group (p = 0.6). Event-free survival was 88% for lateral MIDCAB versus 81% for on-pump CABG (p = 0.1). Lateral MIDCAB may safely be performed in patients with isolated coronary artery disease of the circumflex system with improved early morbidity and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional median sternotomy on-pump CABG.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><pmid>11081901</pmid><doi>10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01680-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2000-10, Vol.70 (4), p.1371-1377
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72416625
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Disease - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the heart
Thoracotomy
title Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: Different approaches and long-term outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronary%20revascularization%20of%20the%20circumflex%20system:%20Different%20approaches%20and%20long-term%20outcome&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=STAMOU,%20Sotiris%20C&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1371&rft.epage=1377&rft.pages=1371-1377&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft.coden=ATHSAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01680-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72416625%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72416625&rft_id=info:pmid/11081901&rfr_iscdi=true