Is a Second Urine Specimen Necessary for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria?
By use of pulse-field gel electrophoresis, we evaluated the molecular identity of 32 Escherichia coli isolates obtained in 2 consecutive urine cultures from 16 patients as part of a large study of asymptomatic bacteriuria in dia-betic women and found different E. coli isolates in 7 of 16 patients, m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2000-09, Vol.31 (3), p.e3-e4 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e4 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e3 |
| container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Geerlings, Suzanne E. Brouwer, Ellen C. Gaastra, Wim Hoepelman, Andy I. M. |
| description | By use of pulse-field gel electrophoresis, we evaluated the molecular identity of 32 Escherichia coli isolates obtained in 2 consecutive urine cultures from 16 patients as part of a large study of asymptomatic bacteriuria in dia-betic women and found different E. coli isolates in 7 of 16 patients, meaning that nearly half (44%) of the patients who had been previously classified as having asymptomatic bacteriuria were reinfected with a different strain. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/314038 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72414313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1086/314038</oup_id><sourcerecordid>72414313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3178-5862e4e6bd4a35766b640adeef2991c19ae5a44fbecc55dc66bab249d47a063e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtO3DAUBmALtWIol0dA7oZdWju-ZlUNtAO0XBbDSCM2luOcgNtJHOxEKm_fVBkxq6qrcxaf_nP0I3RCySdKtPzMKCdM76EDKpjKpCjou3EnQmdcMz1DH1L6SQilmoh9NKOUUKWFOkDL64QtXoILbYVX0beAlx0430CL78BBSja-4jpE3D8D_urtUxuSTzjUeJ5em64Pje29w-fW9RD9EL39coTe13aT4Hg7D9Fq8e3h4iq7ub-8vpjfZI6N1zOhZQ4cZFlxy4SSspSc2AqgzouCOlpYEJbzugTnhKjcCGyZ86LiyhLJgB2isym3i-FlgNSbxicHm41tIQzJqJxTzij7Lxy_UYxovoMuhpQi1KaLvhkbMJSYvz2bqecRnm4Th7KBase2xY7g4wTC0P07JJuMTz38flM2_jJSMSXM1frRFOvL_MeC35rv7A9xwo_j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17873084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a Second Urine Specimen Necessary for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Geerlings, Suzanne E. ; Brouwer, Ellen C. ; Gaastra, Wim ; Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Geerlings, Suzanne E. ; Brouwer, Ellen C. ; Gaastra, Wim ; Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</creatorcontrib><description>By use of pulse-field gel electrophoresis, we evaluated the molecular identity of 32 Escherichia coli isolates obtained in 2 consecutive urine cultures from 16 patients as part of a large study of asymptomatic bacteriuria in dia-betic women and found different E. coli isolates in 7 of 16 patients, meaning that nearly half (44%) of the patients who had been previously classified as having asymptomatic bacteriuria were reinfected with a different strain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/314038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11017857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Bacteriuria - diagnosis ; Bacteriuria - microbiology ; Bacteriuria - urine ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - genetics ; Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Female ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2000-09, Vol.31 (3), p.e3-e4</ispartof><rights>2000 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3178-5862e4e6bd4a35766b640adeef2991c19ae5a44fbecc55dc66bab249d47a063e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3178-5862e4e6bd4a35766b640adeef2991c19ae5a44fbecc55dc66bab249d47a063e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11017857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geerlings, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Ellen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaastra, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Is a Second Urine Specimen Necessary for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria?</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>By use of pulse-field gel electrophoresis, we evaluated the molecular identity of 32 Escherichia coli isolates obtained in 2 consecutive urine cultures from 16 patients as part of a large study of asymptomatic bacteriuria in dia-betic women and found different E. coli isolates in 7 of 16 patients, meaning that nearly half (44%) of the patients who had been previously classified as having asymptomatic bacteriuria were reinfected with a different strain.</description><subject>Bacteriuria - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bacteriuria - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacteriuria - urine</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtO3DAUBmALtWIol0dA7oZdWju-ZlUNtAO0XBbDSCM2luOcgNtJHOxEKm_fVBkxq6qrcxaf_nP0I3RCySdKtPzMKCdM76EDKpjKpCjou3EnQmdcMz1DH1L6SQilmoh9NKOUUKWFOkDL64QtXoILbYVX0beAlx0430CL78BBSja-4jpE3D8D_urtUxuSTzjUeJ5em64Pje29w-fW9RD9EL39coTe13aT4Hg7D9Fq8e3h4iq7ub-8vpjfZI6N1zOhZQ4cZFlxy4SSspSc2AqgzouCOlpYEJbzugTnhKjcCGyZ86LiyhLJgB2isym3i-FlgNSbxicHm41tIQzJqJxTzij7Lxy_UYxovoMuhpQi1KaLvhkbMJSYvz2bqecRnm4Th7KBase2xY7g4wTC0P07JJuMTz38flM2_jJSMSXM1frRFOvL_MeC35rv7A9xwo_j</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Geerlings, Suzanne E.</creator><creator>Brouwer, Ellen C.</creator><creator>Gaastra, Wim</creator><creator>Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Is a Second Urine Specimen Necessary for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria?</title><author>Geerlings, Suzanne E. ; Brouwer, Ellen C. ; Gaastra, Wim ; Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3178-5862e4e6bd4a35766b640adeef2991c19ae5a44fbecc55dc66bab249d47a063e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Bacteriuria - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bacteriuria - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacteriuria - urine</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geerlings, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Ellen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaastra, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geerlings, Suzanne E.</au><au>Brouwer, Ellen C.</au><au>Gaastra, Wim</au><au>Hoepelman, Andy I. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a Second Urine Specimen Necessary for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e3</spage><epage>e4</epage><pages>e3-e4</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>By use of pulse-field gel electrophoresis, we evaluated the molecular identity of 32 Escherichia coli isolates obtained in 2 consecutive urine cultures from 16 patients as part of a large study of asymptomatic bacteriuria in dia-betic women and found different E. coli isolates in 7 of 16 patients, meaning that nearly half (44%) of the patients who had been previously classified as having asymptomatic bacteriuria were reinfected with a different strain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>11017857</pmid><doi>10.1086/314038</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
| ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2000-09, Vol.31 (3), p.e3-e4 |
| issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72414313 |
| source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Bacteriuria - diagnosis Bacteriuria - microbiology Bacteriuria - urine DNA, Bacterial - genetics Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - genetics Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Female Humans |
| title | Is a Second Urine Specimen Necessary for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%20Second%20Urine%20Specimen%20Necessary%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Asymptomatic%20Bacteriuria?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Geerlings,%20Suzanne%20E.&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e3&rft.epage=e4&rft.pages=e3-e4&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/314038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72414313%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17873084&rft_id=info:pmid/11017857&rft_oup_id=10.1086/314038&rfr_iscdi=true |