The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis

Background. The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is a widely used measure of learning approach and was proposed to have three orientations: surface, deep, and achieving, each with an underlying motive and strategy. Aims. This study aimed to examine the factor structure and longitudinal stability ov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of educational psychology 2001-12, Vol.71 (4), p.511-530
Hauptverfasser: Fox, Robin A., McManus, I.C., Winder, Belinda C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 530
container_issue 4
container_start_page 511
container_title British journal of educational psychology
container_volume 71
creator Fox, Robin A.
McManus, I.C.
Winder, Belinda C.
description Background. The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is a widely used measure of learning approach and was proposed to have three orientations: surface, deep, and achieving, each with an underlying motive and strategy. Aims. This study aimed to examine the factor structure and longitudinal stability over five to seven years of a modified shortened 18‐item version of the SPQ. Samples. A total of 1349 medical students completed the shortened SPQ at application and in their final year of medical school. Three additional cohorts of students completed the shortened SPQ during their third and fourth year of medical school (sample size: 194, 203, 174). Method. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the dimensionality and longitudinal stability of the shortened SPQ. Results. Like the full 42‐item version, the shortened SPQ has six subscales and the data are best fit by three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep and achieving) and a single higher order composite deep‐achieving factor. The longitudinal analysis found 26.8%, 26.3%, and 18.7% of the non‐attenuated variance of the surface, deep and achieving factor scores in the final year is predicted from the shortened SPQ completed at application to medical school. Conclusions. The shortened 18‐item SPQ has the same six subscales as the full SPQ as well as three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep, achieving) and one higher order deep‐achieving factor similar to that suggested by Biggs (1987). The longitudinal analysis supports this hypothesis and suggests that these learning approaches are partly stable during medical school undergraduate training and partly modifiable under the influence of the educational environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1348/000709901158659
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72403992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>98615595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-42a2fd5ab8f627953bb08db5f897fc26acad80541ee258bbf43fb042a33063183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPAmh2ykGAX6mfssGurPqgqmIoCEhvLceypS8YudgLkL_CrcTQjKnXT1ZXv-c61jg4ALzF6hymT-wghgZoGYcxlzZtHYEEQY5UkonkMFrNaFVnugWc535QnF5Q9BXsYS0Qk5gvw9-rawnwd02CD7eDnYewmuErR2Jzh5Wjz4GMI2if7Hh4E6MOvebXW8xpGB_2QYR7SaIYxWahDB_sY1r6c8UH3RdKt7_0wwTH7sIYmBufTRg8xTdBpU2Yx6X7KPj8HT5zus32xm0vw5eT46uisuvh0-uHo4KIyrGa0YkQT13HdSleXmJy2LZJdy51shDOk1kZ3EnGGrSVctq1j1LWouChFNcWSLsHb7d3bFH_OCdXGZ2P7Xgcbx6wEYYg2DXkQ5ILjhjBewNf3wJs4phIrK4LrRtSC1QXa30ImxZyTdeo2-Y1Ok8JIzWWqe2UWx6vd2bHd2O6O37VXgDc7QGeje5d0MD7fcQw1gpfKl4Btud--t9ND_6rD8-MVRrTYqq3N58H--W_T6YeqBRVcfft4qr7Lk6_y7HylLuk_A6nHKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216976746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Fox, Robin A. ; McManus, I.C. ; Winder, Belinda C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fox, Robin A. ; McManus, I.C. ; Winder, Belinda C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is a widely used measure of learning approach and was proposed to have three orientations: surface, deep, and achieving, each with an underlying motive and strategy. Aims. This study aimed to examine the factor structure and longitudinal stability over five to seven years of a modified shortened 18‐item version of the SPQ. Samples. A total of 1349 medical students completed the shortened SPQ at application and in their final year of medical school. Three additional cohorts of students completed the shortened SPQ during their third and fourth year of medical school (sample size: 194, 203, 174). Method. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the dimensionality and longitudinal stability of the shortened SPQ. Results. Like the full 42‐item version, the shortened SPQ has six subscales and the data are best fit by three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep and achieving) and a single higher order composite deep‐achieving factor. The longitudinal analysis found 26.8%, 26.3%, and 18.7% of the non‐attenuated variance of the surface, deep and achieving factor scores in the final year is predicted from the shortened SPQ completed at application to medical school. Conclusions. The shortened 18‐item SPQ has the same six subscales as the full SPQ as well as three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep, achieving) and one higher order deep‐achieving factor similar to that suggested by Biggs (1987). The longitudinal analysis supports this hypothesis and suggests that these learning approaches are partly stable during medical school undergraduate training and partly modifiable under the influence of the educational environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/000709901158659</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11802815</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJESAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Style ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Environment ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Educational psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning styles ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical students ; Orientation. Evaluation ; Outcomes of Education ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Short forms ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational psychology, 2001-12, Vol.71 (4), p.511-530</ispartof><rights>2001 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright British Psychological Society Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-42a2fd5ab8f627953bb08db5f897fc26acad80541ee258bbf43fb042a33063183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F000709901158659$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F000709901158659$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,12846,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14097557$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11802815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fox, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winder, Belinda C.</creatorcontrib><title>The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis</title><title>British journal of educational psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Educ Psychol</addtitle><description>Background. The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is a widely used measure of learning approach and was proposed to have three orientations: surface, deep, and achieving, each with an underlying motive and strategy. Aims. This study aimed to examine the factor structure and longitudinal stability over five to seven years of a modified shortened 18‐item version of the SPQ. Samples. A total of 1349 medical students completed the shortened SPQ at application and in their final year of medical school. Three additional cohorts of students completed the shortened SPQ during their third and fourth year of medical school (sample size: 194, 203, 174). Method. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the dimensionality and longitudinal stability of the shortened SPQ. Results. Like the full 42‐item version, the shortened SPQ has six subscales and the data are best fit by three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep and achieving) and a single higher order composite deep‐achieving factor. The longitudinal analysis found 26.8%, 26.3%, and 18.7% of the non‐attenuated variance of the surface, deep and achieving factor scores in the final year is predicted from the shortened SPQ completed at application to medical school. Conclusions. The shortened 18‐item SPQ has the same six subscales as the full SPQ as well as three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep, achieving) and one higher order deep‐achieving factor similar to that suggested by Biggs (1987). The longitudinal analysis supports this hypothesis and suggests that these learning approaches are partly stable during medical school undergraduate training and partly modifiable under the influence of the educational environment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning styles</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Orientation. Evaluation</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Short forms</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0007-0998</issn><issn>2044-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPAmh2ykGAX6mfssGurPqgqmIoCEhvLceypS8YudgLkL_CrcTQjKnXT1ZXv-c61jg4ALzF6hymT-wghgZoGYcxlzZtHYEEQY5UkonkMFrNaFVnugWc535QnF5Q9BXsYS0Qk5gvw9-rawnwd02CD7eDnYewmuErR2Jzh5Wjz4GMI2if7Hh4E6MOvebXW8xpGB_2QYR7SaIYxWahDB_sY1r6c8UH3RdKt7_0wwTH7sIYmBufTRg8xTdBpU2Yx6X7KPj8HT5zus32xm0vw5eT46uisuvh0-uHo4KIyrGa0YkQT13HdSleXmJy2LZJdy51shDOk1kZ3EnGGrSVctq1j1LWouChFNcWSLsHb7d3bFH_OCdXGZ2P7Xgcbx6wEYYg2DXkQ5ILjhjBewNf3wJs4phIrK4LrRtSC1QXa30ImxZyTdeo2-Y1Ok8JIzWWqe2UWx6vd2bHd2O6O37VXgDc7QGeje5d0MD7fcQw1gpfKl4Btud--t9ND_6rD8-MVRrTYqq3N58H--W_T6YeqBRVcfft4qr7Lk6_y7HylLuk_A6nHKA</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>Fox, Robin A.</creator><creator>McManus, I.C.</creator><creator>Winder, Belinda C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis</title><author>Fox, Robin A. ; McManus, I.C. ; Winder, Belinda C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-42a2fd5ab8f627953bb08db5f897fc26acad80541ee258bbf43fb042a33063183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning styles</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Orientation. Evaluation</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Short forms</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fox, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winder, Belinda C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fox, Robin A.</au><au>McManus, I.C.</au><au>Winder, Belinda C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Educ Psychol</addtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>511-530</pages><issn>0007-0998</issn><eissn>2044-8279</eissn><coden>BJESAE</coden><abstract>Background. The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is a widely used measure of learning approach and was proposed to have three orientations: surface, deep, and achieving, each with an underlying motive and strategy. Aims. This study aimed to examine the factor structure and longitudinal stability over five to seven years of a modified shortened 18‐item version of the SPQ. Samples. A total of 1349 medical students completed the shortened SPQ at application and in their final year of medical school. Three additional cohorts of students completed the shortened SPQ during their third and fourth year of medical school (sample size: 194, 203, 174). Method. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the dimensionality and longitudinal stability of the shortened SPQ. Results. Like the full 42‐item version, the shortened SPQ has six subscales and the data are best fit by three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep and achieving) and a single higher order composite deep‐achieving factor. The longitudinal analysis found 26.8%, 26.3%, and 18.7% of the non‐attenuated variance of the surface, deep and achieving factor scores in the final year is predicted from the shortened SPQ completed at application to medical school. Conclusions. The shortened 18‐item SPQ has the same six subscales as the full SPQ as well as three second order shared indicator factors (surface, deep, achieving) and one higher order deep‐achieving factor similar to that suggested by Biggs (1987). The longitudinal analysis supports this hypothesis and suggests that these learning approaches are partly stable during medical school undergraduate training and partly modifiable under the influence of the educational environment.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11802815</pmid><doi>10.1348/000709901158659</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0998
ispartof British journal of educational psychology, 2001-12, Vol.71 (4), p.511-530
issn 0007-0998
2044-8279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72403992
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive Style
Confirmatory factor analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Educational Environment
Educational Measurement - standards
Educational psychology
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Factor Structure
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Learning
Learning Processes
Learning styles
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medical students
Orientation. Evaluation
Outcomes of Education
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Short forms
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Teaching Methods
Undergraduate Study
title The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20shortened%20Study%20Process%20Questionnaire:%20An%20investigation%20of%20its%20structure%20and%20longitudinal%20stability%20using%20confirmatory%20factor%20analysis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Fox,%20Robin%20A.&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=511-530&rft.issn=0007-0998&rft.eissn=2044-8279&rft.coden=BJESAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/000709901158659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E98615595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216976746&rft_id=info:pmid/11802815&rfr_iscdi=true