Discriminant validity of the Child Behaviour Checklist CBCL-4/18 in German samples
This study examined the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL in two large samples of referred and non-referred children and adolescents which were matched for age, sex and socio-economic status. The combined sample that was used for statistical analysis consists of 2,058 referred and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European child & adolescent psychiatry 2001-12, Vol.10 (4), p.240-247 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 247 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 240 |
| container_title | European child & adolescent psychiatry |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | SCHMECK, K POUSTKA, F DÖPFNER, M PLÜCK, J BERNER, W LEHMKUHL, G FEGERT, J. M LENZ, K HUSS, M LEHMKUHL, U |
| description | This study examined the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL in two large samples of referred and non-referred children and adolescents which were matched for age, sex and socio-economic status. The combined sample that was used for statistical analysis consists of 2,058 referred and 2,058 non-referred boys and girls between 4 and 18 years of age (mean age: referred boys= 10.9 years, non-referred boys = 10.9 years, referred girls=11.3 years, non-referred girls=11.1 years). Referral status was used as validity criterion. Statistical procedures included Odds Ratios, Total Predictive Values, ROC analyses and discriminant analyses. Results indicated that the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL is comparable to the original English version. With the use of CBCL Total Problem Score as predictor (cut-off T > or = 60) 83.8% of children and adolescents could correctly be classified (sensitivity 83.6%, specificity 83.9%). Symptoms of the "Attention Problems Scale" show the highest discriminative power to distinguish between disturbed and undisturbed children and adolescents. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s007870170013 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72401591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2201814109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-976d17a6227750a467d5cdf319ca02ff7d4cd699dc1ff267cdc85db0f14132f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UlLxDAUB_AgiuN29CoB0VudvDRpmqPWFQYEUfBWYhYmY5cxaYX59mZwQPTiJQv8eI__ewgdA7kAQsQ0pqMUBAQhkG-hPWA5z6Dgr9vpTaDMypKKCdqPcZEEl4TuogmAkIwzuYeern3Uwbe-U92AP1XjjR9WuHd4mFtczX1j8JWdq0_fjyH9rX5vfBxwdVXNMjaFEvsO39nQqg5H1S4bGw_RjlNNtEeb-wC93N48V_fZ7PHuobqcZZrldMikKAwIVVAqBCeKFcJwbVwOUitCnROGaVNIaTQ4RwuhjS65eSMOGOTUFfkBOv-uuwz9x2jjULcpi20a1dl-jLWgbB0Y_oVciEKWgid4-gcuUuouhagpTbNMnYlMKvtWOvQxBuvqZRqgCqsaSL3eSf1rJ8mfbKqOb601P3qzhATONkBFrRoXVKd9_HHrrkzy_Atbg5DL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2201814109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discriminant validity of the Child Behaviour Checklist CBCL-4/18 in German samples</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>SCHMECK, K ; POUSTKA, F ; DÖPFNER, M ; PLÜCK, J ; BERNER, W ; LEHMKUHL, G ; FEGERT, J. M ; LENZ, K ; HUSS, M ; LEHMKUHL, U</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHMECK, K ; POUSTKA, F ; DÖPFNER, M ; PLÜCK, J ; BERNER, W ; LEHMKUHL, G ; FEGERT, J. M ; LENZ, K ; HUSS, M ; LEHMKUHL, U</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL in two large samples of referred and non-referred children and adolescents which were matched for age, sex and socio-economic status. The combined sample that was used for statistical analysis consists of 2,058 referred and 2,058 non-referred boys and girls between 4 and 18 years of age (mean age: referred boys= 10.9 years, non-referred boys = 10.9 years, referred girls=11.3 years, non-referred girls=11.1 years). Referral status was used as validity criterion. Statistical procedures included Odds Ratios, Total Predictive Values, ROC analyses and discriminant analyses. Results indicated that the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL is comparable to the original English version. With the use of CBCL Total Problem Score as predictor (cut-off T > or = 60) 83.8% of children and adolescents could correctly be classified (sensitivity 83.6%, specificity 83.9%). Symptoms of the "Attention Problems Scale" show the highest discriminative power to distinguish between disturbed and undisturbed children and adolescents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-8827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-165X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s007870170013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11794549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Age ; Behaviour disorders ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Behavior - psychology ; Child Behavior Checklist ; Child Behaviour Checklist ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; Discriminant Analysis ; Discriminant validity ; English language ; Female ; German language ; German version ; Germany ; Girls ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Odds Ratio ; Personality Inventory ; Power ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics ; Techniques and methods ; Teenagers ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2001-12, Vol.10 (4), p.240-247</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry is a copyright of Springer, (2001). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-976d17a6227750a467d5cdf319ca02ff7d4cd699dc1ff267cdc85db0f14132f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14109495$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11794549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHMECK, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POUSTKA, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DÖPFNER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PLÜCK, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNER, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEGERT, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LENZ, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUSS, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, U</creatorcontrib><title>Discriminant validity of the Child Behaviour Checklist CBCL-4/18 in German samples</title><title>European child & adolescent psychiatry</title><addtitle>Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry</addtitle><description>This study examined the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL in two large samples of referred and non-referred children and adolescents which were matched for age, sex and socio-economic status. The combined sample that was used for statistical analysis consists of 2,058 referred and 2,058 non-referred boys and girls between 4 and 18 years of age (mean age: referred boys= 10.9 years, non-referred boys = 10.9 years, referred girls=11.3 years, non-referred girls=11.1 years). Referral status was used as validity criterion. Statistical procedures included Odds Ratios, Total Predictive Values, ROC analyses and discriminant analyses. Results indicated that the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL is comparable to the original English version. With the use of CBCL Total Problem Score as predictor (cut-off T > or = 60) 83.8% of children and adolescents could correctly be classified (sensitivity 83.6%, specificity 83.9%). Symptoms of the "Attention Problems Scale" show the highest discriminative power to distinguish between disturbed and undisturbed children and adolescents.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Behaviour disorders</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Child Behavior Checklist</subject><subject>Child Behaviour Checklist</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Discriminant Analysis</subject><subject>Discriminant validity</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>German language</subject><subject>German version</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1018-8827</issn><issn>1435-165X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UlLxDAUB_AgiuN29CoB0VudvDRpmqPWFQYEUfBWYhYmY5cxaYX59mZwQPTiJQv8eI__ewgdA7kAQsQ0pqMUBAQhkG-hPWA5z6Dgr9vpTaDMypKKCdqPcZEEl4TuogmAkIwzuYeern3Uwbe-U92AP1XjjR9WuHd4mFtczX1j8JWdq0_fjyH9rX5vfBxwdVXNMjaFEvsO39nQqg5H1S4bGw_RjlNNtEeb-wC93N48V_fZ7PHuobqcZZrldMikKAwIVVAqBCeKFcJwbVwOUitCnROGaVNIaTQ4RwuhjS65eSMOGOTUFfkBOv-uuwz9x2jjULcpi20a1dl-jLWgbB0Y_oVciEKWgid4-gcuUuouhagpTbNMnYlMKvtWOvQxBuvqZRqgCqsaSL3eSf1rJ8mfbKqOb601P3qzhATONkBFrRoXVKd9_HHrrkzy_Atbg5DL</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>SCHMECK, K</creator><creator>POUSTKA, F</creator><creator>DÖPFNER, M</creator><creator>PLÜCK, J</creator><creator>BERNER, W</creator><creator>LEHMKUHL, G</creator><creator>FEGERT, J. M</creator><creator>LENZ, K</creator><creator>HUSS, M</creator><creator>LEHMKUHL, U</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Discriminant validity of the Child Behaviour Checklist CBCL-4/18 in German samples</title><author>SCHMECK, K ; POUSTKA, F ; DÖPFNER, M ; PLÜCK, J ; BERNER, W ; LEHMKUHL, G ; FEGERT, J. M ; LENZ, K ; HUSS, M ; LEHMKUHL, U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-976d17a6227750a467d5cdf319ca02ff7d4cd699dc1ff267cdc85db0f14132f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Behaviour disorders</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Child Behavior Checklist</topic><topic>Child Behaviour Checklist</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Discriminant Analysis</topic><topic>Discriminant validity</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>German language</topic><topic>German version</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHMECK, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POUSTKA, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DÖPFNER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PLÜCK, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNER, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEGERT, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LENZ, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUSS, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, U</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European child & adolescent psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHMECK, K</au><au>POUSTKA, F</au><au>DÖPFNER, M</au><au>PLÜCK, J</au><au>BERNER, W</au><au>LEHMKUHL, G</au><au>FEGERT, J. M</au><au>LENZ, K</au><au>HUSS, M</au><au>LEHMKUHL, U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discriminant validity of the Child Behaviour Checklist CBCL-4/18 in German samples</atitle><jtitle>European child & adolescent psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>240-247</pages><issn>1018-8827</issn><eissn>1435-165X</eissn><abstract>This study examined the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL in two large samples of referred and non-referred children and adolescents which were matched for age, sex and socio-economic status. The combined sample that was used for statistical analysis consists of 2,058 referred and 2,058 non-referred boys and girls between 4 and 18 years of age (mean age: referred boys= 10.9 years, non-referred boys = 10.9 years, referred girls=11.3 years, non-referred girls=11.1 years). Referral status was used as validity criterion. Statistical procedures included Odds Ratios, Total Predictive Values, ROC analyses and discriminant analyses. Results indicated that the discriminant validity of the German version of CBCL is comparable to the original English version. With the use of CBCL Total Problem Score as predictor (cut-off T > or = 60) 83.8% of children and adolescents could correctly be classified (sensitivity 83.6%, specificity 83.9%). Symptoms of the "Attention Problems Scale" show the highest discriminative power to distinguish between disturbed and undisturbed children and adolescents.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11794549</pmid><doi>10.1007/s007870170013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1018-8827 |
| ispartof | European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2001-12, Vol.10 (4), p.240-247 |
| issn | 1018-8827 1435-165X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72401591 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SpringerLink |
| subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Age Behaviour disorders Biological and medical sciences Child Child Behavior - psychology Child Behavior Checklist Child Behaviour Checklist Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Discriminant Analysis Discriminant validity English language Female German language German version Germany Girls Humans Male Medical sciences Odds Ratio Personality Inventory Power Psychological tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomic status Statistical analysis Statistics Techniques and methods Teenagers Validation studies Validity |
| title | Discriminant validity of the Child Behaviour Checklist CBCL-4/18 in German samples |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminant%20validity%20of%20the%20Child%20Behaviour%20Checklist%20CBCL-4/18%20in%20German%20samples&rft.jtitle=European%20child%20&%20adolescent%20psychiatry&rft.au=SCHMECK,%20K&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=240-247&rft.issn=1018-8827&rft.eissn=1435-165X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s007870170013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2201814109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2201814109&rft_id=info:pmid/11794549&rfr_iscdi=true |