Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage
Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of vascular surgery 2001-11, Vol.15 (6), p.634-643 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 643 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 634 |
container_title | Annals of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Halloran, Brian G. Lilly, Michael P. Cohn, E. Jerry Benjamin, Marshall E. Flinn, William R. |
description | Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%,
p < 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72374559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089050960660006X</els_id><sourcerecordid>72374559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdSvPCumrT5aPVqDr9goOB2HdL0ZGT0y6Ydbr_ejA4EL7zIGzg85-XwIHRJ8C3BWNw5n4SHPvxLcbg7QmPCCQtZSsUxGuPEDxlO-QidObf2XJTQ5BSNCBE8JZSO0evCZlYVweO2Uc4FS2erVTCry6aA72Dad3VRr-re-VGV97a7Dz5UB5XeBqrKg7kts-BTFRu1gnN0YlTh4OLwT9Dy-Wkxew3n7y9vs-k81LHgXUg1oWAU5Ewog0FQYiKcslTwjOWZURxiYCJOtMJGRMpwSlIdcQ6G50ZlJp6gm6G3aeuvHlwnS-s0FIWqwB8qRRQLyljqwes_4Lru28rfJiNCWeIFCg-RAdJt7VwLRjatLVW7lQTLvWM5OJY-5N6x3Pmdq0Nxn5WQ_24cpHrgYQDAe9hYaKXT1kuD3LagO5nX9p_6H7aJipo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214580077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Halloran, Brian G. ; Lilly, Michael P. ; Cohn, E. Jerry ; Benjamin, Marshall E. ; Flinn, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brian G. ; Lilly, Michael P. ; Cohn, E. Jerry ; Benjamin, Marshall E. ; Flinn, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%,
p < 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11769144</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AVSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ischemia - complications ; Ischemia - mortality ; Ischemia - surgery ; Leg - blood supply ; Leg - surgery ; Limb Salvage ; Male ; Maryland ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Saphenous Vein - surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Tibial Arteries - surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency - physiology ; Vascular Surgical Procedures</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2001-11, Vol.15 (6), p.634-643</ispartof><rights>2001 Annals of Vascular Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11769144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, E. Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, Marshall E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flinn, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%,
p < 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia - complications</subject><subject>Ischemia - mortality</subject><subject>Ischemia - surgery</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>Leg - surgery</subject><subject>Limb Salvage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tibial Arteries - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Patency - physiology</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdSvPCumrT5aPVqDr9goOB2HdL0ZGT0y6Ydbr_ejA4EL7zIGzg85-XwIHRJ8C3BWNw5n4SHPvxLcbg7QmPCCQtZSsUxGuPEDxlO-QidObf2XJTQ5BSNCBE8JZSO0evCZlYVweO2Uc4FS2erVTCry6aA72Dad3VRr-re-VGV97a7Dz5UB5XeBqrKg7kts-BTFRu1gnN0YlTh4OLwT9Dy-Wkxew3n7y9vs-k81LHgXUg1oWAU5Ewog0FQYiKcslTwjOWZURxiYCJOtMJGRMpwSlIdcQ6G50ZlJp6gm6G3aeuvHlwnS-s0FIWqwB8qRRQLyljqwes_4Lru28rfJiNCWeIFCg-RAdJt7VwLRjatLVW7lQTLvWM5OJY-5N6x3Pmdq0Nxn5WQ_24cpHrgYQDAe9hYaKXT1kuD3LagO5nX9p_6H7aJipo</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Halloran, Brian G.</creator><creator>Lilly, Michael P.</creator><creator>Cohn, E. Jerry</creator><creator>Benjamin, Marshall E.</creator><creator>Flinn, William R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</title><author>Halloran, Brian G. ; Lilly, Michael P. ; Cohn, E. Jerry ; Benjamin, Marshall E. ; Flinn, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia - complications</topic><topic>Ischemia - mortality</topic><topic>Ischemia - surgery</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>Leg - surgery</topic><topic>Limb Salvage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tibial Arteries - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Patency - physiology</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, E. Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, Marshall E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flinn, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halloran, Brian G.</au><au>Lilly, Michael P.</au><au>Cohn, E. Jerry</au><au>Benjamin, Marshall E.</au><au>Flinn, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>634</spage><epage>643</epage><pages>634-643</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><coden>AVSUEV</coden><abstract>Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%,
p < 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11769144</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-5096 |
ispartof | Annals of vascular surgery, 2001-11, Vol.15 (6), p.634-643 |
issn | 0890-5096 1615-5947 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72374559 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Anastomosis, Surgical Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Ischemia - complications Ischemia - mortality Ischemia - surgery Leg - blood supply Leg - surgery Limb Salvage Male Maryland Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - mortality Reoperation Retrospective Studies Saphenous Vein - surgery Survival Analysis Tibial Arteries - surgery Time Factors Treatment Outcome Vascular Patency - physiology Vascular Surgical Procedures |
title | Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A57%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tibial%20Bypass%20Using%20Complex%20Autologous%20Conduit:%20Patency%20and%20Limb%20Salvage&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Halloran,%20Brian%20G.&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=634&rft.epage=643&rft.pages=634-643&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft.coden=AVSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72374559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214580077&rft_id=info:pmid/11769144&rft_els_id=S089050960660006X&rfr_iscdi=true |