Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage

Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2001-11, Vol.15 (6), p.634-643
Hauptverfasser: Halloran, Brian G., Lilly, Michael P., Cohn, E. Jerry, Benjamin, Marshall E., Flinn, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 643
container_issue 6
container_start_page 634
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 15
creator Halloran, Brian G.
Lilly, Michael P.
Cohn, E. Jerry
Benjamin, Marshall E.
Flinn, William R.
description Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%, p < 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72374559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089050960660006X</els_id><sourcerecordid>72374559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdSvPCumrT5aPVqDr9goOB2HdL0ZGT0y6Ydbr_ejA4EL7zIGzg85-XwIHRJ8C3BWNw5n4SHPvxLcbg7QmPCCQtZSsUxGuPEDxlO-QidObf2XJTQ5BSNCBE8JZSO0evCZlYVweO2Uc4FS2erVTCry6aA72Dad3VRr-re-VGV97a7Dz5UB5XeBqrKg7kts-BTFRu1gnN0YlTh4OLwT9Dy-Wkxew3n7y9vs-k81LHgXUg1oWAU5Ewog0FQYiKcslTwjOWZURxiYCJOtMJGRMpwSlIdcQ6G50ZlJp6gm6G3aeuvHlwnS-s0FIWqwB8qRRQLyljqwes_4Lru28rfJiNCWeIFCg-RAdJt7VwLRjatLVW7lQTLvWM5OJY-5N6x3Pmdq0Nxn5WQ_24cpHrgYQDAe9hYaKXT1kuD3LagO5nX9p_6H7aJipo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214580077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Halloran, Brian G. ; Lilly, Michael P. ; Cohn, E. Jerry ; Benjamin, Marshall E. ; Flinn, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brian G. ; Lilly, Michael P. ; Cohn, E. Jerry ; Benjamin, Marshall E. ; Flinn, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%, p &lt; 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11769144</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AVSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ischemia - complications ; Ischemia - mortality ; Ischemia - surgery ; Leg - blood supply ; Leg - surgery ; Limb Salvage ; Male ; Maryland ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Saphenous Vein - surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Tibial Arteries - surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency - physiology ; Vascular Surgical Procedures</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2001-11, Vol.15 (6), p.634-643</ispartof><rights>2001 Annals of Vascular Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11769144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, E. Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, Marshall E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flinn, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%, p &lt; 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia - complications</subject><subject>Ischemia - mortality</subject><subject>Ischemia - surgery</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>Leg - surgery</subject><subject>Limb Salvage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tibial Arteries - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Patency - physiology</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdSvPCumrT5aPVqDr9goOB2HdL0ZGT0y6Ydbr_ejA4EL7zIGzg85-XwIHRJ8C3BWNw5n4SHPvxLcbg7QmPCCQtZSsUxGuPEDxlO-QidObf2XJTQ5BSNCBE8JZSO0evCZlYVweO2Uc4FS2erVTCry6aA72Dad3VRr-re-VGV97a7Dz5UB5XeBqrKg7kts-BTFRu1gnN0YlTh4OLwT9Dy-Wkxew3n7y9vs-k81LHgXUg1oWAU5Ewog0FQYiKcslTwjOWZURxiYCJOtMJGRMpwSlIdcQ6G50ZlJp6gm6G3aeuvHlwnS-s0FIWqwB8qRRQLyljqwes_4Lru28rfJiNCWeIFCg-RAdJt7VwLRjatLVW7lQTLvWM5OJY-5N6x3Pmdq0Nxn5WQ_24cpHrgYQDAe9hYaKXT1kuD3LagO5nX9p_6H7aJipo</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Halloran, Brian G.</creator><creator>Lilly, Michael P.</creator><creator>Cohn, E. Jerry</creator><creator>Benjamin, Marshall E.</creator><creator>Flinn, William R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</title><author>Halloran, Brian G. ; Lilly, Michael P. ; Cohn, E. Jerry ; Benjamin, Marshall E. ; Flinn, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-4c14efaed57af0e741f2095976b5dbfa6e3e5738ca0f72af6419c266ef6dfabf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia - complications</topic><topic>Ischemia - mortality</topic><topic>Ischemia - surgery</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>Leg - surgery</topic><topic>Limb Salvage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tibial Arteries - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Patency - physiology</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halloran, Brian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, E. Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, Marshall E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flinn, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halloran, Brian G.</au><au>Lilly, Michael P.</au><au>Cohn, E. Jerry</au><au>Benjamin, Marshall E.</au><au>Flinn, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>634</spage><epage>643</epage><pages>634-643</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><coden>AVSUEV</coden><abstract>Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%, p &lt; 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11769144</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2001-11, Vol.15 (6), p.634-643
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72374559
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Ischemia - complications
Ischemia - mortality
Ischemia - surgery
Leg - blood supply
Leg - surgery
Limb Salvage
Male
Maryland
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Saphenous Vein - surgery
Survival Analysis
Tibial Arteries - surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency - physiology
Vascular Surgical Procedures
title Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A57%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tibial%20Bypass%20Using%20Complex%20Autologous%20Conduit:%20Patency%20and%20Limb%20Salvage&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Halloran,%20Brian%20G.&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=634&rft.epage=643&rft.pages=634-643&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft.coden=AVSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72374559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214580077&rft_id=info:pmid/11769144&rft_els_id=S089050960660006X&rfr_iscdi=true