Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: a transcultural study
Objective: There were two aims: First, to compare children’s rates of being battered in home, by peers, and by teachers among students between China and Korea, and second, to identify particular risk factors for such violence. Methods: Children in grades four through six in Shanghai (238 cases) and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Child abuse & neglect 2000-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1163-1173 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1173 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1163 |
| container_title | Child abuse & neglect |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Kim, Dae-Ho Kim, Kwang-Iel Park, Yong-Chon Zhang, Liang Dong Lu, Ming Kang Li, Donggen |
| description | Objective: There were two aims: First, to compare children’s rates of being battered in home, by peers, and by teachers among students between China and Korea, and second, to identify particular risk factors for such violence.
Methods: Children in grades four through six in Shanghai (238 cases) and Yanji (245 cases) in China and Seoul (248 cases) and Kimpo (241 cases) in Korea were surveyed by questionnaire method. They were asked to complete the Straus’ Conflict Tactics Scale and their frequencies in the three situations respectively, and other demographic items.
Results: Family violence during the last 1 year was experienced in 70.6% (minor 42.2%; serious 22.6%) of the children in China and 68.9% (minor 9.4%; serious 51.3%) of those in Korea. Experience rates of violence by peers were 42.7% (minor 25.7%; serious 13.7%) in China and 26.0% (minor 11.5%; serious 14.3%) in Korea. Finally, rates of corporal punishment by teachers were 51.1% (minor 28.0%; serious 4.1%) in China and 62.0% (minor 8.8%; serious 43.8%) in Korea. The most important and common risk factor for violence in one situation was the presence of violence in another situation.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that the differences in children’s overall experience rates were not particularly striking. However, Korean children experienced more severe forms of violence from family members and from teachers. Findings of risk factors clearly imply that there are children vulnerable to violence from multiple sources.
Objectif: L’étude avait deux objectifs: de comparer chez des étudiants chinois et koréens, les taux de violence physique perpétrée au foyer, par leurs pairs et par les enseignants; et d’identifier les facteurs de risques particuliers.
Méthode: On a administré une questionnaire à des enfants qui étaient dans la 4ème année de leurs études primaires: en Chine, 238 cas à Shanghai et 245 cas à Yanji; en Korée, 248 cas à Séoule et 241 cas à Kimpo. On s’est servi du Straus Conflict Tactics Scale pour connaı̂tre la fréquence des mauvais traitements dans les trois circonstances. D’autres renseignements démorgraphiques ont été recueillis.
Résultats: Durant l’année précédent l’étude, 70,6% des enfants chinois ont été victimes de violence familiale (violence grave, 22,6%; moins grave, 42,2%) alors que le taux pour les enfants koréens était de 68,9% (violence grave, 51,3%; violence moins grave, 9,4%). Lorsqu’il s’agit d’agressions par leurs pairs, on note que 42,7% des enfants chinois (violence g |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00175-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72372733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0145213400001757</els_id><sourcerecordid>57553385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-66feeb6ac167bc2f57ce082941a84bbe2bdb8f9f3c128459198303eac68d6a613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1qFTEUwPEgFntbfQRl0CJ1MXpOMvkYNyIXv7DiQl2HTOYMpsyduSYzxe76Gn09n8TcDywIUrNJFr-EJH_GHiI8R0D14gtgJUuOojoFeAaAWpb6Dlug0aLUWuq7bPGHHLKjlM4hD6nlPXaImBcaxIJ9Wn4PfRtp-HV1nQr6uaYYaPBUjF1xEcZ-uw5DkdngCje0xccxkntZuGKKbkh-7qc5ur5I09xe3mcHnesTPdjPx-zb2zdfl-_Ls8_vPixfn5Vegp5KpTqiRjmPSjeed1J7AsPrCp2pmoZ40zamqzvhkZtK1lgbAYKcV6ZVTqE4Zk93567j-GOmNNlVSJ763g00zslqLjTXQtwKFQgjqv-A-d-kEEZm-PgveD7OccivtVzkMICoMnryL4SmyhVqo01Wcqd8HFOK1Nl1DCsXLy2C3US228h2U9AC2G1kq_O-R_vT52ZF7c2ufdUMTvbAJe_6LofyId04CZzrzS--2jHKqS4CRZv8Nn4bIvnJtmO45Sa_AWNZwTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840059878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: a transcultural study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kim, Dae-Ho ; Kim, Kwang-Iel ; Park, Yong-Chon ; Zhang, Liang Dong ; Lu, Ming Kang ; Li, Donggen</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae-Ho ; Kim, Kwang-Iel ; Park, Yong-Chon ; Zhang, Liang Dong ; Lu, Ming Kang ; Li, Donggen</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: There were two aims: First, to compare children’s rates of being battered in home, by peers, and by teachers among students between China and Korea, and second, to identify particular risk factors for such violence.
Methods: Children in grades four through six in Shanghai (238 cases) and Yanji (245 cases) in China and Seoul (248 cases) and Kimpo (241 cases) in Korea were surveyed by questionnaire method. They were asked to complete the Straus’ Conflict Tactics Scale and their frequencies in the three situations respectively, and other demographic items.
Results: Family violence during the last 1 year was experienced in 70.6% (minor 42.2%; serious 22.6%) of the children in China and 68.9% (minor 9.4%; serious 51.3%) of those in Korea. Experience rates of violence by peers were 42.7% (minor 25.7%; serious 13.7%) in China and 26.0% (minor 11.5%; serious 14.3%) in Korea. Finally, rates of corporal punishment by teachers were 51.1% (minor 28.0%; serious 4.1%) in China and 62.0% (minor 8.8%; serious 43.8%) in Korea. The most important and common risk factor for violence in one situation was the presence of violence in another situation.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that the differences in children’s overall experience rates were not particularly striking. However, Korean children experienced more severe forms of violence from family members and from teachers. Findings of risk factors clearly imply that there are children vulnerable to violence from multiple sources.
Objectif: L’étude avait deux objectifs: de comparer chez des étudiants chinois et koréens, les taux de violence physique perpétrée au foyer, par leurs pairs et par les enseignants; et d’identifier les facteurs de risques particuliers.
Méthode: On a administré une questionnaire à des enfants qui étaient dans la 4ème année de leurs études primaires: en Chine, 238 cas à Shanghai et 245 cas à Yanji; en Korée, 248 cas à Séoule et 241 cas à Kimpo. On s’est servi du Straus Conflict Tactics Scale pour connaı̂tre la fréquence des mauvais traitements dans les trois circonstances. D’autres renseignements démorgraphiques ont été recueillis.
Résultats: Durant l’année précédent l’étude, 70,6% des enfants chinois ont été victimes de violence familiale (violence grave, 22,6%; moins grave, 42,2%) alors que le taux pour les enfants koréens était de 68,9% (violence grave, 51,3%; violence moins grave, 9,4%). Lorsqu’il s’agit d’agressions par leurs pairs, on note que 42,7% des enfants chinois (violence grave, 13,7%, moins grave, 25,7%) et 26% des enfants foréens (Violence grave, 14,3%, moins grave, 11,5%) sont agressés. Enfin, pour ce qui est de la violence par les enseignants, 51,1% des enfants chinois (violence grave, 4,1%, violence moins grave, 28%) et 62% des enfants koréens (violence grave, 43,8%, moins grave, 8,8%) en sont victimes. La présence d’une autre agression constitue le facteur de risque le plus élevé pour une agression.
Conclusions: On remarque que les différences ne sont pas trè marquées. Cependant, les enfants koréens ont vécu une violence familiale et une violence par leurs enseignants qui était plus grave que ce que les enfants chinois ont connu. Les facteurs de risque portent à conclure que les enfants sont vulnérables à la violence vernant de plusieurs sources.
Objetivo: Los objetivos fueron dos: Primero, comparar las tasas de abuso en el hogar, por compañeros y por maestros entre estudiantes de China y Corea, y segundo, identificar los factores de riesgo especı́ficos de esta violencia.
Métodos: Los niños en los grados cuatro hasta el seis en Shanghai (238 casos) y Yanji (245 casos) en China y Seus (248 casos) y Kimpo (241 casos) en Corea, fueron encuestados por el método del cuestionario. Se les pidió responder a la Escala de Tácticas de Conflicto de Straus y sus frecuencias en las tres situaciones respectivamente, y otros datos demográficos.
Resultados: Sufrieron violencia familiar durante el último año en 70.6% (leve 42.2%; grave 22.6%) de los niños en China y 68.9% (leve 9.4%, grave 51.3%) de los de Corea. La experiencia de violencia por los compañeros fue 42.7% (leve 25.7%; grave 13.7% en China y 26.0% (leve 11.5%; grave 14.3%) en Corea. Finalmente, las tasas de castigo corporal infligido por maestros fue de 51.1% (leve 28.0%; grave 4.1%) en China y 62.0% (leve 8.8%; grave 43.8%) en Corea. El factor de riesgo más importante y común de violencia en una sola situación fue la presencia de violencia en otra situación.
Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que las diferencias en las tasas de experiencias en general no fueron particularmente significativas. Sin embargo, los niños coreanos vivieron formas de violencia más severas de los miembros de la familia y de los maestros. Los resultados de los factores de riesgo señalan claramente que hay niños vulnerables a la violencia de múltiples fuentes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00175-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11057703</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CABND3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; China ; China - epidemiology ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Crosscultural Differences ; Exposure ; Family Violence ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Home Environment ; Humans ; Korea ; Korea - epidemiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Occurrence ; Peoples Republic of China ; Prevalence ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Risk factor ; Risk Factors ; School Environment ; South Korea ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tropical medicine ; Victim ; Victimology ; Violence ; Violence - psychology</subject><ispartof>Child abuse & neglect, 2000-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1163-1173</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Sep 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-66feeb6ac167bc2f57ce082941a84bbe2bdb8f9f3c128459198303eac68d6a613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-66feeb6ac167bc2f57ce082941a84bbe2bdb8f9f3c128459198303eac68d6a613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00175-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27850,27905,27906,30980,30981,33755,33756,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1502271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11057703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwang-Iel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yong-Chon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liang Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ming Kang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Donggen</creatorcontrib><title>Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: a transcultural study</title><title>Child abuse & neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Objective: There were two aims: First, to compare children’s rates of being battered in home, by peers, and by teachers among students between China and Korea, and second, to identify particular risk factors for such violence.
Methods: Children in grades four through six in Shanghai (238 cases) and Yanji (245 cases) in China and Seoul (248 cases) and Kimpo (241 cases) in Korea were surveyed by questionnaire method. They were asked to complete the Straus’ Conflict Tactics Scale and their frequencies in the three situations respectively, and other demographic items.
Results: Family violence during the last 1 year was experienced in 70.6% (minor 42.2%; serious 22.6%) of the children in China and 68.9% (minor 9.4%; serious 51.3%) of those in Korea. Experience rates of violence by peers were 42.7% (minor 25.7%; serious 13.7%) in China and 26.0% (minor 11.5%; serious 14.3%) in Korea. Finally, rates of corporal punishment by teachers were 51.1% (minor 28.0%; serious 4.1%) in China and 62.0% (minor 8.8%; serious 43.8%) in Korea. The most important and common risk factor for violence in one situation was the presence of violence in another situation.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that the differences in children’s overall experience rates were not particularly striking. However, Korean children experienced more severe forms of violence from family members and from teachers. Findings of risk factors clearly imply that there are children vulnerable to violence from multiple sources.
Objectif: L’étude avait deux objectifs: de comparer chez des étudiants chinois et koréens, les taux de violence physique perpétrée au foyer, par leurs pairs et par les enseignants; et d’identifier les facteurs de risques particuliers.
Méthode: On a administré une questionnaire à des enfants qui étaient dans la 4ème année de leurs études primaires: en Chine, 238 cas à Shanghai et 245 cas à Yanji; en Korée, 248 cas à Séoule et 241 cas à Kimpo. On s’est servi du Straus Conflict Tactics Scale pour connaı̂tre la fréquence des mauvais traitements dans les trois circonstances. D’autres renseignements démorgraphiques ont été recueillis.
Résultats: Durant l’année précédent l’étude, 70,6% des enfants chinois ont été victimes de violence familiale (violence grave, 22,6%; moins grave, 42,2%) alors que le taux pour les enfants koréens était de 68,9% (violence grave, 51,3%; violence moins grave, 9,4%). Lorsqu’il s’agit d’agressions par leurs pairs, on note que 42,7% des enfants chinois (violence grave, 13,7%, moins grave, 25,7%) et 26% des enfants foréens (Violence grave, 14,3%, moins grave, 11,5%) sont agressés. Enfin, pour ce qui est de la violence par les enseignants, 51,1% des enfants chinois (violence grave, 4,1%, violence moins grave, 28%) et 62% des enfants koréens (violence grave, 43,8%, moins grave, 8,8%) en sont victimes. La présence d’une autre agression constitue le facteur de risque le plus élevé pour une agression.
Conclusions: On remarque que les différences ne sont pas trè marquées. Cependant, les enfants koréens ont vécu une violence familiale et une violence par leurs enseignants qui était plus grave que ce que les enfants chinois ont connu. Les facteurs de risque portent à conclure que les enfants sont vulnérables à la violence vernant de plusieurs sources.
Objetivo: Los objetivos fueron dos: Primero, comparar las tasas de abuso en el hogar, por compañeros y por maestros entre estudiantes de China y Corea, y segundo, identificar los factores de riesgo especı́ficos de esta violencia.
Métodos: Los niños en los grados cuatro hasta el seis en Shanghai (238 casos) y Yanji (245 casos) en China y Seus (248 casos) y Kimpo (241 casos) en Corea, fueron encuestados por el método del cuestionario. Se les pidió responder a la Escala de Tácticas de Conflicto de Straus y sus frecuencias en las tres situaciones respectivamente, y otros datos demográficos.
Resultados: Sufrieron violencia familiar durante el último año en 70.6% (leve 42.2%; grave 22.6%) de los niños en China y 68.9% (leve 9.4%, grave 51.3%) de los de Corea. La experiencia de violencia por los compañeros fue 42.7% (leve 25.7%; grave 13.7% en China y 26.0% (leve 11.5%; grave 14.3%) en Corea. Finalmente, las tasas de castigo corporal infligido por maestros fue de 51.1% (leve 28.0%; grave 4.1%) en China y 62.0% (leve 8.8%; grave 43.8%) en Corea. El factor de riesgo más importante y común de violencia en una sola situación fue la presencia de violencia en otra situación.
Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que las diferencias en las tasas de experiencias en general no fueron particularmente significativas. Sin embargo, los niños coreanos vivieron formas de violencia más severas de los miembros de la familia y de los maestros. Los resultados de los factores de riesgo señalan claramente que hay niños vulnerables a la violencia de múltiples fuentes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Home Environment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Korea - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occurrence</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Risk factor</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>School Environment</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Victim</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence - psychology</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1qFTEUwPEgFntbfQRl0CJ1MXpOMvkYNyIXv7DiQl2HTOYMpsyduSYzxe76Gn09n8TcDywIUrNJFr-EJH_GHiI8R0D14gtgJUuOojoFeAaAWpb6Dlug0aLUWuq7bPGHHLKjlM4hD6nlPXaImBcaxIJ9Wn4PfRtp-HV1nQr6uaYYaPBUjF1xEcZ-uw5DkdngCje0xccxkntZuGKKbkh-7qc5ur5I09xe3mcHnesTPdjPx-zb2zdfl-_Ls8_vPixfn5Vegp5KpTqiRjmPSjeed1J7AsPrCp2pmoZ40zamqzvhkZtK1lgbAYKcV6ZVTqE4Zk93567j-GOmNNlVSJ763g00zslqLjTXQtwKFQgjqv-A-d-kEEZm-PgveD7OccivtVzkMICoMnryL4SmyhVqo01Wcqd8HFOK1Nl1DCsXLy2C3US228h2U9AC2G1kq_O-R_vT52ZF7c2ufdUMTvbAJe_6LofyId04CZzrzS--2jHKqS4CRZv8Nn4bIvnJtmO45Sa_AWNZwTU</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Kim, Dae-Ho</creator><creator>Kim, Kwang-Iel</creator><creator>Park, Yong-Chon</creator><creator>Zhang, Liang Dong</creator><creator>Lu, Ming Kang</creator><creator>Li, Donggen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HGTKA</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: a transcultural study</title><author>Kim, Dae-Ho ; Kim, Kwang-Iel ; Park, Yong-Chon ; Zhang, Liang Dong ; Lu, Ming Kang ; Li, Donggen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-66feeb6ac167bc2f57ce082941a84bbe2bdb8f9f3c128459198303eac68d6a613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Home Environment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Korea - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occurrence</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Risk factor</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>School Environment</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Victim</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwang-Iel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yong-Chon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liang Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ming Kang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Donggen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 18</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dae-Ho</au><au>Kim, Kwang-Iel</au><au>Park, Yong-Chon</au><au>Zhang, Liang Dong</au><au>Lu, Ming Kang</au><au>Li, Donggen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: a transcultural study</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1163</spage><epage>1173</epage><pages>1163-1173</pages><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><coden>CABND3</coden><abstract>Objective: There were two aims: First, to compare children’s rates of being battered in home, by peers, and by teachers among students between China and Korea, and second, to identify particular risk factors for such violence.
Methods: Children in grades four through six in Shanghai (238 cases) and Yanji (245 cases) in China and Seoul (248 cases) and Kimpo (241 cases) in Korea were surveyed by questionnaire method. They were asked to complete the Straus’ Conflict Tactics Scale and their frequencies in the three situations respectively, and other demographic items.
Results: Family violence during the last 1 year was experienced in 70.6% (minor 42.2%; serious 22.6%) of the children in China and 68.9% (minor 9.4%; serious 51.3%) of those in Korea. Experience rates of violence by peers were 42.7% (minor 25.7%; serious 13.7%) in China and 26.0% (minor 11.5%; serious 14.3%) in Korea. Finally, rates of corporal punishment by teachers were 51.1% (minor 28.0%; serious 4.1%) in China and 62.0% (minor 8.8%; serious 43.8%) in Korea. The most important and common risk factor for violence in one situation was the presence of violence in another situation.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that the differences in children’s overall experience rates were not particularly striking. However, Korean children experienced more severe forms of violence from family members and from teachers. Findings of risk factors clearly imply that there are children vulnerable to violence from multiple sources.
Objectif: L’étude avait deux objectifs: de comparer chez des étudiants chinois et koréens, les taux de violence physique perpétrée au foyer, par leurs pairs et par les enseignants; et d’identifier les facteurs de risques particuliers.
Méthode: On a administré une questionnaire à des enfants qui étaient dans la 4ème année de leurs études primaires: en Chine, 238 cas à Shanghai et 245 cas à Yanji; en Korée, 248 cas à Séoule et 241 cas à Kimpo. On s’est servi du Straus Conflict Tactics Scale pour connaı̂tre la fréquence des mauvais traitements dans les trois circonstances. D’autres renseignements démorgraphiques ont été recueillis.
Résultats: Durant l’année précédent l’étude, 70,6% des enfants chinois ont été victimes de violence familiale (violence grave, 22,6%; moins grave, 42,2%) alors que le taux pour les enfants koréens était de 68,9% (violence grave, 51,3%; violence moins grave, 9,4%). Lorsqu’il s’agit d’agressions par leurs pairs, on note que 42,7% des enfants chinois (violence grave, 13,7%, moins grave, 25,7%) et 26% des enfants foréens (Violence grave, 14,3%, moins grave, 11,5%) sont agressés. Enfin, pour ce qui est de la violence par les enseignants, 51,1% des enfants chinois (violence grave, 4,1%, violence moins grave, 28%) et 62% des enfants koréens (violence grave, 43,8%, moins grave, 8,8%) en sont victimes. La présence d’une autre agression constitue le facteur de risque le plus élevé pour une agression.
Conclusions: On remarque que les différences ne sont pas trè marquées. Cependant, les enfants koréens ont vécu une violence familiale et une violence par leurs enseignants qui était plus grave que ce que les enfants chinois ont connu. Les facteurs de risque portent à conclure que les enfants sont vulnérables à la violence vernant de plusieurs sources.
Objetivo: Los objetivos fueron dos: Primero, comparar las tasas de abuso en el hogar, por compañeros y por maestros entre estudiantes de China y Corea, y segundo, identificar los factores de riesgo especı́ficos de esta violencia.
Métodos: Los niños en los grados cuatro hasta el seis en Shanghai (238 casos) y Yanji (245 casos) en China y Seus (248 casos) y Kimpo (241 casos) en Corea, fueron encuestados por el método del cuestionario. Se les pidió responder a la Escala de Tácticas de Conflicto de Straus y sus frecuencias en las tres situaciones respectivamente, y otros datos demográficos.
Resultados: Sufrieron violencia familiar durante el último año en 70.6% (leve 42.2%; grave 22.6%) de los niños en China y 68.9% (leve 9.4%, grave 51.3%) de los de Corea. La experiencia de violencia por los compañeros fue 42.7% (leve 25.7%; grave 13.7% en China y 26.0% (leve 11.5%; grave 14.3%) en Corea. Finalmente, las tasas de castigo corporal infligido por maestros fue de 51.1% (leve 28.0%; grave 4.1%) en China y 62.0% (leve 8.8%; grave 43.8%) en Corea. El factor de riesgo más importante y común de violencia en una sola situación fue la presencia de violencia en otra situación.
Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que las diferencias en las tasas de experiencias en general no fueron particularmente significativas. Sin embargo, los niños coreanos vivieron formas de violencia más severas de los miembros de la familia y de los maestros. Los resultados de los factores de riesgo señalan claramente que hay niños vulnerables a la violencia de múltiples fuentes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11057703</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00175-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0145-2134 |
| ispartof | Child abuse & neglect, 2000-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1163-1173 |
| issn | 0145-2134 1873-7757 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72372733 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Child Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data Child, Preschool Children Children & youth China China - epidemiology Cross-Cultural Comparison Crosscultural Differences Exposure Family Violence Female Health risk assessment Home Environment Humans Korea Korea - epidemiology Male Medical sciences Occurrence Peoples Republic of China Prevalence Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Risk factor Risk Factors School Environment South Korea Surveys and Questionnaires Tropical medicine Victim Victimology Violence Violence - psychology |
| title | Children’s experience of violence in China and Korea: a transcultural study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A22%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Children%E2%80%99s%20experience%20of%20violence%20in%20China%20and%20Korea:%20a%20transcultural%20study&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Kim,%20Dae-Ho&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1163&rft.epage=1173&rft.pages=1163-1173&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft.coden=CABND3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00175-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57553385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840059878&rft_id=info:pmid/11057703&rft_els_id=S0145213400001757&rfr_iscdi=true |