Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer

Port-site metastasis (PSM) after laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer is a new phenomenon. This situation creates potential therapeutic difficulties, especially in node-negative and early stages of disease. We report a case of port-site metastases following laparoscopic removal of para-ao...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecological cancer 2001-09, Vol.11 (5), p.409-412
Hauptverfasser: Tjalma, W. A. A., Winter-Roach, B. A., Rowlands, P., De Barros Lopes, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 412
container_issue 5
container_start_page 409
container_title International journal of gynecological cancer
container_volume 11
creator Tjalma, W. A. A.
Winter-Roach, B. A.
Rowlands, P.
De Barros Lopes, A.
description Port-site metastasis (PSM) after laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer is a new phenomenon. This situation creates potential therapeutic difficulties, especially in node-negative and early stages of disease. We report a case of port-site metastases following laparoscopic removal of para-aortic lymph nodes in a 74-year-old women with stage IIIb squamous cancer of the cervix, together with an update of all the previous published cases in the literature. None of the removed lymph nodes showed evidence of metastatic carcinoma. The patient received radiation therapy and a complete response was accomplished. Fifteen months after the operation, the patient presented with a suspicious lesion around the umbilical port-site. The lesion was excised and histology confirmed metastatic disease. The patient was further treated with cisplatin. However, she died of her disease after 24 months. The development of a port-site recurrence after laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer could jeopardize use of this approach. Therefore, all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for malignancies should have careful follow-up with special attention to the port sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200109000-00012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72340624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1048891X24145240</els_id><sourcerecordid>2552795155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2494-942e902b632bf618b5267da7b172552c4bb58fc082b26b67253dd8e5b3b738d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMobn78BSmI3lXz2aQXXshwUxjohYJ3oUnTkdI2M1kn-_embip4pblJzuF9z3vyAHCB4BVCJLu29UKnMJ6ccZ5iCBHMYzW0EN4DY8QwSxElYj--IRWpyNHrCByFUA8mDPNDMEKIE045HYPpk_OrNNiVSbzRvfem0yapXNO4d9stkqZYFt4F7ZZWJ6H3C-M3ie0Sbfza6qJJdBEN_gQcVEUTzOnuPgYv07vnyX06f5w9TG7nqcI0p2lOsckhVhnBqsqQUAxnvCy4QhwzhjVViolKQ4EVzlQWm6QshWGKKE5EScgxuNzOXXr31puwkq0N2jRN0RnXB8kxoTDDNArPfwlr1_su7iaHJJ4zxFhU3WxVOv4xeFPJpbdt4TcSQTnglgNu-YVbfuOWn7ij_2yX0qvWlD_uHd8omG0FJkJZW-Nl0HZAXNqIeyVLZ_8cJbaTVFv_c8sP646hrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552795155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tjalma, W. A. A. ; Winter-Roach, B. A. ; Rowlands, P. ; De Barros Lopes, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tjalma, W. A. A. ; Winter-Roach, B. A. ; Rowlands, P. ; De Barros Lopes, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Port-site metastasis (PSM) after laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer is a new phenomenon. This situation creates potential therapeutic difficulties, especially in node-negative and early stages of disease. We report a case of port-site metastases following laparoscopic removal of para-aortic lymph nodes in a 74-year-old women with stage IIIb squamous cancer of the cervix, together with an update of all the previous published cases in the literature. None of the removed lymph nodes showed evidence of metastatic carcinoma. The patient received radiation therapy and a complete response was accomplished. Fifteen months after the operation, the patient presented with a suspicious lesion around the umbilical port-site. The lesion was excised and histology confirmed metastatic disease. The patient was further treated with cisplatin. However, she died of her disease after 24 months. The development of a port-site recurrence after laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer could jeopardize use of this approach. Therefore, all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for malignancies should have careful follow-up with special attention to the port sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200109000-00012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11737474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Cervical cancer ; Fatal Outcome ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects ; Lymphatic system ; Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Seeding ; Port-site recurrence ; Skin Neoplasms - secondary ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecological cancer, 2001-09, Vol.11 (5), p.409-412</ispartof><rights>2001 IGCS</rights><rights>2001 IGCS and ESGO.</rights><rights>2001 2001 IGCS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2494-942e902b632bf618b5267da7b172552c4bb58fc082b26b67253dd8e5b3b738d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11737474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tjalma, W. A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter-Roach, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlands, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Barros Lopes, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer</title><title>International journal of gynecological cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><description>Port-site metastasis (PSM) after laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer is a new phenomenon. This situation creates potential therapeutic difficulties, especially in node-negative and early stages of disease. We report a case of port-site metastases following laparoscopic removal of para-aortic lymph nodes in a 74-year-old women with stage IIIb squamous cancer of the cervix, together with an update of all the previous published cases in the literature. None of the removed lymph nodes showed evidence of metastatic carcinoma. The patient received radiation therapy and a complete response was accomplished. Fifteen months after the operation, the patient presented with a suspicious lesion around the umbilical port-site. The lesion was excised and histology confirmed metastatic disease. The patient was further treated with cisplatin. However, she died of her disease after 24 months. The development of a port-site recurrence after laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer could jeopardize use of this approach. Therefore, all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for malignancies should have careful follow-up with special attention to the port sites.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Fatal Outcome</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Seeding</subject><subject>Port-site recurrence</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>1048-891X</issn><issn>1525-1438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMobn78BSmI3lXz2aQXXshwUxjohYJ3oUnTkdI2M1kn-_embip4pblJzuF9z3vyAHCB4BVCJLu29UKnMJ6ccZ5iCBHMYzW0EN4DY8QwSxElYj--IRWpyNHrCByFUA8mDPNDMEKIE045HYPpk_OrNNiVSbzRvfem0yapXNO4d9stkqZYFt4F7ZZWJ6H3C-M3ie0Sbfza6qJJdBEN_gQcVEUTzOnuPgYv07vnyX06f5w9TG7nqcI0p2lOsckhVhnBqsqQUAxnvCy4QhwzhjVViolKQ4EVzlQWm6QshWGKKE5EScgxuNzOXXr31puwkq0N2jRN0RnXB8kxoTDDNArPfwlr1_su7iaHJJ4zxFhU3WxVOv4xeFPJpbdt4TcSQTnglgNu-YVbfuOWn7ij_2yX0qvWlD_uHd8omG0FJkJZW-Nl0HZAXNqIeyVLZ_8cJbaTVFv_c8sP646hrQ</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Tjalma, W. A. A.</creator><creator>Winter-Roach, B. A.</creator><creator>Rowlands, P.</creator><creator>De Barros Lopes, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer</title><author>Tjalma, W. A. A. ; Winter-Roach, B. A. ; Rowlands, P. ; De Barros Lopes, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2494-942e902b632bf618b5267da7b172552c4bb58fc082b26b67253dd8e5b3b738d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Fatal Outcome</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Seeding</topic><topic>Port-site recurrence</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tjalma, W. A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter-Roach, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlands, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Barros Lopes, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tjalma, W. A. A.</au><au>Winter-Roach, B. A.</au><au>Rowlands, P.</au><au>De Barros Lopes, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>409-412</pages><issn>1048-891X</issn><eissn>1525-1438</eissn><abstract>Port-site metastasis (PSM) after laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer is a new phenomenon. This situation creates potential therapeutic difficulties, especially in node-negative and early stages of disease. We report a case of port-site metastases following laparoscopic removal of para-aortic lymph nodes in a 74-year-old women with stage IIIb squamous cancer of the cervix, together with an update of all the previous published cases in the literature. None of the removed lymph nodes showed evidence of metastatic carcinoma. The patient received radiation therapy and a complete response was accomplished. Fifteen months after the operation, the patient presented with a suspicious lesion around the umbilical port-site. The lesion was excised and histology confirmed metastatic disease. The patient was further treated with cisplatin. However, she died of her disease after 24 months. The development of a port-site recurrence after laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer could jeopardize use of this approach. Therefore, all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for malignancies should have careful follow-up with special attention to the port sites.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11737474</pmid><doi>10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200109000-00012</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1048-891X
ispartof International journal of gynecological cancer, 2001-09, Vol.11 (5), p.409-412
issn 1048-891X
1525-1438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72340624
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Cervical cancer
Fatal Outcome
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects
Lymphatic system
Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Seeding
Port-site recurrence
Skin Neoplasms - secondary
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
Surgery
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
title Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Port-site%20recurrence%20following%20laparoscopic%20surgery%20in%20cervical%20cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecological%20cancer&rft.au=Tjalma,%20W.%20A.%20A.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=409-412&rft.issn=1048-891X&rft.eissn=1525-1438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200109000-00012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552795155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552795155&rft_id=info:pmid/11737474&rft_els_id=S1048891X24145240&rfr_iscdi=true