Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects

This study was conducted to help to establish the feasibility of a multi-channel auditory prosthesis based on microstimulation within the human ventral cochlear nucleus, and to define the range of stimulus parameters that can be used safely with such a device. We chronically implanted activated irid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hearing research 2000-11, Vol.149 (1), p.223-238
Hauptverfasser: McCreery, D.B, Yuen, T.G.H, Bullara, L.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 238
container_issue 1
container_start_page 223
container_title Hearing research
container_volume 149
creator McCreery, D.B
Yuen, T.G.H
Bullara, L.A
description This study was conducted to help to establish the feasibility of a multi-channel auditory prosthesis based on microstimulation within the human ventral cochlear nucleus, and to define the range of stimulus parameters that can be used safely with such a device. We chronically implanted activated iridium microelectrodes into the feline ventral cochlear nucleus and, beginning 80–250 days after implantation, they were pulsed for 7 h/day, on up to 21 successive days. The stimulus was charge-balanced pulses whose amplitude was modulated by a simulated human voice. The pulse rate (250 Hz/electrode) and the maximum pulse amplitude were selected as those that are likely to provide a patient with useful auditory percepts. The changes in neuronal responses during the multi-day stimulation regimens were partitioned into long-lasting, stimulation-induced depression of neuronal excitability (SIDNE), and short-acting neuronal refractivity (SANR). Both SIDNE and SANR were quantified from the changes in the growth functions of the evoked potentials recorded in the inferior colliculus. All of the stimulation regimens that we tested induced measurable SIDNE and SANR. The combined effect of SIDNE and the superimposed SANR is to depress the neuronal response near threshold, and thereby, to depress the population response over the entire amplitude range of the stimulus pulses. SIDNE and SANR may cause the greatest degradation of the performance of a clinical device at the low end of the amplitude range, and this may represent an inherent limitation of this type of spatially localized, high-rate neuronal stimulation. We determined sets of stimulus parameters which preserved most of the dynamic range of the neuronal response, when using either long (150 μs/phase) or short (40 μs/phase) stimulus pulses. Increasing the amplitude of the stimulus was relatively ineffective as a means of increasing the dynamic range of neuronal response, since the greater stimulus amplitude induced more SIDNE. All of the pulsed and unpulsed electrode sites were examined histologically, and no neuronal changes attributable to the stimulation were detected. There was some aggregation of glial cells immediately adjacent to some of the electrodes that were pulsed with the short-duration pulses, and at the highest current densities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00190-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72336687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378595500001908</els_id><sourcerecordid>72336687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-808954d851c1be2cf2d4dcaa78512f6beef97bfc933d19534d3e6922a9f0741d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtr3DAQgEVoSbZpfkKLoFDagxs91raUSylLXxDoIc1ZaKVRrSJLG8kO5N9Xzprk2NMwwzevD6E3lHyihHaXN4T3omll234g5CMhVJJGnKANFUtZSPoCbZ6QM_SqlL8VavmWnaIzSgnnrKMbZHZDTtEbPHqTU5n8OAc9-RSxj3gaADsIPgK-hzhlHbBJZgigM46zCTCXK3wYHopPIf2pQ3S0ePBlWlNwDsxUXqOXTocCF2s8R7ffvv7e_Wiuf33_ufty3Rgu5NQIImS7taKlhu6BGcfs1hqt-1phrtsDONnvnZGcWyrrJ5ZDJxnT0pF-Sy0_R--Pcw853c1QJjX6YiAEHSHNRfWM864TfQXbI7i8XDI4dch-1PlBUaIWu-rRrlrUKULUo10lat_bdcG8H8E-d606K_BuBXQxOriso_HliRO0Zd2y_vORgirj3kNWxXiIBqzP1Zeyyf_nkH_qIJgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72336687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>McCreery, D.B ; Yuen, T.G.H ; Bullara, L.A</creator><creatorcontrib>McCreery, D.B ; Yuen, T.G.H ; Bullara, L.A</creatorcontrib><description>This study was conducted to help to establish the feasibility of a multi-channel auditory prosthesis based on microstimulation within the human ventral cochlear nucleus, and to define the range of stimulus parameters that can be used safely with such a device. We chronically implanted activated iridium microelectrodes into the feline ventral cochlear nucleus and, beginning 80–250 days after implantation, they were pulsed for 7 h/day, on up to 21 successive days. The stimulus was charge-balanced pulses whose amplitude was modulated by a simulated human voice. The pulse rate (250 Hz/electrode) and the maximum pulse amplitude were selected as those that are likely to provide a patient with useful auditory percepts. The changes in neuronal responses during the multi-day stimulation regimens were partitioned into long-lasting, stimulation-induced depression of neuronal excitability (SIDNE), and short-acting neuronal refractivity (SANR). Both SIDNE and SANR were quantified from the changes in the growth functions of the evoked potentials recorded in the inferior colliculus. All of the stimulation regimens that we tested induced measurable SIDNE and SANR. The combined effect of SIDNE and the superimposed SANR is to depress the neuronal response near threshold, and thereby, to depress the population response over the entire amplitude range of the stimulus pulses. SIDNE and SANR may cause the greatest degradation of the performance of a clinical device at the low end of the amplitude range, and this may represent an inherent limitation of this type of spatially localized, high-rate neuronal stimulation. We determined sets of stimulus parameters which preserved most of the dynamic range of the neuronal response, when using either long (150 μs/phase) or short (40 μs/phase) stimulus pulses. Increasing the amplitude of the stimulus was relatively ineffective as a means of increasing the dynamic range of neuronal response, since the greater stimulus amplitude induced more SIDNE. All of the pulsed and unpulsed electrode sites were examined histologically, and no neuronal changes attributable to the stimulation were detected. There was some aggregation of glial cells immediately adjacent to some of the electrodes that were pulsed with the short-duration pulses, and at the highest current densities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00190-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11033261</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HERED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Auditory brainstem implant ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cat ; Cats ; Chronic stimulation ; Cochlear Nucleus - cytology ; Cochlear Nucleus - physiology ; Diseases of the ear ; Electric Stimulation - instrumentation ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Ent and stomatology ; Feasibility Studies ; Medical sciences ; Microelectrode ; Microelectrodes ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Neurons - cytology ; Neurons - physiology ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Refractory Period, Electrophysiological ; Time Factors ; Ventral cochlear nucleus</subject><ispartof>Hearing research, 2000-11, Vol.149 (1), p.223-238</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-808954d851c1be2cf2d4dcaa78512f6beef97bfc933d19534d3e6922a9f0741d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-808954d851c1be2cf2d4dcaa78512f6beef97bfc933d19534d3e6922a9f0741d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00190-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=815267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11033261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCreery, D.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, T.G.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullara, L.A</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects</title><title>Hearing research</title><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><description>This study was conducted to help to establish the feasibility of a multi-channel auditory prosthesis based on microstimulation within the human ventral cochlear nucleus, and to define the range of stimulus parameters that can be used safely with such a device. We chronically implanted activated iridium microelectrodes into the feline ventral cochlear nucleus and, beginning 80–250 days after implantation, they were pulsed for 7 h/day, on up to 21 successive days. The stimulus was charge-balanced pulses whose amplitude was modulated by a simulated human voice. The pulse rate (250 Hz/electrode) and the maximum pulse amplitude were selected as those that are likely to provide a patient with useful auditory percepts. The changes in neuronal responses during the multi-day stimulation regimens were partitioned into long-lasting, stimulation-induced depression of neuronal excitability (SIDNE), and short-acting neuronal refractivity (SANR). Both SIDNE and SANR were quantified from the changes in the growth functions of the evoked potentials recorded in the inferior colliculus. All of the stimulation regimens that we tested induced measurable SIDNE and SANR. The combined effect of SIDNE and the superimposed SANR is to depress the neuronal response near threshold, and thereby, to depress the population response over the entire amplitude range of the stimulus pulses. SIDNE and SANR may cause the greatest degradation of the performance of a clinical device at the low end of the amplitude range, and this may represent an inherent limitation of this type of spatially localized, high-rate neuronal stimulation. We determined sets of stimulus parameters which preserved most of the dynamic range of the neuronal response, when using either long (150 μs/phase) or short (40 μs/phase) stimulus pulses. Increasing the amplitude of the stimulus was relatively ineffective as a means of increasing the dynamic range of neuronal response, since the greater stimulus amplitude induced more SIDNE. All of the pulsed and unpulsed electrode sites were examined histologically, and no neuronal changes attributable to the stimulation were detected. There was some aggregation of glial cells immediately adjacent to some of the electrodes that were pulsed with the short-duration pulses, and at the highest current densities.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory brainstem implant</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cat</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Chronic stimulation</subject><subject>Cochlear Nucleus - cytology</subject><subject>Cochlear Nucleus - physiology</subject><subject>Diseases of the ear</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Ent and stomatology</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microelectrode</subject><subject>Microelectrodes</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Neurons - cytology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Refractory Period, Electrophysiological</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventral cochlear nucleus</subject><issn>0378-5955</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtr3DAQgEVoSbZpfkKLoFDagxs91raUSylLXxDoIc1ZaKVRrSJLG8kO5N9Xzprk2NMwwzevD6E3lHyihHaXN4T3omll234g5CMhVJJGnKANFUtZSPoCbZ6QM_SqlL8VavmWnaIzSgnnrKMbZHZDTtEbPHqTU5n8OAc9-RSxj3gaADsIPgK-hzhlHbBJZgigM46zCTCXK3wYHopPIf2pQ3S0ePBlWlNwDsxUXqOXTocCF2s8R7ffvv7e_Wiuf33_ufty3Rgu5NQIImS7taKlhu6BGcfs1hqt-1phrtsDONnvnZGcWyrrJ5ZDJxnT0pF-Sy0_R--Pcw853c1QJjX6YiAEHSHNRfWM864TfQXbI7i8XDI4dch-1PlBUaIWu-rRrlrUKULUo10lat_bdcG8H8E-d606K_BuBXQxOriso_HliRO0Zd2y_vORgirj3kNWxXiIBqzP1Zeyyf_nkH_qIJgA</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>McCreery, D.B</creator><creator>Yuen, T.G.H</creator><creator>Bullara, L.A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects</title><author>McCreery, D.B ; Yuen, T.G.H ; Bullara, L.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-808954d851c1be2cf2d4dcaa78512f6beef97bfc933d19534d3e6922a9f0741d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory brainstem implant</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cat</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Chronic stimulation</topic><topic>Cochlear Nucleus - cytology</topic><topic>Cochlear Nucleus - physiology</topic><topic>Diseases of the ear</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Ent and stomatology</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microelectrode</topic><topic>Microelectrodes</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Neurons - cytology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Refractory Period, Electrophysiological</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventral cochlear nucleus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCreery, D.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, T.G.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullara, L.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCreery, D.B</au><au>Yuen, T.G.H</au><au>Bullara, L.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects</atitle><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>223-238</pages><issn>0378-5955</issn><eissn>1878-5891</eissn><coden>HERED3</coden><abstract>This study was conducted to help to establish the feasibility of a multi-channel auditory prosthesis based on microstimulation within the human ventral cochlear nucleus, and to define the range of stimulus parameters that can be used safely with such a device. We chronically implanted activated iridium microelectrodes into the feline ventral cochlear nucleus and, beginning 80–250 days after implantation, they were pulsed for 7 h/day, on up to 21 successive days. The stimulus was charge-balanced pulses whose amplitude was modulated by a simulated human voice. The pulse rate (250 Hz/electrode) and the maximum pulse amplitude were selected as those that are likely to provide a patient with useful auditory percepts. The changes in neuronal responses during the multi-day stimulation regimens were partitioned into long-lasting, stimulation-induced depression of neuronal excitability (SIDNE), and short-acting neuronal refractivity (SANR). Both SIDNE and SANR were quantified from the changes in the growth functions of the evoked potentials recorded in the inferior colliculus. All of the stimulation regimens that we tested induced measurable SIDNE and SANR. The combined effect of SIDNE and the superimposed SANR is to depress the neuronal response near threshold, and thereby, to depress the population response over the entire amplitude range of the stimulus pulses. SIDNE and SANR may cause the greatest degradation of the performance of a clinical device at the low end of the amplitude range, and this may represent an inherent limitation of this type of spatially localized, high-rate neuronal stimulation. We determined sets of stimulus parameters which preserved most of the dynamic range of the neuronal response, when using either long (150 μs/phase) or short (40 μs/phase) stimulus pulses. Increasing the amplitude of the stimulus was relatively ineffective as a means of increasing the dynamic range of neuronal response, since the greater stimulus amplitude induced more SIDNE. All of the pulsed and unpulsed electrode sites were examined histologically, and no neuronal changes attributable to the stimulation were detected. There was some aggregation of glial cells immediately adjacent to some of the electrodes that were pulsed with the short-duration pulses, and at the highest current densities.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>11033261</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00190-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5955
ispartof Hearing research, 2000-11, Vol.149 (1), p.223-238
issn 0378-5955
1878-5891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72336687
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Auditory brainstem implant
Biological and medical sciences
Cat
Cats
Chronic stimulation
Cochlear Nucleus - cytology
Cochlear Nucleus - physiology
Diseases of the ear
Electric Stimulation - instrumentation
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electrodes, Implanted
Ent and stomatology
Feasibility Studies
Medical sciences
Microelectrode
Microelectrodes
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Neurons - cytology
Neurons - physiology
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Refractory Period, Electrophysiological
Time Factors
Ventral cochlear nucleus
title Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A33%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20microstimulation%20in%20the%20feline%20ventral%20cochlear%20nucleus:%20physiologic%20and%20histologic%20effects&rft.jtitle=Hearing%20research&rft.au=McCreery,%20D.B&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=223-238&rft.issn=0378-5955&rft.eissn=1878-5891&rft.coden=HERED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00190-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72336687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72336687&rft_id=info:pmid/11033261&rft_els_id=S0378595500001908&rfr_iscdi=true