Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to compare long-term survival and valve-related complications between bioprosthetic and mechanical heart valves. BACKGROUND Different heart valves may have different patient outcomes. METHODS Five hundred seventy-five patients undergoing single aortic valve repl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000-10, Vol.36 (4), p.1152-1158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVES
The goal of this study was to compare long-term survival and valve-related complications between bioprosthetic and mechanical heart valves.
BACKGROUND
Different heart valves may have different patient outcomes.
METHODS
Five hundred seventy-five patients undergoing single aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) at 13 VA medical centers were randomized to receive a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve.
RESULTS
By survival analysis at 15 years, all-cause mortality after AVR was lower with the mechanical valve versus bioprosthesis (66% vs. 79%, p = 0.02) but not after MVR. Primary valve failure occurred mainly in patients |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00834-2 |