ASSESSMENT OF TWO DEVICES FOR IN VITRO PREPARATION OF HUMAN SPERM
The aim of the study was to assess and compare the efficiency of the ZSC-II versus the Sperm Select techniques in preparing human sperm from normozoospermic patients for use in intrauterine insemination and other assisted reproductive technologies. Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Se...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of andrology 2000, Vol.45 (2), p.85-90 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 90 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 85 |
| container_title | Archives of andrology |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | ZAVOS, P. M ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N CORREA, J. R ASLANIS, P ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N |
| description | The aim of the study was to assess and compare the efficiency of the ZSC-II versus the Sperm Select techniques in preparing human sperm from normozoospermic patients for use in intrauterine insemination and other assisted reproductive technologies. Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Semen was collected at intercourse and processed via 2 sperm preparation methods. Recovery of motile sperm and other sperm qualitative measurements were evaluated before and after ZSC-II and Sperm Select sperm preparation. Sperm qualitative measurements were not significantly different after the ZSC-II and Sperm Select procedures (p >. 05). Differences (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/014850100418756 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72323997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72323997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bfd38188c192eaf81f11b81745713fe48748c3ae09e0c36ed0333f6545f630c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFPwjAUBvDGaATRszezxMQb8rp2W-dtwSFLgJFt4HEppQ2YwbBlMfz3DkGNJlzad_h9Ly8fQrcYHjEw6ACmzAEMQDHzHPcMNTFx7TYB3zlHzfp16hnsBroy5g3qCQi7RA2MwWa-TZsoCNI0TNNhOMqsuGdlr7H1HE6jbphavTixopE1jbIktsZJOA6SIIvi0d71J8NgZKXjMBleowvFCyNvjn8LTXph1u23B_FL1A0GbUGpu23P1JwwzJjAvi25YlhhPGPYo46HiZKUeZQJwiX4EgRx5RwIIcp1qKNcAsIlLfRw2LvR5XslzTZfLY2QRcHXsqxM7tnEJr7v1bBzgEKXxmip8o1errje5RjyfWv5v9bqxN1xdTVbyfmvP9ZUg_sj4EbwQmm-Fkvz4xil3pd6OqjlWpV6xT9KXczzLd8Vpf6OkNM3-H_CC8mL7UJwLfO3stLrutqT938C70OQGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72323997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ASSESSMENT OF TWO DEVICES FOR IN VITRO PREPARATION OF HUMAN SPERM</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>ZAVOS, P. M ; ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N ; CORREA, J. R ; ASLANIS, P ; ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</creator><creatorcontrib>ZAVOS, P. M ; ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N ; CORREA, J. R ; ASLANIS, P ; ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to assess and compare the efficiency of the ZSC-II versus the Sperm Select techniques in preparing human sperm from normozoospermic patients for use in intrauterine insemination and other assisted reproductive technologies. Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Semen was collected at intercourse and processed via 2 sperm preparation methods. Recovery of motile sperm and other sperm qualitative measurements were evaluated before and after ZSC-II and Sperm Select sperm preparation. Sperm qualitative measurements were not significantly different after the ZSC-II and Sperm Select procedures (p >. 05). Differences (p <. 05) were noted between the 2 procedures in the number of sperm recovered. A higher survival rate (longevity test, 72 h) was observed after ZSC-II sperm preparation and recovery. The ZSC-II procedure yielded higher total motile sperm than the Sperm Select. The superiority in longevity may suggest possible advantages in obtaining higher fertilization and pregnancy rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-3002</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1362-3095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/014850100418756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11028924</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARANDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Insemination, Artificial ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Reproductive Techniques ; Specimen Handling - instrumentation ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Sperm Count ; Sperm Motility ; Sperm Sperm Preparation Techniques Sperm Select Zsc-II ; Spermatozoa - physiology ; Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><ispartof>Archives of andrology, 2000, Vol.45 (2), p.85-90</ispartof><rights>2000 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2000</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bfd38188c192eaf81f11b81745713fe48748c3ae09e0c36ed0333f6545f630c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/014850100418756$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/014850100418756$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904,59623,59729,60412,60518,61197,61232,61378,61413</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=844724$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11028924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZAVOS, P. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORREA, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASLANIS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</creatorcontrib><title>ASSESSMENT OF TWO DEVICES FOR IN VITRO PREPARATION OF HUMAN SPERM</title><title>Archives of andrology</title><addtitle>Arch Androl</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to assess and compare the efficiency of the ZSC-II versus the Sperm Select techniques in preparing human sperm from normozoospermic patients for use in intrauterine insemination and other assisted reproductive technologies. Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Semen was collected at intercourse and processed via 2 sperm preparation methods. Recovery of motile sperm and other sperm qualitative measurements were evaluated before and after ZSC-II and Sperm Select sperm preparation. Sperm qualitative measurements were not significantly different after the ZSC-II and Sperm Select procedures (p >. 05). Differences (p <. 05) were noted between the 2 procedures in the number of sperm recovered. A higher survival rate (longevity test, 72 h) was observed after ZSC-II sperm preparation and recovery. The ZSC-II procedure yielded higher total motile sperm than the Sperm Select. The superiority in longevity may suggest possible advantages in obtaining higher fertilization and pregnancy rates.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - instrumentation</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Sperm Count</subject><subject>Sperm Motility</subject><subject>Sperm Sperm Preparation Techniques Sperm Select Zsc-II</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - physiology</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><issn>0955-3002</issn><issn>0148-5016</issn><issn>1362-3095</issn><issn>1521-0375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFPwjAUBvDGaATRszezxMQb8rp2W-dtwSFLgJFt4HEppQ2YwbBlMfz3DkGNJlzad_h9Ly8fQrcYHjEw6ACmzAEMQDHzHPcMNTFx7TYB3zlHzfp16hnsBroy5g3qCQi7RA2MwWa-TZsoCNI0TNNhOMqsuGdlr7H1HE6jbphavTixopE1jbIktsZJOA6SIIvi0d71J8NgZKXjMBleowvFCyNvjn8LTXph1u23B_FL1A0GbUGpu23P1JwwzJjAvi25YlhhPGPYo46HiZKUeZQJwiX4EgRx5RwIIcp1qKNcAsIlLfRw2LvR5XslzTZfLY2QRcHXsqxM7tnEJr7v1bBzgEKXxmip8o1errje5RjyfWv5v9bqxN1xdTVbyfmvP9ZUg_sj4EbwQmm-Fkvz4xil3pd6OqjlWpV6xT9KXczzLd8Vpf6OkNM3-H_CC8mL7UJwLfO3stLrutqT938C70OQGQ</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>ZAVOS, P. M</creator><creator>ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N</creator><creator>CORREA, J. R</creator><creator>ASLANIS, P</creator><creator>ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>ASSESSMENT OF TWO DEVICES FOR IN VITRO PREPARATION OF HUMAN SPERM</title><author>ZAVOS, P. M ; ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N ; CORREA, J. R ; ASLANIS, P ; ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bfd38188c192eaf81f11b81745713fe48748c3ae09e0c36ed0333f6545f630c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - instrumentation</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Sperm Count</topic><topic>Sperm Motility</topic><topic>Sperm Sperm Preparation Techniques Sperm Select Zsc-II</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - physiology</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZAVOS, P. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORREA, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASLANIS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of andrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZAVOS, P. M</au><au>ZARMAKOUPIS-ZAVOS, P. N</au><au>CORREA, J. R</au><au>ASLANIS, P</au><au>ZARMAKOUPIS, C. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ASSESSMENT OF TWO DEVICES FOR IN VITRO PREPARATION OF HUMAN SPERM</atitle><jtitle>Archives of andrology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Androl</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>85-90</pages><issn>0955-3002</issn><issn>0148-5016</issn><eissn>1362-3095</eissn><eissn>1521-0375</eissn><coden>ARANDR</coden><abstract>The aim of the study was to assess and compare the efficiency of the ZSC-II versus the Sperm Select techniques in preparing human sperm from normozoospermic patients for use in intrauterine insemination and other assisted reproductive technologies. Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Semen was collected at intercourse and processed via 2 sperm preparation methods. Recovery of motile sperm and other sperm qualitative measurements were evaluated before and after ZSC-II and Sperm Select sperm preparation. Sperm qualitative measurements were not significantly different after the ZSC-II and Sperm Select procedures (p >. 05). Differences (p <. 05) were noted between the 2 procedures in the number of sperm recovered. A higher survival rate (longevity test, 72 h) was observed after ZSC-II sperm preparation and recovery. The ZSC-II procedure yielded higher total motile sperm than the Sperm Select. The superiority in longevity may suggest possible advantages in obtaining higher fertilization and pregnancy rates.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>11028924</pmid><doi>10.1080/014850100418756</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0955-3002 |
| ispartof | Archives of andrology, 2000, Vol.45 (2), p.85-90 |
| issn | 0955-3002 0148-5016 1362-3095 1521-0375 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72323997 |
| source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Birth control Fertilization in Vitro Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Insemination, Artificial Male Medical sciences Reproductive Techniques Specimen Handling - instrumentation Specimen Handling - methods Sperm Count Sperm Motility Sperm Sperm Preparation Techniques Sperm Select Zsc-II Spermatozoa - physiology Sterility. Assisted procreation |
| title | ASSESSMENT OF TWO DEVICES FOR IN VITRO PREPARATION OF HUMAN SPERM |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ASSESSMENT%20OF%20TWO%20DEVICES%20FOR%20IN%20VITRO%20PREPARATION%20OF%20HUMAN%20SPERM&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20andrology&rft.au=ZAVOS,%20P.%20M&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=85-90&rft.issn=0955-3002&rft.eissn=1362-3095&rft.coden=ARANDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/014850100418756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E72323997%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72323997&rft_id=info:pmid/11028924&rfr_iscdi=true |