Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities

BACKGROUND: A previous European study found a longer time to pregnancy (TTP) among fertile women from Paris compared with women from other Western European countries. A co-ordinated, cross-sectional study of pregnant couples from Denmark (Copenhagen), France (Paris), Scotland (Edinburgh) and Finland...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2001-12, Vol.16 (12), p.2697-2704
Hauptverfasser: Jensen, T.K., Slama, R., Ducot, B., Suominen, J., Cawood, E.H.H., Andersen, A.G., Eustache, F., Irvine, S., Auger, S., Jouannet, P., Vierula, M., Jørgensen, N., Toppari, J., Skakkebaek, N.E., Keiding, N., Spira, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2704
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2697
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 16
creator Jensen, T.K.
Slama, R.
Ducot, B.
Suominen, J.
Cawood, E.H.H.
Andersen, A.G.
Eustache, F.
Irvine, S.
Auger, S.
Jouannet, P.
Vierula, M.
Jørgensen, N.
Toppari, J.
Skakkebaek, N.E.
Keiding, N.
Spira, A.
description BACKGROUND: A previous European study found a longer time to pregnancy (TTP) among fertile women from Paris compared with women from other Western European countries. A co-ordinated, cross-sectional study of pregnant couples from Denmark (Copenhagen), France (Paris), Scotland (Edinburgh) and Finland (Turku) was therefore undertaken to assess differences in waiting TTP among couples from these cities. METHODS: Pregnant women were invited to participate when they showed up for their first antenatal visit in one of the four centres. Inclusion criteria included that their partner was 20–45 years of age and born in the country in which he was currently living and that the pregnancy was achieved without fertility treatment. Both partners filled in a questionnaire and the man underwent a physical examination and delivered a semen sample (Turku: n = 237, Copenhagen: n = 302, Edinburgh: n = 212, Paris: n = 191). RESULTS: French couples had a decreased probability of conception compared with couples from the other three countries, although only after adjustment for confounders. No significant differences between couples from the three other countries were found. CONCLUSION: The observed geographical differences in TTP remain unexplained and were not due to differences in semen quality, but may be caused by varying exposures to environmental factors or psychological distress. In addition, selection bias due to the low participation rates cannot be ruled out. Future studies examining the causes for geographical differences in TTP are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72308611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697</oup_id><sourcerecordid>72308611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-1aa10582cd2751f0a9890d798039540448d35daeddd38fb7e68f4ce1ad9b40d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMGKFDEQhoMo7rj6AF4kFz3Zs6mkO0kfZV1dYURYFMRLyCSVMdrdaZNudN_eLDO4V09VFN__F3yEPAe2BdaLi-_rmHG-ALkFvuWyVw_IBlrJGi469pBsGJe6AZBwRp6U8oOxumr5mJwBKC67Xm-IvcFDTJMdqI8hYMbJYaFxor9tXOJ0oEsckS6JzhkPk53cLbVjqvfKLnFA6tI6DzUSchppSGumV2tOM9qJutqA5Sl5FOxQ8NlpnpMv764-X143u0_vP1y-2TWuA7E0YC2wTnPnueogMNvrnnnVayb6rmVtq73ovEXvvdBhr1Dq0DoE6_t9yzwT5-TVsXfO6deKZTFjLA6HwU6Y1mIUF0xLgArCEXQ5lZIxmDnH0eZbA8zceTVHrwakAW7uvNbMi1P5uh_R3ydOIivw8gTY4uwQclUVyz0nhFJa8Mq9PnJV23_9bY54LAv--Rew-aeRSqjOXH_9ZmD3Vijx8cYI8RdL3KCu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72308611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jensen, T.K. ; Slama, R. ; Ducot, B. ; Suominen, J. ; Cawood, E.H.H. ; Andersen, A.G. ; Eustache, F. ; Irvine, S. ; Auger, S. ; Jouannet, P. ; Vierula, M. ; Jørgensen, N. ; Toppari, J. ; Skakkebaek, N.E. ; Keiding, N. ; Spira, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.K. ; Slama, R. ; Ducot, B. ; Suominen, J. ; Cawood, E.H.H. ; Andersen, A.G. ; Eustache, F. ; Irvine, S. ; Auger, S. ; Jouannet, P. ; Vierula, M. ; Jørgensen, N. ; Toppari, J. ; Skakkebaek, N.E. ; Keiding, N. ; Spira, A.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: A previous European study found a longer time to pregnancy (TTP) among fertile women from Paris compared with women from other Western European countries. A co-ordinated, cross-sectional study of pregnant couples from Denmark (Copenhagen), France (Paris), Scotland (Edinburgh) and Finland (Turku) was therefore undertaken to assess differences in waiting TTP among couples from these cities. METHODS: Pregnant women were invited to participate when they showed up for their first antenatal visit in one of the four centres. Inclusion criteria included that their partner was 20–45 years of age and born in the country in which he was currently living and that the pregnancy was achieved without fertility treatment. Both partners filled in a questionnaire and the man underwent a physical examination and delivered a semen sample (Turku: n = 237, Copenhagen: n = 302, Edinburgh: n = 212, Paris: n = 191). RESULTS: French couples had a decreased probability of conception compared with couples from the other three countries, although only after adjustment for confounders. No significant differences between couples from the three other countries were found. CONCLUSION: The observed geographical differences in TTP remain unexplained and were not due to differences in semen quality, but may be caused by varying exposures to environmental factors or psychological distress. In addition, selection bias due to the low participation rates cannot be ruled out. Future studies examining the causes for geographical differences in TTP are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11726598</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Denmark - epidemiology ; Educational Status ; Environment ; environmental health ; Female ; Fertility ; Finland - epidemiology ; France - epidemiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Infertility - epidemiology ; Infertility - etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk ; Parity ; population surveillance ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy rate ; Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation ; Scotland - epidemiology ; Semen - physiology ; Sperm Count ; Stress, Psychological ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2001-12, Vol.16 (12), p.2697-2704</ispartof><rights>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2001</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-1aa10582cd2751f0a9890d798039540448d35daeddd38fb7e68f4ce1ad9b40d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-1aa10582cd2751f0a9890d798039540448d35daeddd38fb7e68f4ce1ad9b40d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13377832$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11726598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducot, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suominen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawood, E.H.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustache, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irvine, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auger, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouannet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vierula, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toppari, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skakkebaek, N.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keiding, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spira, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: A previous European study found a longer time to pregnancy (TTP) among fertile women from Paris compared with women from other Western European countries. A co-ordinated, cross-sectional study of pregnant couples from Denmark (Copenhagen), France (Paris), Scotland (Edinburgh) and Finland (Turku) was therefore undertaken to assess differences in waiting TTP among couples from these cities. METHODS: Pregnant women were invited to participate when they showed up for their first antenatal visit in one of the four centres. Inclusion criteria included that their partner was 20–45 years of age and born in the country in which he was currently living and that the pregnancy was achieved without fertility treatment. Both partners filled in a questionnaire and the man underwent a physical examination and delivered a semen sample (Turku: n = 237, Copenhagen: n = 302, Edinburgh: n = 212, Paris: n = 191). RESULTS: French couples had a decreased probability of conception compared with couples from the other three countries, although only after adjustment for confounders. No significant differences between couples from the three other countries were found. CONCLUSION: The observed geographical differences in TTP remain unexplained and were not due to differences in semen quality, but may be caused by varying exposures to environmental factors or psychological distress. In addition, selection bias due to the low participation rates cannot be ruled out. Future studies examining the causes for geographical differences in TTP are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Finland - epidemiology</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility - etiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>population surveillance</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy rate</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Semen - physiology</subject><subject>Sperm Count</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMGKFDEQhoMo7rj6AF4kFz3Zs6mkO0kfZV1dYURYFMRLyCSVMdrdaZNudN_eLDO4V09VFN__F3yEPAe2BdaLi-_rmHG-ALkFvuWyVw_IBlrJGi469pBsGJe6AZBwRp6U8oOxumr5mJwBKC67Xm-IvcFDTJMdqI8hYMbJYaFxor9tXOJ0oEsckS6JzhkPk53cLbVjqvfKLnFA6tI6DzUSchppSGumV2tOM9qJutqA5Sl5FOxQ8NlpnpMv764-X143u0_vP1y-2TWuA7E0YC2wTnPnueogMNvrnnnVayb6rmVtq73ovEXvvdBhr1Dq0DoE6_t9yzwT5-TVsXfO6deKZTFjLA6HwU6Y1mIUF0xLgArCEXQ5lZIxmDnH0eZbA8zceTVHrwakAW7uvNbMi1P5uh_R3ydOIivw8gTY4uwQclUVyz0nhFJa8Mq9PnJV23_9bY54LAv--Rew-aeRSqjOXH_9ZmD3Vijx8cYI8RdL3KCu</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Jensen, T.K.</creator><creator>Slama, R.</creator><creator>Ducot, B.</creator><creator>Suominen, J.</creator><creator>Cawood, E.H.H.</creator><creator>Andersen, A.G.</creator><creator>Eustache, F.</creator><creator>Irvine, S.</creator><creator>Auger, S.</creator><creator>Jouannet, P.</creator><creator>Vierula, M.</creator><creator>Jørgensen, N.</creator><creator>Toppari, J.</creator><creator>Skakkebaek, N.E.</creator><creator>Keiding, N.</creator><creator>Spira, A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities</title><author>Jensen, T.K. ; Slama, R. ; Ducot, B. ; Suominen, J. ; Cawood, E.H.H. ; Andersen, A.G. ; Eustache, F. ; Irvine, S. ; Auger, S. ; Jouannet, P. ; Vierula, M. ; Jørgensen, N. ; Toppari, J. ; Skakkebaek, N.E. ; Keiding, N. ; Spira, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-1aa10582cd2751f0a9890d798039540448d35daeddd38fb7e68f4ce1ad9b40d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Finland - epidemiology</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility - etiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>population surveillance</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy rate</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Semen - physiology</topic><topic>Sperm Count</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducot, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suominen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawood, E.H.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustache, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irvine, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auger, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouannet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vierula, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toppari, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skakkebaek, N.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keiding, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spira, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, T.K.</au><au>Slama, R.</au><au>Ducot, B.</au><au>Suominen, J.</au><au>Cawood, E.H.H.</au><au>Andersen, A.G.</au><au>Eustache, F.</au><au>Irvine, S.</au><au>Auger, S.</au><au>Jouannet, P.</au><au>Vierula, M.</au><au>Jørgensen, N.</au><au>Toppari, J.</au><au>Skakkebaek, N.E.</au><au>Keiding, N.</au><au>Spira, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><stitle>Hum. Reprod</stitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2697</spage><epage>2704</epage><pages>2697-2704</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: A previous European study found a longer time to pregnancy (TTP) among fertile women from Paris compared with women from other Western European countries. A co-ordinated, cross-sectional study of pregnant couples from Denmark (Copenhagen), France (Paris), Scotland (Edinburgh) and Finland (Turku) was therefore undertaken to assess differences in waiting TTP among couples from these cities. METHODS: Pregnant women were invited to participate when they showed up for their first antenatal visit in one of the four centres. Inclusion criteria included that their partner was 20–45 years of age and born in the country in which he was currently living and that the pregnancy was achieved without fertility treatment. Both partners filled in a questionnaire and the man underwent a physical examination and delivered a semen sample (Turku: n = 237, Copenhagen: n = 302, Edinburgh: n = 212, Paris: n = 191). RESULTS: French couples had a decreased probability of conception compared with couples from the other three countries, although only after adjustment for confounders. No significant differences between couples from the three other countries were found. CONCLUSION: The observed geographical differences in TTP remain unexplained and were not due to differences in semen quality, but may be caused by varying exposures to environmental factors or psychological distress. In addition, selection bias due to the low participation rates cannot be ruled out. Future studies examining the causes for geographical differences in TTP are needed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11726598</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2001-12, Vol.16 (12), p.2697-2704
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72308611
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Cross-Sectional Studies
Denmark - epidemiology
Educational Status
Environment
environmental health
Female
Fertility
Finland - epidemiology
France - epidemiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Infertility - epidemiology
Infertility - etiology
Male
Middle Aged
Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk
Parity
population surveillance
Pregnancy
pregnancy rate
Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation
Scotland - epidemiology
Semen - physiology
Sperm Count
Stress, Psychological
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Vertebrates: reproduction
title Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A31%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20differences%20in%20waiting%20time%20to%20pregnancy%20among%20fertile%20couples%20from%20four%20European%20cities&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Jensen,%20T.K.&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2697&rft.epage=2704&rft.pages=2697-2704&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72308611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72308611&rft_id=info:pmid/11726598&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697&rfr_iscdi=true