The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo
Within the framework of the current call for standardization in upper extremity research, three methods to determine the glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo were tested. Therefore, subjects performed humeral movements, while a 3D electromagnetic tracking device registered the motion of the hu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2000-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1629-1636 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1636 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1629 |
| container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Stokdijk, M. Nagels, J. Rozing, P.M. |
| description | Within the framework of the current call for standardization in upper extremity research, three methods to determine the glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo were tested. Therefore, subjects performed humeral movements, while a 3D electromagnetic tracking device registered the motion of the humerus with respect to the scapula. For the first method to estimate the glenohumeral joint rotation centre five scapular bony landmarks served as input to regression equations. The second method fitted a sphere through the humeral position data and the third method calculated the rotation centre determining an optimal helical axis. The experiment consisted of two parts, at first one subject was measured 10 times, subsequently one observer measured 10 subjects twice and another observer measured these subjects once. The first part of the experiment demonstrated that all methods are capable to reproduce the rotation centre within 4
mm, but the location of the centre differed significantly between methods (
p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00121-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72294370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929000001214</els_id><sourcerecordid>72294370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-48792a1b2769c730ccf1a8f69afa63d2b7e01105ecbd22f001a488f6f302f55d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIn0cPWSbK72ZxEii8oeLCeQ5qdtSm7m5psC_57U1v0WBgYhvnmwUfIJYUxBVrcvQMwmkom4QbgFoDGKjsiQ1oKnjJewjEZ_iEDchbCEgBEJuQpGVAKUPBSDMl4tsDks8HOLdYtet0kS2e7PvGu1711XWKw6z0mtks2duPOyUmtm4AX-zwiH0-Ps8lLOn17fp08TFPDJevTrBSSaTpnopBGcDCmprqsC6lrXfCKzQVC_CFHM68Yq-P3Oitjv-bA6jyv-Ihc7_auvPtaY-hVa4PBptEdunVQgjGZcQEHQVpynjHJIpjvQONdCB5rtfK21f5bUVBbo-rXqNrqUrCNaFRlce5qf2A9b7H6n9orjMD9DsDoY2PRq2AsdgYr69H0qnL2wIkfR0iDuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18334292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stokdijk, M. ; Nagels, J. ; Rozing, P.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stokdijk, M. ; Nagels, J. ; Rozing, P.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Within the framework of the current call for standardization in upper extremity research, three methods to determine the glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo were tested. Therefore, subjects performed humeral movements, while a 3D electromagnetic tracking device registered the motion of the humerus with respect to the scapula. For the first method to estimate the glenohumeral joint rotation centre five scapular bony landmarks served as input to regression equations. The second method fitted a sphere through the humeral position data and the third method calculated the rotation centre determining an optimal helical axis. The experiment consisted of two parts, at first one subject was measured 10 times, subsequently one observer measured 10 subjects twice and another observer measured these subjects once. The first part of the experiment demonstrated that all methods are capable to reproduce the rotation centre within 4
mm, but the location of the centre differed significantly between methods (
p<0.001). The second part, showed that inter- and intra-observer reliability was sufficiently for the sphere-fitting method and for the helical-axes method. The two observations of one observer differed significantly (
p<0.008) using the regression method. The authors prefer the helical-axes method, it is a reliable and valid method which can be applied in movement registration of healthy subjects and patients with a shoulder endoprosthesis, it can be applied in hinge joints to determine a rotation axis instead of a rotation centre which is desirable in standardized upper extremity research, and calculation time is short.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00121-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11006387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Electromagnetic Phenomena - methods ; Equipment and Supplies ; Glenohumeral ; Humans ; In vivo ; Male ; Methods ; Observer Variation ; Reliability ; Rotation ; Rotation centre ; Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2000-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1629-1636</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-48792a1b2769c730ccf1a8f69afa63d2b7e01105ecbd22f001a488f6f302f55d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-48792a1b2769c730ccf1a8f69afa63d2b7e01105ecbd22f001a488f6f302f55d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929000001214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11006387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stokdijk, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagels, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozing, P.M.</creatorcontrib><title>The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Within the framework of the current call for standardization in upper extremity research, three methods to determine the glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo were tested. Therefore, subjects performed humeral movements, while a 3D electromagnetic tracking device registered the motion of the humerus with respect to the scapula. For the first method to estimate the glenohumeral joint rotation centre five scapular bony landmarks served as input to regression equations. The second method fitted a sphere through the humeral position data and the third method calculated the rotation centre determining an optimal helical axis. The experiment consisted of two parts, at first one subject was measured 10 times, subsequently one observer measured 10 subjects twice and another observer measured these subjects once. The first part of the experiment demonstrated that all methods are capable to reproduce the rotation centre within 4
mm, but the location of the centre differed significantly between methods (
p<0.001). The second part, showed that inter- and intra-observer reliability was sufficiently for the sphere-fitting method and for the helical-axes method. The two observations of one observer differed significantly (
p<0.008) using the regression method. The authors prefer the helical-axes method, it is a reliable and valid method which can be applied in movement registration of healthy subjects and patients with a shoulder endoprosthesis, it can be applied in hinge joints to determine a rotation axis instead of a rotation centre which is desirable in standardized upper extremity research, and calculation time is short.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Equipment and Supplies</subject><subject>Glenohumeral</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vivo</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Rotation centre</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIn0cPWSbK72ZxEii8oeLCeQ5qdtSm7m5psC_57U1v0WBgYhvnmwUfIJYUxBVrcvQMwmkom4QbgFoDGKjsiQ1oKnjJewjEZ_iEDchbCEgBEJuQpGVAKUPBSDMl4tsDks8HOLdYtet0kS2e7PvGu1711XWKw6z0mtks2duPOyUmtm4AX-zwiH0-Ps8lLOn17fp08TFPDJevTrBSSaTpnopBGcDCmprqsC6lrXfCKzQVC_CFHM68Yq-P3Oitjv-bA6jyv-Ihc7_auvPtaY-hVa4PBptEdunVQgjGZcQEHQVpynjHJIpjvQONdCB5rtfK21f5bUVBbo-rXqNrqUrCNaFRlce5qf2A9b7H6n9orjMD9DsDoY2PRq2AsdgYr69H0qnL2wIkfR0iDuw</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Stokdijk, M.</creator><creator>Nagels, J.</creator><creator>Rozing, P.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo</title><author>Stokdijk, M. ; Nagels, J. ; Rozing, P.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-48792a1b2769c730ccf1a8f69afa63d2b7e01105ecbd22f001a488f6f302f55d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Equipment and Supplies</topic><topic>Glenohumeral</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vivo</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Rotation centre</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stokdijk, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagels, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozing, P.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stokdijk, M.</au><au>Nagels, J.</au><au>Rozing, P.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1636</epage><pages>1629-1636</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Within the framework of the current call for standardization in upper extremity research, three methods to determine the glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo were tested. Therefore, subjects performed humeral movements, while a 3D electromagnetic tracking device registered the motion of the humerus with respect to the scapula. For the first method to estimate the glenohumeral joint rotation centre five scapular bony landmarks served as input to regression equations. The second method fitted a sphere through the humeral position data and the third method calculated the rotation centre determining an optimal helical axis. The experiment consisted of two parts, at first one subject was measured 10 times, subsequently one observer measured 10 subjects twice and another observer measured these subjects once. The first part of the experiment demonstrated that all methods are capable to reproduce the rotation centre within 4
mm, but the location of the centre differed significantly between methods (
p<0.001). The second part, showed that inter- and intra-observer reliability was sufficiently for the sphere-fitting method and for the helical-axes method. The two observations of one observer differed significantly (
p<0.008) using the regression method. The authors prefer the helical-axes method, it is a reliable and valid method which can be applied in movement registration of healthy subjects and patients with a shoulder endoprosthesis, it can be applied in hinge joints to determine a rotation axis instead of a rotation centre which is desirable in standardized upper extremity research, and calculation time is short.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11006387</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00121-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
| ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2000-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1629-1636 |
| issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72294370 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Biomechanical Phenomena Electromagnetic Phenomena - methods Equipment and Supplies Glenohumeral Humans In vivo Male Methods Observer Variation Reliability Rotation Rotation centre Shoulder Joint - physiology |
| title | The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A54%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20glenohumeral%20joint%20rotation%20centre%20in%20vivo&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Stokdijk,%20M.&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1636&rft.pages=1629-1636&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00121-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72294370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18334292&rft_id=info:pmid/11006387&rft_els_id=S0021929000001214&rfr_iscdi=true |