Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking
It has been suggested that attention can disambiguate stimuli that have equal motion energy in opposite directions (e.g. a counterphasing grating), such that a clear motion direction is perceived. The direction of this movement is determined by the observer and can be changed at will. Assuming that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vision research (Oxford) 2001-01, Vol.41 (25), p.3505-3511 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3511 |
---|---|
container_issue | 25 |
container_start_page | 3505 |
container_title | Vision research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Verstraten, Frans A.J Hooge, Ignace T.C Culham, Jody Van Wezel, Richard J.A |
description | It has been suggested that attention can disambiguate stimuli that have equal motion energy in opposite directions (e.g. a counterphasing grating), such that a clear motion direction is perceived. The direction of this movement is determined by the observer and can be changed at will. Assuming that the responses of front-end motion detectors are equal for the two opponent directions, it has been proposed that the unambiguous motion perceived with attentive tracking arises from an independent mechanism that monitors the shifts of attention directed to the moving feature of interest. However, while perceiving motion under attentive tracking conditions, observers often report a strong impression that they are making eye movements. In this study, we investigated whether systematic eye movements are present during attentive tracking and, as a result, could be responsible for the subjective experience of movement. We had observers track an object in smooth motion, apparent motion and ambiguous motion, either with eye movements or with attention. The results show that there are negligible eye movements during attentive tracking, which are neither systematic nor correlated with the stimulus. Given that neither eye movements nor retinal image motion can account for subjectively perceived motion, as well as the absence of any other plausible explanation, we find it tempting evidence for an earlier suggestion that the percept of movement must arise from a specialized mechanism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00205-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72293755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004269890100205X</els_id><sourcerecordid>72293755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d17aa4e91e08723144f52a8a3268d7bad5b68c823fc7a1cfccd3b1bd04108b703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLLDEQRoMoOj5-gpes5LporaQfSa_kMvgCwYUKrgzppNobne6MSXpg_r3tzKBLV1UU56uiDiHHDM4YsOr8AaDgWVXL-i-wUwAOZfa8RSZMCpmVVVFtk8k3skf2Y3wDAFHyepfsMSZGrmYT8vKwjAk7nZyhuETa-QV22KdIrae9T1Qb44c-0dYHmv4jnWMwOE_O99S3I77q7BBc_0p1SmPULZCmoM37ODokO62eRTza1APydHX5OL3J7u6vb6f_7jKT15Ayy4TWBdYMQQqes6JoS66lznklrWi0LZtKGsnz1gjNTGuMzRvWWCgYyEZAfkBO1nvnwX8MGJPqXDQ4m-ke_RCV4LzORVmOYLkGTfAxBmzVPLhOh6VioL7EqpVY9WVNAVMrsep5zP3ZHBiaDu1PamNyBC7WAI5vLhwGFY3D3qB1AU1S1rtfTnwCzo-KAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72293755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Verstraten, Frans A.J ; Hooge, Ignace T.C ; Culham, Jody ; Van Wezel, Richard J.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Verstraten, Frans A.J ; Hooge, Ignace T.C ; Culham, Jody ; Van Wezel, Richard J.A</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that attention can disambiguate stimuli that have equal motion energy in opposite directions (e.g. a counterphasing grating), such that a clear motion direction is perceived. The direction of this movement is determined by the observer and can be changed at will. Assuming that the responses of front-end motion detectors are equal for the two opponent directions, it has been proposed that the unambiguous motion perceived with attentive tracking arises from an independent mechanism that monitors the shifts of attention directed to the moving feature of interest. However, while perceiving motion under attentive tracking conditions, observers often report a strong impression that they are making eye movements. In this study, we investigated whether systematic eye movements are present during attentive tracking and, as a result, could be responsible for the subjective experience of movement. We had observers track an object in smooth motion, apparent motion and ambiguous motion, either with eye movements or with attention. The results show that there are negligible eye movements during attentive tracking, which are neither systematic nor correlated with the stimulus. Given that neither eye movements nor retinal image motion can account for subjectively perceived motion, as well as the absence of any other plausible explanation, we find it tempting evidence for an earlier suggestion that the percept of movement must arise from a specialized mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00205-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11718791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Attentive tracking ; Consciousness ; Efference copy ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Perceived motion ; Systematic eye movements</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2001-01, Vol.41 (25), p.3505-3511</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d17aa4e91e08723144f52a8a3268d7bad5b68c823fc7a1cfccd3b1bd04108b703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d17aa4e91e08723144f52a8a3268d7bad5b68c823fc7a1cfccd3b1bd04108b703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00205-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11718791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verstraten, Frans A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooge, Ignace T.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culham, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wezel, Richard J.A</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that attention can disambiguate stimuli that have equal motion energy in opposite directions (e.g. a counterphasing grating), such that a clear motion direction is perceived. The direction of this movement is determined by the observer and can be changed at will. Assuming that the responses of front-end motion detectors are equal for the two opponent directions, it has been proposed that the unambiguous motion perceived with attentive tracking arises from an independent mechanism that monitors the shifts of attention directed to the moving feature of interest. However, while perceiving motion under attentive tracking conditions, observers often report a strong impression that they are making eye movements. In this study, we investigated whether systematic eye movements are present during attentive tracking and, as a result, could be responsible for the subjective experience of movement. We had observers track an object in smooth motion, apparent motion and ambiguous motion, either with eye movements or with attention. The results show that there are negligible eye movements during attentive tracking, which are neither systematic nor correlated with the stimulus. Given that neither eye movements nor retinal image motion can account for subjectively perceived motion, as well as the absence of any other plausible explanation, we find it tempting evidence for an earlier suggestion that the percept of movement must arise from a specialized mechanism.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Attentive tracking</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Efference copy</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Perceived motion</subject><subject>Systematic eye movements</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLLDEQRoMoOj5-gpes5LporaQfSa_kMvgCwYUKrgzppNobne6MSXpg_r3tzKBLV1UU56uiDiHHDM4YsOr8AaDgWVXL-i-wUwAOZfa8RSZMCpmVVVFtk8k3skf2Y3wDAFHyepfsMSZGrmYT8vKwjAk7nZyhuETa-QV22KdIrae9T1Qb44c-0dYHmv4jnWMwOE_O99S3I77q7BBc_0p1SmPULZCmoM37ODokO62eRTza1APydHX5OL3J7u6vb6f_7jKT15Ayy4TWBdYMQQqes6JoS66lznklrWi0LZtKGsnz1gjNTGuMzRvWWCgYyEZAfkBO1nvnwX8MGJPqXDQ4m-ke_RCV4LzORVmOYLkGTfAxBmzVPLhOh6VioL7EqpVY9WVNAVMrsep5zP3ZHBiaDu1PamNyBC7WAI5vLhwGFY3D3qB1AU1S1rtfTnwCzo-KAg</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Verstraten, Frans A.J</creator><creator>Hooge, Ignace T.C</creator><creator>Culham, Jody</creator><creator>Van Wezel, Richard J.A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking</title><author>Verstraten, Frans A.J ; Hooge, Ignace T.C ; Culham, Jody ; Van Wezel, Richard J.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d17aa4e91e08723144f52a8a3268d7bad5b68c823fc7a1cfccd3b1bd04108b703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Attentive tracking</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Efference copy</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Perceived motion</topic><topic>Systematic eye movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verstraten, Frans A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooge, Ignace T.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culham, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wezel, Richard J.A</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verstraten, Frans A.J</au><au>Hooge, Ignace T.C</au><au>Culham, Jody</au><au>Van Wezel, Richard J.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>3505</spage><epage>3511</epage><pages>3505-3511</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><abstract>It has been suggested that attention can disambiguate stimuli that have equal motion energy in opposite directions (e.g. a counterphasing grating), such that a clear motion direction is perceived. The direction of this movement is determined by the observer and can be changed at will. Assuming that the responses of front-end motion detectors are equal for the two opponent directions, it has been proposed that the unambiguous motion perceived with attentive tracking arises from an independent mechanism that monitors the shifts of attention directed to the moving feature of interest. However, while perceiving motion under attentive tracking conditions, observers often report a strong impression that they are making eye movements. In this study, we investigated whether systematic eye movements are present during attentive tracking and, as a result, could be responsible for the subjective experience of movement. We had observers track an object in smooth motion, apparent motion and ambiguous motion, either with eye movements or with attention. The results show that there are negligible eye movements during attentive tracking, which are neither systematic nor correlated with the stimulus. Given that neither eye movements nor retinal image motion can account for subjectively perceived motion, as well as the absence of any other plausible explanation, we find it tempting evidence for an earlier suggestion that the percept of movement must arise from a specialized mechanism.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11718791</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00205-X</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-6989 |
ispartof | Vision research (Oxford), 2001-01, Vol.41 (25), p.3505-3511 |
issn | 0042-6989 1878-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72293755 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Attention - physiology Attentive tracking Consciousness Efference copy Eye Movements - physiology Humans Male Motion Perception - physiology Perceived motion Systematic eye movements |
title | Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A49%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20eye%20movements%20do%20not%20account%20for%20the%20perception%20of%20motion%20during%20attentive%20tracking&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Verstraten,%20Frans%20A.J&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=3505&rft.epage=3511&rft.pages=3505-3511&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00205-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72293755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72293755&rft_id=info:pmid/11718791&rft_els_id=S004269890100205X&rfr_iscdi=true |