Patient‐Based Assessments of Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Patients: Validation of the NEWQOL

Purpose: In epilepsy, patient‐based assessments are increasingly used as outcome measures in clinical trials of novel therapies alongside the traditional clinical measures of efficacy. The objective of this study was to validate psychometrically a quality of life (QOL) measure developed for use with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsia (Copenhagen) 2000-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1119-1128
Hauptverfasser: Abetz, Linda, Jacoby, Ann, Baker, Gus A., McNulty, Pauline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1128
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1119
container_title Epilepsia (Copenhagen)
container_volume 41
creator Abetz, Linda
Jacoby, Ann
Baker, Gus A.
McNulty, Pauline
description Purpose: In epilepsy, patient‐based assessments are increasingly used as outcome measures in clinical trials of novel therapies alongside the traditional clinical measures of efficacy. The objective of this study was to validate psychometrically a quality of life (QOL) measure developed for use with recently diagnosed epilepsy patients. Methods: The NEWQOL (Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Instrument) is a 93‐item self‐administered battery designed to assess QOL in patients with new‐onset epilepsy. NEWQOL consists of eight multi‐item scales (13 subscales) measuring several health parameters: Anxiety, Depression, Social Activities, Symptoms, Locus of Control/Mastery, Neuropsychological Problems (includes the following subscales: Fatigue, Memory, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), Social Stigma, Worry, Work Limitations, and several single‐item measures (General Health, Number of Seizures, Social Limitations, Social Support, Self Concept, Ambition Limitations, Health Transition, and General Limitations). The NEWQOL was collected at baseline and 1 week post‐baseline from 108 patients in the U.K. and U.S. Results: All of the multi‐item scales had high item discriminant validity, good test‐retest reliability, and acceptable levels of internal consistency reliability; all but the Reading and Stigma subscales had negligible floor and ceiling effects. General linear models were used to examine the known groups validity of NEWQOL. Significant differences were observed in the Worry, Symptoms, Summary Neuropsychological Scales, and all Neuropsychological subscales (Memory, Fatigue, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), indicating poorer functioning in the more frequent or severe seizure groups. Conclusions: Results from this study offer supportive evidence that NEWQOL has good validity and reliability and can discriminate between patient groups, particularly in relation to symptoms and psychological problems. We conclude that NEWQOL represents a useful measure for future studies in this patient population.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72276799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72276799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e1f4c4425ce7f67b2d4637488345c3853423d41388404ea52f3708e7aa3509623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMmO1DAQhi0EYpqBV0AWQtwSvMb2XNAwNDBSaxaJ5Wi5kwq4laVJpTWTG4_AM_IkOOpIcMUXu-zvL5c-Ql5wlvO0Xu9yroXNONcmF4yxfNwyJrnJ7x-Q1fJUmIdkxRiXmdOWnZAniLuEmsLIx-SEM-ec1nxF2pswRujG3z9_vQ0IFT1HBMQ2XSHta3p7CE0cp_m4iTXQ2NEruGsm-i6Gb10_J9b72MAeJ7q0wjP6JYWqVPXdHBy_A71af7293jwlj-rQIDxb9lPy-f3608XHbHP94fLifJOVynKXAa9VqZTQJZi6MFtRqUIaZa1UupRWSyVkpbi0VjEFQYtaGmbBhCA1c4WQp-TVse9-6H8cAEffRiyhaUIH_QG9ESKZcC6BZ0ewHHrEAWq_H2Ibhslz5mfZfudno36W7WfZfpHt71P4-fLLYdtC9U_0aDcBLxcgYBmaeghdGfEvp4wxep72zRG7SyKn_5jAr28uE-HkH1ozmyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72276799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient‐Based Assessments of Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Patients: Validation of the NEWQOL</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abetz, Linda ; Jacoby, Ann ; Baker, Gus A. ; McNulty, Pauline</creator><creatorcontrib>Abetz, Linda ; Jacoby, Ann ; Baker, Gus A. ; McNulty, Pauline</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: In epilepsy, patient‐based assessments are increasingly used as outcome measures in clinical trials of novel therapies alongside the traditional clinical measures of efficacy. The objective of this study was to validate psychometrically a quality of life (QOL) measure developed for use with recently diagnosed epilepsy patients. Methods: The NEWQOL (Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Instrument) is a 93‐item self‐administered battery designed to assess QOL in patients with new‐onset epilepsy. NEWQOL consists of eight multi‐item scales (13 subscales) measuring several health parameters: Anxiety, Depression, Social Activities, Symptoms, Locus of Control/Mastery, Neuropsychological Problems (includes the following subscales: Fatigue, Memory, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), Social Stigma, Worry, Work Limitations, and several single‐item measures (General Health, Number of Seizures, Social Limitations, Social Support, Self Concept, Ambition Limitations, Health Transition, and General Limitations). The NEWQOL was collected at baseline and 1 week post‐baseline from 108 patients in the U.K. and U.S. Results: All of the multi‐item scales had high item discriminant validity, good test‐retest reliability, and acceptable levels of internal consistency reliability; all but the Reading and Stigma subscales had negligible floor and ceiling effects. General linear models were used to examine the known groups validity of NEWQOL. Significant differences were observed in the Worry, Symptoms, Summary Neuropsychological Scales, and all Neuropsychological subscales (Memory, Fatigue, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), indicating poorer functioning in the more frequent or severe seizure groups. Conclusions: Results from this study offer supportive evidence that NEWQOL has good validity and reliability and can discriminate between patient groups, particularly in relation to symptoms and psychological problems. We conclude that NEWQOL represents a useful measure for future studies in this patient population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9580</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10999551</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPILAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Epilepsy - diagnosis ; Epilepsy - psychology ; Female ; Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy ; Health Status ; Health‐related quality of life ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Newly diagnosed epilepsy ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometric validation ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index</subject><ispartof>Epilepsia (Copenhagen), 2000-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1119-1128</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e1f4c4425ce7f67b2d4637488345c3853423d41388404ea52f3708e7aa3509623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e1f4c4425ce7f67b2d4637488345c3853423d41388404ea52f3708e7aa3509623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1477752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10999551$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abetz, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacoby, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Gus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, Pauline</creatorcontrib><title>Patient‐Based Assessments of Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Patients: Validation of the NEWQOL</title><title>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Epilepsia</addtitle><description>Purpose: In epilepsy, patient‐based assessments are increasingly used as outcome measures in clinical trials of novel therapies alongside the traditional clinical measures of efficacy. The objective of this study was to validate psychometrically a quality of life (QOL) measure developed for use with recently diagnosed epilepsy patients. Methods: The NEWQOL (Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Instrument) is a 93‐item self‐administered battery designed to assess QOL in patients with new‐onset epilepsy. NEWQOL consists of eight multi‐item scales (13 subscales) measuring several health parameters: Anxiety, Depression, Social Activities, Symptoms, Locus of Control/Mastery, Neuropsychological Problems (includes the following subscales: Fatigue, Memory, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), Social Stigma, Worry, Work Limitations, and several single‐item measures (General Health, Number of Seizures, Social Limitations, Social Support, Self Concept, Ambition Limitations, Health Transition, and General Limitations). The NEWQOL was collected at baseline and 1 week post‐baseline from 108 patients in the U.K. and U.S. Results: All of the multi‐item scales had high item discriminant validity, good test‐retest reliability, and acceptable levels of internal consistency reliability; all but the Reading and Stigma subscales had negligible floor and ceiling effects. General linear models were used to examine the known groups validity of NEWQOL. Significant differences were observed in the Worry, Symptoms, Summary Neuropsychological Scales, and all Neuropsychological subscales (Memory, Fatigue, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), indicating poorer functioning in the more frequent or severe seizure groups. Conclusions: Results from this study offer supportive evidence that NEWQOL has good validity and reliability and can discriminate between patient groups, particularly in relation to symptoms and psychological problems. We conclude that NEWQOL represents a useful measure for future studies in this patient population.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Epilepsy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Epilepsy - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health‐related quality of life</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Newly diagnosed epilepsy</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometric validation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><issn>0013-9580</issn><issn>1528-1167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMmO1DAQhi0EYpqBV0AWQtwSvMb2XNAwNDBSaxaJ5Wi5kwq4laVJpTWTG4_AM_IkOOpIcMUXu-zvL5c-Ql5wlvO0Xu9yroXNONcmF4yxfNwyJrnJ7x-Q1fJUmIdkxRiXmdOWnZAniLuEmsLIx-SEM-ec1nxF2pswRujG3z9_vQ0IFT1HBMQ2XSHta3p7CE0cp_m4iTXQ2NEruGsm-i6Gb10_J9b72MAeJ7q0wjP6JYWqVPXdHBy_A71af7293jwlj-rQIDxb9lPy-f3608XHbHP94fLifJOVynKXAa9VqZTQJZi6MFtRqUIaZa1UupRWSyVkpbi0VjEFQYtaGmbBhCA1c4WQp-TVse9-6H8cAEffRiyhaUIH_QG9ESKZcC6BZ0ewHHrEAWq_H2Ibhslz5mfZfudno36W7WfZfpHt71P4-fLLYdtC9U_0aDcBLxcgYBmaeghdGfEvp4wxep72zRG7SyKn_5jAr28uE-HkH1ozmyo</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Abetz, Linda</creator><creator>Jacoby, Ann</creator><creator>Baker, Gus A.</creator><creator>McNulty, Pauline</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Patient‐Based Assessments of Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Patients: Validation of the NEWQOL</title><author>Abetz, Linda ; Jacoby, Ann ; Baker, Gus A. ; McNulty, Pauline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e1f4c4425ce7f67b2d4637488345c3853423d41388404ea52f3708e7aa3509623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Epilepsy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Epilepsy - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health‐related quality of life</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Newly diagnosed epilepsy</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometric validation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abetz, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacoby, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Gus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, Pauline</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abetz, Linda</au><au>Jacoby, Ann</au><au>Baker, Gus A.</au><au>McNulty, Pauline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient‐Based Assessments of Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Patients: Validation of the NEWQOL</atitle><jtitle>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Epilepsia</addtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1128</epage><pages>1119-1128</pages><issn>0013-9580</issn><eissn>1528-1167</eissn><coden>EPILAK</coden><abstract>Purpose: In epilepsy, patient‐based assessments are increasingly used as outcome measures in clinical trials of novel therapies alongside the traditional clinical measures of efficacy. The objective of this study was to validate psychometrically a quality of life (QOL) measure developed for use with recently diagnosed epilepsy patients. Methods: The NEWQOL (Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Instrument) is a 93‐item self‐administered battery designed to assess QOL in patients with new‐onset epilepsy. NEWQOL consists of eight multi‐item scales (13 subscales) measuring several health parameters: Anxiety, Depression, Social Activities, Symptoms, Locus of Control/Mastery, Neuropsychological Problems (includes the following subscales: Fatigue, Memory, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), Social Stigma, Worry, Work Limitations, and several single‐item measures (General Health, Number of Seizures, Social Limitations, Social Support, Self Concept, Ambition Limitations, Health Transition, and General Limitations). The NEWQOL was collected at baseline and 1 week post‐baseline from 108 patients in the U.K. and U.S. Results: All of the multi‐item scales had high item discriminant validity, good test‐retest reliability, and acceptable levels of internal consistency reliability; all but the Reading and Stigma subscales had negligible floor and ceiling effects. General linear models were used to examine the known groups validity of NEWQOL. Significant differences were observed in the Worry, Symptoms, Summary Neuropsychological Scales, and all Neuropsychological subscales (Memory, Fatigue, Concentration, Motor Skills, and Reading), indicating poorer functioning in the more frequent or severe seizure groups. Conclusions: Results from this study offer supportive evidence that NEWQOL has good validity and reliability and can discriminate between patient groups, particularly in relation to symptoms and psychological problems. We conclude that NEWQOL represents a useful measure for future studies in this patient population.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10999551</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9580
ispartof Epilepsia (Copenhagen), 2000-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1119-1128
issn 0013-9580
1528-1167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72276799
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Epilepsy - diagnosis
Epilepsy - psychology
Female
Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy
Health Status
Health‐related quality of life
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Newly diagnosed epilepsy
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data
Psychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Psychometric validation
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
title Patient‐Based Assessments of Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Patients: Validation of the NEWQOL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A20%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%E2%80%90Based%20Assessments%20of%20Quality%20of%20Life%20in%20Newly%20Diagnosed%20Epilepsy%20Patients:%20Validation%20of%20the%20NEWQOL&rft.jtitle=Epilepsia%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Abetz,%20Linda&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1128&rft.pages=1119-1128&rft.issn=0013-9580&rft.eissn=1528-1167&rft.coden=EPILAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72276799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72276799&rft_id=info:pmid/10999551&rfr_iscdi=true