Long-term outcome of the ‘Beefburger’ procedure in patients unsuitable for two-stage revision following infected total knee replacement

A 5-year review of a group of 13 patients with infected total knee replacements deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision is presented. The ‘Beefburger’ procedure was initially performed in all the patients as a ‘definitive’ procedure. Eight patients had no further procedure performed, three patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2001-12, Vol.8 (4), p.281-286
Hauptverfasser: Scott, S.J., Hennessey, M.S., Parkinson, R.W., Molloy, A.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 4
container_start_page 281
container_title The knee
container_volume 8
creator Scott, S.J.
Hennessey, M.S.
Parkinson, R.W.
Molloy, A.P.
description A 5-year review of a group of 13 patients with infected total knee replacements deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision is presented. The ‘Beefburger’ procedure was initially performed in all the patients as a ‘definitive’ procedure. Eight patients had no further procedure performed, three patients were deemed suitable for a subsequent arthrodesis, and two went on to above-knee amputation. Three patients died within the first 6 weeks, but infection was successfully eradicated in eight of the remaining 10 patients (80%) at the time of death or latest review. At follow-up, all traceable subjects had Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores and SF-36 scores of below average. No significant difference was found between the ‘Beefburger’ or arthrodesis groups. In conclusion, the ‘Beefburger’ procedure gives results similar to arthrodesis and amputation in patients deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision surgery and should perhaps be considered as an option in these medically compromised patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00104-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72272965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016001001041</els_id><sourcerecordid>72272965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1f0ba1df7c1c5a07a76e8a0fd638ecff27e0257e3b37d7120abf7af48411d14e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1uFDEQhS0EIpPAEYi8imDRUNU_ds8qgogA0kgsgLXldpcnTrrbE9udiF32XACul5PgyYzIkk25ZH2vSvUeY68Q3iKgePcNlqItcgevAd8AINQFPmELbGVVNC3AU7b4hxywwxgvAUAs6-Y5O0CUIMQSFuzXyk_rIlEYuZ-T8SNxb3m6IH5_9_sDke3msKZwf_eHb4I31M-BuJv4RidHU4p8nuLsku4G4tYHnm59EZNeEw9046LzU_4eBn_rpnXWWTKJep580gO_mmiLbQZtaMzDXrBnVg-RXu7fI_bj_OP3s8_F6uunL2fvV4WpBKYCLXQaeysNmkaD1FJQq8H2omrJWFtKgrKRVHWV7CWWoDsrta3bGrHHmqojdrKbmy-6nikmNbpoaBj0RH6OSpalLJeiyWCzA03wMQayahPcqMNPhaC2KaiHFNTW4lzUQwoKs-54v2DuRuofVXvbM3C6AyifeeMoqGiyndleF7JDqvfuPyv-ArD2nIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72272965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term outcome of the ‘Beefburger’ procedure in patients unsuitable for two-stage revision following infected total knee replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Scott, S.J. ; Hennessey, M.S. ; Parkinson, R.W. ; Molloy, A.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, S.J. ; Hennessey, M.S. ; Parkinson, R.W. ; Molloy, A.P.</creatorcontrib><description>A 5-year review of a group of 13 patients with infected total knee replacements deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision is presented. The ‘Beefburger’ procedure was initially performed in all the patients as a ‘definitive’ procedure. Eight patients had no further procedure performed, three patients were deemed suitable for a subsequent arthrodesis, and two went on to above-knee amputation. Three patients died within the first 6 weeks, but infection was successfully eradicated in eight of the remaining 10 patients (80%) at the time of death or latest review. At follow-up, all traceable subjects had Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores and SF-36 scores of below average. No significant difference was found between the ‘Beefburger’ or arthrodesis groups. In conclusion, the ‘Beefburger’ procedure gives results similar to arthrodesis and amputation in patients deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision surgery and should perhaps be considered as an option in these medically compromised patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00104-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11706690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputation ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Arthrodesis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Beefburger procedure ; Debridement ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Female ; Gentamicins - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Total knee replacement ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2001-12, Vol.8 (4), p.281-286</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1f0ba1df7c1c5a07a76e8a0fd638ecff27e0257e3b37d7120abf7af48411d14e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1f0ba1df7c1c5a07a76e8a0fd638ecff27e0257e3b37d7120abf7af48411d14e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00104-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11706690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennessey, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, R.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molloy, A.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term outcome of the ‘Beefburger’ procedure in patients unsuitable for two-stage revision following infected total knee replacement</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>A 5-year review of a group of 13 patients with infected total knee replacements deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision is presented. The ‘Beefburger’ procedure was initially performed in all the patients as a ‘definitive’ procedure. Eight patients had no further procedure performed, three patients were deemed suitable for a subsequent arthrodesis, and two went on to above-knee amputation. Three patients died within the first 6 weeks, but infection was successfully eradicated in eight of the remaining 10 patients (80%) at the time of death or latest review. At follow-up, all traceable subjects had Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores and SF-36 scores of below average. No significant difference was found between the ‘Beefburger’ or arthrodesis groups. In conclusion, the ‘Beefburger’ procedure gives results similar to arthrodesis and amputation in patients deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision surgery and should perhaps be considered as an option in these medically compromised patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Arthrodesis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Beefburger procedure</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gentamicins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Total knee replacement</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1uFDEQhS0EIpPAEYi8imDRUNU_ds8qgogA0kgsgLXldpcnTrrbE9udiF32XACul5PgyYzIkk25ZH2vSvUeY68Q3iKgePcNlqItcgevAd8AINQFPmELbGVVNC3AU7b4hxywwxgvAUAs6-Y5O0CUIMQSFuzXyk_rIlEYuZ-T8SNxb3m6IH5_9_sDke3msKZwf_eHb4I31M-BuJv4RidHU4p8nuLsku4G4tYHnm59EZNeEw9046LzU_4eBn_rpnXWWTKJep580gO_mmiLbQZtaMzDXrBnVg-RXu7fI_bj_OP3s8_F6uunL2fvV4WpBKYCLXQaeysNmkaD1FJQq8H2omrJWFtKgrKRVHWV7CWWoDsrta3bGrHHmqojdrKbmy-6nikmNbpoaBj0RH6OSpalLJeiyWCzA03wMQayahPcqMNPhaC2KaiHFNTW4lzUQwoKs-54v2DuRuofVXvbM3C6AyifeeMoqGiyndleF7JDqvfuPyv-ArD2nIE</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Scott, S.J.</creator><creator>Hennessey, M.S.</creator><creator>Parkinson, R.W.</creator><creator>Molloy, A.P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Long-term outcome of the ‘Beefburger’ procedure in patients unsuitable for two-stage revision following infected total knee replacement</title><author>Scott, S.J. ; Hennessey, M.S. ; Parkinson, R.W. ; Molloy, A.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1f0ba1df7c1c5a07a76e8a0fd638ecff27e0257e3b37d7120abf7af48411d14e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Arthrodesis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Beefburger procedure</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gentamicins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Total knee replacement</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennessey, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, R.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molloy, A.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, S.J.</au><au>Hennessey, M.S.</au><au>Parkinson, R.W.</au><au>Molloy, A.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term outcome of the ‘Beefburger’ procedure in patients unsuitable for two-stage revision following infected total knee replacement</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>281-286</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>A 5-year review of a group of 13 patients with infected total knee replacements deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision is presented. The ‘Beefburger’ procedure was initially performed in all the patients as a ‘definitive’ procedure. Eight patients had no further procedure performed, three patients were deemed suitable for a subsequent arthrodesis, and two went on to above-knee amputation. Three patients died within the first 6 weeks, but infection was successfully eradicated in eight of the remaining 10 patients (80%) at the time of death or latest review. At follow-up, all traceable subjects had Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores and SF-36 scores of below average. No significant difference was found between the ‘Beefburger’ or arthrodesis groups. In conclusion, the ‘Beefburger’ procedure gives results similar to arthrodesis and amputation in patients deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision surgery and should perhaps be considered as an option in these medically compromised patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>11706690</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00104-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2001-12, Vol.8 (4), p.281-286
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72272965
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amputation
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Arthrodesis
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Beefburger procedure
Debridement
Drug Delivery Systems
Female
Gentamicins - administration & dosage
Humans
Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Total knee replacement
Treatment Outcome
title Long-term outcome of the ‘Beefburger’ procedure in patients unsuitable for two-stage revision following infected total knee replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A48%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20outcome%20of%20the%20%E2%80%98Beefburger%E2%80%99%20procedure%20in%20patients%20unsuitable%20for%20two-stage%20revision%20following%20infected%20total%20knee%20replacement&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Scott,%20S.J.&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=281-286&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00104-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72272965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72272965&rft_id=info:pmid/11706690&rft_els_id=S0968016001001041&rfr_iscdi=true