Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2001-10, Vol.18 (10), p.557-565
Hauptverfasser: BLAKE, Deborah L, DEAN, Nicola L, KNIGHT, Casey, SEANG LIN TAN, AO, Asangla
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 565
container_issue 10
container_start_page 557
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 18
creator BLAKE, Deborah L
DEAN, Nicola L
KNIGHT, Casey
SEANG LIN TAN
AO, Asangla
description Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products. Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, > 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate. Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1011958008240
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72268705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72268705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p278t-ce070e22ba63b0256ae8da627fd665e27e307869268d4888aa71e1911706162e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzA3lAreCk6xJym3iW0LiAucqa90R1KalzpB25D8nwCZOtp9_fnoyYycCLgRIdTm_EiBEkVsAK2eww6YiNyozSsFu6iG3Gcy0nbADoncAKKxU-2wihC4KIe2Ufd34EavIq74b3OipD7xveI0xiT4NtKaIHfEVYc2bfuTxDdP6E9t-6DDEH5p8WLaYVdi2fIkBo694RIrEfeDDiL4bWhei-zXcArV3y9CTpyO217iW8HhTD9nr3e3L9UP29Hz_eD1_ygZpbEzuYAClXDitFiBz7dDWTkvT1FrnKA0qMFYXUtt6Zq11zggUhRAGtNAS1SE7__Mdxv5jleKVnaefzC5gv6LSyHRqIE_g6QZcLTqsy2H0nRvX5fZpCTjbAI4q1zajC5Wnf24mwNrCqm_3v31F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72268705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>BLAKE, Deborah L ; DEAN, Nicola L ; KNIGHT, Casey ; SEANG LIN TAN ; AO, Asangla</creator><creatorcontrib>BLAKE, Deborah L ; DEAN, Nicola L ; KNIGHT, Casey ; SEANG LIN TAN ; AO, Asangla</creatorcontrib><description>Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products. Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, &gt; 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate. Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1011958008240</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11699128</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JARGE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis ; Cystic Fibrosis - genetics ; Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics ; DNA - chemistry ; DNA - genetics ; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel ; Female ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Mutation - genetics ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational ; Pregnancy ; Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Single-Blind Method</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2001-10, Vol.18 (10), p.557-565</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14108898$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11699128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLAKE, Deborah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEAN, Nicola L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNIGHT, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEANG LIN TAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AO, Asangla</creatorcontrib><title>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products. Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, &gt; 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate. Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis - genetics</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics</subject><subject>DNA - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzA3lAreCk6xJym3iW0LiAucqa90R1KalzpB25D8nwCZOtp9_fnoyYycCLgRIdTm_EiBEkVsAK2eww6YiNyozSsFu6iG3Gcy0nbADoncAKKxU-2wihC4KIe2Ufd34EavIq74b3OipD7xveI0xiT4NtKaIHfEVYc2bfuTxDdP6E9t-6DDEH5p8WLaYVdi2fIkBo694RIrEfeDDiL4bWhei-zXcArV3y9CTpyO217iW8HhTD9nr3e3L9UP29Hz_eD1_ygZpbEzuYAClXDitFiBz7dDWTkvT1FrnKA0qMFYXUtt6Zq11zggUhRAGtNAS1SE7__Mdxv5jleKVnaefzC5gv6LSyHRqIE_g6QZcLTqsy2H0nRvX5fZpCTjbAI4q1zajC5Wnf24mwNrCqm_3v31F</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>BLAKE, Deborah L</creator><creator>DEAN, Nicola L</creator><creator>KNIGHT, Casey</creator><creator>SEANG LIN TAN</creator><creator>AO, Asangla</creator><general>Kluwer/Plenum</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><author>BLAKE, Deborah L ; DEAN, Nicola L ; KNIGHT, Casey ; SEANG LIN TAN ; AO, Asangla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p278t-ce070e22ba63b0256ae8da627fd665e27e307869268d4888aa71e1911706162e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis - genetics</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics</topic><topic>DNA - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLAKE, Deborah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEAN, Nicola L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNIGHT, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEANG LIN TAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AO, Asangla</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLAKE, Deborah L</au><au>DEAN, Nicola L</au><au>KNIGHT, Casey</au><au>SEANG LIN TAN</au><au>AO, Asangla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>557-565</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><coden>JARGE4</coden><abstract>Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products. Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, &gt; 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate. Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Kluwer/Plenum</pub><pmid>11699128</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1011958008240</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2001-10, Vol.18 (10), p.557-565
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72268705
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis
Cystic Fibrosis - genetics
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics
DNA - chemistry
DNA - genetics
Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel
Female
Genetic Testing - methods
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Metabolic diseases
Mutation - genetics
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational
Pregnancy
Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods
Prenatal Diagnosis - methods
Single-Blind Method
title Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A04%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20comparison%20of%20detection%20systems%20used%20for%20the%20development%20of%20single-cell%20genetic%20tests%20in%20preimplantation%20genetic%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=BLAKE,%20Deborah%20L&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=557-565&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft.coden=JARGE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1011958008240&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72268705%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72268705&rft_id=info:pmid/11699128&rfr_iscdi=true