Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2001-10, Vol.18 (10), p.557-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 565 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 557 |
container_title | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | BLAKE, Deborah L DEAN, Nicola L KNIGHT, Casey SEANG LIN TAN AO, Asangla |
description | Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products.
Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, > 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate.
Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1011958008240 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72268705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72268705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p278t-ce070e22ba63b0256ae8da627fd665e27e307869268d4888aa71e1911706162e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzA3lAreCk6xJym3iW0LiAucqa90R1KalzpB25D8nwCZOtp9_fnoyYycCLgRIdTm_EiBEkVsAK2eww6YiNyozSsFu6iG3Gcy0nbADoncAKKxU-2wihC4KIe2Ufd34EavIq74b3OipD7xveI0xiT4NtKaIHfEVYc2bfuTxDdP6E9t-6DDEH5p8WLaYVdi2fIkBo694RIrEfeDDiL4bWhei-zXcArV3y9CTpyO217iW8HhTD9nr3e3L9UP29Hz_eD1_ygZpbEzuYAClXDitFiBz7dDWTkvT1FrnKA0qMFYXUtt6Zq11zggUhRAGtNAS1SE7__Mdxv5jleKVnaefzC5gv6LSyHRqIE_g6QZcLTqsy2H0nRvX5fZpCTjbAI4q1zajC5Wnf24mwNrCqm_3v31F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72268705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>BLAKE, Deborah L ; DEAN, Nicola L ; KNIGHT, Casey ; SEANG LIN TAN ; AO, Asangla</creator><creatorcontrib>BLAKE, Deborah L ; DEAN, Nicola L ; KNIGHT, Casey ; SEANG LIN TAN ; AO, Asangla</creatorcontrib><description>Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products.
Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, > 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate.
Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1011958008240</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11699128</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JARGE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis ; Cystic Fibrosis - genetics ; Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics ; DNA - chemistry ; DNA - genetics ; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel ; Female ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Mutation - genetics ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational ; Pregnancy ; Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Single-Blind Method</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2001-10, Vol.18 (10), p.557-565</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14108898$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11699128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLAKE, Deborah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEAN, Nicola L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNIGHT, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEANG LIN TAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AO, Asangla</creatorcontrib><title>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products.
Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, > 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate.
Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis - genetics</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics</subject><subject>DNA - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzA3lAreCk6xJym3iW0LiAucqa90R1KalzpB25D8nwCZOtp9_fnoyYycCLgRIdTm_EiBEkVsAK2eww6YiNyozSsFu6iG3Gcy0nbADoncAKKxU-2wihC4KIe2Ufd34EavIq74b3OipD7xveI0xiT4NtKaIHfEVYc2bfuTxDdP6E9t-6DDEH5p8WLaYVdi2fIkBo694RIrEfeDDiL4bWhei-zXcArV3y9CTpyO217iW8HhTD9nr3e3L9UP29Hz_eD1_ygZpbEzuYAClXDitFiBz7dDWTkvT1FrnKA0qMFYXUtt6Zq11zggUhRAGtNAS1SE7__Mdxv5jleKVnaefzC5gv6LSyHRqIE_g6QZcLTqsy2H0nRvX5fZpCTjbAI4q1zajC5Wnf24mwNrCqm_3v31F</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>BLAKE, Deborah L</creator><creator>DEAN, Nicola L</creator><creator>KNIGHT, Casey</creator><creator>SEANG LIN TAN</creator><creator>AO, Asangla</creator><general>Kluwer/Plenum</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><author>BLAKE, Deborah L ; DEAN, Nicola L ; KNIGHT, Casey ; SEANG LIN TAN ; AO, Asangla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p278t-ce070e22ba63b0256ae8da627fd665e27e307869268d4888aa71e1911706162e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis - genetics</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics</topic><topic>DNA - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLAKE, Deborah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEAN, Nicola L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNIGHT, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEANG LIN TAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AO, Asangla</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLAKE, Deborah L</au><au>DEAN, Nicola L</au><au>KNIGHT, Casey</au><au>SEANG LIN TAN</au><au>AO, Asangla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>557-565</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><coden>JARGE4</coden><abstract>Single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires efficient amplification and accurate detection. We compare the accuracy of heteroduplex, fluorescent-fragment, and fluorescent single-strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) analysis as detection systems for analysis of a PCR assay developed for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
A single-cell, fluorescent multiplex PCR assay was developed for the cystic fibrosis delta F508 mutation and the short tandem repeat, D21S11. Detection systems were compared by analyzing blinded PCR products.
Amplification rates for cystic fibrosis were 89% by heteroduplex and 91% by fragment analysis, while it was 72% for D21S11 by fragment analysis. No difference in allele dropout was detected for cystic fibrosis by any method (2%). Overall accuracy was high, > 97%, although SSCP was the least accurate.
Heteroduplex and fragment analysis proved equal in the diagnosis of a single amplified locus. We determined that fragment analysis allows maximal accuracy of detection and permits analysis of a second loci, controlling for DNA contamination and allelic dropout.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Kluwer/Plenum</pub><pmid>11699128</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1011958008240</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0468 |
ispartof | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2001-10, Vol.18 (10), p.557-565 |
issn | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72268705 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis Cystic Fibrosis - genetics Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator - genetics DNA - chemistry DNA - genetics Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel Female Genetic Testing - methods Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Metabolic diseases Mutation - genetics Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Polymerase Chain Reaction Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational Pregnancy Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods Prenatal Diagnosis - methods Single-Blind Method |
title | Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A04%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20comparison%20of%20detection%20systems%20used%20for%20the%20development%20of%20single-cell%20genetic%20tests%20in%20preimplantation%20genetic%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=BLAKE,%20Deborah%20L&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=557-565&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft.coden=JARGE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1011958008240&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72268705%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72268705&rft_id=info:pmid/11699128&rfr_iscdi=true |