Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?

Objectives To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance. Design Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2001-10, Vol.108 (10), p.1025-1030
Hauptverfasser: Flannelly, G., Bolger, B., Fawzi, H., Lopes, A., Monaghan, J.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1030
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1025
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 108
creator Flannelly, G.
Bolger, B.
Fawzi, H.
Lopes, A.
Monaghan, J.M.
description Objectives To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance. Design Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears. Population Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years). Setting Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead. Methods Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities. Results Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged < 50 with no disease at the margins (n=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (n=93); and 3. women aged < 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (n=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged < 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00240.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72265880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72265880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-3233100f33788ba40a35c2db3d4733ec42df9f39f57e760aa0cb46e7728566e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQQC1ERUvhLyBf4JZ07EliFyEhqFpKtVIPLRculmOPIYt3vdgbtf33JN0VvXYuM9K8-dBjjAuoxRQny1o0SlTQSl1LAFEDyAbq-xfs6H_j5WMNFaDUh-x1KcsJ7CTgK3YohAKpUR6xm4sUY7rj44bbsKXMF4vz258fuUtj9Ly43-THSIX3xFfJD2Egz61zKfth_YtvE89D-cNT4JncmDOtHX1-ww6CjYXe7vMx-3Fxfnt2WS2uv30_-7KoHMoOKpSIAiAgKq1724DF1knfo28UIrlG-nAa8DS0ilQH1oLrm46UkrrtOgI8Zh92ezc5_R2pbM1qKI5itGtKYzFKyq7Vegb1DnQ5lZIpmE0eVjY_GAFmFmqWZvZmZm9mFmoehZr7afTd_sbYr8g_De4NTsD7PWCLszFku3ZDeeIa0B0qMXGfdtzdEOnh2Q-Yr1fXU4H_ABmxjtE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72265880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Flannelly, G. ; Bolger, B. ; Fawzi, H. ; Lopes, A. ; Monaghan, J.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flannelly, G. ; Bolger, B. ; Fawzi, H. ; Lopes, A. ; Monaghan, J.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance. Design Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears. Population Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years). Setting Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead. Methods Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities. Results Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged &lt; 50 with no disease at the margins (n=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (n=93); and 3. women aged &lt; 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (n=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged &lt; 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00240.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11702832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention &amp; control ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - surgery ; Clinical Protocols ; Colposcopy - methods ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery ; Vaginal Smears</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2001-10, Vol.108 (10), p.1025-1030</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-3233100f33788ba40a35c2db3d4733ec42df9f39f57e760aa0cb46e7728566e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-3233100f33788ba40a35c2db3d4733ec42df9f39f57e760aa0cb46e7728566e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2001.00240.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2001.00240.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14086371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11702832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flannelly, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolger, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawzi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, J.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objectives To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance. Design Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears. Population Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years). Setting Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead. Methods Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities. Results Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged &lt; 50 with no disease at the margins (n=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (n=93); and 3. women aged &lt; 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (n=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged &lt; 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Colposcopy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQQC1ERUvhLyBf4JZ07EliFyEhqFpKtVIPLRculmOPIYt3vdgbtf33JN0VvXYuM9K8-dBjjAuoxRQny1o0SlTQSl1LAFEDyAbq-xfs6H_j5WMNFaDUh-x1KcsJ7CTgK3YohAKpUR6xm4sUY7rj44bbsKXMF4vz258fuUtj9Ly43-THSIX3xFfJD2Egz61zKfth_YtvE89D-cNT4JncmDOtHX1-ww6CjYXe7vMx-3Fxfnt2WS2uv30_-7KoHMoOKpSIAiAgKq1724DF1knfo28UIrlG-nAa8DS0ilQH1oLrm46UkrrtOgI8Zh92ezc5_R2pbM1qKI5itGtKYzFKyq7Vegb1DnQ5lZIpmE0eVjY_GAFmFmqWZvZmZm9mFmoehZr7afTd_sbYr8g_De4NTsD7PWCLszFku3ZDeeIa0B0qMXGfdtzdEOnh2Q-Yr1fXU4H_ABmxjtE</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Flannelly, G.</creator><creator>Bolger, B.</creator><creator>Fawzi, H.</creator><creator>Lopes, A.</creator><creator>Monaghan, J.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?</title><author>Flannelly, G. ; Bolger, B. ; Fawzi, H. ; Lopes, A. ; Monaghan, J.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-3233100f33788ba40a35c2db3d4733ec42df9f39f57e760aa0cb46e7728566e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Colposcopy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flannelly, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolger, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawzi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, J.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flannelly, G.</au><au>Bolger, B.</au><au>Fawzi, H.</au><au>Lopes, A.</au><au>Monaghan, J.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1025</spage><epage>1030</epage><pages>1025-1030</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Objectives To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance. Design Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears. Population Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years). Setting Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead. Methods Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities. Results Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged &lt; 50 with no disease at the margins (n=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (n=93); and 3. women aged &lt; 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (n=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged &lt; 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11702832</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00240.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2001-10, Vol.108 (10), p.1025-1030
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72265880
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention & control
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - surgery
Clinical Protocols
Colposcopy - methods
Female
Female genital diseases
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Vaginal Smears
title Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A50%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Follow%20up%20after%20LLETZ:%20could%20schedules%20be%20modified%20according%20to%20risk%20of%20recurrence?&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Flannelly,%20G.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1025&rft.epage=1030&rft.pages=1025-1030&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00240.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72265880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72265880&rft_id=info:pmid/11702832&rfr_iscdi=true