Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model

OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND Low energy biphasic countershocks have b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000-09, Vol.36 (3), p.932-938
Hauptverfasser: Niemann, James T, Burian, Daniel, Garner, Daniel, Lewis, Roger J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 938
container_issue 3
container_start_page 932
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 36
creator Niemann, James T
Burian, Daniel
Garner, Daniel
Lewis, Roger J
description OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities. METHODS Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation. RESULTS The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72263139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109700007816</els_id><sourcerecordid>72263139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vFSEUhomxsdfqT9CwMI0uRmEYvlbGNH4lNS7UNWEOjBedC1eYaeO_97T3Rt11BefkeeHNQ8gTzl5yxtWrL0wL2XFm9XPGXjCmDe_UPbLhUppOSKvvk81f5JQ8bO0HY0wZbh-QU9wZrfp-Q8qnkst-61sCehVrWxsd03Feqs9t2ZbqAScoa16Q2Bb4Sf2EV7qvZS75ewwYzUtNsM6-0imNNc2zX1LJNGXqabtOOdJdCXF-RE4mP7f4-HiekW_v3n69-NBdfn7_8eLNZQeD5ktnJhuEAaNtGJXRehwGYeI0MtyPvfCG4zYAE720PYxGqjBgEFmQymojzsj54V3s-GuNbXG71CBirRzL2pzueyW4sAjKAwi1tFbj5PY17Xz97ThzN6bdrWl3o9Ex5m5NO4W5p8cP1nEXw3-pg1oEnh0B38DPE8qE1P5xg7WWS8ReH7CINq5SrK5BihliSDXC4kJJdzT5A0rpnI8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72263139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Niemann, James T ; Burian, Daniel ; Garner, Daniel ; Lewis, Roger J</creator><creatorcontrib>Niemann, James T ; Burian, Daniel ; Garner, Daniel ; Lewis, Roger J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities. METHODS Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation. RESULTS The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10987622</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACCDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Diseases of the cardiovascular system ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Female ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Odds Ratio ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Swine ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000-09, Vol.36 (3), p.932-938</ispartof><rights>2000 American College of Cardiology</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1499915$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10987622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niemann, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burian, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Roger J</creatorcontrib><title>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities. METHODS Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation. RESULTS The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1vFSEUhomxsdfqT9CwMI0uRmEYvlbGNH4lNS7UNWEOjBedC1eYaeO_97T3Rt11BefkeeHNQ8gTzl5yxtWrL0wL2XFm9XPGXjCmDe_UPbLhUppOSKvvk81f5JQ8bO0HY0wZbh-QU9wZrfp-Q8qnkst-61sCehVrWxsd03Feqs9t2ZbqAScoa16Q2Bb4Sf2EV7qvZS75ewwYzUtNsM6-0imNNc2zX1LJNGXqabtOOdJdCXF-RE4mP7f4-HiekW_v3n69-NBdfn7_8eLNZQeD5ktnJhuEAaNtGJXRehwGYeI0MtyPvfCG4zYAE720PYxGqjBgEFmQymojzsj54V3s-GuNbXG71CBirRzL2pzueyW4sAjKAwi1tFbj5PY17Xz97ThzN6bdrWl3o9Ex5m5NO4W5p8cP1nEXw3-pg1oEnh0B38DPE8qE1P5xg7WWS8ReH7CINq5SrK5BihliSDXC4kJJdzT5A0rpnI8</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Niemann, James T</creator><creator>Burian, Daniel</creator><creator>Garner, Daniel</creator><creator>Lewis, Roger J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</title><author>Niemann, James T ; Burian, Daniel ; Garner, Daniel ; Lewis, Roger J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niemann, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burian, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Roger J</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niemann, James T</au><au>Burian, Daniel</au><au>Garner, Daniel</au><au>Lewis, Roger J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>932</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>932-938</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><coden>JACCDI</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities. METHODS Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation. RESULTS The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10987622</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000-09, Vol.36 (3), p.932-938
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72263139
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Diseases of the cardiovascular system
Electric Countershock - methods
Female
Male
Medical sciences
Odds Ratio
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Swine
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
title Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A13%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monophasic%20versus%20biphasic%20transthoracic%20countershock%20after%20prolonged%20ventricular%20fibrillation%20in%20a%20swine%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Niemann,%20James%20T&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=932&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=932-938&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft.coden=JACCDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72263139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72263139&rft_id=info:pmid/10987622&rft_els_id=S0735109700007816&rfr_iscdi=true