Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model
OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND Low energy biphasic countershocks have b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000-09, Vol.36 (3), p.932-938 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 938 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 932 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Niemann, James T Burian, Daniel Garner, Daniel Lewis, Roger J |
description | OBJECTIVE
We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF).
BACKGROUND
Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities.
METHODS
Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation.
RESULTS
The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation.
CONCLUSIONS
Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72263139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109700007816</els_id><sourcerecordid>72263139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vFSEUhomxsdfqT9CwMI0uRmEYvlbGNH4lNS7UNWEOjBedC1eYaeO_97T3Rt11BefkeeHNQ8gTzl5yxtWrL0wL2XFm9XPGXjCmDe_UPbLhUppOSKvvk81f5JQ8bO0HY0wZbh-QU9wZrfp-Q8qnkst-61sCehVrWxsd03Feqs9t2ZbqAScoa16Q2Bb4Sf2EV7qvZS75ewwYzUtNsM6-0imNNc2zX1LJNGXqabtOOdJdCXF-RE4mP7f4-HiekW_v3n69-NBdfn7_8eLNZQeD5ktnJhuEAaNtGJXRehwGYeI0MtyPvfCG4zYAE720PYxGqjBgEFmQymojzsj54V3s-GuNbXG71CBirRzL2pzueyW4sAjKAwi1tFbj5PY17Xz97ThzN6bdrWl3o9Ex5m5NO4W5p8cP1nEXw3-pg1oEnh0B38DPE8qE1P5xg7WWS8ReH7CINq5SrK5BihliSDXC4kJJdzT5A0rpnI8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72263139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Niemann, James T ; Burian, Daniel ; Garner, Daniel ; Lewis, Roger J</creator><creatorcontrib>Niemann, James T ; Burian, Daniel ; Garner, Daniel ; Lewis, Roger J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE
We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF).
BACKGROUND
Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities.
METHODS
Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation.
RESULTS
The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation.
CONCLUSIONS
Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10987622</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACCDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Diseases of the cardiovascular system ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Female ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Odds Ratio ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Swine ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000-09, Vol.36 (3), p.932-938</ispartof><rights>2000 American College of Cardiology</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1499915$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10987622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niemann, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burian, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Roger J</creatorcontrib><title>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE
We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF).
BACKGROUND
Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities.
METHODS
Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation.
RESULTS
The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation.
CONCLUSIONS
Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1vFSEUhomxsdfqT9CwMI0uRmEYvlbGNH4lNS7UNWEOjBedC1eYaeO_97T3Rt11BefkeeHNQ8gTzl5yxtWrL0wL2XFm9XPGXjCmDe_UPbLhUppOSKvvk81f5JQ8bO0HY0wZbh-QU9wZrfp-Q8qnkst-61sCehVrWxsd03Feqs9t2ZbqAScoa16Q2Bb4Sf2EV7qvZS75ewwYzUtNsM6-0imNNc2zX1LJNGXqabtOOdJdCXF-RE4mP7f4-HiekW_v3n69-NBdfn7_8eLNZQeD5ktnJhuEAaNtGJXRehwGYeI0MtyPvfCG4zYAE720PYxGqjBgEFmQymojzsj54V3s-GuNbXG71CBirRzL2pzueyW4sAjKAwi1tFbj5PY17Xz97ThzN6bdrWl3o9Ex5m5NO4W5p8cP1nEXw3-pg1oEnh0B38DPE8qE1P5xg7WWS8ReH7CINq5SrK5BihliSDXC4kJJdzT5A0rpnI8</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Niemann, James T</creator><creator>Burian, Daniel</creator><creator>Garner, Daniel</creator><creator>Lewis, Roger J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</title><author>Niemann, James T ; Burian, Daniel ; Garner, Daniel ; Lewis, Roger J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-8f9d38c879db6877b4438efb0f9db23a81687dc032592cb856d4471b68c569783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niemann, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burian, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Roger J</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niemann, James T</au><au>Burian, Daniel</au><au>Garner, Daniel</au><au>Lewis, Roger J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>932</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>932-938</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><coden>JACCDI</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE
We sought to compare the defibrillation efficacy of a low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a conventional higher-energy monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveform after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF).
BACKGROUND
Low energy biphasic countershocks have been shown to be effective after brief episodes of VF (15 to 30 s) and to produce few postshock electrocardiogram abnormalities.
METHODS
Swine were randomized to MTE (n = 18) or BTE (n = 20) after 5 min of VF. The first MTE shock dose was 200 J, and first BTE dose 150 J. If required, up to two additional shocks were administered (300, 360 J MTE; 150, 150 J BTE). If VF persisted manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and shocks were administered until VF was terminated. Successful defibrillation was defined as termination of VF regardless of postshock rhythm. If countershock terminated VF but was followed by a nonperfusing rhythm, CPR was performed until a perfusing rhythm developed. Arterial pressure, left ventricular (LV) pressure, first derivative of LV pressure and cardiac output were measured at intervals for 60 min postresuscitation.
RESULTS
The odds ratio of first-shock success with BTE versus MTE was 0.67 (p = 0.55). The rate of termination of VF with the second or third shocks was similar between groups, as was the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity (15/18 MTE, 18/20 BTE) and CPR time for those animals that were resuscitated. Hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between groups at 15, 30 and 60 min after resuscitation.
CONCLUSIONS
Monophasic and biphasic waveforms were equally effective in terminating prolonged VF with the first shock, and there was no apparent clinical disadvantage of subsequent low-energy biphasic shocks compared with progressive energy monophasic shocks. Lower-energy shocks were not associated with less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10987622</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000-09, Vol.36 (3), p.932-938 |
issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72263139 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Diseases of the cardiovascular system Electric Countershock - methods Female Male Medical sciences Odds Ratio Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Swine Treatment Outcome Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy |
title | Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A13%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monophasic%20versus%20biphasic%20transthoracic%20countershock%20after%20prolonged%20ventricular%20fibrillation%20in%20a%20swine%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Niemann,%20James%20T&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=932&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=932-938&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft.coden=JACCDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00781-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72263139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72263139&rft_id=info:pmid/10987622&rft_els_id=S0735109700007816&rfr_iscdi=true |