Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision

Purpose: To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction. Setting: Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan. Methods: Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2001-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1615-1619
Hauptverfasser: Matsumoto, Yukihiro, Hara, Tsutomu, Chiba, Keizo, Chikuda, Makoto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1619
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1615
container_title Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
container_volume 27
creator Matsumoto, Yukihiro
Hara, Tsutomu
Chiba, Keizo
Chikuda, Makoto
description Purpose: To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction. Setting: Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan. Methods: Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results: In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively ( P < .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively ( P < .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian. Conclusions: The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72255526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886335001008768</els_id><sourcerecordid>72255526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAQgEVpaTZpf0KLLg3pwYnGsmT7FELoCwI5ND0LSR6lKn5sNXJL_n212SU5FgYGhm8efMPYOxDnIEBffBddpysplTgT8FGIrtVV94JtoGtl1ShRv2SbJ-SIHRP9EkI0tVSv2RGALpiGDcu32xwnO_I4-0hxmTnFjMTzwheXbZy5LUE53k82R5qqkBC5X9KMltuQMXFvs03WZ05rusf0wP_G_JNbLs9rPk2lmteEIxI97XjDXgU7Er495BP24_Onu-uv1c3tl2_XVzeVlz3kyg0AA3rhwLda6cGHvu0RBTgl9RBs7_oaasAGau36ToJyIoQ2OGhaJQchT9jpfu42Lb9XpGymSB7H0c64rGTaulZK1bqAag_6tBAlDGabipX0YECYnW7zqNvsXBoB5lG36Urf-8OC1U04PHcd_BbgwwGw5O0Ykt0peOYaAFleUrjLPYdFx5-IyZCPOHscYkKfzbDE_5zyD1_FnYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72255526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Hara, Tsutomu ; Chiba, Keizo ; Chikuda, Makoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Hara, Tsutomu ; Chiba, Keizo ; Chikuda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction. Setting: Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan. Methods: Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results: In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively ( P &lt; .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively ( P &lt; .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian. Conclusions: The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11687361</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Astigmatism - physiopathology ; Astigmatism - prevention &amp; control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cornea - physiopathology ; Corneal Topography ; Humans ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Limbus Corneae - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Phacoemulsification ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Suture Techniques ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1615-1619</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886335001008768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14113235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Keizo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikuda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</title><title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction. Setting: Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan. Methods: Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results: In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively ( P &lt; .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively ( P &lt; .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian. Conclusions: The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Astigmatism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Astigmatism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cornea - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corneal Topography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Limbus Corneae - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>0886-3350</issn><issn>1873-4502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAQgEVpaTZpf0KLLg3pwYnGsmT7FELoCwI5ND0LSR6lKn5sNXJL_n212SU5FgYGhm8efMPYOxDnIEBffBddpysplTgT8FGIrtVV94JtoGtl1ShRv2SbJ-SIHRP9EkI0tVSv2RGALpiGDcu32xwnO_I4-0hxmTnFjMTzwheXbZy5LUE53k82R5qqkBC5X9KMltuQMXFvs03WZ05rusf0wP_G_JNbLs9rPk2lmteEIxI97XjDXgU7Er495BP24_Onu-uv1c3tl2_XVzeVlz3kyg0AA3rhwLda6cGHvu0RBTgl9RBs7_oaasAGau36ToJyIoQ2OGhaJQchT9jpfu42Lb9XpGymSB7H0c64rGTaulZK1bqAag_6tBAlDGabipX0YECYnW7zqNvsXBoB5lG36Urf-8OC1U04PHcd_BbgwwGw5O0Ykt0peOYaAFleUrjLPYdFx5-IyZCPOHscYkKfzbDE_5zyD1_FnYE</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Hara, Tsutomu</creator><creator>Chiba, Keizo</creator><creator>Chikuda, Makoto</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</title><author>Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Hara, Tsutomu ; Chiba, Keizo ; Chikuda, Makoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Astigmatism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Astigmatism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cornea - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corneal Topography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Limbus Corneae - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Keizo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikuda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</au><au>Hara, Tsutomu</au><au>Chiba, Keizo</au><au>Chikuda, Makoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1615</spage><epage>1619</epage><pages>1615-1619</pages><issn>0886-3350</issn><eissn>1873-4502</eissn><coden>JCSUEV</coden><abstract>Purpose: To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction. Setting: Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan. Methods: Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results: In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively ( P &lt; .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively ( P &lt; .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian. Conclusions: The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11687361</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-3350
ispartof Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1615-1619
issn 0886-3350
1873-4502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72255526
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Astigmatism - physiopathology
Astigmatism - prevention & control
Biological and medical sciences
Cornea - physiopathology
Corneal Topography
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Limbus Corneae - surgery
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Phacoemulsification
Postoperative Complications - physiopathology
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the eye and orbit
Suture Techniques
Sutures
title Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A35%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20incision%20sites%20to%20obtain%20an%20astigmatism-free%20cornea%20after%20cataract%20surgery%20with%20a%203.2%20mm%20sutureless%20incision&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cataract%20and%20refractive%20surgery&rft.au=Matsumoto,%20Yukihiro&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1615&rft.epage=1619&rft.pages=1615-1619&rft.issn=0886-3350&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.coden=JCSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72255526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72255526&rft_id=info:pmid/11687361&rft_els_id=S0886335001008768&rfr_iscdi=true