Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision
Purpose: To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction. Setting: Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan. Methods: Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2001-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1615-1619 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1619 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1615 |
container_title | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Matsumoto, Yukihiro Hara, Tsutomu Chiba, Keizo Chikuda, Makoto |
description | Purpose:
To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction.
Setting:
Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Methods:
Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
Results:
In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively (
P < .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively (
P < .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian.
Conclusions:
The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72255526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886335001008768</els_id><sourcerecordid>72255526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAQgEVpaTZpf0KLLg3pwYnGsmT7FELoCwI5ND0LSR6lKn5sNXJL_n212SU5FgYGhm8efMPYOxDnIEBffBddpysplTgT8FGIrtVV94JtoGtl1ShRv2SbJ-SIHRP9EkI0tVSv2RGALpiGDcu32xwnO_I4-0hxmTnFjMTzwheXbZy5LUE53k82R5qqkBC5X9KMltuQMXFvs03WZ05rusf0wP_G_JNbLs9rPk2lmteEIxI97XjDXgU7Er495BP24_Onu-uv1c3tl2_XVzeVlz3kyg0AA3rhwLda6cGHvu0RBTgl9RBs7_oaasAGau36ToJyIoQ2OGhaJQchT9jpfu42Lb9XpGymSB7H0c64rGTaulZK1bqAag_6tBAlDGabipX0YECYnW7zqNvsXBoB5lG36Urf-8OC1U04PHcd_BbgwwGw5O0Ykt0peOYaAFleUrjLPYdFx5-IyZCPOHscYkKfzbDE_5zyD1_FnYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72255526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Hara, Tsutomu ; Chiba, Keizo ; Chikuda, Makoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Hara, Tsutomu ; Chiba, Keizo ; Chikuda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction.
Setting:
Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Methods:
Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
Results:
In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively (
P < .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively (
P < .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian.
Conclusions:
The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11687361</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Astigmatism - physiopathology ; Astigmatism - prevention & control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cornea - physiopathology ; Corneal Topography ; Humans ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Limbus Corneae - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Phacoemulsification ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Suture Techniques ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1615-1619</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886335001008768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14113235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Keizo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikuda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</title><title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose:
To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction.
Setting:
Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Methods:
Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
Results:
In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively (
P < .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively (
P < .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian.
Conclusions:
The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Astigmatism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Astigmatism - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cornea - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corneal Topography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Limbus Corneae - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>0886-3350</issn><issn>1873-4502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAQgEVpaTZpf0KLLg3pwYnGsmT7FELoCwI5ND0LSR6lKn5sNXJL_n212SU5FgYGhm8efMPYOxDnIEBffBddpysplTgT8FGIrtVV94JtoGtl1ShRv2SbJ-SIHRP9EkI0tVSv2RGALpiGDcu32xwnO_I4-0hxmTnFjMTzwheXbZy5LUE53k82R5qqkBC5X9KMltuQMXFvs03WZ05rusf0wP_G_JNbLs9rPk2lmteEIxI97XjDXgU7Er495BP24_Onu-uv1c3tl2_XVzeVlz3kyg0AA3rhwLda6cGHvu0RBTgl9RBs7_oaasAGau36ToJyIoQ2OGhaJQchT9jpfu42Lb9XpGymSB7H0c64rGTaulZK1bqAag_6tBAlDGabipX0YECYnW7zqNvsXBoB5lG36Urf-8OC1U04PHcd_BbgwwGw5O0Ykt0peOYaAFleUrjLPYdFx5-IyZCPOHscYkKfzbDE_5zyD1_FnYE</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Hara, Tsutomu</creator><creator>Chiba, Keizo</creator><creator>Chikuda, Makoto</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</title><author>Matsumoto, Yukihiro ; Hara, Tsutomu ; Chiba, Keizo ; Chikuda, Makoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bd11dec0b1c7656dcf979ee01b536dfa9b92121e4126b98315b0ff7fb14753d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Astigmatism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Astigmatism - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cornea - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corneal Topography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Limbus Corneae - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Keizo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikuda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsumoto, Yukihiro</au><au>Hara, Tsutomu</au><au>Chiba, Keizo</au><au>Chikuda, Makoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1615</spage><epage>1619</epage><pages>1615-1619</pages><issn>0886-3350</issn><eissn>1873-4502</eissn><coden>JCSUEV</coden><abstract>Purpose:
To determine the optimal incision to eliminate astigmatism after cataract extraction.
Setting:
Hara Eye Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Methods:
Patients having cataract extraction through a 3.2 mm corneal limbal incision without limbal sutures were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 98 eyes of 80 patients without preoperative astigmatism and Group 2, 72 eyes of 62 patients with no astigmatism postoperatively. In Group 1, the incisions that caused postoperative corneal changes were retrospectively evaluated. In Group 2, the types of incisions that induced an astigmatism-free cornea postoperatively were retrospectively studied. Patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
Results:
In Group 1, 23 of 40 eyes (57.5%) with an incision between 9 and 12 o’clock (BENT incision) and 10 of 58 eyes (17.2%) with an incision at 12 o’clock remained astigmatism free postoperatively (
P < .0001). One eye (2.5%) with a BENT incision and 17 (29.3%) with a 12 o’clock incision had astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) postoperatively (
P < .001). In Group 2, 72 eyes had less than 1.2 D of preoperative astigmatism. No eye with more than 1.2 D of astigmatism was astigmatism free postoperatively, even when the incision was made at the steepest meridian.
Conclusions:
The results indicate that to reduce astigmatism in eyes with preoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or more, a limbal 3.2 mm BENT incision should be placed at 10:30 o’clock. To prevent astigmatism postoperatively, the incision should be placed at the steepest meridian in eyes with preoperative astigmatism greater than 0.5 D; for preoperative astigmatism greater than 1.2 D, a 3.2 mm incision at the corneal limbus is insufficient and a wider incision or an additional incision is required.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11687361</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-3350 |
ispartof | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1615-1619 |
issn | 0886-3350 1873-4502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72255526 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Astigmatism - physiopathology Astigmatism - prevention & control Biological and medical sciences Cornea - physiopathology Corneal Topography Humans Lens Implantation, Intraocular Limbus Corneae - surgery Medical sciences Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Phacoemulsification Postoperative Complications - physiopathology Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit Suture Techniques Sutures |
title | Optimal incision sites to obtain an astigmatism-free cornea after cataract surgery with a 3.2 mm sutureless incision |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A35%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20incision%20sites%20to%20obtain%20an%20astigmatism-free%20cornea%20after%20cataract%20surgery%20with%20a%203.2%20mm%20sutureless%20incision&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cataract%20and%20refractive%20surgery&rft.au=Matsumoto,%20Yukihiro&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1615&rft.epage=1619&rft.pages=1615-1619&rft.issn=0886-3350&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.coden=JCSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00876-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72255526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72255526&rft_id=info:pmid/11687361&rft_els_id=S0886335001008768&rfr_iscdi=true |