The Microtensile Strength of Bonding Resins
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage. Methods: Cyli...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Australian dental journal 2001-09, Vol.46 (3), p.194-197 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 197 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 194 |
| container_title | Australian dental journal |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Hogan, Lucinda C. Burrow, Michael F. |
| description | Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage.
Methods: Cylinders of bonding resin 2.4±0.2mm diameter and 9.5mm long were made and stored at 37d̀C for 24 hours. The specimens were milled into dumb‐bell shapes and stored in either air or water at 37d̀C. Five specimens of each material were stressed in tension after the specified storage times at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine. The mean tensile strengths of bonding resins were calculated and analysed statistically using one‐way analysis of variance, lower standard deviation and student t‐tests.
Results: Comparison of the air and water samples at all test periods showed the tensile strengths of specimens stored in water were significantly less than those stored in air (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72253791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72253791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-6aa6c5162365d3e616f70dd2b8f292ff696de3e71deae04acd171eba98a39a4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1PwzAMhiMEYuPjL6CKAxfUEidp2nBAGuNbQ0gwzlHauFunrh1NJ7Z_T6tVcMYXH_y8tvUQcg40gLauFgHEXPhRDCpglELQJJSyGILNHhn-jvbJkFIR-lQwGJAj5xYtJHhED8kAQKoQwnhILqdz9F7ztK4aLF1eoPfR1FjOmrlXZd5tVdq8nHnv6PLSnZCDzBQOT_t-TD4f7qfjJ3_y9vg8Hk38VHApfGmMTEOQjMvQcpQgs4hay5I4Y4plmVTSIscILBqkwqQWIsDEqNhwZYThx-Rit3dVV19rdI1e5i7FojAlVmunI8ZCHilowesd2L7vXI2ZXtX50tRbDVR3qvRCdz5050N3qnSvSm_a8Fl_ZZ0s0f5FezctcLMDvlst23-s1qO7F1CC_wCyn3gc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72253791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Microtensile Strength of Bonding Resins</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hogan, Lucinda C. ; Burrow, Michael F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lucinda C. ; Burrow, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage.
Methods: Cylinders of bonding resin 2.4±0.2mm diameter and 9.5mm long were made and stored at 37d̀C for 24 hours. The specimens were milled into dumb‐bell shapes and stored in either air or water at 37d̀C. Five specimens of each material were stressed in tension after the specified storage times at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine. The mean tensile strengths of bonding resins were calculated and analysed statistically using one‐way analysis of variance, lower standard deviation and student t‐tests.
Results: Comparison of the air and water samples at all test periods showed the tensile strengths of specimens stored in water were significantly less than those stored in air (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The effect of water on the tensile strength of bonding resins indicated a slight decrease in strength of each material over the 168 day test period, whereas the air samples showed little change over the test period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-0421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1834-7819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11695158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; bonding resin ; Dental Bonding ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Dentistry ; Drug Storage ; low viscosity composite ; Materials Testing ; Methacrylates ; Microtensile strength ; Resin Cements ; Tensile Strength ; Time Factors ; Viscosity ; Water</subject><ispartof>Australian dental journal, 2001-09, Vol.46 (3), p.194-197</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-6aa6c5162365d3e616f70dd2b8f292ff696de3e71deae04acd171eba98a39a4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-6aa6c5162365d3e616f70dd2b8f292ff696de3e71deae04acd171eba98a39a4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11695158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lucinda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burrow, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Microtensile Strength of Bonding Resins</title><title>Australian dental journal</title><addtitle>Aust Dent J</addtitle><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage.
Methods: Cylinders of bonding resin 2.4±0.2mm diameter and 9.5mm long were made and stored at 37d̀C for 24 hours. The specimens were milled into dumb‐bell shapes and stored in either air or water at 37d̀C. Five specimens of each material were stressed in tension after the specified storage times at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine. The mean tensile strengths of bonding resins were calculated and analysed statistically using one‐way analysis of variance, lower standard deviation and student t‐tests.
Results: Comparison of the air and water samples at all test periods showed the tensile strengths of specimens stored in water were significantly less than those stored in air (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The effect of water on the tensile strength of bonding resins indicated a slight decrease in strength of each material over the 168 day test period, whereas the air samples showed little change over the test period.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>bonding resin</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Drug Storage</subject><subject>low viscosity composite</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Methacrylates</subject><subject>Microtensile strength</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0045-0421</issn><issn>1834-7819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1PwzAMhiMEYuPjL6CKAxfUEidp2nBAGuNbQ0gwzlHauFunrh1NJ7Z_T6tVcMYXH_y8tvUQcg40gLauFgHEXPhRDCpglELQJJSyGILNHhn-jvbJkFIR-lQwGJAj5xYtJHhED8kAQKoQwnhILqdz9F7ztK4aLF1eoPfR1FjOmrlXZd5tVdq8nHnv6PLSnZCDzBQOT_t-TD4f7qfjJ3_y9vg8Hk38VHApfGmMTEOQjMvQcpQgs4hay5I4Y4plmVTSIscILBqkwqQWIsDEqNhwZYThx-Rit3dVV19rdI1e5i7FojAlVmunI8ZCHilowesd2L7vXI2ZXtX50tRbDVR3qvRCdz5050N3qnSvSm_a8Fl_ZZ0s0f5FezctcLMDvlst23-s1qO7F1CC_wCyn3gc</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Hogan, Lucinda C.</creator><creator>Burrow, Michael F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>The Microtensile Strength of Bonding Resins</title><author>Hogan, Lucinda C. ; Burrow, Michael F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-6aa6c5162365d3e616f70dd2b8f292ff696de3e71deae04acd171eba98a39a4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>bonding resin</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Drug Storage</topic><topic>low viscosity composite</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Methacrylates</topic><topic>Microtensile strength</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lucinda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burrow, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hogan, Lucinda C.</au><au>Burrow, Michael F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Microtensile Strength of Bonding Resins</atitle><jtitle>Australian dental journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Dent J</addtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>194-197</pages><issn>0045-0421</issn><eissn>1834-7819</eissn><abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi‐Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage.
Methods: Cylinders of bonding resin 2.4±0.2mm diameter and 9.5mm long were made and stored at 37d̀C for 24 hours. The specimens were milled into dumb‐bell shapes and stored in either air or water at 37d̀C. Five specimens of each material were stressed in tension after the specified storage times at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine. The mean tensile strengths of bonding resins were calculated and analysed statistically using one‐way analysis of variance, lower standard deviation and student t‐tests.
Results: Comparison of the air and water samples at all test periods showed the tensile strengths of specimens stored in water were significantly less than those stored in air (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The effect of water on the tensile strength of bonding resins indicated a slight decrease in strength of each material over the 168 day test period, whereas the air samples showed little change over the test period.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11695158</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0045-0421 |
| ispartof | Australian dental journal, 2001-09, Vol.46 (3), p.194-197 |
| issn | 0045-0421 1834-7819 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72253791 |
| source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Analysis of Variance bonding resin Dental Bonding Dentin-Bonding Agents Dentistry Drug Storage low viscosity composite Materials Testing Methacrylates Microtensile strength Resin Cements Tensile Strength Time Factors Viscosity Water |
| title | The Microtensile Strength of Bonding Resins |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Microtensile%20Strength%20of%20Bonding%20Resins&rft.jtitle=Australian%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Hogan,%20Lucinda%20C.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=194-197&rft.issn=0045-0421&rft.eissn=1834-7819&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72253791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72253791&rft_id=info:pmid/11695158&rfr_iscdi=true |