Is there any benefit from the culture of a single oocyte to a blastocyst-stage embryo in unstimulated cycles?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to test the influence of 2- and 5-day cultivation of a single oocyte on the pregnancy rate in a non-stimulated cycle. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 391 consecutive patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unstimulated cycles was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2001-11, Vol.16 (11), p.2379-2383
Hauptverfasser: Vlaisavljević, Veljko, Kovačič, Borut, Reljič, Milan, Lovrec, Vida Gavrić, Sajko, Mojca Čižek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to test the influence of 2- and 5-day cultivation of a single oocyte on the pregnancy rate in a non-stimulated cycle. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 391 consecutive patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unstimulated cycles was performed. The embryos were kept in MediCult universal IVF medium for day 2 transfers and in BlastAssist System for day 5 transfers. RESULTS: The oocyte recovery rate in the group for 2-day cultivation and in the group for 5-day cultivation was similar, being 79.4 (162/204) and 83.6% (154/187) respectively. The same is true of the fertilization rate (73.8 versus 77.7%). The blastulation rate was 52.8%. The embryo transfer rate per cycle was higher when day 2 embryos were transferred: 64.8% (105/162) compared with 35.7% (55/154) if blastocyst-stage embryos were transferred. The pregnancy rate per transferred embryo was higher when a blastocyst was transferred (40.0%) instead of a day 2 embryo (23.8%). CONCLUSION: The expected pregnancy rate calculated per embryo available on day 2 of cultivation was similar in both groups (23.8 versus 22.2%) and it was not affected by oocyte culture to the blastocyst stage.
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.11.2379