Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: Is there an alternative to radiographs?

Background: In patients with low back pain (LBP) the position of the pelvis is often a focus of physical or manual therapy. The “gold standard” to determine sacral inclination is by radiograph, but methods to measure sacral inclination externally with an inclinometer have also been introduced. Objec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2001-10, Vol.24 (8), p.505-508
Hauptverfasser: Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A., van Gool, Jack J.C.M., Bernsen, Roos M.D., Njoo, Khing H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 508
container_issue 8
container_start_page 505
container_title Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics
container_volume 24
creator Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A.
van Gool, Jack J.C.M.
Bernsen, Roos M.D.
Njoo, Khing H.
description Background: In patients with low back pain (LBP) the position of the pelvis is often a focus of physical or manual therapy. The “gold standard” to determine sacral inclination is by radiograph, but methods to measure sacral inclination externally with an inclinometer have also been introduced. Objective: To determine the validity of the inclinometer in measuring the sacral inclination in patients with LBP. Subjects: Adult patients with LBP who were referred by the general practitioner to the hospital for radiograph examination of the lumbosacral spine were included. Methods: Measurement of sacral inclination acquired with the inclinometer, simultaneous with the x-ray exposure, was compared with the “gold standard” measurement of sacral inclination on the radiograph. Regression analysis was used to define the measurement error. Results: Of 50 consecutive patients with LBP, radiographs of 41 patients were useful for the required measurements on the radiograph. The mean difference between the radiographic and inclinometer method was 23.12°. The measurement error was 8.26°. Regression analyses showed poor correlation between both methods (r = 0.28). Conclusions: The method we used to measure sacral inclination with an inclinometer proved to be invalid. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:505-8)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mmt.2001.118207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72226740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161475401089084</els_id><sourcerecordid>72226740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1cc875b75f278cb131c809d1e29cceed8f72ea323523de80c0dd642900f99cd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtLBDEUhYMouj5qO0llN2seM5OJjcjiCxQbrUP25s4amceaZAX_vRl2wcoqcPKdA_cj5JyzOWe1uur7NBeM8TnnjWBqj8x4JUVRV029T2aM17woVVUekeMYPxljWurmkBxxXqsc6xlxL2jjJvhhRdMH0mgh2I76ATo_2OTHgdph1WFO6BR5yL_rYCF5wGv6FKdWwAxR2yUMU-cbaRppsM6Pq2DXH_HmlBy0tot4tntPyPv93dvisXh-fXha3D4XIEuZCg7QqGqpqlaoBpZccmiYdhyFBkB0TasEWilkJaTDhgFzri6FZqzVGpyQJ-Ryu7sO49cGYzK9j4BdZwccN9EoIUStSpbBqy0IYYwxYGvWwfc2_BjOzCTWZLFmEmu2YnPjYje9Wfbo_vidyQzoLYD5wG-PwUTwOAA6HxCScaP_d_wX9O6ITA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72226740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: Is there an alternative to radiographs?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A. ; van Gool, Jack J.C.M. ; Bernsen, Roos M.D. ; Njoo, Khing H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A. ; van Gool, Jack J.C.M. ; Bernsen, Roos M.D. ; Njoo, Khing H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: In patients with low back pain (LBP) the position of the pelvis is often a focus of physical or manual therapy. The “gold standard” to determine sacral inclination is by radiograph, but methods to measure sacral inclination externally with an inclinometer have also been introduced. Objective: To determine the validity of the inclinometer in measuring the sacral inclination in patients with LBP. Subjects: Adult patients with LBP who were referred by the general practitioner to the hospital for radiograph examination of the lumbosacral spine were included. Methods: Measurement of sacral inclination acquired with the inclinometer, simultaneous with the x-ray exposure, was compared with the “gold standard” measurement of sacral inclination on the radiograph. Regression analysis was used to define the measurement error. Results: Of 50 consecutive patients with LBP, radiographs of 41 patients were useful for the required measurements on the radiograph. The mean difference between the radiographic and inclinometer method was 23.12°. The measurement error was 8.26°. Regression analyses showed poor correlation between both methods (r = 0.28). Conclusions: The method we used to measure sacral inclination with an inclinometer proved to be invalid. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:505-8)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2001.118207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11677549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain ; Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging ; Low Back Pain - pathology ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Lumbar Lordosis ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pelvimetry ; Pelvis ; Prognosis ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Regression Analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sacrum - diagnostic imaging ; Sacrum - pathology ; Sacrum - physiopathology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2001-10, Vol.24 (8), p.505-508</ispartof><rights>2001 JMPT</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1cc875b75f278cb131c809d1e29cceed8f72ea323523de80c0dd642900f99cd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1cc875b75f278cb131c809d1e29cceed8f72ea323523de80c0dd642900f99cd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mmt.2001.118207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11677549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gool, Jack J.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernsen, Roos M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njoo, Khing H.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: Is there an alternative to radiographs?</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Background: In patients with low back pain (LBP) the position of the pelvis is often a focus of physical or manual therapy. The “gold standard” to determine sacral inclination is by radiograph, but methods to measure sacral inclination externally with an inclinometer have also been introduced. Objective: To determine the validity of the inclinometer in measuring the sacral inclination in patients with LBP. Subjects: Adult patients with LBP who were referred by the general practitioner to the hospital for radiograph examination of the lumbosacral spine were included. Methods: Measurement of sacral inclination acquired with the inclinometer, simultaneous with the x-ray exposure, was compared with the “gold standard” measurement of sacral inclination on the radiograph. Regression analysis was used to define the measurement error. Results: Of 50 consecutive patients with LBP, radiographs of 41 patients were useful for the required measurements on the radiograph. The mean difference between the radiographic and inclinometer method was 23.12°. The measurement error was 8.26°. Regression analyses showed poor correlation between both methods (r = 0.28). Conclusions: The method we used to measure sacral inclination with an inclinometer proved to be invalid. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:505-8)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - pathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Lordosis</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvimetry</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sacrum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sacrum - pathology</subject><subject>Sacrum - physiopathology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtLBDEUhYMouj5qO0llN2seM5OJjcjiCxQbrUP25s4amceaZAX_vRl2wcoqcPKdA_cj5JyzOWe1uur7NBeM8TnnjWBqj8x4JUVRV029T2aM17woVVUekeMYPxljWurmkBxxXqsc6xlxL2jjJvhhRdMH0mgh2I76ATo_2OTHgdph1WFO6BR5yL_rYCF5wGv6FKdWwAxR2yUMU-cbaRppsM6Pq2DXH_HmlBy0tot4tntPyPv93dvisXh-fXha3D4XIEuZCg7QqGqpqlaoBpZccmiYdhyFBkB0TasEWilkJaTDhgFzri6FZqzVGpyQJ-Ryu7sO49cGYzK9j4BdZwccN9EoIUStSpbBqy0IYYwxYGvWwfc2_BjOzCTWZLFmEmu2YnPjYje9Wfbo_vidyQzoLYD5wG-PwUTwOAA6HxCScaP_d_wX9O6ITA</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A.</creator><creator>van Gool, Jack J.C.M.</creator><creator>Bernsen, Roos M.D.</creator><creator>Njoo, Khing H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: Is there an alternative to radiographs?</title><author>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A. ; van Gool, Jack J.C.M. ; Bernsen, Roos M.D. ; Njoo, Khing H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1cc875b75f278cb131c809d1e29cceed8f72ea323523de80c0dd642900f99cd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - pathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Lordosis</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvimetry</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sacrum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sacrum - pathology</topic><topic>Sacrum - physiopathology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gool, Jack J.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernsen, Roos M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njoo, Khing H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.A.</au><au>van Gool, Jack J.C.M.</au><au>Bernsen, Roos M.D.</au><au>Njoo, Khing H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: Is there an alternative to radiographs?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>505-508</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Background: In patients with low back pain (LBP) the position of the pelvis is often a focus of physical or manual therapy. The “gold standard” to determine sacral inclination is by radiograph, but methods to measure sacral inclination externally with an inclinometer have also been introduced. Objective: To determine the validity of the inclinometer in measuring the sacral inclination in patients with LBP. Subjects: Adult patients with LBP who were referred by the general practitioner to the hospital for radiograph examination of the lumbosacral spine were included. Methods: Measurement of sacral inclination acquired with the inclinometer, simultaneous with the x-ray exposure, was compared with the “gold standard” measurement of sacral inclination on the radiograph. Regression analysis was used to define the measurement error. Results: Of 50 consecutive patients with LBP, radiographs of 41 patients were useful for the required measurements on the radiograph. The mean difference between the radiographic and inclinometer method was 23.12°. The measurement error was 8.26°. Regression analyses showed poor correlation between both methods (r = 0.28). Conclusions: The method we used to measure sacral inclination with an inclinometer proved to be invalid. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:505-8)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11677549</pmid><doi>10.1067/mmt.2001.118207</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-4754
ispartof Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2001-10, Vol.24 (8), p.505-508
issn 0161-4754
1532-6586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72226740
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging
Low Back Pain - pathology
Low Back Pain - physiopathology
Lumbar Lordosis
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Pelvimetry
Pelvis
Prognosis
Radiography
Range of Motion, Articular
Regression Analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Sacrum - diagnostic imaging
Sacrum - pathology
Sacrum - physiopathology
Validity
title Measuring the sacral inclination angle in clinical practice: Is there an alternative to radiographs?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A22%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20sacral%20inclination%20angle%20in%20clinical%20practice:%20Is%20there%20an%20alternative%20to%20radiographs?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Bierma-Zeinstra,%20Sita%20M.A.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=505-508&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mmt.2001.118207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72226740%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72226740&rft_id=info:pmid/11677549&rft_els_id=S0161475401089084&rfr_iscdi=true