Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland
We tested the null hypothesis that populations of hosts trapped in isolated neighbouring locations showing comparable habitat quality, should support similar helminth parasite communities. The study was undertaken in a 2-week period in late summer in NE Poland in a single year, thereby eliminating s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parasitology 2001-10, Vol.123 (4), p.401-414 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 414 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 401 |
container_title | Parasitology |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | BEHNKE, J. M. BARNARD, C. J. BAJER, A. BRAY, D. DINMORE, J. FRAKE, K. OSMOND, J. RACE, T. SINSKI, E. |
description | We tested the null hypothesis that populations of hosts trapped in isolated neighbouring locations showing comparable habitat quality, should support similar helminth parasite communities. The study was undertaken in a 2-week period in late summer in NE Poland in a single year, thereby eliminating seasonal and between-year variation in parasite burdens. A total of 139 Clethrionomys glareolus (bank vole) were sampled from 3 forest sites of similar habitat quality. Total species richness was 11 (6 nematodes and 5 cestodes) with 85·6% of the voles carrying at least 1 species and an overall mean species richness of 1·4. At the component community level, the fewest species of helminths were recorded from site 2 (n = 6, compared with 9 at each of the other sites), but site 3 had the lowest Berger-Parker Dominance Index and the highest Simpson's Index of Diversity. At the infracommunity level, site 3 had the highest mean no. of helminth species/vole, the highest mean Brillouin's Index of Diversity but the lowest mean no. of helminths/vole. Voles from sites 1 and 3 differed in the nematodes that were most common (site 1, Heligmosomum mixtum – 95%; site 3, Heligmosomoides glareoli – 79·3%). At site 2 no species exceeded 50% but prevalence of Syphacia petrusewiczi was higher than at the other sites. The prevalence of cestodes was too low to test reliably (12·9%), but the highest prevalence of adult cestodes was recorded at site 1 (22·5% compared with 4·9 and 1·7% for sites 2 and 3 respectively). Host sex did not influence infection, but mean species richness increased with age. The different sites were responsible for most of the variation in our data, and the intrinsic factors (sex and age) were less important in shaping the component community structure of helminths. We conclude that even locations in relative close proximity to one another (13–25 km), selected on the basis of similar habitat quality, have rodent populations that differ in their helminth parasite communities, although for reasons other than the factors quantified in the present study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0031182001008605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72226147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0031182001008605</cupid><sourcerecordid>1875847357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-f43329ceac72d58a1fee368178937907bb4a38683cd61ea2c62177b2d3dd9a203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks-O0zAQxiMEYsvCA3BBFhJoOQQ8dmInR1RgQRTxH6S9WI4zab1N4mIniPI6vCiOGlEJBJzmML_vm280kyS3gT4ECvLRe0o5QMEoBUoLQfMryQIyUaYFCLiaLKZ2OvVPkhshXFJKBRfsenICIKTgki2SH5-0t3qwrie2J8MGyQbbzvbDhhjXdWNvhz0Jgx_NMHqcmEr3W_LVtRjI2bLFYeOj2HX7QNat9ujaMTwgjXdddPOIk81Oe121SFpndGsHG6XzsFf6--j3ZKW3SJ7YOMeagXhcT3lcQ964Vvf1zeRao9uAt-Z6mnx89vTD8nm6en3-Yvl4lZqMsyFtMs5ZaVAbyeq80NAgclGALEouSyqrKtO8EAU3tQDUzAgGUlas5nVdakb5aXL_4Lvz7suIYVCdDQbbmAHdGJRkjAnIZATP_glCIfMicrn8rydIISSleQTv_gZeutH3cV_F4k0ZL4FHCA6Q8S4Ej43aedtpv1dA1fQS6o-XiJo7s_FYdVgfFfMPRODeDOgQ79N43RsbjlwGVOS0iFx64OKd8NuvvvZbJSSXuRLnbxXwi3cvP19wNfF8Dqu7ytt6jceV_h73J_LI3Xo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214623913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>BEHNKE, J. M. ; BARNARD, C. J. ; BAJER, A. ; BRAY, D. ; DINMORE, J. ; FRAKE, K. ; OSMOND, J. ; RACE, T. ; SINSKI, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>BEHNKE, J. M. ; BARNARD, C. J. ; BAJER, A. ; BRAY, D. ; DINMORE, J. ; FRAKE, K. ; OSMOND, J. ; RACE, T. ; SINSKI, E.</creatorcontrib><description>We tested the null hypothesis that populations of hosts trapped in isolated neighbouring locations showing comparable habitat quality, should support similar helminth parasite communities. The study was undertaken in a 2-week period in late summer in NE Poland in a single year, thereby eliminating seasonal and between-year variation in parasite burdens. A total of 139 Clethrionomys glareolus (bank vole) were sampled from 3 forest sites of similar habitat quality. Total species richness was 11 (6 nematodes and 5 cestodes) with 85·6% of the voles carrying at least 1 species and an overall mean species richness of 1·4. At the component community level, the fewest species of helminths were recorded from site 2 (n = 6, compared with 9 at each of the other sites), but site 3 had the lowest Berger-Parker Dominance Index and the highest Simpson's Index of Diversity. At the infracommunity level, site 3 had the highest mean no. of helminth species/vole, the highest mean Brillouin's Index of Diversity but the lowest mean no. of helminths/vole. Voles from sites 1 and 3 differed in the nematodes that were most common (site 1, Heligmosomum mixtum – 95%; site 3, Heligmosomoides glareoli – 79·3%). At site 2 no species exceeded 50% but prevalence of Syphacia petrusewiczi was higher than at the other sites. The prevalence of cestodes was too low to test reliably (12·9%), but the highest prevalence of adult cestodes was recorded at site 1 (22·5% compared with 4·9 and 1·7% for sites 2 and 3 respectively). Host sex did not influence infection, but mean species richness increased with age. The different sites were responsible for most of the variation in our data, and the intrinsic factors (sex and age) were less important in shaping the component community structure of helminths. We conclude that even locations in relative close proximity to one another (13–25 km), selected on the basis of similar habitat quality, have rodent populations that differ in their helminth parasite communities, although for reasons other than the factors quantified in the present study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-1820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0031182001008605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11676372</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PARAAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Analysis of Variance ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Arvicolinae - parasitology ; bank vole ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cestoda - growth & development ; cestodes ; Clethrionomys glareolus ; Community structure ; component community ; Ecology ; Environmental quality ; Female ; Fresh Water ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology ; Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology ; helminths ; Helminths - classification ; Helminths - growth & development ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Male ; Nematoda ; Nematoda - growth & development ; nematodes ; Parasites ; Poland - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Rodent Diseases - epidemiology ; Rodent Diseases - parasitology ; site-specific variation ; Species richness ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Trematoda - growth & development</subject><ispartof>Parasitology, 2001-10, Vol.123 (4), p.401-414</ispartof><rights>2001 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-f43329ceac72d58a1fee368178937907bb4a38683cd61ea2c62177b2d3dd9a203</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031182001008605/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14106508$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11676372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BEHNKE, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARNARD, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAY, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINMORE, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRAKE, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OSMOND, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RACE, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINSKI, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland</title><title>Parasitology</title><addtitle>Parasitology</addtitle><description>We tested the null hypothesis that populations of hosts trapped in isolated neighbouring locations showing comparable habitat quality, should support similar helminth parasite communities. The study was undertaken in a 2-week period in late summer in NE Poland in a single year, thereby eliminating seasonal and between-year variation in parasite burdens. A total of 139 Clethrionomys glareolus (bank vole) were sampled from 3 forest sites of similar habitat quality. Total species richness was 11 (6 nematodes and 5 cestodes) with 85·6% of the voles carrying at least 1 species and an overall mean species richness of 1·4. At the component community level, the fewest species of helminths were recorded from site 2 (n = 6, compared with 9 at each of the other sites), but site 3 had the lowest Berger-Parker Dominance Index and the highest Simpson's Index of Diversity. At the infracommunity level, site 3 had the highest mean no. of helminth species/vole, the highest mean Brillouin's Index of Diversity but the lowest mean no. of helminths/vole. Voles from sites 1 and 3 differed in the nematodes that were most common (site 1, Heligmosomum mixtum – 95%; site 3, Heligmosomoides glareoli – 79·3%). At site 2 no species exceeded 50% but prevalence of Syphacia petrusewiczi was higher than at the other sites. The prevalence of cestodes was too low to test reliably (12·9%), but the highest prevalence of adult cestodes was recorded at site 1 (22·5% compared with 4·9 and 1·7% for sites 2 and 3 respectively). Host sex did not influence infection, but mean species richness increased with age. The different sites were responsible for most of the variation in our data, and the intrinsic factors (sex and age) were less important in shaping the component community structure of helminths. We conclude that even locations in relative close proximity to one another (13–25 km), selected on the basis of similar habitat quality, have rodent populations that differ in their helminth parasite communities, although for reasons other than the factors quantified in the present study.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arvicolinae - parasitology</subject><subject>bank vole</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cestoda - growth & development</subject><subject>cestodes</subject><subject>Clethrionomys glareolus</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>component community</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology</subject><subject>helminths</subject><subject>Helminths - classification</subject><subject>Helminths - growth & development</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematoda - growth & development</subject><subject>nematodes</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Poland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Rodent Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rodent Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>site-specific variation</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Trematoda - growth & development</subject><issn>0031-1820</issn><issn>1469-8161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks-O0zAQxiMEYsvCA3BBFhJoOQQ8dmInR1RgQRTxH6S9WI4zab1N4mIniPI6vCiOGlEJBJzmML_vm280kyS3gT4ECvLRe0o5QMEoBUoLQfMryQIyUaYFCLiaLKZ2OvVPkhshXFJKBRfsenICIKTgki2SH5-0t3qwrie2J8MGyQbbzvbDhhjXdWNvhz0Jgx_NMHqcmEr3W_LVtRjI2bLFYeOj2HX7QNat9ujaMTwgjXdddPOIk81Oe121SFpndGsHG6XzsFf6--j3ZKW3SJ7YOMeagXhcT3lcQ964Vvf1zeRao9uAt-Z6mnx89vTD8nm6en3-Yvl4lZqMsyFtMs5ZaVAbyeq80NAgclGALEouSyqrKtO8EAU3tQDUzAgGUlas5nVdakb5aXL_4Lvz7suIYVCdDQbbmAHdGJRkjAnIZATP_glCIfMicrn8rydIISSleQTv_gZeutH3cV_F4k0ZL4FHCA6Q8S4Ej43aedtpv1dA1fQS6o-XiJo7s_FYdVgfFfMPRODeDOgQ79N43RsbjlwGVOS0iFx64OKd8NuvvvZbJSSXuRLnbxXwi3cvP19wNfF8Dqu7ytt6jceV_h73J_LI3Xo</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>BEHNKE, J. M.</creator><creator>BARNARD, C. J.</creator><creator>BAJER, A.</creator><creator>BRAY, D.</creator><creator>DINMORE, J.</creator><creator>FRAKE, K.</creator><creator>OSMOND, J.</creator><creator>RACE, T.</creator><creator>SINSKI, E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland</title><author>BEHNKE, J. M. ; BARNARD, C. J. ; BAJER, A. ; BRAY, D. ; DINMORE, J. ; FRAKE, K. ; OSMOND, J. ; RACE, T. ; SINSKI, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-f43329ceac72d58a1fee368178937907bb4a38683cd61ea2c62177b2d3dd9a203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arvicolinae - parasitology</topic><topic>bank vole</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cestoda - growth & development</topic><topic>cestodes</topic><topic>Clethrionomys glareolus</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>component community</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology</topic><topic>helminths</topic><topic>Helminths - classification</topic><topic>Helminths - growth & development</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematoda - growth & development</topic><topic>nematodes</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Poland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Rodent Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rodent Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>site-specific variation</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Trematoda - growth & development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BEHNKE, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARNARD, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAY, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINMORE, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRAKE, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OSMOND, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RACE, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINSKI, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BEHNKE, J. M.</au><au>BARNARD, C. J.</au><au>BAJER, A.</au><au>BRAY, D.</au><au>DINMORE, J.</au><au>FRAKE, K.</au><au>OSMOND, J.</au><au>RACE, T.</au><au>SINSKI, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Parasitology</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>401-414</pages><issn>0031-1820</issn><eissn>1469-8161</eissn><coden>PARAAE</coden><abstract>We tested the null hypothesis that populations of hosts trapped in isolated neighbouring locations showing comparable habitat quality, should support similar helminth parasite communities. The study was undertaken in a 2-week period in late summer in NE Poland in a single year, thereby eliminating seasonal and between-year variation in parasite burdens. A total of 139 Clethrionomys glareolus (bank vole) were sampled from 3 forest sites of similar habitat quality. Total species richness was 11 (6 nematodes and 5 cestodes) with 85·6% of the voles carrying at least 1 species and an overall mean species richness of 1·4. At the component community level, the fewest species of helminths were recorded from site 2 (n = 6, compared with 9 at each of the other sites), but site 3 had the lowest Berger-Parker Dominance Index and the highest Simpson's Index of Diversity. At the infracommunity level, site 3 had the highest mean no. of helminth species/vole, the highest mean Brillouin's Index of Diversity but the lowest mean no. of helminths/vole. Voles from sites 1 and 3 differed in the nematodes that were most common (site 1, Heligmosomum mixtum – 95%; site 3, Heligmosomoides glareoli – 79·3%). At site 2 no species exceeded 50% but prevalence of Syphacia petrusewiczi was higher than at the other sites. The prevalence of cestodes was too low to test reliably (12·9%), but the highest prevalence of adult cestodes was recorded at site 1 (22·5% compared with 4·9 and 1·7% for sites 2 and 3 respectively). Host sex did not influence infection, but mean species richness increased with age. The different sites were responsible for most of the variation in our data, and the intrinsic factors (sex and age) were less important in shaping the component community structure of helminths. We conclude that even locations in relative close proximity to one another (13–25 km), selected on the basis of similar habitat quality, have rodent populations that differ in their helminth parasite communities, although for reasons other than the factors quantified in the present study.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>11676372</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0031182001008605</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-1820 |
ispartof | Parasitology, 2001-10, Vol.123 (4), p.401-414 |
issn | 0031-1820 1469-8161 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72226147 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Age Factors Analysis of Variance Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Arvicolinae - parasitology bank vole Biological and medical sciences Cestoda - growth & development cestodes Clethrionomys glareolus Community structure component community Ecology Environmental quality Female Fresh Water Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitats Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology helminths Helminths - classification Helminths - growth & development Host-Parasite Interactions Male Nematoda Nematoda - growth & development nematodes Parasites Poland - epidemiology Prevalence Rodent Diseases - epidemiology Rodent Diseases - parasitology site-specific variation Species richness Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems Trematoda - growth & development |
title | Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A16%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20the%20helminth%20community%20structure%20in%20bank%20voles%20(Clethrionomys%20glareolus)%20from%20three%20comparable%20localities%20in%20the%20Mazury%20Lake%20District%20region%20of%20Poland&rft.jtitle=Parasitology&rft.au=BEHNKE,%20J.%20M.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=401-414&rft.issn=0031-1820&rft.eissn=1469-8161&rft.coden=PARAAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0031182001008605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1875847357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214623913&rft_id=info:pmid/11676372&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0031182001008605&rfr_iscdi=true |