Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (medpor)

To evaluate the fibrovascular ingrowth progression within the porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor) with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) trial. Ten patients who underwent enucleation and implantation of a 20-mm porous polyethy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1656-1660
Hauptverfasser: De Potter, Patrick, Duprez, Thierry, Cosnard, Guy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1660
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1656
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 107
creator De Potter, Patrick
Duprez, Thierry
Cosnard, Guy
description To evaluate the fibrovascular ingrowth progression within the porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor) with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) trial. Ten patients who underwent enucleation and implantation of a 20-mm porous polyethylene implant wrapped with heterologous sclera. Serial precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted MRI were obtained at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage area of enhancement was calculated by use of manual planimetric contouring unenhanced areas at the equator of each sphere on axial and coronal planes. All the implants showed enhancing areas as early as 1.5 months after enucleation. In 8 of the 10 patients, the areas of enhancement at the equator of the implant consistently showed similar centripetal progression primarily during the first 6 months after enucleation. The presence of fibrovascular tissue at the equator was associated in all cases with enhancing zones at the anterior portion of the implant. None of the implants showed diffuse complete enhancement after 12 months. Two patients failed to demonstrate further enhancement progression 1.5 months after implantation. No histopathologic study to equate with the MRI findings was performed in this series. Postcontrast magnetic resonance studies seem to be the best-suited imaging modality for assessing the fibrovascular tissue progression into porous polyethylene spheres after enucleation and for identifying patients in whom failure of vascularization occurs. Incomplete vascularization at the equator of the porous polyethylene sphere does not prove an absence of fibrovascular ingrowth in the anterior region. Prior ocular surgery and coexisting arterial hypertension may slow the progression of fibrovascular ingrowth.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00249-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72221474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642000002499</els_id><sourcerecordid>72221474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e321t-3163a92bfb2449281fa4e26361f43a7d8a98b2ace1b85c40671dd4533fe2b70d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkVtLxDAQhYMoul5-gtIHEX2o5ta0eRIRbyAoqM8hTaca6TZrkhX23zurq0LIDOHLcOYcQvYZPWWUqbMnvFipJKfHlJ5QyqUu9RqZsAobWTOxTiZ_yBbZTumdUqqUkJtki1GtZMPFhLSPIWUXxhxtysXUvo6QvSsipDDa0UHh8c2Pr4VNCVKawpiL0BezEMM8YRkWkN8WA4xQhNj6bAf8MRssYsdT6JA72SUbvR0S7K3qDnm5vnq-vC3vH27uLi_uSxCc5VIwJazmbd9yKTVvWG8lcCUU66WwdddY3bTcOmBtUzlJVc26TlZC9MDbmnZihxz9zJ3F8DGHlM3UJwcDigEUa2rOOZO1RPBgBc5b1GhmEZeMC_PrCgKHK8AmZ4c-ohM-_XMVpbrSiJ3_YIBbfXqIJjkPaFrnI7hsuuBxplnGZb7jMsssDF0ejMto8QV-v4dA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72221474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (medpor)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>De Potter, Patrick ; Duprez, Thierry ; Cosnard, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>De Potter, Patrick ; Duprez, Thierry ; Cosnard, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the fibrovascular ingrowth progression within the porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor) with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) trial. Ten patients who underwent enucleation and implantation of a 20-mm porous polyethylene implant wrapped with heterologous sclera. Serial precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted MRI were obtained at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage area of enhancement was calculated by use of manual planimetric contouring unenhanced areas at the equator of each sphere on axial and coronal planes. All the implants showed enhancing areas as early as 1.5 months after enucleation. In 8 of the 10 patients, the areas of enhancement at the equator of the implant consistently showed similar centripetal progression primarily during the first 6 months after enucleation. The presence of fibrovascular tissue at the equator was associated in all cases with enhancing zones at the anterior portion of the implant. None of the implants showed diffuse complete enhancement after 12 months. Two patients failed to demonstrate further enhancement progression 1.5 months after implantation. No histopathologic study to equate with the MRI findings was performed in this series. Postcontrast magnetic resonance studies seem to be the best-suited imaging modality for assessing the fibrovascular tissue progression into porous polyethylene spheres after enucleation and for identifying patients in whom failure of vascularization occurs. Incomplete vascularization at the equator of the porous polyethylene sphere does not prove an absence of fibrovascular ingrowth in the anterior region. Prior ocular surgery and coexisting arterial hypertension may slow the progression of fibrovascular ingrowth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00249-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10964823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Vessels - anatomy &amp; histology ; Eye Enucleation ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neovascularization, Physiologic ; Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology ; Orbit - blood supply ; Orbital Implants ; Osseointegration ; Polyethylene ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1656-1660</ispartof><rights>2000 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642000002499$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1500959$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10964823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Potter, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprez, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosnard, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (medpor)</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To evaluate the fibrovascular ingrowth progression within the porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor) with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) trial. Ten patients who underwent enucleation and implantation of a 20-mm porous polyethylene implant wrapped with heterologous sclera. Serial precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted MRI were obtained at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage area of enhancement was calculated by use of manual planimetric contouring unenhanced areas at the equator of each sphere on axial and coronal planes. All the implants showed enhancing areas as early as 1.5 months after enucleation. In 8 of the 10 patients, the areas of enhancement at the equator of the implant consistently showed similar centripetal progression primarily during the first 6 months after enucleation. The presence of fibrovascular tissue at the equator was associated in all cases with enhancing zones at the anterior portion of the implant. None of the implants showed diffuse complete enhancement after 12 months. Two patients failed to demonstrate further enhancement progression 1.5 months after implantation. No histopathologic study to equate with the MRI findings was performed in this series. Postcontrast magnetic resonance studies seem to be the best-suited imaging modality for assessing the fibrovascular tissue progression into porous polyethylene spheres after enucleation and for identifying patients in whom failure of vascularization occurs. Incomplete vascularization at the equator of the porous polyethylene sphere does not prove an absence of fibrovascular ingrowth in the anterior region. Prior ocular surgery and coexisting arterial hypertension may slow the progression of fibrovascular ingrowth.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Vessels - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Eye Enucleation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Physiologic</subject><subject>Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Orbit - blood supply</subject><subject>Orbital Implants</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkVtLxDAQhYMoul5-gtIHEX2o5ta0eRIRbyAoqM8hTaca6TZrkhX23zurq0LIDOHLcOYcQvYZPWWUqbMnvFipJKfHlJ5QyqUu9RqZsAobWTOxTiZ_yBbZTumdUqqUkJtki1GtZMPFhLSPIWUXxhxtysXUvo6QvSsipDDa0UHh8c2Pr4VNCVKawpiL0BezEMM8YRkWkN8WA4xQhNj6bAf8MRssYsdT6JA72SUbvR0S7K3qDnm5vnq-vC3vH27uLi_uSxCc5VIwJazmbd9yKTVvWG8lcCUU66WwdddY3bTcOmBtUzlJVc26TlZC9MDbmnZihxz9zJ3F8DGHlM3UJwcDigEUa2rOOZO1RPBgBc5b1GhmEZeMC_PrCgKHK8AmZ4c-ohM-_XMVpbrSiJ3_YIBbfXqIJjkPaFrnI7hsuuBxplnGZb7jMsssDF0ejMto8QV-v4dA</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>De Potter, Patrick</creator><creator>Duprez, Thierry</creator><creator>Cosnard, Guy</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (medpor)</title><author>De Potter, Patrick ; Duprez, Thierry ; Cosnard, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e321t-3163a92bfb2449281fa4e26361f43a7d8a98b2ace1b85c40671dd4533fe2b70d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Vessels - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Eye Enucleation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Physiologic</topic><topic>Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Orbit - blood supply</topic><topic>Orbital Implants</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Potter, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprez, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosnard, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Potter, Patrick</au><au>Duprez, Thierry</au><au>Cosnard, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (medpor)</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1656</spage><epage>1660</epage><pages>1656-1660</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>To evaluate the fibrovascular ingrowth progression within the porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor) with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) trial. Ten patients who underwent enucleation and implantation of a 20-mm porous polyethylene implant wrapped with heterologous sclera. Serial precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted MRI were obtained at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage area of enhancement was calculated by use of manual planimetric contouring unenhanced areas at the equator of each sphere on axial and coronal planes. All the implants showed enhancing areas as early as 1.5 months after enucleation. In 8 of the 10 patients, the areas of enhancement at the equator of the implant consistently showed similar centripetal progression primarily during the first 6 months after enucleation. The presence of fibrovascular tissue at the equator was associated in all cases with enhancing zones at the anterior portion of the implant. None of the implants showed diffuse complete enhancement after 12 months. Two patients failed to demonstrate further enhancement progression 1.5 months after implantation. No histopathologic study to equate with the MRI findings was performed in this series. Postcontrast magnetic resonance studies seem to be the best-suited imaging modality for assessing the fibrovascular tissue progression into porous polyethylene spheres after enucleation and for identifying patients in whom failure of vascularization occurs. Incomplete vascularization at the equator of the porous polyethylene sphere does not prove an absence of fibrovascular ingrowth in the anterior region. Prior ocular surgery and coexisting arterial hypertension may slow the progression of fibrovascular ingrowth.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10964823</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00249-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1656-1660
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72221474
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Vessels - anatomy & histology
Eye Enucleation
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neovascularization, Physiologic
Orbit - anatomy & histology
Orbit - blood supply
Orbital Implants
Osseointegration
Polyethylene
Prosthesis Implantation
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the eye and orbit
title Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (medpor)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postcontrast%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20assessment%20of%20porous%20polyethylene%20orbital%20implant%20(medpor)&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=De%20Potter,%20Patrick&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1656&rft.epage=1660&rft.pages=1656-1660&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00249-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72221474%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72221474&rft_id=info:pmid/10964823&rft_els_id=S0161642000002499&rfr_iscdi=true