Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genes chromosomes & cancer 2000-10, Vol.29 (2), p.180-185
Hauptverfasser: Cuthbert, Gavin, Thompson, Karen, Breese, Gareth, McCullough, Simon, Bown, Nick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 2
container_start_page 180
container_title Genes chromosomes & cancer
container_volume 29
creator Cuthbert, Gavin
Thompson, Karen
Breese, Gareth
McCullough, Simon
Bown, Nick
description Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1016>3.0.CO;2-K
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72211183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72211183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2546-50fafc25bfd66aca4ee36a427ce1ecd837950c565808b43d517f1825a0ee26973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOj_-gvRK9KIzH03SThGk6pyb7mKK4s0ha1OIdq02nbp_b8LmMBcnh5PnvJAHoYTgLsGYnhKcxCGlIjqmGOOTxJ2eL-e93uXgKuynKcFEXLAu7qbjMxoON1BnvbPp-4i7nssdtGvtm8sQLOHbaMdBPHFgB4mJrqxpzZdpF0FdBDeDyW1gqiDXrc5aU1d-eD8aBW2jKlvWmfJDu4-2ClVafbC699DTzfVjehuOxv1BejkKDeWRCDkuVJFRPi1yIVSmIq2ZUBGVmSY6y2MmE44zLniM42nEck5kQWLKFdaaikSyPXS0zP1o6s-5ti3MjM10WapK13MLklJCSMwceLgC59OZzuGjMTPVLODvpw54XALfptSLf-_gVXsuBq8NvGrwlpfFiYaVaGCAIR0DheHfyMWGy1hjW_2zjlXNOwjJJIfnhz68SIZfBU3gjv0C0f2CMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72211183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Cuthbert, Gavin ; Thompson, Karen ; Breese, Gareth ; McCullough, Simon ; Bown, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Gavin ; Thompson, Karen ; Breese, Gareth ; McCullough, Simon ; Bown, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2264</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999&lt;::AID-GCC1016&gt;3.0.CO;2-K</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10959098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Blotting, Southern ; DNA Probes - genetics ; Female ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Genetic Variation - genetics ; GTP Phosphohydrolases ; GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis ; GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Septins ; Sequence Deletion - genetics ; Translocation, Genetic - genetics</subject><ispartof>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer, 2000-10, Vol.29 (2), p.180-185</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1098-2264%282000%299999%3A9999%3C%3A%3AAID-GCC1016%3E3.0.CO%3B2-K$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1098-2264%282000%299999%3A9999%3C%3A%3AAID-GCC1016%3E3.0.CO%3B2-K$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10959098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breese, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bown, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</title><title>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer</title><addtitle>Genes Chromosom. Cancer</addtitle><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Blotting, Southern</subject><subject>DNA Probes - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Genetic Variation - genetics</subject><subject>GTP Phosphohydrolases</subject><subject>GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Septins</subject><subject>Sequence Deletion - genetics</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic - genetics</subject><issn>1045-2257</issn><issn>1098-2264</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOj_-gvRK9KIzH03SThGk6pyb7mKK4s0ha1OIdq02nbp_b8LmMBcnh5PnvJAHoYTgLsGYnhKcxCGlIjqmGOOTxJ2eL-e93uXgKuynKcFEXLAu7qbjMxoON1BnvbPp-4i7nssdtGvtm8sQLOHbaMdBPHFgB4mJrqxpzZdpF0FdBDeDyW1gqiDXrc5aU1d-eD8aBW2jKlvWmfJDu4-2ClVafbC699DTzfVjehuOxv1BejkKDeWRCDkuVJFRPi1yIVSmIq2ZUBGVmSY6y2MmE44zLniM42nEck5kQWLKFdaaikSyPXS0zP1o6s-5ti3MjM10WapK13MLklJCSMwceLgC59OZzuGjMTPVLODvpw54XALfptSLf-_gVXsuBq8NvGrwlpfFiYaVaGCAIR0DheHfyMWGy1hjW_2zjlXNOwjJJIfnhz68SIZfBU3gjv0C0f2CMw</recordid><startdate>200010</startdate><enddate>200010</enddate><creator>Cuthbert, Gavin</creator><creator>Thompson, Karen</creator><creator>Breese, Gareth</creator><creator>McCullough, Simon</creator><creator>Bown, Nick</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200010</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</title><author>Cuthbert, Gavin ; Thompson, Karen ; Breese, Gareth ; McCullough, Simon ; Bown, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2546-50fafc25bfd66aca4ee36a427ce1ecd837950c565808b43d517f1825a0ee26973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Blotting, Southern</topic><topic>DNA Probes - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Genetic Variation - genetics</topic><topic>GTP Phosphohydrolases</topic><topic>GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Septins</topic><topic>Sequence Deletion - genetics</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breese, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bown, Nick</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuthbert, Gavin</au><au>Thompson, Karen</au><au>Breese, Gareth</au><au>McCullough, Simon</au><au>Bown, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</atitle><jtitle>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Genes Chromosom. Cancer</addtitle><date>2000-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>180-185</pages><issn>1045-2257</issn><eissn>1098-2264</eissn><abstract>Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>10959098</pmid><doi>10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999&lt;::AID-GCC1016&gt;3.0.CO;2-K</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2257
ispartof Genes chromosomes & cancer, 2000-10, Vol.29 (2), p.180-185
issn 1045-2257
1098-2264
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72211183
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Blotting, Southern
DNA Probes - genetics
Female
Fluorescent Dyes
Genetic Variation - genetics
GTP Phosphohydrolases
GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis
GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Septins
Sequence Deletion - genetics
Translocation, Genetic - genetics
title Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20FISH%20in%20detection%20of%20MLL%20translocations&rft.jtitle=Genes%20chromosomes%20&%20cancer&rft.au=Cuthbert,%20Gavin&rft.date=2000-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=180-185&rft.issn=1045-2257&rft.eissn=1098-2264&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-GCC1016%3E3.0.CO;2-K&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72211183%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72211183&rft_id=info:pmid/10959098&rfr_iscdi=true