Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations
Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FI...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genes chromosomes & cancer 2000-10, Vol.29 (2), p.180-185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | Genes chromosomes & cancer |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Cuthbert, Gavin Thompson, Karen Breese, Gareth McCullough, Simon Bown, Nick |
description | Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1016>3.0.CO;2-K |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72211183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72211183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2546-50fafc25bfd66aca4ee36a427ce1ecd837950c565808b43d517f1825a0ee26973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOj_-gvRK9KIzH03SThGk6pyb7mKK4s0ha1OIdq02nbp_b8LmMBcnh5PnvJAHoYTgLsGYnhKcxCGlIjqmGOOTxJ2eL-e93uXgKuynKcFEXLAu7qbjMxoON1BnvbPp-4i7nssdtGvtm8sQLOHbaMdBPHFgB4mJrqxpzZdpF0FdBDeDyW1gqiDXrc5aU1d-eD8aBW2jKlvWmfJDu4-2ClVafbC699DTzfVjehuOxv1BejkKDeWRCDkuVJFRPi1yIVSmIq2ZUBGVmSY6y2MmE44zLniM42nEck5kQWLKFdaaikSyPXS0zP1o6s-5ti3MjM10WapK13MLklJCSMwceLgC59OZzuGjMTPVLODvpw54XALfptSLf-_gVXsuBq8NvGrwlpfFiYaVaGCAIR0DheHfyMWGy1hjW_2zjlXNOwjJJIfnhz68SIZfBU3gjv0C0f2CMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72211183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Cuthbert, Gavin ; Thompson, Karen ; Breese, Gareth ; McCullough, Simon ; Bown, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Gavin ; Thompson, Karen ; Breese, Gareth ; McCullough, Simon ; Bown, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2264</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1016>3.0.CO;2-K</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10959098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Blotting, Southern ; DNA Probes - genetics ; Female ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Genetic Variation - genetics ; GTP Phosphohydrolases ; GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis ; GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Septins ; Sequence Deletion - genetics ; Translocation, Genetic - genetics</subject><ispartof>Genes chromosomes & cancer, 2000-10, Vol.29 (2), p.180-185</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1098-2264%282000%299999%3A9999%3C%3A%3AAID-GCC1016%3E3.0.CO%3B2-K$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1098-2264%282000%299999%3A9999%3C%3A%3AAID-GCC1016%3E3.0.CO%3B2-K$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10959098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breese, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bown, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</title><title>Genes chromosomes & cancer</title><addtitle>Genes Chromosom. Cancer</addtitle><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Blotting, Southern</subject><subject>DNA Probes - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Genetic Variation - genetics</subject><subject>GTP Phosphohydrolases</subject><subject>GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Septins</subject><subject>Sequence Deletion - genetics</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic - genetics</subject><issn>1045-2257</issn><issn>1098-2264</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOj_-gvRK9KIzH03SThGk6pyb7mKK4s0ha1OIdq02nbp_b8LmMBcnh5PnvJAHoYTgLsGYnhKcxCGlIjqmGOOTxJ2eL-e93uXgKuynKcFEXLAu7qbjMxoON1BnvbPp-4i7nssdtGvtm8sQLOHbaMdBPHFgB4mJrqxpzZdpF0FdBDeDyW1gqiDXrc5aU1d-eD8aBW2jKlvWmfJDu4-2ClVafbC699DTzfVjehuOxv1BejkKDeWRCDkuVJFRPi1yIVSmIq2ZUBGVmSY6y2MmE44zLniM42nEck5kQWLKFdaaikSyPXS0zP1o6s-5ti3MjM10WapK13MLklJCSMwceLgC59OZzuGjMTPVLODvpw54XALfptSLf-_gVXsuBq8NvGrwlpfFiYaVaGCAIR0DheHfyMWGy1hjW_2zjlXNOwjJJIfnhz68SIZfBU3gjv0C0f2CMw</recordid><startdate>200010</startdate><enddate>200010</enddate><creator>Cuthbert, Gavin</creator><creator>Thompson, Karen</creator><creator>Breese, Gareth</creator><creator>McCullough, Simon</creator><creator>Bown, Nick</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200010</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</title><author>Cuthbert, Gavin ; Thompson, Karen ; Breese, Gareth ; McCullough, Simon ; Bown, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2546-50fafc25bfd66aca4ee36a427ce1ecd837950c565808b43d517f1825a0ee26973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Blotting, Southern</topic><topic>DNA Probes - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Genetic Variation - genetics</topic><topic>GTP Phosphohydrolases</topic><topic>GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Septins</topic><topic>Sequence Deletion - genetics</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breese, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bown, Nick</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Genes chromosomes & cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuthbert, Gavin</au><au>Thompson, Karen</au><au>Breese, Gareth</au><au>McCullough, Simon</au><au>Bown, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations</atitle><jtitle>Genes chromosomes & cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Genes Chromosom. Cancer</addtitle><date>2000-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>180-185</pages><issn>1045-2257</issn><eissn>1098-2264</eissn><abstract>Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detection of MLL translocations is now commonplace in cytogenetics laboratories. One of the most widely used probes is the Oncor MLL probe (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) that theoretically demonstrates the presence of an MLL rearrangement by a splitting of the FISH signal between the two derivative chromosomes generated by a translocation. Recently, another commercial probe has been made available from Vysis (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) that uses a dual colour system. We examined material from 29 patients and 4 cell lines, all with recognised MLL translocations by G‐banding, that were confirmed using Southern blot analysis of the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Both Oncor and Vysis MLL FISH probes were applied to these cases to compare their performance in detection of the MLL translocations. Thirty of the 33 cases demonstrated a clear splitting of Oncor MLL FISH signal in concordance with the Southern blot analysis and cytogenetics. Three cases failed to demonstrate a split MLL FISH signal. Therefore, we conclude that the Oncor MLL FISH probe has a 9.1% false negative rate, i.e., 90.9% sensitivity in detection of classic MLL translocations. Vysis MLL FISH detected the rearrangement in all 33 cases. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>10959098</pmid><doi>10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1016>3.0.CO;2-K</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-2257 |
ispartof | Genes chromosomes & cancer, 2000-10, Vol.29 (2), p.180-185 |
issn | 1045-2257 1098-2264 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72211183 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Blotting, Southern DNA Probes - genetics Female Fluorescent Dyes Genetic Variation - genetics GTP Phosphohydrolases GTP-Binding Proteins - analysis GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods Sensitivity and Specificity Septins Sequence Deletion - genetics Translocation, Genetic - genetics |
title | Sensitivity of FISH in detection of MLL translocations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20FISH%20in%20detection%20of%20MLL%20translocations&rft.jtitle=Genes%20chromosomes%20&%20cancer&rft.au=Cuthbert,%20Gavin&rft.date=2000-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=180-185&rft.issn=1045-2257&rft.eissn=1098-2264&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-GCC1016%3E3.0.CO;2-K&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72211183%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72211183&rft_id=info:pmid/10959098&rfr_iscdi=true |