Accuracy of Single Ultrasound Parameters in Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different single ultrasonographic parameters in predicting intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) babies as defined by Ponderal index at birth. Study sample composed of two sets of data from Iran and Australia. The Irania...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of perinatology 2001-09, Vol.18 (6), p.325-334
Hauptverfasser: Niknafs, Parvin, Sibbald, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 334
container_issue 6
container_start_page 325
container_title American journal of perinatology
container_volume 18
creator Niknafs, Parvin
Sibbald, John
description ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different single ultrasonographic parameters in predicting intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) babies as defined by Ponderal index at birth. Study sample composed of two sets of data from Iran and Australia. The Iranian sample consisted of 296 Iranian women. All the study women received prenatal care and delivered at Fatemieh Hospital in Shahrood, Iran. The data from 219 Australian fetuses were obtained from the ultrasound section at the Wollongong Hospital in Australia. Ultrasonographic measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), amniotic fluid index (AFI), and Doppler from umbilical arteries (S/D ratio) were obtained. Only those pregnancies were included in which the estimated date of delivery (EDD) by LMP (last menstrual period) agreed within 14 days with the estimated date of delivery determined by the initial ultrasound examination. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for single proposed ultrasound parameters in the Iranian and Australian samples. When different variables are compared, with a cut-off point at or below the 10th percentile AC and HC had the highest sensitivities in the Australian sample while AC was the most sensitive parameter for IUGR detection in the Iranian sample. BPD has a reasonably high sensitivity at this threshold. The AFI ratio has the lowest sensitivity in predicting IUGR in the Australian sample. Positive predictive values were low in all of the parameters in both the Iranian and Australian samples. By increasing the cut-off for PI to the 20th percentile, the sensitivity of reduced AC increased in the Australian sample while the sensitivity for an abnormal S/D ratio and reduced AFI to identify IUGR decreased. Our results indicate that reduced AC was the best single parameter in discriminating between IUGR and non-IUGR fetuses with the highest sensitivity among the proposed parameters in the both Iranian and Australian sample. However, the PPV of this parameter is low. This means that a high number of false-positive cases are detected using each parameter, which reduces the usefulness of identification. Other ultrasound obstetrical parameters may also have a reasonable level of sensitivity, however, the PPV of all parameters is low. On the whole, our results show that although the examined
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2001-17856
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72209441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72209441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9225a0755ac9fc7c50ef801b4ec7901c9c720788a2fe5b0935c960fdcdb03f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0D1PwzAQBmALgWgpbMwoCywQOCdxE49VoQWpEl9ltpyLTVPlo9iJUP89ThupC9P55Ed3p5eQSwr3FBh7sH4AQH0aJ2x8RIYUeOInrjkmQ4hD5tNxSAfkzNq1Y0ECySkZUDoGR2BI3ieIrZG49WrtfebVd6G8r6Ix0tZtlXlv0shSNcpYL6-8R_fCJq-rDs9UIwtvburfZuV9KNuYfPd3Tk60LKy66OuILGdPy-mzv3idv0wnCx9DFjY-DwImIWZMItcYIwOlE6BppDDmQJFjHLgbExloxVLgIUM-Bp1hlkKo43BEbvZjN6b-ad16UeYWVVHIStWtFXEQAI8i6uDdHqKprTVKi43JS2m2goLoEhRWdAmKXYKOX_Vz27RU2QH3kTlw3QNpURbayApze3ARZTTh3YG3e9esclUqsa5bU7lA_l_7B3ZGheQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72209441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of Single Ultrasound Parameters in Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Niknafs, Parvin ; Sibbald, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Niknafs, Parvin ; Sibbald, John</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different single ultrasonographic parameters in predicting intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) babies as defined by Ponderal index at birth. Study sample composed of two sets of data from Iran and Australia. The Iranian sample consisted of 296 Iranian women. All the study women received prenatal care and delivered at Fatemieh Hospital in Shahrood, Iran. The data from 219 Australian fetuses were obtained from the ultrasound section at the Wollongong Hospital in Australia. Ultrasonographic measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), amniotic fluid index (AFI), and Doppler from umbilical arteries (S/D ratio) were obtained. Only those pregnancies were included in which the estimated date of delivery (EDD) by LMP (last menstrual period) agreed within 14 days with the estimated date of delivery determined by the initial ultrasound examination. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for single proposed ultrasound parameters in the Iranian and Australian samples. When different variables are compared, with a cut-off point at or below the 10th percentile AC and HC had the highest sensitivities in the Australian sample while AC was the most sensitive parameter for IUGR detection in the Iranian sample. BPD has a reasonably high sensitivity at this threshold. The AFI ratio has the lowest sensitivity in predicting IUGR in the Australian sample. Positive predictive values were low in all of the parameters in both the Iranian and Australian samples. By increasing the cut-off for PI to the 20th percentile, the sensitivity of reduced AC increased in the Australian sample while the sensitivity for an abnormal S/D ratio and reduced AFI to identify IUGR decreased. Our results indicate that reduced AC was the best single parameter in discriminating between IUGR and non-IUGR fetuses with the highest sensitivity among the proposed parameters in the both Iranian and Australian sample. However, the PPV of this parameter is low. This means that a high number of false-positive cases are detected using each parameter, which reduces the usefulness of identification. Other ultrasound obstetrical parameters may also have a reasonable level of sensitivity, however, the PPV of all parameters is low. On the whole, our results show that although the examined ultrasonographic criteria may detect a group of fetuses that need close antepartum surveillance, none of these parameters are appropriate enough to be used in isolation in clinical practice. Using single ultrasound parameters does not have high sensitivity and PPVs in detection of fetal growth restriction. This limits accuracy and utility of these tests in the detection of IUGR fetuses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-8785</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0098-8785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17856</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11607850</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Thieme</publisher><subject>Abdomen - anatomy &amp; histology ; Adult ; Amniotic Fluid ; Anthropometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Femur - embryology ; Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tropical medicine ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>American journal of perinatology, 2001-09, Vol.18 (6), p.325-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9225a0755ac9fc7c50ef801b4ec7901c9c720788a2fe5b0935c960fdcdb03f73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2001-17856.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2001-17856$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3004,3005,27901,27902,54534,54535</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14151897$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11607850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niknafs, Parvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibbald, John</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of Single Ultrasound Parameters in Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><title>American journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different single ultrasonographic parameters in predicting intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) babies as defined by Ponderal index at birth. Study sample composed of two sets of data from Iran and Australia. The Iranian sample consisted of 296 Iranian women. All the study women received prenatal care and delivered at Fatemieh Hospital in Shahrood, Iran. The data from 219 Australian fetuses were obtained from the ultrasound section at the Wollongong Hospital in Australia. Ultrasonographic measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), amniotic fluid index (AFI), and Doppler from umbilical arteries (S/D ratio) were obtained. Only those pregnancies were included in which the estimated date of delivery (EDD) by LMP (last menstrual period) agreed within 14 days with the estimated date of delivery determined by the initial ultrasound examination. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for single proposed ultrasound parameters in the Iranian and Australian samples. When different variables are compared, with a cut-off point at or below the 10th percentile AC and HC had the highest sensitivities in the Australian sample while AC was the most sensitive parameter for IUGR detection in the Iranian sample. BPD has a reasonably high sensitivity at this threshold. The AFI ratio has the lowest sensitivity in predicting IUGR in the Australian sample. Positive predictive values were low in all of the parameters in both the Iranian and Australian samples. By increasing the cut-off for PI to the 20th percentile, the sensitivity of reduced AC increased in the Australian sample while the sensitivity for an abnormal S/D ratio and reduced AFI to identify IUGR decreased. Our results indicate that reduced AC was the best single parameter in discriminating between IUGR and non-IUGR fetuses with the highest sensitivity among the proposed parameters in the both Iranian and Australian sample. However, the PPV of this parameter is low. This means that a high number of false-positive cases are detected using each parameter, which reduces the usefulness of identification. Other ultrasound obstetrical parameters may also have a reasonable level of sensitivity, however, the PPV of all parameters is low. On the whole, our results show that although the examined ultrasonographic criteria may detect a group of fetuses that need close antepartum surveillance, none of these parameters are appropriate enough to be used in isolation in clinical practice. Using single ultrasound parameters does not have high sensitivity and PPVs in detection of fetal growth restriction. This limits accuracy and utility of these tests in the detection of IUGR fetuses.</description><subject>Abdomen - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amniotic Fluid</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - embryology</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0735-1631</issn><issn>1098-8785</issn><issn>0098-8785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0D1PwzAQBmALgWgpbMwoCywQOCdxE49VoQWpEl9ltpyLTVPlo9iJUP89ThupC9P55Ed3p5eQSwr3FBh7sH4AQH0aJ2x8RIYUeOInrjkmQ4hD5tNxSAfkzNq1Y0ECySkZUDoGR2BI3ieIrZG49WrtfebVd6G8r6Ix0tZtlXlv0shSNcpYL6-8R_fCJq-rDs9UIwtvburfZuV9KNuYfPd3Tk60LKy66OuILGdPy-mzv3idv0wnCx9DFjY-DwImIWZMItcYIwOlE6BppDDmQJFjHLgbExloxVLgIUM-Bp1hlkKo43BEbvZjN6b-ad16UeYWVVHIStWtFXEQAI8i6uDdHqKprTVKi43JS2m2goLoEhRWdAmKXYKOX_Vz27RU2QH3kTlw3QNpURbayApze3ARZTTh3YG3e9esclUqsa5bU7lA_l_7B3ZGheQ</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Niknafs, Parvin</creator><creator>Sibbald, John</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Accuracy of Single Ultrasound Parameters in Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><author>Niknafs, Parvin ; Sibbald, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-9225a0755ac9fc7c50ef801b4ec7901c9c720788a2fe5b0935c960fdcdb03f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amniotic Fluid</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - embryology</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niknafs, Parvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibbald, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niknafs, Parvin</au><au>Sibbald, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of Single Ultrasound Parameters in Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction</atitle><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>325-334</pages><issn>0735-1631</issn><eissn>1098-8785</eissn><eissn>0098-8785</eissn><coden>AJPEEK</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different single ultrasonographic parameters in predicting intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) babies as defined by Ponderal index at birth. Study sample composed of two sets of data from Iran and Australia. The Iranian sample consisted of 296 Iranian women. All the study women received prenatal care and delivered at Fatemieh Hospital in Shahrood, Iran. The data from 219 Australian fetuses were obtained from the ultrasound section at the Wollongong Hospital in Australia. Ultrasonographic measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), amniotic fluid index (AFI), and Doppler from umbilical arteries (S/D ratio) were obtained. Only those pregnancies were included in which the estimated date of delivery (EDD) by LMP (last menstrual period) agreed within 14 days with the estimated date of delivery determined by the initial ultrasound examination. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for single proposed ultrasound parameters in the Iranian and Australian samples. When different variables are compared, with a cut-off point at or below the 10th percentile AC and HC had the highest sensitivities in the Australian sample while AC was the most sensitive parameter for IUGR detection in the Iranian sample. BPD has a reasonably high sensitivity at this threshold. The AFI ratio has the lowest sensitivity in predicting IUGR in the Australian sample. Positive predictive values were low in all of the parameters in both the Iranian and Australian samples. By increasing the cut-off for PI to the 20th percentile, the sensitivity of reduced AC increased in the Australian sample while the sensitivity for an abnormal S/D ratio and reduced AFI to identify IUGR decreased. Our results indicate that reduced AC was the best single parameter in discriminating between IUGR and non-IUGR fetuses with the highest sensitivity among the proposed parameters in the both Iranian and Australian sample. However, the PPV of this parameter is low. This means that a high number of false-positive cases are detected using each parameter, which reduces the usefulness of identification. Other ultrasound obstetrical parameters may also have a reasonable level of sensitivity, however, the PPV of all parameters is low. On the whole, our results show that although the examined ultrasonographic criteria may detect a group of fetuses that need close antepartum surveillance, none of these parameters are appropriate enough to be used in isolation in clinical practice. Using single ultrasound parameters does not have high sensitivity and PPVs in detection of fetal growth restriction. This limits accuracy and utility of these tests in the detection of IUGR fetuses.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>11607850</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2001-17856</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1631
ispartof American journal of perinatology, 2001-09, Vol.18 (6), p.325-334
issn 0735-1631
1098-8785
0098-8785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72209441
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Abdomen - anatomy & histology
Adult
Amniotic Fluid
Anthropometry
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Femur - embryology
Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tropical medicine
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
title Accuracy of Single Ultrasound Parameters in Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T11%3A39%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20Single%20Ultrasound%20Parameters%20in%20Detection%20of%20Fetal%20Growth%20Restriction&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Niknafs,%20Parvin&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=325-334&rft.issn=0735-1631&rft.eissn=1098-8785&rft.coden=AJPEEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2001-17856&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72209441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72209441&rft_id=info:pmid/11607850&rfr_iscdi=true