Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states

The frictional properties of conventional stainless steel brackets that were coupled with rectangular stainless steel archwires and ligated with stainless steel ligature wires and the frictional properties of closed self-ligating brackets coupled with the same archwires were compared in terms of sec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.361-370
Hauptverfasser: Thorstenson, Glenys A., Kusy, Robert P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 370
container_issue 4
container_start_page 361
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 120
creator Thorstenson, Glenys A.
Kusy, Robert P.
description The frictional properties of conventional stainless steel brackets that were coupled with rectangular stainless steel archwires and ligated with stainless steel ligature wires and the frictional properties of closed self-ligating brackets coupled with the same archwires were compared in terms of second-order angulation. The slides of these self-ligating brackets passively restrained the archwires within the slots. As a control, the frictional properties of the opened self-ligating brackets, which were ligated with stainless steel ligature wires, were measured. The resistance to sliding of the conventional brackets and the opened self-ligating brackets were measured at ligation forces ranging from 200 to 600 cN and at angles from −9° to 9°. The resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were measured at the same angles, but no external ligation forces were applied. In the passive configuration, the conventional brackets exhibited similar frictional resistance as the opened self-ligating brackets, whereas the closed self-ligating brackets exhibited no friction. In the active configuration, all brackets exhibited increased resistance to sliding as the angulation increased. At all angles, the resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were lower than those of the conventional brackets because of the absence of a ligation force when the slide restrained the archwire. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:361-70)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mod.2001.116090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72208308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540601527675</els_id><sourcerecordid>72208308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f086a7ea97bca0b1ecceb5c8d4a237b575babf230d0017bc615a804b5ec2ca883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzq2ZvkJO6hZyv93UdZ_IIFQfQc8lE9G80kayo9w_4c_6lpZmBPnioUz_tC5WHsjYCtgH642Ue7rQHEVogeJnjGNgKmoeqHrn7ONjCOU9W10F-wS6JfADC1NbxkFyvdTz1s2N_vSI6yCgZ5jpy8sy7seJw5oZ8r73YqrwudlPmNmfgBEy3ETQwHDNnFoDwveRc8EpUXouf56MJT4ujyfWkrCVvFZDFxFXaLV2uYFzDfI7fpsWwtP2Lm70l5d1DXa21GesVezMoTvj7PK_bz08cft1-qu2-fv95-uKtM0za5mmHs1YBqGrRRoAUag7ozo21V3Qy6Gzqt9Fw3YMt3FaYXnRqh1R2a2qhxbK7Yu1PvQ4p_FqQs944Meq8CxoXkUNcwNrCCNyfQpEiUcJYPye1VepQC5GpFFitytSJPVkri7bl60Xu0T_xZQwGmE4DlwIPDJMk4LE6sS2iytNH9t_wfbL-gYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72208308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thorstenson, Glenys A. ; Kusy, Robert P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thorstenson, Glenys A. ; Kusy, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><description>The frictional properties of conventional stainless steel brackets that were coupled with rectangular stainless steel archwires and ligated with stainless steel ligature wires and the frictional properties of closed self-ligating brackets coupled with the same archwires were compared in terms of second-order angulation. The slides of these self-ligating brackets passively restrained the archwires within the slots. As a control, the frictional properties of the opened self-ligating brackets, which were ligated with stainless steel ligature wires, were measured. The resistance to sliding of the conventional brackets and the opened self-ligating brackets were measured at ligation forces ranging from 200 to 600 cN and at angles from −9° to 9°. The resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were measured at the same angles, but no external ligation forces were applied. In the passive configuration, the conventional brackets exhibited similar frictional resistance as the opened self-ligating brackets, whereas the closed self-ligating brackets exhibited no friction. In the active configuration, all brackets exhibited increased resistance to sliding as the angulation increased. At all angles, the resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were lower than those of the conventional brackets because of the absence of a ligation force when the slide restrained the archwire. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:361-70)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.116090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11606960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Friction ; Linear Models ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Orthodontic Wires ; Saliva ; Stainless Steel</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.361-370</ispartof><rights>2001 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f086a7ea97bca0b1ecceb5c8d4a237b575babf230d0017bc615a804b5ec2ca883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f086a7ea97bca0b1ecceb5c8d4a237b575babf230d0017bc615a804b5ec2ca883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540601527675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thorstenson, Glenys A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>The frictional properties of conventional stainless steel brackets that were coupled with rectangular stainless steel archwires and ligated with stainless steel ligature wires and the frictional properties of closed self-ligating brackets coupled with the same archwires were compared in terms of second-order angulation. The slides of these self-ligating brackets passively restrained the archwires within the slots. As a control, the frictional properties of the opened self-ligating brackets, which were ligated with stainless steel ligature wires, were measured. The resistance to sliding of the conventional brackets and the opened self-ligating brackets were measured at ligation forces ranging from 200 to 600 cN and at angles from −9° to 9°. The resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were measured at the same angles, but no external ligation forces were applied. In the passive configuration, the conventional brackets exhibited similar frictional resistance as the opened self-ligating brackets, whereas the closed self-ligating brackets exhibited no friction. In the active configuration, all brackets exhibited increased resistance to sliding as the angulation increased. At all angles, the resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were lower than those of the conventional brackets because of the absence of a ligation force when the slide restrained the archwire. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:361-70)</description><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Orthodontic Wires</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzq2ZvkJO6hZyv93UdZ_IIFQfQc8lE9G80kayo9w_4c_6lpZmBPnioUz_tC5WHsjYCtgH642Ue7rQHEVogeJnjGNgKmoeqHrn7ONjCOU9W10F-wS6JfADC1NbxkFyvdTz1s2N_vSI6yCgZ5jpy8sy7seJw5oZ8r73YqrwudlPmNmfgBEy3ETQwHDNnFoDwveRc8EpUXouf56MJT4ujyfWkrCVvFZDFxFXaLV2uYFzDfI7fpsWwtP2Lm70l5d1DXa21GesVezMoTvj7PK_bz08cft1-qu2-fv95-uKtM0za5mmHs1YBqGrRRoAUag7ozo21V3Qy6Gzqt9Fw3YMt3FaYXnRqh1R2a2qhxbK7Yu1PvQ4p_FqQs944Meq8CxoXkUNcwNrCCNyfQpEiUcJYPye1VepQC5GpFFitytSJPVkri7bl60Xu0T_xZQwGmE4DlwIPDJMk4LE6sS2iytNH9t_wfbL-gYA</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Thorstenson, Glenys A.</creator><creator>Kusy, Robert P.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states</title><author>Thorstenson, Glenys A. ; Kusy, Robert P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f086a7ea97bca0b1ecceb5c8d4a237b575babf230d0017bc615a804b5ec2ca883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Orthodontic Wires</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thorstenson, Glenys A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thorstenson, Glenys A.</au><au>Kusy, Robert P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>361-370</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>The frictional properties of conventional stainless steel brackets that were coupled with rectangular stainless steel archwires and ligated with stainless steel ligature wires and the frictional properties of closed self-ligating brackets coupled with the same archwires were compared in terms of second-order angulation. The slides of these self-ligating brackets passively restrained the archwires within the slots. As a control, the frictional properties of the opened self-ligating brackets, which were ligated with stainless steel ligature wires, were measured. The resistance to sliding of the conventional brackets and the opened self-ligating brackets were measured at ligation forces ranging from 200 to 600 cN and at angles from −9° to 9°. The resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were measured at the same angles, but no external ligation forces were applied. In the passive configuration, the conventional brackets exhibited similar frictional resistance as the opened self-ligating brackets, whereas the closed self-ligating brackets exhibited no friction. In the active configuration, all brackets exhibited increased resistance to sliding as the angulation increased. At all angles, the resistances to sliding of the closed self-ligating brackets were lower than those of the conventional brackets because of the absence of a ligation force when the slide restrained the archwire. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:361-70)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11606960</pmid><doi>10.1067/mod.2001.116090</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.361-370
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72208308
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Friction
Linear Models
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Orthodontic Brackets
Orthodontic Wires
Saliva
Stainless Steel
title Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A55%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20to%20sliding%20of%20self-ligating%20brackets%20versus%20conventional%20stainless%20steel%20twin%20brackets%20with%20second-order%20angulation%20in%20the%20dry%20and%20wet%20(saliva)%20states&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Thorstenson,%20Glenys%20A.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=361-370&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mod.2001.116090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72208308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72208308&rft_id=info:pmid/11606960&rft_els_id=S0889540601527675&rfr_iscdi=true