An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)

Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.416-426
Hauptverfasser: Vardimon, Alexander D., Köklü, Saduman, Iseri, Haluk, Shpack, Nir, Fricke, Jorg, Mete, Levent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 426
container_issue 4
container_start_page 416
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 120
creator Vardimon, Alexander D.
Köklü, Saduman
Iseri, Haluk
Shpack, Nir
Fricke, Jorg
Mete, Levent
description Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mod.2001.116084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72207024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540601942015</els_id><sourcerecordid>72207024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PHDEMhiPUChbouTeUU9UeZnE-Jpk5IgSlElUPLb1GIfG0U2aSZZytxL9vVrsSp55s2Y9fyQ9j7wWsBRh7Oee4lgBiLYSBTh-xlYDeNsa28g1bQdf1TavBnLBToj8A0GsJx-xkR5ve2BX7eZW4J0KiGVPheeD0hBMWP3GfIo91WNsFaZNTpXjJvPxGPmxTKGNOdTf7XwnLGDi9UMGZf7z9-v3TOXs7-Inw3aGesYfbmx_Xd839t89frq_um6C0Ko0Qutdd5wetILZKRWN029ahgkdj9SD6IIPwIDute7Cq9Qq89qBlDKhtp87Yh33uZsnPW6Ti5pECTpNPmLfkrJRgQeoKXu7BsGSiBQe3WcbZLy9OgNupdFWl26l0e5X14uIQvX2cMb7yB3cV6PcA1gf_jrg4CiOmgHFcMBQX8_jf8H8e0oCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72207024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vardimon, Alexander D. ; Köklü, Saduman ; Iseri, Haluk ; Shpack, Nir ; Fricke, Jorg ; Mete, Levent</creator><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D. ; Köklü, Saduman ; Iseri, Haluk ; Shpack, Nir ; Fricke, Jorg ; Mete, Levent</creatorcontrib><description>Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.116084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11606967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Cephalometry ; Child ; Dental Arch - physiology ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Jaw - physiology ; Magnetics - instrumentation ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy ; Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tooth Movement Techniques ; Vertical Dimension</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.416-426</ispartof><rights>2001 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.116084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köklü, Saduman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iseri, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpack, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, Jorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mete, Levent</creatorcontrib><title>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dental Arch - physiology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw - physiology</subject><subject>Magnetics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</subject><subject>Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances, Functional</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PHDEMhiPUChbouTeUU9UeZnE-Jpk5IgSlElUPLb1GIfG0U2aSZZytxL9vVrsSp55s2Y9fyQ9j7wWsBRh7Oee4lgBiLYSBTh-xlYDeNsa28g1bQdf1TavBnLBToj8A0GsJx-xkR5ve2BX7eZW4J0KiGVPheeD0hBMWP3GfIo91WNsFaZNTpXjJvPxGPmxTKGNOdTf7XwnLGDi9UMGZf7z9-v3TOXs7-Inw3aGesYfbmx_Xd839t89frq_um6C0Ko0Qutdd5wetILZKRWN029ahgkdj9SD6IIPwIDute7Cq9Qq89qBlDKhtp87Yh33uZsnPW6Ti5pECTpNPmLfkrJRgQeoKXu7BsGSiBQe3WcbZLy9OgNupdFWl26l0e5X14uIQvX2cMb7yB3cV6PcA1gf_jrg4CiOmgHFcMBQX8_jf8H8e0oCI</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creator><creator>Köklü, Saduman</creator><creator>Iseri, Haluk</creator><creator>Shpack, Nir</creator><creator>Fricke, Jorg</creator><creator>Mete, Levent</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</title><author>Vardimon, Alexander D. ; Köklü, Saduman ; Iseri, Haluk ; Shpack, Nir ; Fricke, Jorg ; Mete, Levent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dental Arch - physiology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw - physiology</topic><topic>Magnetics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</topic><topic>Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances, Functional</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köklü, Saduman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iseri, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpack, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, Jorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mete, Levent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vardimon, Alexander D.</au><au>Köklü, Saduman</au><au>Iseri, Haluk</au><au>Shpack, Nir</au><au>Fricke, Jorg</au><au>Mete, Levent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>416-426</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11606967</pmid><doi>10.1067/mod.2001.116084</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.416-426
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72207024
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Analysis of Variance
Cephalometry
Child
Dental Arch - physiology
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Jaw - physiology
Magnetics - instrumentation
Male
Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy
Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Retrospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Tooth Movement Techniques
Vertical Dimension
title An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20assessment%20of%20skeletal%20and%20dental%20responses%20to%20the%20functional%20magnetic%20system%20(FMS)&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Vardimon,%20Alexander%20D.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=416-426&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mod.2001.116084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72207024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72207024&rft_id=info:pmid/11606967&rft_els_id=S0889540601942015&rfr_iscdi=true