An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)
Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Cl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.416-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 426 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 416 |
container_title | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Vardimon, Alexander D. Köklü, Saduman Iseri, Haluk Shpack, Nir Fricke, Jorg Mete, Levent |
description | Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mod.2001.116084 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72207024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540601942015</els_id><sourcerecordid>72207024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PHDEMhiPUChbouTeUU9UeZnE-Jpk5IgSlElUPLb1GIfG0U2aSZZytxL9vVrsSp55s2Y9fyQ9j7wWsBRh7Oee4lgBiLYSBTh-xlYDeNsa28g1bQdf1TavBnLBToj8A0GsJx-xkR5ve2BX7eZW4J0KiGVPheeD0hBMWP3GfIo91WNsFaZNTpXjJvPxGPmxTKGNOdTf7XwnLGDi9UMGZf7z9-v3TOXs7-Inw3aGesYfbmx_Xd839t89frq_um6C0Ko0Qutdd5wetILZKRWN029ahgkdj9SD6IIPwIDute7Cq9Qq89qBlDKhtp87Yh33uZsnPW6Ti5pECTpNPmLfkrJRgQeoKXu7BsGSiBQe3WcbZLy9OgNupdFWl26l0e5X14uIQvX2cMb7yB3cV6PcA1gf_jrg4CiOmgHFcMBQX8_jf8H8e0oCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72207024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vardimon, Alexander D. ; Köklü, Saduman ; Iseri, Haluk ; Shpack, Nir ; Fricke, Jorg ; Mete, Levent</creator><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D. ; Köklü, Saduman ; Iseri, Haluk ; Shpack, Nir ; Fricke, Jorg ; Mete, Levent</creatorcontrib><description>Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.116084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11606967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Cephalometry ; Child ; Dental Arch - physiology ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Jaw - physiology ; Magnetics - instrumentation ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy ; Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tooth Movement Techniques ; Vertical Dimension</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.416-426</ispartof><rights>2001 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.116084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köklü, Saduman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iseri, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpack, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, Jorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mete, Levent</creatorcontrib><title>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dental Arch - physiology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw - physiology</subject><subject>Magnetics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</subject><subject>Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances, Functional</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PHDEMhiPUChbouTeUU9UeZnE-Jpk5IgSlElUPLb1GIfG0U2aSZZytxL9vVrsSp55s2Y9fyQ9j7wWsBRh7Oee4lgBiLYSBTh-xlYDeNsa28g1bQdf1TavBnLBToj8A0GsJx-xkR5ve2BX7eZW4J0KiGVPheeD0hBMWP3GfIo91WNsFaZNTpXjJvPxGPmxTKGNOdTf7XwnLGDi9UMGZf7z9-v3TOXs7-Inw3aGesYfbmx_Xd839t89frq_um6C0Ko0Qutdd5wetILZKRWN029ahgkdj9SD6IIPwIDute7Cq9Qq89qBlDKhtp87Yh33uZsnPW6Ti5pECTpNPmLfkrJRgQeoKXu7BsGSiBQe3WcbZLy9OgNupdFWl26l0e5X14uIQvX2cMb7yB3cV6PcA1gf_jrg4CiOmgHFcMBQX8_jf8H8e0oCI</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creator><creator>Köklü, Saduman</creator><creator>Iseri, Haluk</creator><creator>Shpack, Nir</creator><creator>Fricke, Jorg</creator><creator>Mete, Levent</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</title><author>Vardimon, Alexander D. ; Köklü, Saduman ; Iseri, Haluk ; Shpack, Nir ; Fricke, Jorg ; Mete, Levent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1149488af430d533d6645514930b674f19c2c1a0284490735a30a4a042dce4783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dental Arch - physiology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw - physiology</topic><topic>Magnetics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</topic><topic>Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances, Functional</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köklü, Saduman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iseri, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpack, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, Jorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mete, Levent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vardimon, Alexander D.</au><au>Köklü, Saduman</au><au>Iseri, Haluk</au><au>Shpack, Nir</au><au>Fricke, Jorg</au><au>Mete, Levent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>416-426</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with functional appliances has been accepted as a viable treatment modality. However, its mechanism of action is still disputed. This retrospective study compared 20 Class II patients treated with the functional magnetic system (FMS) with Class I and Class II groups (the control groups) of 20 untreated subjects each. Dental and skeletal changes were compared using serial lateral cephalograms. The FMS group differed significantly from the control groups in 15 of 24 parameters. The great increase in articulare-gnathion distance (3.07 mm) attributed to the attractive magnetic component of the FMS dictates a prolonged propulsion of the mandible. The skeletal:dental response ratio was 1:2 for the anterior region and 1:1 for the posterior region. The dental and skeletal parameters demonstrated a synergistic response in the maxilla and a competitive response in the mandible. This means that greater maxillary molar distal movement and incisor retroclination resulted in a more significant restraint of point A. In contrast, increasing the mandibular molar mesial movement and the incisor proclination accompanied less advancement of the pogonion. Although the skeletal contribution to the resolution of the malocclusion was less than the dental contribution (anteriorly, one third), the functional correction response was found to be regulated by skeletal factors. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:416-26).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11606967</pmid><doi>10.1067/mod.2001.116084</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-5406 |
ispartof | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-10, Vol.120 (4), p.416-426 |
issn | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72207024 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Cephalometry Child Dental Arch - physiology Dentistry Female Humans Jaw - physiology Magnetics - instrumentation Male Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy Mandibular Advancement - instrumentation Orthodontic Appliance Design Orthodontic Appliances, Functional Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Retrospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric Tooth Movement Techniques Vertical Dimension |
title | An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20assessment%20of%20skeletal%20and%20dental%20responses%20to%20the%20functional%20magnetic%20system%20(FMS)&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Vardimon,%20Alexander%20D.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=416-426&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mod.2001.116084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72207024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72207024&rft_id=info:pmid/11606967&rft_els_id=S0889540601942015&rfr_iscdi=true |