The metabolic cost of birdsong production

The metabolic cost of birdsong production has not been studied in detail but is of importance in our understanding of how selective pressures shape song behavior. We measured rates of oxygen consumption during song in three songbird species, zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), Waterslager canaries...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental biology 2001-10, Vol.204 (Pt 19), p.3379-3388
Hauptverfasser: Oberweger, K, Goller, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3388
container_issue Pt 19
container_start_page 3379
container_title Journal of experimental biology
container_volume 204
creator Oberweger, K
Goller, F
description The metabolic cost of birdsong production has not been studied in detail but is of importance in our understanding of how selective pressures shape song behavior. We measured rates of oxygen consumption during song in three songbird species, zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), Waterslager canaries (Serinus canaria) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). These species sing songs with different acoustic and temporal characteristics: short stereotyped song (zebra finch), long song with high temporal complexity (canary) and long song with high acoustic, but low temporal, complexity (starling). In all three species, song slightly increased the rate of oxygen consumption over pre-song levels (1.02-1.36-fold). In zebra finches, the metabolic cost per song motif averaged 1.2 microl g(-1). This cost per motif did not change over the range of song duration measured for the four individuals. Surprisingly, the metabolic cost of song production in the species with the temporally most complex song, the canary, was no greater than in the other two species. In starlings, a 16 dB increase in sound intensity was accompanied by a 1.16-fold increase in the rate of oxygen consumption. These data indicate that the metabolic cost of song production in the songbird species studied is no higher than that for other types of vocal behavior in various bird groups. Our analysis shows that the metabolic cost of singing is also similar to that of calling in frogs and of human speech production. However, difficulties with measurements on freely behaving birds in a small respirometry chamber limit the depth of analysis that is possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3379
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72206536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18439406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-114f21291f2464ea0ae341ab456ac13c7612173bf3534a12b21ee998e9e61dd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqEws6FMSAxJffbFqUdU8SVVYimzZTsXSJXUJU4G_j2pWomRW2553vd0D2O3wHMQKBZbcrngmIPOpSz1GUsAyzLTgMU5SzgXIuMa9Yxdxbjl06gCL9kMQHGlABL2sPmitKPButA2PvUhDmmoU9f0VQy7z3Tfh2r0QxN21-yitm2km9Oes4_np83qNVu_v7ytHteZR7EcMgCsBQgNtUCFZLkliWAdFsp6kL5UIKCUrpaFRAvCCSDSekmaFFQVl3N2f-ydTn-PFAfTNdFT29odhTGaUojpC6n-BWGJUiM_gIsj6PsQY0-12fdNZ_sfA9wcNJpJo5k0GtDmoHFK3J2qR9dR9cefvMlfCRBruw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18439406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The metabolic cost of birdsong production</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><source>EZB*</source><creator>Oberweger, K ; Goller, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Oberweger, K ; Goller, F</creatorcontrib><description>The metabolic cost of birdsong production has not been studied in detail but is of importance in our understanding of how selective pressures shape song behavior. We measured rates of oxygen consumption during song in three songbird species, zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), Waterslager canaries (Serinus canaria) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). These species sing songs with different acoustic and temporal characteristics: short stereotyped song (zebra finch), long song with high temporal complexity (canary) and long song with high acoustic, but low temporal, complexity (starling). In all three species, song slightly increased the rate of oxygen consumption over pre-song levels (1.02-1.36-fold). In zebra finches, the metabolic cost per song motif averaged 1.2 microl g(-1). This cost per motif did not change over the range of song duration measured for the four individuals. Surprisingly, the metabolic cost of song production in the species with the temporally most complex song, the canary, was no greater than in the other two species. In starlings, a 16 dB increase in sound intensity was accompanied by a 1.16-fold increase in the rate of oxygen consumption. These data indicate that the metabolic cost of song production in the songbird species studied is no higher than that for other types of vocal behavior in various bird groups. Our analysis shows that the metabolic cost of singing is also similar to that of calling in frogs and of human speech production. However, difficulties with measurements on freely behaving birds in a small respirometry chamber limit the depth of analysis that is possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11606611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Basal Metabolism ; Kinetics ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption ; Songbirds - metabolism ; Vocalization, Animal - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 2001-10, Vol.204 (Pt 19), p.3379-3388</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-114f21291f2464ea0ae341ab456ac13c7612173bf3534a12b21ee998e9e61dd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-114f21291f2464ea0ae341ab456ac13c7612173bf3534a12b21ee998e9e61dd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3678,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oberweger, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goller, F</creatorcontrib><title>The metabolic cost of birdsong production</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>The metabolic cost of birdsong production has not been studied in detail but is of importance in our understanding of how selective pressures shape song behavior. We measured rates of oxygen consumption during song in three songbird species, zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), Waterslager canaries (Serinus canaria) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). These species sing songs with different acoustic and temporal characteristics: short stereotyped song (zebra finch), long song with high temporal complexity (canary) and long song with high acoustic, but low temporal, complexity (starling). In all three species, song slightly increased the rate of oxygen consumption over pre-song levels (1.02-1.36-fold). In zebra finches, the metabolic cost per song motif averaged 1.2 microl g(-1). This cost per motif did not change over the range of song duration measured for the four individuals. Surprisingly, the metabolic cost of song production in the species with the temporally most complex song, the canary, was no greater than in the other two species. In starlings, a 16 dB increase in sound intensity was accompanied by a 1.16-fold increase in the rate of oxygen consumption. These data indicate that the metabolic cost of song production in the songbird species studied is no higher than that for other types of vocal behavior in various bird groups. Our analysis shows that the metabolic cost of singing is also similar to that of calling in frogs and of human speech production. However, difficulties with measurements on freely behaving birds in a small respirometry chamber limit the depth of analysis that is possible.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Basal Metabolism</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Songbirds - metabolism</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal - physiology</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqEws6FMSAxJffbFqUdU8SVVYimzZTsXSJXUJU4G_j2pWomRW2553vd0D2O3wHMQKBZbcrngmIPOpSz1GUsAyzLTgMU5SzgXIuMa9Yxdxbjl06gCL9kMQHGlABL2sPmitKPButA2PvUhDmmoU9f0VQy7z3Tfh2r0QxN21-yitm2km9Oes4_np83qNVu_v7ytHteZR7EcMgCsBQgNtUCFZLkliWAdFsp6kL5UIKCUrpaFRAvCCSDSekmaFFQVl3N2f-ydTn-PFAfTNdFT29odhTGaUojpC6n-BWGJUiM_gIsj6PsQY0-12fdNZ_sfA9wcNJpJo5k0GtDmoHFK3J2qR9dR9cefvMlfCRBruw</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Oberweger, K</creator><creator>Goller, F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>The metabolic cost of birdsong production</title><author>Oberweger, K ; Goller, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-114f21291f2464ea0ae341ab456ac13c7612173bf3534a12b21ee998e9e61dd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Basal Metabolism</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Songbirds - metabolism</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oberweger, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goller, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oberweger, K</au><au>Goller, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The metabolic cost of birdsong production</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>204</volume><issue>Pt 19</issue><spage>3379</spage><epage>3388</epage><pages>3379-3388</pages><issn>0022-0949</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><abstract>The metabolic cost of birdsong production has not been studied in detail but is of importance in our understanding of how selective pressures shape song behavior. We measured rates of oxygen consumption during song in three songbird species, zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), Waterslager canaries (Serinus canaria) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). These species sing songs with different acoustic and temporal characteristics: short stereotyped song (zebra finch), long song with high temporal complexity (canary) and long song with high acoustic, but low temporal, complexity (starling). In all three species, song slightly increased the rate of oxygen consumption over pre-song levels (1.02-1.36-fold). In zebra finches, the metabolic cost per song motif averaged 1.2 microl g(-1). This cost per motif did not change over the range of song duration measured for the four individuals. Surprisingly, the metabolic cost of song production in the species with the temporally most complex song, the canary, was no greater than in the other two species. In starlings, a 16 dB increase in sound intensity was accompanied by a 1.16-fold increase in the rate of oxygen consumption. These data indicate that the metabolic cost of song production in the songbird species studied is no higher than that for other types of vocal behavior in various bird groups. Our analysis shows that the metabolic cost of singing is also similar to that of calling in frogs and of human speech production. However, difficulties with measurements on freely behaving birds in a small respirometry chamber limit the depth of analysis that is possible.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>11606611</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.204.19.3379</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0949
ispartof Journal of experimental biology, 2001-10, Vol.204 (Pt 19), p.3379-3388
issn 0022-0949
1477-9145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72206536
source MEDLINE; Company of Biologists; EZB*
subjects Animals
Basal Metabolism
Kinetics
Male
Oxygen Consumption
Songbirds - metabolism
Vocalization, Animal - physiology
title The metabolic cost of birdsong production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A07%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20metabolic%20cost%20of%20birdsong%20production&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=Oberweger,%20K&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=204&rft.issue=Pt%2019&rft.spage=3379&rft.epage=3388&rft.pages=3379-3388&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.204.19.3379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18439406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18439406&rft_id=info:pmid/11606611&rfr_iscdi=true