Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure
Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) Address issues related to selecting a quality of life (QOL) measuring tool; and (2) Present data from a pilot test comparing 3 QOL tools (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 [SF-36], the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [LHFQ], and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart & lung 2001-09, Vol.30 (5), p.332-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 332 |
container_title | Heart & lung |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Sneed, Nancee V. Paul, Sara Michel, Yvonne VanBakel, Adrian Hendrix, Grady |
description | Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) Address issues related to selecting a quality of life (QOL) measuring tool; and (2) Present data from a pilot test comparing 3 QOL tools (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 [SF-36], the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [LHFQ], and a visual analogue scale). Design: Descriptive comparative. Setting: A Southern university-affiliated tertiary medical center outpatient heart failure clinic. Patients: Thirty adults, randomly selected from those treated in a multidisciplinary, nurse practitioner–managed heart failure clinic. Results: Significant correlations were found among the global or broader measures of QOL (visual analog scale and LHFQ Total score) and the component scores (LHFQ Emotional, LHFQ Physical, SF-36 Mental [MCS], and SF-36 Physical [PCS]), with the only exception being that of the LHFQ Total and the SF-36 PCS. Mental and physical components of QOL were not related within the SF-36 or between the SF-36 PCS and the LHFQ Emotional score. However, the emotional and physical scores were highly and significantly related within the LHFQ and between the SF-36 MCS and the LHFQ Physical score. Conclusions: The SF-36 was better able to differentiate physical and emotional aspects of QOL in this sample. The LHFQ subscales may be less useful in QOL assessment than the total score. (Heart Lung® 2001;30:332-40.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mhl.2001.118303 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72205484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147956301756130</els_id><sourcerecordid>72205484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e3944a366056a76d9c728a0da5beb3f84d5f37987322bcf73d7fa9e7304aff2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE2LFDEQhoMo7rh69ia56K1n89VJ91GW9QMWvCh4C9XpChNJd2aT9Mr-ezPMwJ6sS6jwvC_FQ8h7zvacaXOzHOJeMMb3nA-SyRdkx3thOimG4SXZMa5MN_ZaXpE3pfxhbaQ2r8kV55qp0fQ78vvuEeIGNaSVJk8lfdgghvp0WmLwSBeEsmVccK20phQLDSs9tkD7KPRvqAfqDjmtwdEDQq7UQ4gt8Ja88hALvru81-TXl7uft9-6-x9fv99-vu-cNLJ2KEelQGrNeg1Gz6MzYgA2Qz_hJP2g5t5LMw5GCjE5b-RsPIxoJFPgvZjkNfl07j3m9LBhqXYJxWGMsGLaijVCsF4NqoE3Z9DlVEpGb485LJCfLGf2JNM2mfYk055ltsSHS_U2LTg_8xd7Dfh4AaA4iD7D6kJ55hSXeuxPReOZwybiMWC2xTV_DueQ0VU7p_DfI_4BKXmQhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72205484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sneed, Nancee V. ; Paul, Sara ; Michel, Yvonne ; VanBakel, Adrian ; Hendrix, Grady</creator><creatorcontrib>Sneed, Nancee V. ; Paul, Sara ; Michel, Yvonne ; VanBakel, Adrian ; Hendrix, Grady</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) Address issues related to selecting a quality of life (QOL) measuring tool; and (2) Present data from a pilot test comparing 3 QOL tools (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 [SF-36], the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [LHFQ], and a visual analogue scale). Design: Descriptive comparative. Setting: A Southern university-affiliated tertiary medical center outpatient heart failure clinic. Patients: Thirty adults, randomly selected from those treated in a multidisciplinary, nurse practitioner–managed heart failure clinic. Results: Significant correlations were found among the global or broader measures of QOL (visual analog scale and LHFQ Total score) and the component scores (LHFQ Emotional, LHFQ Physical, SF-36 Mental [MCS], and SF-36 Physical [PCS]), with the only exception being that of the LHFQ Total and the SF-36 PCS. Mental and physical components of QOL were not related within the SF-36 or between the SF-36 PCS and the LHFQ Emotional score. However, the emotional and physical scores were highly and significantly related within the LHFQ and between the SF-36 MCS and the LHFQ Physical score. Conclusions: The SF-36 was better able to differentiate physical and emotional aspects of QOL in this sample. The LHFQ subscales may be less useful in QOL assessment than the total score. (Heart Lung® 2001;30:332-40.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-9563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mhl.2001.118303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11604975</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HELUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Chronic Disease ; Comorbidity ; Educational Status ; Employment ; Female ; Heart ; Heart Failure - classification ; Heart Failure - drug therapy ; Heart Failure - psychology ; Heart failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, cardiac enlargement ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Pilot Projects ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Heart & lung, 2001-09, Vol.30 (5), p.332-340</ispartof><rights>2001 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e3944a366056a76d9c728a0da5beb3f84d5f37987322bcf73d7fa9e7304aff2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e3944a366056a76d9c728a0da5beb3f84d5f37987322bcf73d7fa9e7304aff2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956301756130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14136953$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11604975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sneed, Nancee V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanBakel, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrix, Grady</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure</title><title>Heart & lung</title><addtitle>Heart Lung</addtitle><description>Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) Address issues related to selecting a quality of life (QOL) measuring tool; and (2) Present data from a pilot test comparing 3 QOL tools (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 [SF-36], the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [LHFQ], and a visual analogue scale). Design: Descriptive comparative. Setting: A Southern university-affiliated tertiary medical center outpatient heart failure clinic. Patients: Thirty adults, randomly selected from those treated in a multidisciplinary, nurse practitioner–managed heart failure clinic. Results: Significant correlations were found among the global or broader measures of QOL (visual analog scale and LHFQ Total score) and the component scores (LHFQ Emotional, LHFQ Physical, SF-36 Mental [MCS], and SF-36 Physical [PCS]), with the only exception being that of the LHFQ Total and the SF-36 PCS. Mental and physical components of QOL were not related within the SF-36 or between the SF-36 PCS and the LHFQ Emotional score. However, the emotional and physical scores were highly and significantly related within the LHFQ and between the SF-36 MCS and the LHFQ Physical score. Conclusions: The SF-36 was better able to differentiate physical and emotional aspects of QOL in this sample. The LHFQ subscales may be less useful in QOL assessment than the total score. (Heart Lung® 2001;30:332-40.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Failure - classification</subject><subject>Heart Failure - drug therapy</subject><subject>Heart Failure - psychology</subject><subject>Heart failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, cardiac enlargement</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0147-9563</issn><issn>1527-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE2LFDEQhoMo7rh69ia56K1n89VJ91GW9QMWvCh4C9XpChNJd2aT9Mr-ezPMwJ6sS6jwvC_FQ8h7zvacaXOzHOJeMMb3nA-SyRdkx3thOimG4SXZMa5MN_ZaXpE3pfxhbaQ2r8kV55qp0fQ78vvuEeIGNaSVJk8lfdgghvp0WmLwSBeEsmVccK20phQLDSs9tkD7KPRvqAfqDjmtwdEDQq7UQ4gt8Ja88hALvru81-TXl7uft9-6-x9fv99-vu-cNLJ2KEelQGrNeg1Gz6MzYgA2Qz_hJP2g5t5LMw5GCjE5b-RsPIxoJFPgvZjkNfl07j3m9LBhqXYJxWGMsGLaijVCsF4NqoE3Z9DlVEpGb485LJCfLGf2JNM2mfYk055ltsSHS_U2LTg_8xd7Dfh4AaA4iD7D6kJ55hSXeuxPReOZwybiMWC2xTV_DueQ0VU7p_DfI_4BKXmQhQ</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Sneed, Nancee V.</creator><creator>Paul, Sara</creator><creator>Michel, Yvonne</creator><creator>VanBakel, Adrian</creator><creator>Hendrix, Grady</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Mosby</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure</title><author>Sneed, Nancee V. ; Paul, Sara ; Michel, Yvonne ; VanBakel, Adrian ; Hendrix, Grady</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e3944a366056a76d9c728a0da5beb3f84d5f37987322bcf73d7fa9e7304aff2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Failure - classification</topic><topic>Heart Failure - drug therapy</topic><topic>Heart Failure - psychology</topic><topic>Heart failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, cardiac enlargement</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sneed, Nancee V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanBakel, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrix, Grady</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart & lung</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sneed, Nancee V.</au><au>Paul, Sara</au><au>Michel, Yvonne</au><au>VanBakel, Adrian</au><au>Hendrix, Grady</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure</atitle><jtitle>Heart & lung</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>332-340</pages><issn>0147-9563</issn><eissn>1527-3288</eissn><coden>HELUAI</coden><abstract>Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) Address issues related to selecting a quality of life (QOL) measuring tool; and (2) Present data from a pilot test comparing 3 QOL tools (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 [SF-36], the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [LHFQ], and a visual analogue scale). Design: Descriptive comparative. Setting: A Southern university-affiliated tertiary medical center outpatient heart failure clinic. Patients: Thirty adults, randomly selected from those treated in a multidisciplinary, nurse practitioner–managed heart failure clinic. Results: Significant correlations were found among the global or broader measures of QOL (visual analog scale and LHFQ Total score) and the component scores (LHFQ Emotional, LHFQ Physical, SF-36 Mental [MCS], and SF-36 Physical [PCS]), with the only exception being that of the LHFQ Total and the SF-36 PCS. Mental and physical components of QOL were not related within the SF-36 or between the SF-36 PCS and the LHFQ Emotional score. However, the emotional and physical scores were highly and significantly related within the LHFQ and between the SF-36 MCS and the LHFQ Physical score. Conclusions: The SF-36 was better able to differentiate physical and emotional aspects of QOL in this sample. The LHFQ subscales may be less useful in QOL assessment than the total score. (Heart Lung® 2001;30:332-40.)</abstract><cop>St. Louis, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11604975</pmid><doi>10.1067/mhl.2001.118303</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-9563 |
ispartof | Heart & lung, 2001-09, Vol.30 (5), p.332-340 |
issn | 0147-9563 1527-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72205484 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Attitude to Health Biological and medical sciences Cardiology. Vascular system Chronic Disease Comorbidity Educational Status Employment Female Heart Heart Failure - classification Heart Failure - drug therapy Heart Failure - psychology Heart failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, cardiac enlargement Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pain Measurement Pilot Projects Quality of Life Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%203%20quality%20of%20life%20measurement%20tools%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20heart%20failure&rft.jtitle=Heart%20&%20lung&rft.au=Sneed,%20Nancee%20V.&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=332-340&rft.issn=0147-9563&rft.eissn=1527-3288&rft.coden=HELUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mhl.2001.118303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72205484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72205484&rft_id=info:pmid/11604975&rft_els_id=S0147956301756130&rfr_iscdi=true |