Platelet concentrates derived from buffy coat and apheresis: biochemical and functional differences

Summary Today, platelet concentrates are generally produced from whole blood by differential centrifugation (buffy coat‐derived platelet concentrates – PCs) or by plateletpheresis (apheresis‐derived platelet concentrates – APCs). As PCs are characterized by a lower number of platelets than APCs, four to six PCs are customarily combined in order to obtain an equivalent dose. In the 1970s and 1980s, the use of PCs exceeded that of APCs by far; in contrast, since the beginning of the 1990s, APCs comprise more than half of all transfused platelets. However, the selection of PCs or APCs for transfusion to thrombocytopenic patients is still a matter of debate. The present paper compares biochemical and functional properties of both platelet preparations in vitro. Besides plasma parameters (e.g. platelet factor 4 (PF4), P‐selectin, C3a‐desarginin, plasma coagulation factors), platelet function was analysed by aggregometry and the PFA 100 system. APCs are characterized by a better preservation of ADP and collagen‐induced platelet aggregation, and shorter closure times of the PFA 100 test system during storage. The improved primary in vitro haemostatic capacity of APCs is presumed to be owing to a lower cellular activation rate in these preparations. This hypothesis is supported by the higher plasma concentrations of PF4, β‐thromboglobulin and P‐selectin found in PCs compared with APCs. The concentrations of C3a‐desarginin in PCs exceed those in APCs by far. Additionally, thrombin generation is higher in PCs than in APCs. These data suggest that APCs are characterized by a superior haemostatic capacity over PCs in vitro. However, in vivo studies should be performed to confirm these findings in the patients' circulation also.