Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis

An inguinal sonogram often is obtained in boys with a nonpalpable testis to "localize" the testis, ie, determine whether the testis is present. The results of ultrasonography in boys with a nonpalpable testis were analyzed. The records of boys who were referred to a pediatric urology cente...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2002-10, Vol.110 (4), p.748-751
1. Verfasser: Elder, Jack S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 751
container_issue 4
container_start_page 748
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 110
creator Elder, Jack S
description An inguinal sonogram often is obtained in boys with a nonpalpable testis to "localize" the testis, ie, determine whether the testis is present. The results of ultrasonography in boys with a nonpalpable testis were analyzed. The records of boys who were referred to a pediatric urology center with a diagnosis of nonpalpable testis and who had undergone inguinal sonography were reviewed. The results of sonography were compared with findings in the office as well as surgical findings. A total of 62 boys who were referred with a diagnosis of a nonpalpable testis and who had undergone a sonogram were reviewed. The sonogram was ordered by the primary care physician in 51 boys (82%) and by a general urologist in 11 cases (18%). The testis was identified by sonography in 12 (18%) of 66 cases, and all were localized to the inguinal canal. Physical examination by a pediatric urologist showed that 6 were in the scrotum and 6 were in the inguinal canal or perineum. Of the 54 testes that were not localized by the sonogram, 33 (61%) were palpable and 21 (39%) were nonpalpable. Of the truly nonpalpable testes, laparoscopy and abdominal/inguinal exploration identified the testis as abdominal in 10 cases and atrophic secondary to spermatic cord torsion in 11 cases. Sonography is unnecessary in boys with a nonpalpable testis, because it rarely if ever localizes a true nonpalpable testis, and it does not alter the surgical approach in these patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.110.4.748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72142263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A92938532</galeid><sourcerecordid>A92938532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad70810127892ac0d42e78efd0cd648529d83e352a24adb5404fdb45ba7ddf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0s9v0zAUB_AIgVgZXDmiCImJw1L8c4mPoxpjomKXThwt135JPbl2Ziew_ve4aqVSVOXg2PrE7-nlWxTvMZpizsiXHkya4rxj05o1L4oJRqKpGKn5y2KCEMUVQ4ifFW9SekQIMV6T18UZJpSLuhGT4seDG6JKwYcuqn61Ke9S-eA9aEhJxU1pfXnzW7lRDdZ35dewSeUvO6xKVf4MvleuV0sH5QLSYNPb4lWrXIJ3-_W8WHy7Wcy-V_P727vZ9bzSnJKhUqZGDUaY5AaI0sgwAnUDrUHaXLGGE2EaCpQTRZgyS84Qa82S8aWqjWkFPS8udtf2MTyNubJc26TBOeUhjEnWBDNCrmiGH_-Dj2GMPrcmCWkoqYXY3na5Q51yIK1vQ56H7sBDVC54aG0-vhZE0CZ3n3l1gufHwNrqU_7zkc9kgOehU2NKsrmdH9HLU1QH56ADmUc4uz_i0x3XMaQUoZV9tOv8zyRGcpsNuc2GzNmQTOZs5A8-7McxLtdgDnwfhgw-7YFKWrk2Kq9tOjgquMC0PlRe2W71x0bYVrJqiFanf14Plf8CAjXP5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228327999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Elder, Jack S</creator><creatorcontrib>Elder, Jack S</creatorcontrib><description>An inguinal sonogram often is obtained in boys with a nonpalpable testis to "localize" the testis, ie, determine whether the testis is present. The results of ultrasonography in boys with a nonpalpable testis were analyzed. The records of boys who were referred to a pediatric urology center with a diagnosis of nonpalpable testis and who had undergone inguinal sonography were reviewed. The results of sonography were compared with findings in the office as well as surgical findings. A total of 62 boys who were referred with a diagnosis of a nonpalpable testis and who had undergone a sonogram were reviewed. The sonogram was ordered by the primary care physician in 51 boys (82%) and by a general urologist in 11 cases (18%). The testis was identified by sonography in 12 (18%) of 66 cases, and all were localized to the inguinal canal. Physical examination by a pediatric urologist showed that 6 were in the scrotum and 6 were in the inguinal canal or perineum. Of the 54 testes that were not localized by the sonogram, 33 (61%) were palpable and 21 (39%) were nonpalpable. Of the truly nonpalpable testes, laparoscopy and abdominal/inguinal exploration identified the testis as abdominal in 10 cases and atrophic secondary to spermatic cord torsion in 11 cases. Sonography is unnecessary in boys with a nonpalpable testis, because it rarely if ever localizes a true nonpalpable testis, and it does not alter the surgical approach in these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.4.748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12359789</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elk Grove Village, IL: Am Acad Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Boys ; CAT scans ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cryptorchidism - diagnosis ; Cryptorchidism - diagnostic imaging ; Cryptorchidism - surgery ; CT imaging ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Infant ; Inguinal Canal - diagnostic imaging ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Palpation - methods ; Pediatrics ; Radiology ; Testis ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2002-10, Vol.110 (4), p.748-751</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad70810127892ac0d42e78efd0cd648529d83e352a24adb5404fdb45ba7ddf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad70810127892ac0d42e78efd0cd648529d83e352a24adb5404fdb45ba7ddf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13959137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12359789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elder, Jack S</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>An inguinal sonogram often is obtained in boys with a nonpalpable testis to "localize" the testis, ie, determine whether the testis is present. The results of ultrasonography in boys with a nonpalpable testis were analyzed. The records of boys who were referred to a pediatric urology center with a diagnosis of nonpalpable testis and who had undergone inguinal sonography were reviewed. The results of sonography were compared with findings in the office as well as surgical findings. A total of 62 boys who were referred with a diagnosis of a nonpalpable testis and who had undergone a sonogram were reviewed. The sonogram was ordered by the primary care physician in 51 boys (82%) and by a general urologist in 11 cases (18%). The testis was identified by sonography in 12 (18%) of 66 cases, and all were localized to the inguinal canal. Physical examination by a pediatric urologist showed that 6 were in the scrotum and 6 were in the inguinal canal or perineum. Of the 54 testes that were not localized by the sonogram, 33 (61%) were palpable and 21 (39%) were nonpalpable. Of the truly nonpalpable testes, laparoscopy and abdominal/inguinal exploration identified the testis as abdominal in 10 cases and atrophic secondary to spermatic cord torsion in 11 cases. Sonography is unnecessary in boys with a nonpalpable testis, because it rarely if ever localizes a true nonpalpable testis, and it does not alter the surgical approach in these patients.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Boys</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cryptorchidism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cryptorchidism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cryptorchidism - surgery</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Inguinal Canal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Palpation - methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Testis</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0s9v0zAUB_AIgVgZXDmiCImJw1L8c4mPoxpjomKXThwt135JPbl2Ziew_ve4aqVSVOXg2PrE7-nlWxTvMZpizsiXHkya4rxj05o1L4oJRqKpGKn5y2KCEMUVQ4ifFW9SekQIMV6T18UZJpSLuhGT4seDG6JKwYcuqn61Ke9S-eA9aEhJxU1pfXnzW7lRDdZ35dewSeUvO6xKVf4MvleuV0sH5QLSYNPb4lWrXIJ3-_W8WHy7Wcy-V_P727vZ9bzSnJKhUqZGDUaY5AaI0sgwAnUDrUHaXLGGE2EaCpQTRZgyS84Qa82S8aWqjWkFPS8udtf2MTyNubJc26TBOeUhjEnWBDNCrmiGH_-Dj2GMPrcmCWkoqYXY3na5Q51yIK1vQ56H7sBDVC54aG0-vhZE0CZ3n3l1gufHwNrqU_7zkc9kgOehU2NKsrmdH9HLU1QH56ADmUc4uz_i0x3XMaQUoZV9tOv8zyRGcpsNuc2GzNmQTOZs5A8-7McxLtdgDnwfhgw-7YFKWrk2Kq9tOjgquMC0PlRe2W71x0bYVrJqiFanf14Plf8CAjXP5A</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Elder, Jack S</creator><general>Am Acad Pediatrics</general><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis</title><author>Elder, Jack S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-ad70810127892ac0d42e78efd0cd648529d83e352a24adb5404fdb45ba7ddf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Boys</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cryptorchidism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cryptorchidism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cryptorchidism - surgery</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Inguinal Canal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Palpation - methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Testis</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elder, Jack S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elder, Jack S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>748-751</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>An inguinal sonogram often is obtained in boys with a nonpalpable testis to "localize" the testis, ie, determine whether the testis is present. The results of ultrasonography in boys with a nonpalpable testis were analyzed. The records of boys who were referred to a pediatric urology center with a diagnosis of nonpalpable testis and who had undergone inguinal sonography were reviewed. The results of sonography were compared with findings in the office as well as surgical findings. A total of 62 boys who were referred with a diagnosis of a nonpalpable testis and who had undergone a sonogram were reviewed. The sonogram was ordered by the primary care physician in 51 boys (82%) and by a general urologist in 11 cases (18%). The testis was identified by sonography in 12 (18%) of 66 cases, and all were localized to the inguinal canal. Physical examination by a pediatric urologist showed that 6 were in the scrotum and 6 were in the inguinal canal or perineum. Of the 54 testes that were not localized by the sonogram, 33 (61%) were palpable and 21 (39%) were nonpalpable. Of the truly nonpalpable testes, laparoscopy and abdominal/inguinal exploration identified the testis as abdominal in 10 cases and atrophic secondary to spermatic cord torsion in 11 cases. Sonography is unnecessary in boys with a nonpalpable testis, because it rarely if ever localizes a true nonpalpable testis, and it does not alter the surgical approach in these patients.</abstract><cop>Elk Grove Village, IL</cop><pub>Am Acad Pediatrics</pub><pmid>12359789</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.110.4.748</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2002-10, Vol.110 (4), p.748-751
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72142263
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Abnormalities
Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Boys
CAT scans
Child
Child, Preschool
Cryptorchidism - diagnosis
Cryptorchidism - diagnostic imaging
Cryptorchidism - surgery
CT imaging
Genital system. Mammary gland
Humans
Infant
Inguinal Canal - diagnostic imaging
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Palpation - methods
Pediatrics
Radiology
Testis
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Ultrasonography
title Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A07%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonography%20Is%20Unnecessary%20in%20Evaluating%20Boys%20With%20a%20Nonpalpable%20Testis&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Elder,%20Jack%20S&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=748-751&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.110.4.748&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA92938532%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228327999&rft_id=info:pmid/12359789&rft_galeid=A92938532&rfr_iscdi=true