Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss
Cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) has been used to identify the presence of a non-organic component in cases where compensation for hearing disability is claimed. This study aims at verifying the magnitude of discrepancy between thresholds estimated by CERA and by pure-tone audiometry (PTA)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of audiology 2002-09, Vol.41 (6), p.330-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 330 |
container_title | International journal of audiology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | TSUI, Betty WONG, Lena L. N WONG, Eddie C. M |
description | Cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) has been used to identify the presence of a non-organic component in cases where compensation for hearing disability is claimed. This study aims at verifying the magnitude of discrepancy between thresholds estimated by CERA and by pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Results from 204 claimants (408 ears) with reliable PTA and CERA records showed mean discrepancy values between PTA and CERAT of less than 5 dB at high frequencies. Over 83.2% of claimants had a CERAT and PTA threshold discrepancy within 10 dB. Results suggested that while CERA threshold measurement could not accurately predict PTA in all cases, it could still be used as an objective guideline to rule out the presence of a non-organic component in hearing disability compensation claimants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/14992020209090407 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72129508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72129508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-ed523afb198fe091df3c22bc9856bb2da1c72a919cdcdce3083948181480d0d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4ADbIG9gF_Ehqe1lVvKRKbGAdOfakNSR2sBOk_j2uKEJ3MSPdMzOai9AVJXecEnVPS6UY2UtllUQcoTMqiCwklYvj3Ge_yLaYofOUPgihoqzkKZpRxiu-INUZ0ktjpqjNDocWmxBHZ3SH4Tt8gsUR0hB8Aqwn60IPY9xh5_G4Bews-NG1mR5d8PthH3wR4kZ7Z_AWdHR-g7uQ0gU6aXWX4PJQ5-j98eFt9VysX59eVst1MTAuxgJsxbhuG6pkC0RR23LDWGOUrBZNw6ymRjCtqDI2CziRXJX5T1pKYomt-Bzd_u4dYviaII1175KBrtMewpRqwShTVR6bo-sDODU92HqIrtdxV_-FkoGbA6BTTqON2huX_rn9YUEF_wF2fHJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72129508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>TSUI, Betty ; WONG, Lena L. N ; WONG, Eddie C. M</creator><creatorcontrib>TSUI, Betty ; WONG, Lena L. N ; WONG, Eddie C. M</creatorcontrib><description>Cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) has been used to identify the presence of a non-organic component in cases where compensation for hearing disability is claimed. This study aims at verifying the magnitude of discrepancy between thresholds estimated by CERA and by pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Results from 204 claimants (408 ears) with reliable PTA and CERA records showed mean discrepancy values between PTA and CERAT of less than 5 dB at high frequencies. Over 83.2% of claimants had a CERAT and PTA threshold discrepancy within 10 dB. Results suggested that while CERA threshold measurement could not accurately predict PTA in all cases, it could still be used as an objective guideline to rule out the presence of a non-organic component in hearing disability compensation claimants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/14992020209090407</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12353605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hamilton, ON: Decker</publisher><subject>Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disability Evaluation ; Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Female ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system ; Non tumoral diseases ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Reflex, Acoustic - physiology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Workers' Compensation</subject><ispartof>International journal of audiology, 2002-09, Vol.41 (6), p.330-333</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13948717$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12353605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TSUI, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, Lena L. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, Eddie C. M</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss</title><title>International journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><description>Cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) has been used to identify the presence of a non-organic component in cases where compensation for hearing disability is claimed. This study aims at verifying the magnitude of discrepancy between thresholds estimated by CERA and by pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Results from 204 claimants (408 ears) with reliable PTA and CERA records showed mean discrepancy values between PTA and CERAT of less than 5 dB at high frequencies. Over 83.2% of claimants had a CERAT and PTA threshold discrepancy within 10 dB. Results suggested that while CERA threshold measurement could not accurately predict PTA in all cases, it could still be used as an objective guideline to rule out the presence of a non-organic component in hearing disability compensation claimants.</description><subject>Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Reflex, Acoustic - physiology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Workers' Compensation</subject><issn>1499-2027</issn><issn>1708-8186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4ADbIG9gF_Ehqe1lVvKRKbGAdOfakNSR2sBOk_j2uKEJ3MSPdMzOai9AVJXecEnVPS6UY2UtllUQcoTMqiCwklYvj3Ge_yLaYofOUPgihoqzkKZpRxiu-INUZ0ktjpqjNDocWmxBHZ3SH4Tt8gsUR0hB8Aqwn60IPY9xh5_G4Bews-NG1mR5d8PthH3wR4kZ7Z_AWdHR-g7uQ0gU6aXWX4PJQ5-j98eFt9VysX59eVst1MTAuxgJsxbhuG6pkC0RR23LDWGOUrBZNw6ymRjCtqDI2CziRXJX5T1pKYomt-Bzd_u4dYviaII1175KBrtMewpRqwShTVR6bo-sDODU92HqIrtdxV_-FkoGbA6BTTqON2huX_rn9YUEF_wF2fHJM</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>TSUI, Betty</creator><creator>WONG, Lena L. N</creator><creator>WONG, Eddie C. M</creator><general>Decker</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss</title><author>TSUI, Betty ; WONG, Lena L. N ; WONG, Eddie C. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-ed523afb198fe091df3c22bc9856bb2da1c72a919cdcdce3083948181480d0d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Reflex, Acoustic - physiology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Workers' Compensation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TSUI, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, Lena L. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, Eddie C. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TSUI, Betty</au><au>WONG, Lena L. N</au><au>WONG, Eddie C. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss</atitle><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>330-333</pages><issn>1499-2027</issn><eissn>1708-8186</eissn><abstract>Cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) has been used to identify the presence of a non-organic component in cases where compensation for hearing disability is claimed. This study aims at verifying the magnitude of discrepancy between thresholds estimated by CERA and by pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Results from 204 claimants (408 ears) with reliable PTA and CERA records showed mean discrepancy values between PTA and CERAT of less than 5 dB at high frequencies. Over 83.2% of claimants had a CERAT and PTA threshold discrepancy within 10 dB. Results suggested that while CERA threshold measurement could not accurately predict PTA in all cases, it could still be used as an objective guideline to rule out the presence of a non-organic component in hearing disability compensation claimants.</abstract><cop>Hamilton, ON</cop><pub>Decker</pub><pmid>12353605</pmid><doi>10.3109/14992020209090407</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1499-2027 |
ispartof | International journal of audiology, 2002-09, Vol.41 (6), p.330-333 |
issn | 1499-2027 1708-8186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72129508 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods Adult Aged Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods Auditory Threshold - physiology Biological and medical sciences Disability Evaluation Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology Female Hearing Disorders - diagnosis Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nervous system Non tumoral diseases Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Reflex, Acoustic - physiology Severity of Illness Index Workers' Compensation |
title | Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A49%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20cortical%20evoked%20response%20audiometry%20in%20the%20identification%20of%20non-organic%20hearing%20loss&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=TSUI,%20Betty&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=330-333&rft.issn=1499-2027&rft.eissn=1708-8186&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/14992020209090407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72129508%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72129508&rft_id=info:pmid/12353605&rfr_iscdi=true |