Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus

PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cornea 2002-10, Vol.21 (7), p.671-679
Hauptverfasser: Zadnik, Karla, Steger-May, Karen, Fink, Barbara A, Joslin, Charlotte E, Nichols, Jason J, Rosenstiel, Carol E, Tyler, Julie A, Yu, Julie A, Raasch, Thomas W, Schechtman, Kenneth B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 679
container_issue 7
container_start_page 671
container_title Cornea
container_volume 21
creator Zadnik, Karla
Steger-May, Karen
Fink, Barbara A
Joslin, Charlotte E
Nichols, Jason J
Rosenstiel, Carol E
Tyler, Julie A
Yu, Julie A
Raasch, Thomas W
Schechtman, Kenneth B
description PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured. RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time. CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72128261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72128261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwF1APiFsgTtokPY5pPMQkLnCOssTVBn2MpNXUf0_HBpzwwZatz4n1EZIAuwGWq1s2hOBcUs4Yh11Hd0kfkTFkQtJU5fqYjBlXigqVshE5i_F9IJSS_JSMgIuMM52OydUdtlvEms57TKaxrypsQ5-s6-QZg20b19RdPCcnhS0jXhzqhLzdz19nj3Tx8vA0my6oE5nUNLe-EF76LBM5Culz0KhYuiw8ZiC900sH4DVPUXFbCCYBpQfhoBhOBGHFhFzv392E5rPD2JpqHR2Wpa2x6aJRHLjmEgZQ70EXmhgDFmYT1pUNvQFmdobMjyHza-h7pIfVy8Mf3bJC_7d4UDIA6R7YNmWLIX6U3RaDWaEt25X5z7z4ApKCbpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72128261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Zadnik, Karla ; Steger-May, Karen ; Fink, Barbara A ; Joslin, Charlotte E ; Nichols, Jason J ; Rosenstiel, Carol E ; Tyler, Julie A ; Yu, Julie A ; Raasch, Thomas W ; Schechtman, Kenneth B</creator><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla ; Steger-May, Karen ; Fink, Barbara A ; Joslin, Charlotte E ; Nichols, Jason J ; Rosenstiel, Carol E ; Tyler, Julie A ; Yu, Julie A ; Raasch, Thomas W ; Schechtman, Kenneth B ; CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured. RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time. CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12352084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cicatrix - complications ; Cohort Studies ; Contact Lenses ; Cornea - pathology ; Corneal Diseases - complications ; Corneal Topography ; Humans ; Keratoconus - complications ; Keratoconus - pathology ; Middle Aged ; Myopia - pathology ; Myopia - rehabilitation ; Refractive Errors - complications ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Cornea, 2002-10, Vol.21 (7), p.671-679</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12352084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steger-May, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joslin, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Jason J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Carol E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raasch, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schechtman, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</creatorcontrib><title>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</title><title>Cornea</title><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><description>PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured. RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time. CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cicatrix - complications</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Contact Lenses</subject><subject>Cornea - pathology</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Corneal Topography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratoconus - complications</subject><subject>Keratoconus - pathology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia - pathology</subject><subject>Myopia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - complications</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0277-3740</issn><issn>1536-4798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwF1APiFsgTtokPY5pPMQkLnCOssTVBn2MpNXUf0_HBpzwwZatz4n1EZIAuwGWq1s2hOBcUs4Yh11Hd0kfkTFkQtJU5fqYjBlXigqVshE5i_F9IJSS_JSMgIuMM52OydUdtlvEms57TKaxrypsQ5-s6-QZg20b19RdPCcnhS0jXhzqhLzdz19nj3Tx8vA0my6oE5nUNLe-EF76LBM5Culz0KhYuiw8ZiC900sH4DVPUXFbCCYBpQfhoBhOBGHFhFzv392E5rPD2JpqHR2Wpa2x6aJRHLjmEgZQ70EXmhgDFmYT1pUNvQFmdobMjyHza-h7pIfVy8Mf3bJC_7d4UDIA6R7YNmWLIX6U3RaDWaEt25X5z7z4ApKCbpg</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Zadnik, Karla</creator><creator>Steger-May, Karen</creator><creator>Fink, Barbara A</creator><creator>Joslin, Charlotte E</creator><creator>Nichols, Jason J</creator><creator>Rosenstiel, Carol E</creator><creator>Tyler, Julie A</creator><creator>Yu, Julie A</creator><creator>Raasch, Thomas W</creator><creator>Schechtman, Kenneth B</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</title><author>Zadnik, Karla ; Steger-May, Karen ; Fink, Barbara A ; Joslin, Charlotte E ; Nichols, Jason J ; Rosenstiel, Carol E ; Tyler, Julie A ; Yu, Julie A ; Raasch, Thomas W ; Schechtman, Kenneth B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cicatrix - complications</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Contact Lenses</topic><topic>Cornea - pathology</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Corneal Topography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratoconus - complications</topic><topic>Keratoconus - pathology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia - pathology</topic><topic>Myopia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - complications</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steger-May, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joslin, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Jason J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Carol E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raasch, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schechtman, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zadnik, Karla</au><au>Steger-May, Karen</au><au>Fink, Barbara A</au><au>Joslin, Charlotte E</au><au>Nichols, Jason J</au><au>Rosenstiel, Carol E</au><au>Tyler, Julie A</au><au>Yu, Julie A</au><au>Raasch, Thomas W</au><au>Schechtman, Kenneth B</au><aucorp>CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</atitle><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>671-679</pages><issn>0277-3740</issn><eissn>1536-4798</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured. RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time. CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12352084</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-3740
ispartof Cornea, 2002-10, Vol.21 (7), p.671-679
issn 0277-3740
1536-4798
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72128261
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Cicatrix - complications
Cohort Studies
Contact Lenses
Cornea - pathology
Corneal Diseases - complications
Corneal Topography
Humans
Keratoconus - complications
Keratoconus - pathology
Middle Aged
Myopia - pathology
Myopia - rehabilitation
Refractive Errors - complications
Visual Acuity
title Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Between-Eye%20Asymmetry%20in%20Keratoconus&rft.jtitle=Cornea&rft.au=Zadnik,%20Karla&rft.aucorp=CLEK%20Study%20Group.%20Collaborative%20Longitudinal%20Evaluation%20of%20Keratoconus&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=671-679&rft.issn=0277-3740&rft.eissn=1536-4798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72128261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72128261&rft_id=info:pmid/12352084&rfr_iscdi=true