Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus
PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cornea 2002-10, Vol.21 (7), p.671-679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 679 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 671 |
container_title | Cornea |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Zadnik, Karla Steger-May, Karen Fink, Barbara A Joslin, Charlotte E Nichols, Jason J Rosenstiel, Carol E Tyler, Julie A Yu, Julie A Raasch, Thomas W Schechtman, Kenneth B |
description | PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease.
METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured.
RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time.
CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72128261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72128261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwF1APiFsgTtokPY5pPMQkLnCOssTVBn2MpNXUf0_HBpzwwZatz4n1EZIAuwGWq1s2hOBcUs4Yh11Hd0kfkTFkQtJU5fqYjBlXigqVshE5i_F9IJSS_JSMgIuMM52OydUdtlvEms57TKaxrypsQ5-s6-QZg20b19RdPCcnhS0jXhzqhLzdz19nj3Tx8vA0my6oE5nUNLe-EF76LBM5Culz0KhYuiw8ZiC900sH4DVPUXFbCCYBpQfhoBhOBGHFhFzv392E5rPD2JpqHR2Wpa2x6aJRHLjmEgZQ70EXmhgDFmYT1pUNvQFmdobMjyHza-h7pIfVy8Mf3bJC_7d4UDIA6R7YNmWLIX6U3RaDWaEt25X5z7z4ApKCbpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72128261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Zadnik, Karla ; Steger-May, Karen ; Fink, Barbara A ; Joslin, Charlotte E ; Nichols, Jason J ; Rosenstiel, Carol E ; Tyler, Julie A ; Yu, Julie A ; Raasch, Thomas W ; Schechtman, Kenneth B</creator><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla ; Steger-May, Karen ; Fink, Barbara A ; Joslin, Charlotte E ; Nichols, Jason J ; Rosenstiel, Carol E ; Tyler, Julie A ; Yu, Julie A ; Raasch, Thomas W ; Schechtman, Kenneth B ; CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease.
METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured.
RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time.
CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12352084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cicatrix - complications ; Cohort Studies ; Contact Lenses ; Cornea - pathology ; Corneal Diseases - complications ; Corneal Topography ; Humans ; Keratoconus - complications ; Keratoconus - pathology ; Middle Aged ; Myopia - pathology ; Myopia - rehabilitation ; Refractive Errors - complications ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Cornea, 2002-10, Vol.21 (7), p.671-679</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12352084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steger-May, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joslin, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Jason J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Carol E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raasch, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schechtman, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</creatorcontrib><title>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</title><title>Cornea</title><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><description>PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease.
METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured.
RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time.
CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cicatrix - complications</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Contact Lenses</subject><subject>Cornea - pathology</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Corneal Topography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratoconus - complications</subject><subject>Keratoconus - pathology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia - pathology</subject><subject>Myopia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - complications</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0277-3740</issn><issn>1536-4798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwF1APiFsgTtokPY5pPMQkLnCOssTVBn2MpNXUf0_HBpzwwZatz4n1EZIAuwGWq1s2hOBcUs4Yh11Hd0kfkTFkQtJU5fqYjBlXigqVshE5i_F9IJSS_JSMgIuMM52OydUdtlvEms57TKaxrypsQ5-s6-QZg20b19RdPCcnhS0jXhzqhLzdz19nj3Tx8vA0my6oE5nUNLe-EF76LBM5Culz0KhYuiw8ZiC900sH4DVPUXFbCCYBpQfhoBhOBGHFhFzv392E5rPD2JpqHR2Wpa2x6aJRHLjmEgZQ70EXmhgDFmYT1pUNvQFmdobMjyHza-h7pIfVy8Mf3bJC_7d4UDIA6R7YNmWLIX6U3RaDWaEt25X5z7z4ApKCbpg</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Zadnik, Karla</creator><creator>Steger-May, Karen</creator><creator>Fink, Barbara A</creator><creator>Joslin, Charlotte E</creator><creator>Nichols, Jason J</creator><creator>Rosenstiel, Carol E</creator><creator>Tyler, Julie A</creator><creator>Yu, Julie A</creator><creator>Raasch, Thomas W</creator><creator>Schechtman, Kenneth B</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</title><author>Zadnik, Karla ; Steger-May, Karen ; Fink, Barbara A ; Joslin, Charlotte E ; Nichols, Jason J ; Rosenstiel, Carol E ; Tyler, Julie A ; Yu, Julie A ; Raasch, Thomas W ; Schechtman, Kenneth B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-9adf3d6d5539e36d918e704bfde516dc8bc11d824e72af3061e6d13c1f74013a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cicatrix - complications</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Contact Lenses</topic><topic>Cornea - pathology</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Corneal Topography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratoconus - complications</topic><topic>Keratoconus - pathology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia - pathology</topic><topic>Myopia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - complications</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steger-May, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joslin, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Jason J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Carol E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raasch, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schechtman, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zadnik, Karla</au><au>Steger-May, Karen</au><au>Fink, Barbara A</au><au>Joslin, Charlotte E</au><au>Nichols, Jason J</au><au>Rosenstiel, Carol E</au><au>Tyler, Julie A</au><au>Yu, Julie A</au><au>Raasch, Thomas W</au><au>Schechtman, Kenneth B</au><aucorp>CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus</atitle><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>671-679</pages><issn>0277-3740</issn><eissn>1536-4798</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE.To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease.
METHODS.A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured.
RESULTS.The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry−3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry−4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time.
CONCLUSIONS.Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12352084</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-3740 |
ispartof | Cornea, 2002-10, Vol.21 (7), p.671-679 |
issn | 0277-3740 1536-4798 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72128261 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Cicatrix - complications Cohort Studies Contact Lenses Cornea - pathology Corneal Diseases - complications Corneal Topography Humans Keratoconus - complications Keratoconus - pathology Middle Aged Myopia - pathology Myopia - rehabilitation Refractive Errors - complications Visual Acuity |
title | Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Between-Eye%20Asymmetry%20in%20Keratoconus&rft.jtitle=Cornea&rft.au=Zadnik,%20Karla&rft.aucorp=CLEK%20Study%20Group.%20Collaborative%20Longitudinal%20Evaluation%20of%20Keratoconus&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=671-679&rft.issn=0277-3740&rft.eissn=1536-4798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72128261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72128261&rft_id=info:pmid/12352084&rfr_iscdi=true |