Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting

Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Differentiation (London) 1991-04, Vol.46 (3), p.209-221
Hauptverfasser: O'Hare, Michael J., Ormerod, Michael G., Monaghan, Paul, Lane, E. Birgitte, Gusterson, Barry A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 3
container_start_page 209
container_title Differentiation (London)
container_volume 46
creator O'Hare, Michael J.
Ormerod, Michael G.
Monaghan, Paul
Lane, E. Birgitte
Gusterson, Barry A.
description Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72126541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301468111602521</els_id><sourcerecordid>72126541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1vFCEch4nR1LX6EUyIMd5mBAYGxoOJ2drapImX3gnDS5cNM6ww03b99DKdTb0qFxJ-z_-FB4APGNW4nM_7GtOGVIg2bY27DtdTj5AQTf34Amyeo5dggxqEK9oK_Bq8yXmPCtUSfAbOsGgawugGpO1OJaUnm_xvNfk4Qj_Cez-lCKODYR78qAJUo4HDMdqDn3Y2-PKibQgZ-hyDmqyBLsUBlgzu5kGNcFDDoNIR3oWlsj8-4TDHNPnx7i145VTI9t3pPge3l99vtz-qm59X19tvN5WmFHUVRbjnnDUE805pJngjmNG0wwJraqjm2mmOjEGEcEaUM8YRy1xPVMuxUM05-LS2PaT4a7Z5koPPyx5qtHHOkhNMWkZxAb-soE4x52SdPCS_rC8xkotvuZeLVLlIlYtvefItH0vx-9OUuR-s-Vu6Ci75x1OuslbBJTVqn58xxrqupaJgX1fswQd7_I8F5MX1JUFdaXCxNrDF6L23SWbt7ait8cnqSZro_-U7fwAmXbRX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72126541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>O'Hare, Michael J. ; Ormerod, Michael G. ; Monaghan, Paul ; Lane, E. Birgitte ; Gusterson, Barry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Michael J. ; Ormerod, Michael G. ; Monaghan, Paul ; Lane, E. Birgitte ; Gusterson, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1833254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis ; Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis ; Breast - cytology ; Breast - metabolism ; Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis ; Cell Division ; Cell physiology ; Cell Separation ; Cells, Cultured ; Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis ; Epithelial Cells ; Epithelium - metabolism ; Flow Cytometry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis ; Microscopy, Electron ; Microscopy, Phase-Contrast ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Mucin-1 ; Neprilysin</subject><ispartof>Differentiation (London), 1991-04, Vol.46 (3), p.209-221</ispartof><rights>1991 International Society of Differentiation</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5599648$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1833254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, E. Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusterson, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</title><title>Differentiation (London)</title><addtitle>Differentiation</addtitle><description>Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.</description><subject>Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Breast - cytology</subject><subject>Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis</subject><subject>Cell Division</subject><subject>Cell physiology</subject><subject>Cell Separation</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells</subject><subject>Epithelium - metabolism</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Mucin-1</subject><subject>Neprilysin</subject><issn>0301-4681</issn><issn>1432-0436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1vFCEch4nR1LX6EUyIMd5mBAYGxoOJ2drapImX3gnDS5cNM6ww03b99DKdTb0qFxJ-z_-FB4APGNW4nM_7GtOGVIg2bY27DtdTj5AQTf34Amyeo5dggxqEK9oK_Bq8yXmPCtUSfAbOsGgawugGpO1OJaUnm_xvNfk4Qj_Cez-lCKODYR78qAJUo4HDMdqDn3Y2-PKibQgZ-hyDmqyBLsUBlgzu5kGNcFDDoNIR3oWlsj8-4TDHNPnx7i145VTI9t3pPge3l99vtz-qm59X19tvN5WmFHUVRbjnnDUE805pJngjmNG0wwJraqjm2mmOjEGEcEaUM8YRy1xPVMuxUM05-LS2PaT4a7Z5koPPyx5qtHHOkhNMWkZxAb-soE4x52SdPCS_rC8xkotvuZeLVLlIlYtvefItH0vx-9OUuR-s-Vu6Ci75x1OuslbBJTVqn58xxrqupaJgX1fswQd7_I8F5MX1JUFdaXCxNrDF6L23SWbt7ait8cnqSZro_-U7fwAmXbRX</recordid><startdate>199104</startdate><enddate>199104</enddate><creator>O'Hare, Michael J.</creator><creator>Ormerod, Michael G.</creator><creator>Monaghan, Paul</creator><creator>Lane, E. Birgitte</creator><creator>Gusterson, Barry A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199104</creationdate><title>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</title><author>O'Hare, Michael J. ; Ormerod, Michael G. ; Monaghan, Paul ; Lane, E. Birgitte ; Gusterson, Barry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Breast - cytology</topic><topic>Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis</topic><topic>Cell Division</topic><topic>Cell physiology</topic><topic>Cell Separation</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells</topic><topic>Epithelium - metabolism</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Mucin-1</topic><topic>Neprilysin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, E. Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusterson, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Differentiation (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Hare, Michael J.</au><au>Ormerod, Michael G.</au><au>Monaghan, Paul</au><au>Lane, E. Birgitte</au><au>Gusterson, Barry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</atitle><jtitle>Differentiation (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Differentiation</addtitle><date>1991-04</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>209-221</pages><issn>0301-4681</issn><eissn>1432-0436</eissn><abstract>Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>1833254</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4681
ispartof Differentiation (London), 1991-04, Vol.46 (3), p.209-221
issn 0301-4681
1432-0436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72126541
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis
Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis
Breast - cytology
Breast - metabolism
Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis
Cell Division
Cell physiology
Cell Separation
Cells, Cultured
Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis
Epithelial Cells
Epithelium - metabolism
Flow Cytometry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis
Microscopy, Electron
Microscopy, Phase-Contrast
Molecular and cellular biology
Mucin-1
Neprilysin
title Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20in%20vitro%20of%20luminal%20and%20myoepithelial%20cells%20isolated%20from%20the%20human%20mammary%20gland%20by%20cell%20sorting&rft.jtitle=Differentiation%20(London)&rft.au=O'Hare,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=1991-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=209-221&rft.issn=0301-4681&rft.eissn=1432-0436&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72126541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72126541&rft_id=info:pmid/1833254&rft_els_id=S0301468111602521&rfr_iscdi=true