Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting
Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Differentiation (London) 1991-04, Vol.46 (3), p.209-221 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 221 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Differentiation (London) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | O'Hare, Michael J. Ormerod, Michael G. Monaghan, Paul Lane, E. Birgitte Gusterson, Barry A. |
description | Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72126541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301468111602521</els_id><sourcerecordid>72126541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1vFCEch4nR1LX6EUyIMd5mBAYGxoOJ2drapImX3gnDS5cNM6ww03b99DKdTb0qFxJ-z_-FB4APGNW4nM_7GtOGVIg2bY27DtdTj5AQTf34Amyeo5dggxqEK9oK_Bq8yXmPCtUSfAbOsGgawugGpO1OJaUnm_xvNfk4Qj_Cez-lCKODYR78qAJUo4HDMdqDn3Y2-PKibQgZ-hyDmqyBLsUBlgzu5kGNcFDDoNIR3oWlsj8-4TDHNPnx7i145VTI9t3pPge3l99vtz-qm59X19tvN5WmFHUVRbjnnDUE805pJngjmNG0wwJraqjm2mmOjEGEcEaUM8YRy1xPVMuxUM05-LS2PaT4a7Z5koPPyx5qtHHOkhNMWkZxAb-soE4x52SdPCS_rC8xkotvuZeLVLlIlYtvefItH0vx-9OUuR-s-Vu6Ci75x1OuslbBJTVqn58xxrqupaJgX1fswQd7_I8F5MX1JUFdaXCxNrDF6L23SWbt7ait8cnqSZro_-U7fwAmXbRX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72126541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>O'Hare, Michael J. ; Ormerod, Michael G. ; Monaghan, Paul ; Lane, E. Birgitte ; Gusterson, Barry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Michael J. ; Ormerod, Michael G. ; Monaghan, Paul ; Lane, E. Birgitte ; Gusterson, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1833254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis ; Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis ; Breast - cytology ; Breast - metabolism ; Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis ; Cell Division ; Cell physiology ; Cell Separation ; Cells, Cultured ; Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis ; Epithelial Cells ; Epithelium - metabolism ; Flow Cytometry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis ; Microscopy, Electron ; Microscopy, Phase-Contrast ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Mucin-1 ; Neprilysin</subject><ispartof>Differentiation (London), 1991-04, Vol.46 (3), p.209-221</ispartof><rights>1991 International Society of Differentiation</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5599648$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1833254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, E. Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusterson, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</title><title>Differentiation (London)</title><addtitle>Differentiation</addtitle><description>Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.</description><subject>Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Breast - cytology</subject><subject>Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis</subject><subject>Cell Division</subject><subject>Cell physiology</subject><subject>Cell Separation</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells</subject><subject>Epithelium - metabolism</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Mucin-1</subject><subject>Neprilysin</subject><issn>0301-4681</issn><issn>1432-0436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1vFCEch4nR1LX6EUyIMd5mBAYGxoOJ2drapImX3gnDS5cNM6ww03b99DKdTb0qFxJ-z_-FB4APGNW4nM_7GtOGVIg2bY27DtdTj5AQTf34Amyeo5dggxqEK9oK_Bq8yXmPCtUSfAbOsGgawugGpO1OJaUnm_xvNfk4Qj_Cez-lCKODYR78qAJUo4HDMdqDn3Y2-PKibQgZ-hyDmqyBLsUBlgzu5kGNcFDDoNIR3oWlsj8-4TDHNPnx7i145VTI9t3pPge3l99vtz-qm59X19tvN5WmFHUVRbjnnDUE805pJngjmNG0wwJraqjm2mmOjEGEcEaUM8YRy1xPVMuxUM05-LS2PaT4a7Z5koPPyx5qtHHOkhNMWkZxAb-soE4x52SdPCS_rC8xkotvuZeLVLlIlYtvefItH0vx-9OUuR-s-Vu6Ci75x1OuslbBJTVqn58xxrqupaJgX1fswQd7_I8F5MX1JUFdaXCxNrDF6L23SWbt7ait8cnqSZro_-U7fwAmXbRX</recordid><startdate>199104</startdate><enddate>199104</enddate><creator>O'Hare, Michael J.</creator><creator>Ormerod, Michael G.</creator><creator>Monaghan, Paul</creator><creator>Lane, E. Birgitte</creator><creator>Gusterson, Barry A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199104</creationdate><title>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</title><author>O'Hare, Michael J. ; Ormerod, Michael G. ; Monaghan, Paul ; Lane, E. Birgitte ; Gusterson, Barry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-401b77532179ac587385dc49181c4d4c7cfc70dd022752afddf2e5fb2a6718a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Breast - cytology</topic><topic>Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis</topic><topic>Cell Division</topic><topic>Cell physiology</topic><topic>Cell Separation</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells</topic><topic>Epithelium - metabolism</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Mucin-1</topic><topic>Neprilysin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, E. Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusterson, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Differentiation (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Hare, Michael J.</au><au>Ormerod, Michael G.</au><au>Monaghan, Paul</au><au>Lane, E. Birgitte</au><au>Gusterson, Barry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting</atitle><jtitle>Differentiation (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Differentiation</addtitle><date>1991-04</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>209-221</pages><issn>0301-4681</issn><eissn>1432-0436</eissn><abstract>Luminal and myoepithelial cells have been separated from normal adult human breast epithelium using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Their isolation was based on the exclusive expression of two surface antigens, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and the common acute lymphoblaslic leukaemia antigen (CALLA/ CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11). Sorted luminal and myoepithelial cells displayed distinctively different morphologies when maintained in monolayer culture, differences which were enhanced by the addition of hydrocortisone. insulin and cholera toxin to the culture medium. The EMA-positive cells formed an attenuated monolayer with indistinct cell boundaries while CALLA-positivc cells, by contrast, formed tightly packed arrays of refractile cells. The distribution of the cell type-specific markers cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells) and smooth muscle α-actin (myoepithelial cells) indicated that the sorted populations were approximately 98% pure. However, a significant minority (-15%) of sorted luminal cells consistently expressed the basal-cell marker cylokeratin 14 in culture. A marked difference was noted in the proliferativc behaviour of the two types of sorted cells, with myoepithelial cells dividing rapidly in response to the humoural additives, in contrast to the luminal cells which proliferated slowly. Both types of sorted cells could be cloned in the presence of feeder layers of mouse fibroblasts. Clones of luminal and myoepilhelial cells were also distinctive; all “spread” luminal clones were similar in appearance to each other, although some cellular heterogeneity, including squamous metaplasia, was observed in “compact” myoepithelial clones. Both types were shown to have retained their original surface markers and to exhibit different cytoskelelal anligenic phenotypcs when they were re-analysed after a 3-week growth period. Both spread and compact phenolypes were obtained when separately isolated duels and alveoli were cloned. This detailed characterization of cells isolated from the human breast epithelium by flow cytometry provides the basis for further studies of luminal-myoepithelial interactions and growth responses of purified cell types in vitro.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>1833254</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4681 |
ispartof | Differentiation (London), 1991-04, Vol.46 (3), p.209-221 |
issn | 0301-4681 1432-0436 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72126541 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Antigens, Differentiation - biosynthesis Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis Breast - cytology Breast - metabolism Cell differentiation, maturation, development, hematopoiesis Cell Division Cell physiology Cell Separation Cells, Cultured Cytoskeletal Proteins - analysis Epithelial Cells Epithelium - metabolism Flow Cytometry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans In Vitro Techniques Membrane Glycoproteins - biosynthesis Microscopy, Electron Microscopy, Phase-Contrast Molecular and cellular biology Mucin-1 Neprilysin |
title | Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20in%20vitro%20of%20luminal%20and%20myoepithelial%20cells%20isolated%20from%20the%20human%20mammary%20gland%20by%20cell%20sorting&rft.jtitle=Differentiation%20(London)&rft.au=O'Hare,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=1991-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=209-221&rft.issn=0301-4681&rft.eissn=1432-0436&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00883.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72126541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72126541&rft_id=info:pmid/1833254&rft_els_id=S0301468111602521&rfr_iscdi=true |