No difference in structure between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and normal pregnancies

Objective: Our purpose was to investigate whether there were structural differences between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and those isolated from women with normal pregnancy. Study Design: A pressure myograph was used to study omenta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2002-09, Vol.187 (3), p.606-610
Hauptverfasser: Ong, Stephen S., Baker, Philip N., Mayhew, Terence M., Dunn, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 610
container_issue 3
container_start_page 606
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 187
creator Ong, Stephen S.
Baker, Philip N.
Mayhew, Terence M.
Dunn, William R.
description Objective: Our purpose was to investigate whether there were structural differences between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and those isolated from women with normal pregnancy. Study Design: A pressure myograph was used to study omental small arteries isolated from women with normal pregnancy and women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (n = 16, 13, and 8, respectively). With the use of a transilluminating system, lumen diameter, wall thickness, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship were studied through pressure ranges of 5 to 100 mm Hg. Arteries were then fixed with glutaraldehyde at the predelivery mean arterial pressure and embedded in epoxy resin. One-micrometer transverse sections were cut for more detailed morphologic examination. Results: Wall thickness, lumen diameter, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship of omental small arteries did not differ between patient groups (P >.05; repeated-measures analysis of variance). Detailed histologic examination confirmed these findings. Conclusions: Alterations in systemic vascular resistance associated with compromised pregnancies are unlikely to result from or produce an alteration in the structure of omental small arteries. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:606-10.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mob.2002.124287
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72101827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937802001758</els_id><sourcerecordid>72101827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5a0c61b6661579c02479aa2132a11171825ac47a0421f5d8cecbbe833f761edd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCmh3yBlbN1D8TO1miCihSBRtYWzfOTTFy7MF2OuJNeFwcZaSuWFmWv3N87zmEvOFsz5nSN3Mc9oIxsefiIDr9jOw463WjOtU9JztWX5pe6u6CXOb8a72KXrwkF1wIqZVsd-Tv10hHN02YMFikLtBc0mLLkpAOWE6IgcYZQwFP8wzeU0gFk8NMXY4eCo50SnGmp5WiJ1d-0mNCtB7mY3ZwXS1LgmXVBKQPKZ4qkbD-4mxxMVxTCCMNMVXzVfkQINhq_4q8mMBnfH0-r8iPTx-_3941998-f7n9cN9YqWVpWmBW8UEpxVvdWyYOugcQXArgnGveiRbsQQM7CD61Y2fRDgN2Uk5acRxHeUXeb77HFH8vdS4zu2zRewgYl2y04Ky66ArebKBNMeeEkzkmN0P6YzgzaxmmlmHWMsxWRlW8PVsvw4zjE39OvwLvzgBkC35K6-r5iZO9khvXbxzWIB4dJpNrRLWv0SW0xYzR_XeIfxpPqTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72101827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No difference in structure between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and normal pregnancies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ong, Stephen S. ; Baker, Philip N. ; Mayhew, Terence M. ; Dunn, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ong, Stephen S. ; Baker, Philip N. ; Mayhew, Terence M. ; Dunn, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Our purpose was to investigate whether there were structural differences between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and those isolated from women with normal pregnancy. Study Design: A pressure myograph was used to study omental small arteries isolated from women with normal pregnancy and women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (n = 16, 13, and 8, respectively). With the use of a transilluminating system, lumen diameter, wall thickness, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship were studied through pressure ranges of 5 to 100 mm Hg. Arteries were then fixed with glutaraldehyde at the predelivery mean arterial pressure and embedded in epoxy resin. One-micrometer transverse sections were cut for more detailed morphologic examination. Results: Wall thickness, lumen diameter, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship of omental small arteries did not differ between patient groups (P &gt;.05; repeated-measures analysis of variance). Detailed histologic examination confirmed these findings. Conclusions: Alterations in systemic vascular resistance associated with compromised pregnancies are unlikely to result from or produce an alteration in the structure of omental small arteries. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:606-10.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.124287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12237635</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arteries - anatomy &amp; histology ; Arteries - pathology ; Arteries - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Female ; Fetal Growth Retardation - pathology ; Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; intrauterine growth restriction ; Medical sciences ; myography ; Omentum - blood supply ; Pre-Eclampsia - pathology ; Pre-Eclampsia - physiopathology ; Preeclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; resistance arteries ; Vascular Resistance</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-09, Vol.187 (3), p.606-610</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5a0c61b6661579c02479aa2132a11171825ac47a0421f5d8cecbbe833f761edd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5a0c61b6661579c02479aa2132a11171825ac47a0421f5d8cecbbe833f761edd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.124287$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13963635$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12237635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ong, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Terence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>No difference in structure between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and normal pregnancies</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: Our purpose was to investigate whether there were structural differences between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and those isolated from women with normal pregnancy. Study Design: A pressure myograph was used to study omental small arteries isolated from women with normal pregnancy and women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (n = 16, 13, and 8, respectively). With the use of a transilluminating system, lumen diameter, wall thickness, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship were studied through pressure ranges of 5 to 100 mm Hg. Arteries were then fixed with glutaraldehyde at the predelivery mean arterial pressure and embedded in epoxy resin. One-micrometer transverse sections were cut for more detailed morphologic examination. Results: Wall thickness, lumen diameter, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship of omental small arteries did not differ between patient groups (P &gt;.05; repeated-measures analysis of variance). Detailed histologic examination confirmed these findings. Conclusions: Alterations in systemic vascular resistance associated with compromised pregnancies are unlikely to result from or produce an alteration in the structure of omental small arteries. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:606-10.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arteries - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Arteries - pathology</subject><subject>Arteries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - pathology</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intrauterine growth restriction</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>myography</subject><subject>Omentum - blood supply</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - pathology</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Preeclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>resistance arteries</subject><subject>Vascular Resistance</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCmh3yBlbN1D8TO1miCihSBRtYWzfOTTFy7MF2OuJNeFwcZaSuWFmWv3N87zmEvOFsz5nSN3Mc9oIxsefiIDr9jOw463WjOtU9JztWX5pe6u6CXOb8a72KXrwkF1wIqZVsd-Tv10hHN02YMFikLtBc0mLLkpAOWE6IgcYZQwFP8wzeU0gFk8NMXY4eCo50SnGmp5WiJ1d-0mNCtB7mY3ZwXS1LgmXVBKQPKZ4qkbD-4mxxMVxTCCMNMVXzVfkQINhq_4q8mMBnfH0-r8iPTx-_3941998-f7n9cN9YqWVpWmBW8UEpxVvdWyYOugcQXArgnGveiRbsQQM7CD61Y2fRDgN2Uk5acRxHeUXeb77HFH8vdS4zu2zRewgYl2y04Ky66ArebKBNMeeEkzkmN0P6YzgzaxmmlmHWMsxWRlW8PVsvw4zjE39OvwLvzgBkC35K6-r5iZO9khvXbxzWIB4dJpNrRLWv0SW0xYzR_XeIfxpPqTE</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Ong, Stephen S.</creator><creator>Baker, Philip N.</creator><creator>Mayhew, Terence M.</creator><creator>Dunn, William R.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>No difference in structure between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and normal pregnancies</title><author>Ong, Stephen S. ; Baker, Philip N. ; Mayhew, Terence M. ; Dunn, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5a0c61b6661579c02479aa2132a11171825ac47a0421f5d8cecbbe833f761edd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arteries - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Arteries - pathology</topic><topic>Arteries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - pathology</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intrauterine growth restriction</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>myography</topic><topic>Omentum - blood supply</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - pathology</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Preeclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>resistance arteries</topic><topic>Vascular Resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ong, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Terence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ong, Stephen S.</au><au>Baker, Philip N.</au><au>Mayhew, Terence M.</au><au>Dunn, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No difference in structure between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and normal pregnancies</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>610</epage><pages>606-610</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>Objective: Our purpose was to investigate whether there were structural differences between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and those isolated from women with normal pregnancy. Study Design: A pressure myograph was used to study omental small arteries isolated from women with normal pregnancy and women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (n = 16, 13, and 8, respectively). With the use of a transilluminating system, lumen diameter, wall thickness, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship were studied through pressure ranges of 5 to 100 mm Hg. Arteries were then fixed with glutaraldehyde at the predelivery mean arterial pressure and embedded in epoxy resin. One-micrometer transverse sections were cut for more detailed morphologic examination. Results: Wall thickness, lumen diameter, wall/lumen ratio, distensibility, and the stress-strain relationship of omental small arteries did not differ between patient groups (P &gt;.05; repeated-measures analysis of variance). Detailed histologic examination confirmed these findings. Conclusions: Alterations in systemic vascular resistance associated with compromised pregnancies are unlikely to result from or produce an alteration in the structure of omental small arteries. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:606-10.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12237635</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2002.124287</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-09, Vol.187 (3), p.606-610
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72101827
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Arteries - anatomy & histology
Arteries - pathology
Arteries - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
Female
Fetal Growth Retardation - pathology
Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology
Gestational Age
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
intrauterine growth restriction
Medical sciences
myography
Omentum - blood supply
Pre-Eclampsia - pathology
Pre-Eclampsia - physiopathology
Preeclampsia
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
resistance arteries
Vascular Resistance
title No difference in structure between omental small arteries isolated from women with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and normal pregnancies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T13%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20difference%20in%20structure%20between%20omental%20small%20arteries%20isolated%20from%20women%20with%20preeclampsia,%20intrauterine%20growth%20restriction,%20and%20normal%20pregnancies&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Ong,%20Stephen%20S.&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=610&rft.pages=606-610&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2002.124287&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72101827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72101827&rft_id=info:pmid/12237635&rft_els_id=S0002937802001758&rfr_iscdi=true