Inbred strain variation in lung function
The purpose of the present study was to determine the strain-specific phenotype variance of lung function parameters among common inbred laboratory mouse strains. In accordance with the "Mouse Phenome Project" run by The Jackson Laboratory (http://www.jax.org/phenome), lung volumes, lung m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mammalian genome 2002-08, Vol.13 (8), p.429-437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 437 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | Mammalian genome |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Reinhard, Claudia Eder, Gunter Fuchs, Helmut Ziesenis, Axel Heyder, Joachim Schulz, Holger |
description | The purpose of the present study was to determine the strain-specific phenotype variance of lung function parameters among common inbred laboratory mouse strains. In accordance with the "Mouse Phenome Project" run by The Jackson Laboratory (http://www.jax.org/phenome), lung volumes, lung mechanics, and diffusing capacity of 16 males and 16 females of the strains C3H/HeJ, BALB/cByJ, C57B1/6J, A/J, FVB/J, 129SV/ImJ, and SWR/J were determined in a standardized manner. The defined respiratory maneuvers for lung function testing were performed with a custom-made, computer-controlled servo-ventilator in anesthetized animals. Sex differences within the strains were found in most (83%) of the absolute lung function parameters. Usually, normalization to body or lung size completely compensates for the observed gender differences. There was great diversity between strains for all of the lung function parameters studied; for example, the total lung capacity as well as the pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide varied by 50% and the static lung compliance by a factor of almost two among the strains. Little, but statistically significant variability was detectable for the dead space volume and the respiratory system resistance. There was no clear-cut evidence for any strain exhibiting either the smallest or the largest values for all parameters studied, suggesting that there were no simple allometric relationships of lung size between the strains. Well-established genealogical relationships among strains were not constantly reflected in phenotype similarities of pulmonary function. Therefore, these data strongly support heritable genetic traits for pulmonary function. Moreover, it constitutes a basis for further genetic lung function-related studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00335-002-3005-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72084426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18482003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-42962c7d8cd487ab1df5a4bbf37980a46525514955bbc560544d1b589b0cea7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIQRAv0cl3cpTFj4UFL3oOSZpKl267Jq3gv7dlFwQvnoYZnveFeRC6JHBHANR9BmBMYACKGYDA8gjNCWcUE6XUMZqDYRprY2CGznLeABAliTpFM0IplQr0HN2uWp9iWeQ-ubotvlyqXV93bTEuzdB-FNXQhulwjk4q1-R4cZgL9P70-LZ8wevX59XyYY0DE7LHnBpJgyp1KLlWzpOyEo57XzFlNDguBRWCcCOE90FIEJyXxAttPIToVGALdLPv3aXuc4i5t9s6h9g0ro3dkK2ioDmn8l-QaK7pJGiBrv-Am25I7fiEJUCJYlTyqY7sqZC6nFOs7C7VW5e-R8hOtu3eth1t28m2nTJXh-bBb2P5mzjoZT_slHeV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021732646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inbred strain variation in lung function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Reinhard, Claudia ; Eder, Gunter ; Fuchs, Helmut ; Ziesenis, Axel ; Heyder, Joachim ; Schulz, Holger</creator><creatorcontrib>Reinhard, Claudia ; Eder, Gunter ; Fuchs, Helmut ; Ziesenis, Axel ; Heyder, Joachim ; Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present study was to determine the strain-specific phenotype variance of lung function parameters among common inbred laboratory mouse strains. In accordance with the "Mouse Phenome Project" run by The Jackson Laboratory (http://www.jax.org/phenome), lung volumes, lung mechanics, and diffusing capacity of 16 males and 16 females of the strains C3H/HeJ, BALB/cByJ, C57B1/6J, A/J, FVB/J, 129SV/ImJ, and SWR/J were determined in a standardized manner. The defined respiratory maneuvers for lung function testing were performed with a custom-made, computer-controlled servo-ventilator in anesthetized animals. Sex differences within the strains were found in most (83%) of the absolute lung function parameters. Usually, normalization to body or lung size completely compensates for the observed gender differences. There was great diversity between strains for all of the lung function parameters studied; for example, the total lung capacity as well as the pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide varied by 50% and the static lung compliance by a factor of almost two among the strains. Little, but statistically significant variability was detectable for the dead space volume and the respiratory system resistance. There was no clear-cut evidence for any strain exhibiting either the smallest or the largest values for all parameters studied, suggesting that there were no simple allometric relationships of lung size between the strains. Well-established genealogical relationships among strains were not constantly reflected in phenotype similarities of pulmonary function. Therefore, these data strongly support heritable genetic traits for pulmonary function. Moreover, it constitutes a basis for further genetic lung function-related studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-8990</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00335-002-3005-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12226708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Body Weight - genetics ; Genetic Variation ; Lung - physiology ; Lung Compliance ; Lung Volume Measurements ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred Strains - physiology ; Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Mammalian genome, 2002-08, Vol.13 (8), p.429-437</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-42962c7d8cd487ab1df5a4bbf37980a46525514955bbc560544d1b589b0cea7c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12226708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reinhard, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eder, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziesenis, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyder, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><title>Inbred strain variation in lung function</title><title>Mammalian genome</title><addtitle>Mamm Genome</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present study was to determine the strain-specific phenotype variance of lung function parameters among common inbred laboratory mouse strains. In accordance with the "Mouse Phenome Project" run by The Jackson Laboratory (http://www.jax.org/phenome), lung volumes, lung mechanics, and diffusing capacity of 16 males and 16 females of the strains C3H/HeJ, BALB/cByJ, C57B1/6J, A/J, FVB/J, 129SV/ImJ, and SWR/J were determined in a standardized manner. The defined respiratory maneuvers for lung function testing were performed with a custom-made, computer-controlled servo-ventilator in anesthetized animals. Sex differences within the strains were found in most (83%) of the absolute lung function parameters. Usually, normalization to body or lung size completely compensates for the observed gender differences. There was great diversity between strains for all of the lung function parameters studied; for example, the total lung capacity as well as the pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide varied by 50% and the static lung compliance by a factor of almost two among the strains. Little, but statistically significant variability was detectable for the dead space volume and the respiratory system resistance. There was no clear-cut evidence for any strain exhibiting either the smallest or the largest values for all parameters studied, suggesting that there were no simple allometric relationships of lung size between the strains. Well-established genealogical relationships among strains were not constantly reflected in phenotype similarities of pulmonary function. Therefore, these data strongly support heritable genetic traits for pulmonary function. Moreover, it constitutes a basis for further genetic lung function-related studies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Weight - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Lung - physiology</subject><subject>Lung Compliance</subject><subject>Lung Volume Measurements</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred Strains - physiology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0938-8990</issn><issn>1432-1777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIQRAv0cl3cpTFj4UFL3oOSZpKl267Jq3gv7dlFwQvnoYZnveFeRC6JHBHANR9BmBMYACKGYDA8gjNCWcUE6XUMZqDYRprY2CGznLeABAliTpFM0IplQr0HN2uWp9iWeQ-ubotvlyqXV93bTEuzdB-FNXQhulwjk4q1-R4cZgL9P70-LZ8wevX59XyYY0DE7LHnBpJgyp1KLlWzpOyEo57XzFlNDguBRWCcCOE90FIEJyXxAttPIToVGALdLPv3aXuc4i5t9s6h9g0ro3dkK2ioDmn8l-QaK7pJGiBrv-Am25I7fiEJUCJYlTyqY7sqZC6nFOs7C7VW5e-R8hOtu3eth1t28m2nTJXh-bBb2P5mzjoZT_slHeV</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Reinhard, Claudia</creator><creator>Eder, Gunter</creator><creator>Fuchs, Helmut</creator><creator>Ziesenis, Axel</creator><creator>Heyder, Joachim</creator><creator>Schulz, Holger</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Inbred strain variation in lung function</title><author>Reinhard, Claudia ; Eder, Gunter ; Fuchs, Helmut ; Ziesenis, Axel ; Heyder, Joachim ; Schulz, Holger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-42962c7d8cd487ab1df5a4bbf37980a46525514955bbc560544d1b589b0cea7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Weight - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Lung - physiology</topic><topic>Lung Compliance</topic><topic>Lung Volume Measurements</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred Strains - physiology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reinhard, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eder, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziesenis, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyder, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mammalian genome</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reinhard, Claudia</au><au>Eder, Gunter</au><au>Fuchs, Helmut</au><au>Ziesenis, Axel</au><au>Heyder, Joachim</au><au>Schulz, Holger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inbred strain variation in lung function</atitle><jtitle>Mammalian genome</jtitle><addtitle>Mamm Genome</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>429-437</pages><issn>0938-8990</issn><eissn>1432-1777</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the present study was to determine the strain-specific phenotype variance of lung function parameters among common inbred laboratory mouse strains. In accordance with the "Mouse Phenome Project" run by The Jackson Laboratory (http://www.jax.org/phenome), lung volumes, lung mechanics, and diffusing capacity of 16 males and 16 females of the strains C3H/HeJ, BALB/cByJ, C57B1/6J, A/J, FVB/J, 129SV/ImJ, and SWR/J were determined in a standardized manner. The defined respiratory maneuvers for lung function testing were performed with a custom-made, computer-controlled servo-ventilator in anesthetized animals. Sex differences within the strains were found in most (83%) of the absolute lung function parameters. Usually, normalization to body or lung size completely compensates for the observed gender differences. There was great diversity between strains for all of the lung function parameters studied; for example, the total lung capacity as well as the pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide varied by 50% and the static lung compliance by a factor of almost two among the strains. Little, but statistically significant variability was detectable for the dead space volume and the respiratory system resistance. There was no clear-cut evidence for any strain exhibiting either the smallest or the largest values for all parameters studied, suggesting that there were no simple allometric relationships of lung size between the strains. Well-established genealogical relationships among strains were not constantly reflected in phenotype similarities of pulmonary function. Therefore, these data strongly support heritable genetic traits for pulmonary function. Moreover, it constitutes a basis for further genetic lung function-related studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12226708</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00335-002-3005-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-8990 |
ispartof | Mammalian genome, 2002-08, Vol.13 (8), p.429-437 |
issn | 0938-8990 1432-1777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72084426 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animals Body Weight - genetics Genetic Variation Lung - physiology Lung Compliance Lung Volume Measurements Mice Mice, Inbred Strains - physiology Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Species Specificity |
title | Inbred strain variation in lung function |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A05%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inbred%20strain%20variation%20in%20lung%20function&rft.jtitle=Mammalian%20genome&rft.au=Reinhard,%20Claudia&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=429-437&rft.issn=0938-8990&rft.eissn=1432-1777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00335-002-3005-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18482003%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021732646&rft_id=info:pmid/12226708&rfr_iscdi=true |