Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials
Summary The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride‐releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid‐modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass–ionomer cement (Ceramfil β). The second aim was to assess the fluo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2002-08, Vol.29 (8), p.791-798 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 798 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 791 |
| container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Attar, N. Önen, A. |
| description | Summary The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride‐releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid‐modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass–ionomer cement (Ceramfil β). The second aim was to assess the fluoride uptake and subsequent release from the same range of materials. Fifteen discs (6 mm diameter and 1·5 mm height) were prepared for each material. Each disc was immersed in 4 ML of deionized water within a plastic vial. The release of fluoride was measured daily at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30 and 60 days. After daily fluoride release was measured for 60 days, samples were refluoridated in 1000‐ppm sodium fluoride (NaF) solutions (pH 6·6) for 10 min and fluoride release was measured daily for a total of 5 days. The release of fluoride from aesthetic restorative materials was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ionanalyser. Results were statistically analysed by two‐way repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results revealed that all fluoride‐containing materials (Ceramfil β, Compoglass, Dyract, Tetric) released fluoride initially and the release was greatest at the first day. At any time during the test period Ceramfil β released the most and Valux Plus did not release any detectable fluoride (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00902.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72076021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72076021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-8131eaab4aa076811a750308932c6d6ffcbfcb00bbb5fd41b72cba50a729930b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EgvL4BZQVu5SxneeCBQIKVBWVEC-xscbORKSkpNgJlL_HoRVskSyPLZ87Hh3GAg5DDlFyPBtymcShyCIxFABiCJD7fbnBBr8Pm2wAEuKQZ-Jph-06NwOATMbpNtvhQgiQUT5gN6O6a2xVUGCpJnQU4FsRdIsWXykwL2jRtGQr11bGBU0ZILn2hfzN865tLLbVBwVz7CGs3T7bKn2hg3XdY_eji7uzq3Ayvbw-O52EJgIpwoxLTog6QoQ0yTjHNPbDZrkUJimSsjTaLwCtdVwWEdepMBpjwFTkuQQt99jRqu_CNu-dn0TNK2eorvGNms6pVPi-ILgHsxVobOOcpVItbDVH-6U4qN6lmqlemeqVqd6l-nGplj56uP6j03Mq_oJreR44WQGfVU1f_26sxtPprT_5fLjKe720_M2jfVVJKtNYPd5cqig5f34YQ6wi-Q3M7pKz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72076021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Attar, N. ; Önen, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Attar, N. ; Önen, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride‐releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid‐modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass–ionomer cement (Ceramfil β). The second aim was to assess the fluoride uptake and subsequent release from the same range of materials. Fifteen discs (6 mm diameter and 1·5 mm height) were prepared for each material. Each disc was immersed in 4 ML of deionized water within a plastic vial. The release of fluoride was measured daily at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30 and 60 days. After daily fluoride release was measured for 60 days, samples were refluoridated in 1000‐ppm sodium fluoride (NaF) solutions (pH 6·6) for 10 min and fluoride release was measured daily for a total of 5 days. The release of fluoride from aesthetic restorative materials was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ionanalyser. Results were statistically analysed by two‐way repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results revealed that all fluoride‐containing materials (Ceramfil β, Compoglass, Dyract, Tetric) released fluoride initially and the release was greatest at the first day. At any time during the test period Ceramfil β released the most and Valux Plus did not release any detectable fluoride (P < 0·01). Sample exposures to 1000 ppm NaF solution increased the 24‐h fluoride release from all fluoride‐containing materials. This difference lasted only 24–48 h after exposure. Ceramfil β had a tendency to recharge not seen with the other materials (P < 0·05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00902.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12220349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Cariostatic Agents - chemistry ; Compomers - chemistry ; composite resin ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dentistry ; fluoride release ; fluoride uptake ; Fluorides - chemistry ; Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry ; glass-ionomer cement ; Ion-Selective Electrodes ; Materials Testing ; Methacrylates - chemistry ; polyacid-modified resin composite ; Silicates - chemistry ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2002-08, Vol.29 (8), p.791-798</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-8131eaab4aa076811a750308932c6d6ffcbfcb00bbb5fd41b72cba50a729930b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-8131eaab4aa076811a750308932c6d6ffcbfcb00bbb5fd41b72cba50a729930b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2842.2002.00902.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2842.2002.00902.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12220349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Attar, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önen, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>Summary The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride‐releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid‐modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass–ionomer cement (Ceramfil β). The second aim was to assess the fluoride uptake and subsequent release from the same range of materials. Fifteen discs (6 mm diameter and 1·5 mm height) were prepared for each material. Each disc was immersed in 4 ML of deionized water within a plastic vial. The release of fluoride was measured daily at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30 and 60 days. After daily fluoride release was measured for 60 days, samples were refluoridated in 1000‐ppm sodium fluoride (NaF) solutions (pH 6·6) for 10 min and fluoride release was measured daily for a total of 5 days. The release of fluoride from aesthetic restorative materials was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ionanalyser. Results were statistically analysed by two‐way repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results revealed that all fluoride‐containing materials (Ceramfil β, Compoglass, Dyract, Tetric) released fluoride initially and the release was greatest at the first day. At any time during the test period Ceramfil β released the most and Valux Plus did not release any detectable fluoride (P < 0·01). Sample exposures to 1000 ppm NaF solution increased the 24‐h fluoride release from all fluoride‐containing materials. This difference lasted only 24–48 h after exposure. Ceramfil β had a tendency to recharge not seen with the other materials (P < 0·05).</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cariostatic Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Compomers - chemistry</subject><subject>composite resin</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>fluoride release</subject><subject>fluoride uptake</subject><subject>Fluorides - chemistry</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>glass-ionomer cement</subject><subject>Ion-Selective Electrodes</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Methacrylates - chemistry</subject><subject>polyacid-modified resin composite</subject><subject>Silicates - chemistry</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EgvL4BZQVu5SxneeCBQIKVBWVEC-xscbORKSkpNgJlL_HoRVskSyPLZ87Hh3GAg5DDlFyPBtymcShyCIxFABiCJD7fbnBBr8Pm2wAEuKQZ-Jph-06NwOATMbpNtvhQgiQUT5gN6O6a2xVUGCpJnQU4FsRdIsWXykwL2jRtGQr11bGBU0ZILn2hfzN865tLLbVBwVz7CGs3T7bKn2hg3XdY_eji7uzq3Ayvbw-O52EJgIpwoxLTog6QoQ0yTjHNPbDZrkUJimSsjTaLwCtdVwWEdepMBpjwFTkuQQt99jRqu_CNu-dn0TNK2eorvGNms6pVPi-ILgHsxVobOOcpVItbDVH-6U4qN6lmqlemeqVqd6l-nGplj56uP6j03Mq_oJreR44WQGfVU1f_26sxtPprT_5fLjKe720_M2jfVVJKtNYPd5cqig5f34YQ6wi-Q3M7pKz</recordid><startdate>200208</startdate><enddate>200208</enddate><creator>Attar, N.</creator><creator>Önen, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200208</creationdate><title>Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials</title><author>Attar, N. ; Önen, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-8131eaab4aa076811a750308932c6d6ffcbfcb00bbb5fd41b72cba50a729930b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cariostatic Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Compomers - chemistry</topic><topic>composite resin</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>fluoride release</topic><topic>fluoride uptake</topic><topic>Fluorides - chemistry</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>glass-ionomer cement</topic><topic>Ion-Selective Electrodes</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Methacrylates - chemistry</topic><topic>polyacid-modified resin composite</topic><topic>Silicates - chemistry</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Attar, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önen, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Attar, N.</au><au>Önen, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2002-08</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>791-798</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>Summary The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride‐releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid‐modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass–ionomer cement (Ceramfil β). The second aim was to assess the fluoride uptake and subsequent release from the same range of materials. Fifteen discs (6 mm diameter and 1·5 mm height) were prepared for each material. Each disc was immersed in 4 ML of deionized water within a plastic vial. The release of fluoride was measured daily at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30 and 60 days. After daily fluoride release was measured for 60 days, samples were refluoridated in 1000‐ppm sodium fluoride (NaF) solutions (pH 6·6) for 10 min and fluoride release was measured daily for a total of 5 days. The release of fluoride from aesthetic restorative materials was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ionanalyser. Results were statistically analysed by two‐way repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results revealed that all fluoride‐containing materials (Ceramfil β, Compoglass, Dyract, Tetric) released fluoride initially and the release was greatest at the first day. At any time during the test period Ceramfil β released the most and Valux Plus did not release any detectable fluoride (P < 0·01). Sample exposures to 1000 ppm NaF solution increased the 24‐h fluoride release from all fluoride‐containing materials. This difference lasted only 24–48 h after exposure. Ceramfil β had a tendency to recharge not seen with the other materials (P < 0·05).</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12220349</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00902.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
| ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2002-08, Vol.29 (8), p.791-798 |
| issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72076021 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Analysis of Variance Cariostatic Agents - chemistry Compomers - chemistry composite resin Composite Resins - chemistry Dentistry fluoride release fluoride uptake Fluorides - chemistry Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry glass-ionomer cement Ion-Selective Electrodes Materials Testing Methacrylates - chemistry polyacid-modified resin composite Silicates - chemistry Statistics, Nonparametric |
| title | Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T07%3A52%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluoride%20release%20and%20uptake%20characteristics%20of%20aesthetic%20restorative%20materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Attar,%20N.&rft.date=2002-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=791-798&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00902.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72076021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72076021&rft_id=info:pmid/12220349&rfr_iscdi=true |