Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated with nonsurgical or surgical options. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. OBJECTIVE To compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of splinting and surgery for relieving the symptoms of CTS. DESIGN, SETTING,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2002-09, Vol.288 (10), p.1245-1251
Hauptverfasser: Gerritsen, Annette A. M, de Vet, Henrica C. W, Scholten, Rob J. P. M, Bertelsmann, Frits W, de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M, Bouter, Lex M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1251
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1245
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 288
creator Gerritsen, Annette A. M
de Vet, Henrica C. W
Scholten, Rob J. P. M
Bertelsmann, Frits W
de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M
Bouter, Lex M
description CONTEXT Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated with nonsurgical or surgical options. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. OBJECTIVE To compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of splinting and surgery for relieving the symptoms of CTS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS A randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1998 to April 2000 at 13 neurological outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. A total of 176 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS were assigned to wrist splinting during the night for at least 6 weeks (89 patients) or open carpal tunnel release (87 patients); 147 patients (84%) completed the final follow-up assessment 18 months after randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES General improvement, number of nights waking up due to symptoms, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analyses, surgery was more effective than splinting on all outcome measures. The success rates (based on general improvement) after 3 months were 80% for the surgery group (62/78 patients) vs 54% for the splinting group (46/86 patients), which is a difference of 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-40%; P
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jama.288.10.1245
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72066510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>195279</ama_id><sourcerecordid>72066510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-6e7c62292333d2a6030c9717927fee07bc67f566fac9e769f1215b62a04c58743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0d1LwzAQAPAgipvTd32RIOhbZz7apPFtFL9gILj5arm16exI05m0wvzrjWwy8F4u3P04jhxC55SMKSH0dgUNjFmajn8LLE4O0JAmPI14otJDNCREpZGM03iATrxfkRCUy2M0oIzRhHI6RO-ztaltV9sl_vJ41ruldhtcW9x9aDx3GrpG2w63Fc7ArcHgeW-tNni2saVrG32HJ_gVbNk29bcucdbazrXGhOfc1WBO0VEFxuuzXR6ht4f7efYUTV8en7PJNAJO0i4SWhaCMcU45yUDQTgplKRSMVlpTeSiELJKhKigUFoKVdGw_0IwIHGRpDLmI3Sznbt27WevfZc3tS-0MWB12_tcMiJEQkmAV__gqu2dDbvljFIuuIhZQJc71C8aXeZrVzfgNvnftwVwvQPgCzCVA1vUfu-4opwTFdzF1oU77bsqYVLxH2xagro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211363642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Gerritsen, Annette A. M ; de Vet, Henrica C. W ; Scholten, Rob J. P. M ; Bertelsmann, Frits W ; de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M ; Bouter, Lex M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Annette A. M ; de Vet, Henrica C. W ; Scholten, Rob J. P. M ; Bertelsmann, Frits W ; de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M ; Bouter, Lex M</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated with nonsurgical or surgical options. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. OBJECTIVE To compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of splinting and surgery for relieving the symptoms of CTS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS A randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1998 to April 2000 at 13 neurological outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. A total of 176 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS were assigned to wrist splinting during the night for at least 6 weeks (89 patients) or open carpal tunnel release (87 patients); 147 patients (84%) completed the final follow-up assessment 18 months after randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES General improvement, number of nights waking up due to symptoms, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analyses, surgery was more effective than splinting on all outcome measures. The success rates (based on general improvement) after 3 months were 80% for the surgery group (62/78 patients) vs 54% for the splinting group (46/86 patients), which is a difference of 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-40%; P&lt;.001). After 18 months, the success rates increased to 90% for the surgery group (61/68 patients) vs 75% for the splinting group (59/79 patients), which is a difference of 15% (95% CI, 3%-27%; P = .02). However, by that time 41% of patients (32/79) in the splint group had also received the surgery treatment. CONCLUSION Treatment with open carpal tunnel release surgery resulted in better outcomes than treatment with wrist splinting for patients with CTS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.10.1245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12215131</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Carpal tunnel syndrome ; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - physiopathology ; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - surgery ; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - therapy ; Comparative studies ; Decompression, Surgical ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Neurology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Splints ; Surgery ; Therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2002-09, Vol.288 (10), p.1245-1251</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Sep 11, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.288.10.1245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.288.10.1245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,315,781,785,3341,27929,27930,76494,76497</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13913309$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12215131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Annette A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vet, Henrica C. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Rob J. P. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertelsmann, Frits W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouter, Lex M</creatorcontrib><title>Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>CONTEXT Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated with nonsurgical or surgical options. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. OBJECTIVE To compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of splinting and surgery for relieving the symptoms of CTS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS A randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1998 to April 2000 at 13 neurological outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. A total of 176 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS were assigned to wrist splinting during the night for at least 6 weeks (89 patients) or open carpal tunnel release (87 patients); 147 patients (84%) completed the final follow-up assessment 18 months after randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES General improvement, number of nights waking up due to symptoms, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analyses, surgery was more effective than splinting on all outcome measures. The success rates (based on general improvement) after 3 months were 80% for the surgery group (62/78 patients) vs 54% for the splinting group (46/86 patients), which is a difference of 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-40%; P&lt;.001). After 18 months, the success rates increased to 90% for the surgery group (61/68 patients) vs 75% for the splinting group (59/79 patients), which is a difference of 15% (95% CI, 3%-27%; P = .02). However, by that time 41% of patients (32/79) in the splint group had also received the surgery treatment. CONCLUSION Treatment with open carpal tunnel release surgery resulted in better outcomes than treatment with wrist splinting for patients with CTS.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carpal tunnel syndrome</subject><subject>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - physiopathology</subject><subject>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - surgery</subject><subject>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Splints</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0d1LwzAQAPAgipvTd32RIOhbZz7apPFtFL9gILj5arm16exI05m0wvzrjWwy8F4u3P04jhxC55SMKSH0dgUNjFmajn8LLE4O0JAmPI14otJDNCREpZGM03iATrxfkRCUy2M0oIzRhHI6RO-ztaltV9sl_vJ41ruldhtcW9x9aDx3GrpG2w63Fc7ArcHgeW-tNni2saVrG32HJ_gVbNk29bcucdbazrXGhOfc1WBO0VEFxuuzXR6ht4f7efYUTV8en7PJNAJO0i4SWhaCMcU45yUDQTgplKRSMVlpTeSiELJKhKigUFoKVdGw_0IwIHGRpDLmI3Sznbt27WevfZc3tS-0MWB12_tcMiJEQkmAV__gqu2dDbvljFIuuIhZQJc71C8aXeZrVzfgNvnftwVwvQPgCzCVA1vUfu-4opwTFdzF1oU77bsqYVLxH2xagro</recordid><startdate>20020911</startdate><enddate>20020911</enddate><creator>Gerritsen, Annette A. M</creator><creator>de Vet, Henrica C. W</creator><creator>Scholten, Rob J. P. M</creator><creator>Bertelsmann, Frits W</creator><creator>de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M</creator><creator>Bouter, Lex M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020911</creationdate><title>Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Gerritsen, Annette A. M ; de Vet, Henrica C. W ; Scholten, Rob J. P. M ; Bertelsmann, Frits W ; de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M ; Bouter, Lex M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-6e7c62292333d2a6030c9717927fee07bc67f566fac9e769f1215b62a04c58743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carpal tunnel syndrome</topic><topic>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - physiopathology</topic><topic>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - surgery</topic><topic>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Splints</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Annette A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vet, Henrica C. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Rob J. P. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertelsmann, Frits W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouter, Lex M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerritsen, Annette A. M</au><au>de Vet, Henrica C. W</au><au>Scholten, Rob J. P. M</au><au>Bertelsmann, Frits W</au><au>de Krom, Marc C. T. F. M</au><au>Bouter, Lex M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2002-09-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>288</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1251</epage><pages>1245-1251</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>CONTEXT Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated with nonsurgical or surgical options. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. OBJECTIVE To compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of splinting and surgery for relieving the symptoms of CTS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS A randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1998 to April 2000 at 13 neurological outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. A total of 176 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS were assigned to wrist splinting during the night for at least 6 weeks (89 patients) or open carpal tunnel release (87 patients); 147 patients (84%) completed the final follow-up assessment 18 months after randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES General improvement, number of nights waking up due to symptoms, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analyses, surgery was more effective than splinting on all outcome measures. The success rates (based on general improvement) after 3 months were 80% for the surgery group (62/78 patients) vs 54% for the splinting group (46/86 patients), which is a difference of 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-40%; P&lt;.001). After 18 months, the success rates increased to 90% for the surgery group (61/68 patients) vs 75% for the splinting group (59/79 patients), which is a difference of 15% (95% CI, 3%-27%; P = .02). However, by that time 41% of patients (32/79) in the splint group had also received the surgery treatment. CONCLUSION Treatment with open carpal tunnel release surgery resulted in better outcomes than treatment with wrist splinting for patients with CTS.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>12215131</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.288.10.1245</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2002-09, Vol.288 (10), p.1245-1251
issn 0098-7484
1538-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72066510
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - physiopathology
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - surgery
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - therapy
Comparative studies
Decompression, Surgical
Effectiveness
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous
Neurology
Severity of Illness Index
Splints
Surgery
Therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A21%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Splinting%20vs%20Surgery%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Carpal%20Tunnel%20Syndrome:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Gerritsen,%20Annette%20A.%20M&rft.date=2002-09-11&rft.volume=288&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1251&rft.pages=1245-1251&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.288.10.1245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72066510%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211363642&rft_id=info:pmid/12215131&rft_ama_id=195279&rfr_iscdi=true