Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15 529 newborn infants

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups) ultrasound screening of the hips should be recommended at birth. We carried out a prospective, randomised trial between 1988 and 1992, including all newborn infants at our hosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 2002-08, Vol.84 (6), p.886-890
Hauptverfasser: HOLEN, K. J, TEGNANDER, A, BREDLAND, T, JOHANSEN, O. J, SAETHER, O. D, EIK-NES, S. H, TERJESEN, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 890
container_issue 6
container_start_page 886
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
container_volume 84
creator HOLEN, K. J
TEGNANDER, A
BREDLAND, T
JOHANSEN, O. J
SAETHER, O. D
EIK-NES, S. H
TERJESEN, T
description The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups) ultrasound screening of the hips should be recommended at birth. We carried out a prospective, randomised trial between 1988 and 1992, including all newborn infants at our hospital. A total of 15 529 infants was randomised to either clinical screening and ultrasound examination of all hips or clinical screening of all hips and ultrasound examination only of those at risk. The effect of the screening was assessed by the rate of late detection of congenital or developmental hip dysplasia in the two groups. During follow-up of between six and 11 years, only one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group, compared with five in the subjective group, representing a rate of 0.13 and 0.65 per 1,000, respectively. The difference in late detection between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). When clinical screening is of high quality, as in our study, the effect of an additional ultrasound examination, measured as late-presenting hip dysplasia, is marginal. Under such circumstances, we consider that universal ultrasound screening is not necessary, but recommend selective ultrasound screening for neonates with abnormal or suspicious clinical findings and those with risk factors for hip dysplasia.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.0840886
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72055823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72055823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1584-5f6acad9b70faaeaaa5a2c857e18f4a2f10c2f6dccacda578a483d8a5b78a0f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoWh9_oQRBV7bmPelKqvgCwY0Fd-E2k-jINFOTGcWdP90MHRRcJSTfOZx7D0JjSqaUE3ZOOKETxcjzVItLNSVaEK3VFhoxIsRE8qLYRqNfaA_tp_RGCBFS8l20RxmjVGkxQt-LUH24mKDGTcTJ1c62-QEnG50LVXjBjcftq8PBNQHajL1Wa9yl_qer2wip6UJ5ged4HZu03qjPcIRQNqsquRK3serNPaYSSzbLRp_LJgZcBQ-hTYdox0Od3NFwHqDFzfXT1d3k4fH2_mr-MLFU6jyRV2ChnC0L4gEcAEhgVsvCUe0FME-JZV6V1oItQRYahOalBrnMV-IlP0CnG9-c871zqTU5nnV1DXmyLpmCESk14xk8_ge-NV0MOZthbKb0TFKdIbWBbJ46RefNOlYriF-GEtMXZPrdm373pi_IDAVl4Xhw75YrV_7JhkYycDIAkCzUPm_SVumP41owJQv-Ay_CmrU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229689518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15 529 newborn infants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>HOLEN, K. J ; TEGNANDER, A ; BREDLAND, T ; JOHANSEN, O. J ; SAETHER, O. D ; EIK-NES, S. H ; TERJESEN, T</creator><creatorcontrib>HOLEN, K. J ; TEGNANDER, A ; BREDLAND, T ; JOHANSEN, O. J ; SAETHER, O. D ; EIK-NES, S. H ; TERJESEN, T</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups) ultrasound screening of the hips should be recommended at birth. We carried out a prospective, randomised trial between 1988 and 1992, including all newborn infants at our hospital. A total of 15 529 infants was randomised to either clinical screening and ultrasound examination of all hips or clinical screening of all hips and ultrasound examination only of those at risk. The effect of the screening was assessed by the rate of late detection of congenital or developmental hip dysplasia in the two groups. During follow-up of between six and 11 years, only one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group, compared with five in the subjective group, representing a rate of 0.13 and 0.65 per 1,000, respectively. The difference in late detection between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). When clinical screening is of high quality, as in our study, the effect of an additional ultrasound examination, measured as late-presenting hip dysplasia, is marginal. Under such circumstances, we consider that universal ultrasound screening is not necessary, but recommend selective ultrasound screening for neonates with abnormal or suspicious clinical findings and those with risk factors for hip dysplasia.</description><edition>British volume</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0301-620X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.0840886</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12211684</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBSUAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Hip - abnormalities ; Hip - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging ; Joints ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neonatal Screening - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2002-08, Vol.84 (6), p.886-890</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright British Editorial Society of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery Aug 2002</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13842657$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12211684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOLEN, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEGNANDER, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREDLAND, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHANSEN, O. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAETHER, O. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EIK-NES, S. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TERJESEN, T</creatorcontrib><title>Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15 529 newborn infants</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups) ultrasound screening of the hips should be recommended at birth. We carried out a prospective, randomised trial between 1988 and 1992, including all newborn infants at our hospital. A total of 15 529 infants was randomised to either clinical screening and ultrasound examination of all hips or clinical screening of all hips and ultrasound examination only of those at risk. The effect of the screening was assessed by the rate of late detection of congenital or developmental hip dysplasia in the two groups. During follow-up of between six and 11 years, only one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group, compared with five in the subjective group, representing a rate of 0.13 and 0.65 per 1,000, respectively. The difference in late detection between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). When clinical screening is of high quality, as in our study, the effect of an additional ultrasound examination, measured as late-presenting hip dysplasia, is marginal. Under such circumstances, we consider that universal ultrasound screening is not necessary, but recommend selective ultrasound screening for neonates with abnormal or suspicious clinical findings and those with risk factors for hip dysplasia.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip - abnormalities</subject><subject>Hip - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0301-620X</issn><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2044-5377</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoWh9_oQRBV7bmPelKqvgCwY0Fd-E2k-jINFOTGcWdP90MHRRcJSTfOZx7D0JjSqaUE3ZOOKETxcjzVItLNSVaEK3VFhoxIsRE8qLYRqNfaA_tp_RGCBFS8l20RxmjVGkxQt-LUH24mKDGTcTJ1c62-QEnG50LVXjBjcftq8PBNQHajL1Wa9yl_qer2wip6UJ5ged4HZu03qjPcIRQNqsquRK3serNPaYSSzbLRp_LJgZcBQ-hTYdox0Od3NFwHqDFzfXT1d3k4fH2_mr-MLFU6jyRV2ChnC0L4gEcAEhgVsvCUe0FME-JZV6V1oItQRYahOalBrnMV-IlP0CnG9-c871zqTU5nnV1DXmyLpmCESk14xk8_ge-NV0MOZthbKb0TFKdIbWBbJ46RefNOlYriF-GEtMXZPrdm373pi_IDAVl4Xhw75YrV_7JhkYycDIAkCzUPm_SVumP41owJQv-Ay_CmrU</recordid><startdate>200208</startdate><enddate>200208</enddate><creator>HOLEN, K. J</creator><creator>TEGNANDER, A</creator><creator>BREDLAND, T</creator><creator>JOHANSEN, O. J</creator><creator>SAETHER, O. D</creator><creator>EIK-NES, S. H</creator><creator>TERJESEN, T</creator><general>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</general><general>British Editorial Society of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200208</creationdate><title>Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15 529 newborn infants</title><author>HOLEN, K. J ; TEGNANDER, A ; BREDLAND, T ; JOHANSEN, O. J ; SAETHER, O. D ; EIK-NES, S. H ; TERJESEN, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1584-5f6acad9b70faaeaaa5a2c857e18f4a2f10c2f6dccacda578a483d8a5b78a0f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip - abnormalities</topic><topic>Hip - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOLEN, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEGNANDER, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREDLAND, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHANSEN, O. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAETHER, O. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EIK-NES, S. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TERJESEN, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOLEN, K. J</au><au>TEGNANDER, A</au><au>BREDLAND, T</au><au>JOHANSEN, O. J</au><au>SAETHER, O. D</au><au>EIK-NES, S. H</au><au>TERJESEN, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15 529 newborn infants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><date>2002-08</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>886</spage><epage>890</epage><pages>886-890</pages><issn>0301-620X</issn><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2044-5377</eissn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><coden>JBSUAK</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups) ultrasound screening of the hips should be recommended at birth. We carried out a prospective, randomised trial between 1988 and 1992, including all newborn infants at our hospital. A total of 15 529 infants was randomised to either clinical screening and ultrasound examination of all hips or clinical screening of all hips and ultrasound examination only of those at risk. The effect of the screening was assessed by the rate of late detection of congenital or developmental hip dysplasia in the two groups. During follow-up of between six and 11 years, only one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group, compared with five in the subjective group, representing a rate of 0.13 and 0.65 per 1,000, respectively. The difference in late detection between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). When clinical screening is of high quality, as in our study, the effect of an additional ultrasound examination, measured as late-presenting hip dysplasia, is marginal. Under such circumstances, we consider that universal ultrasound screening is not necessary, but recommend selective ultrasound screening for neonates with abnormal or suspicious clinical findings and those with risk factors for hip dysplasia.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</pub><pmid>12211684</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.0840886</doi><tpages>5</tpages><edition>British volume</edition></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-620X
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2002-08, Vol.84 (6), p.886-890
issn 0301-620X
2049-4394
2044-5377
2049-4408
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72055823
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Hip - abnormalities
Hip - diagnostic imaging
Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging
Joints
Male
Medical sciences
Neonatal Screening - methods
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Ultrasonography
title Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15 529 newborn infants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20or%20selective%20screening%20of%20the%20neonatal%20hip%20using%20ultrasound?%20A%20prospective,%20randomised%20trial%20of%2015%20529%20newborn%20infants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20British%20volume&rft.au=HOLEN,%20K.%20J&rft.date=2002-08&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=886&rft.epage=890&rft.pages=886-890&rft.issn=0301-620X&rft.eissn=2044-5377&rft.coden=JBSUAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.0840886&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72055823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229689518&rft_id=info:pmid/12211684&rfr_iscdi=true